Title of Invention

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING TRAVELING SPARK IGNITER AT HIGH PRESSURE

Abstract An ignition circuit and a method of operating an igniter (preferably a traveling spark igniter) in an internal combustion engine, including a high pressure engine. A high voltage is applied to electrodes of the igniter, sufficient to cause breakdown to occur between the electrodes, resulting in a high current electrical discharge in the igniter, over a surface of an isolator between the electrodes, and formation of a plasma kernel in a fuel-air mixture adjacent said surface. Following breakdown, a sequence of one or more lower voltage and lower current pulses is applied to said electrodes, with a low "simmer" current being sustained through the plasma between pulses, preventing total plasma recombination and allowing the plasma kernel to move toward a free end of the electrodes with each pulse.
Full Text WO 2006/113850
PCT/US2006/014840
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING
TRAVELING SPARK IGNITER AT HIGH PRESSURE
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
Related Applications
This application claims the benefit, under 35 USC 119(e) of prior US provisional
patent application serial no. 60/672892, filed April 19,2005, having the same title and
assignee, and which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to the fields of plasma generation, ignitions, and internal
combustion (IC) engines. In particular, it relates, but is not limited, to ignition methods
and ignition apparatus for use therein; and, specifically, to ignition methods and
apparatus for various applications, including but not limited to, high pressure engines.
More particularly, some aspects relate to the delivery of discharge current to traveling
spark igniters in order to maximize their performance and longevity, esceciallv in
internal combustion engines operating at high pressures.
2. Discussion of Related Art
For a variety of reasons, there is interest today in increasing the pressures in
internal combustion engines and similar combustion environments, with a concomitant
need for ignition sources capable of operating in these environments. For example,
automobile companies and manufacturers of internal combustion engines would like to
be able to provide vehicles which have IC engines which operate at much higher
pressures than conventional internal combustion engines. To date, however, there has
not been an effective and practical ignition system for such engines. Among other
concerns are longevity of igniters (spark plugs) and reliability of igniter firing.
The traveling spark igniter (TSI) is a device that has been discussed as a
promising spark plug replacement for internal combustion engines, but previously not for
high pressure engines. TSIs have, for example, been shown in a number of prior patents
including, for example, U.S. Patents Nos. 6,321,733 and 6,474,321, both assigned to the

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-2-
same assignee as this invention and incorporated by reference in their entireties for their
explanations of TSI devices and ignition systems.
Briefly, a TSI-based ignition system provides a large plasma kernel which is
propagated along the igniter's electrodes by Lorentz force (along with thermal forces, to
lesser degrees) and propelled into a combustion chamber. The Lorentz force acting on
the ignition kernel (i.e., plasma) is created by way of the discharge current in the plasma
interacting with a magnetic field caused by that same current in the electrodes of the
igniter. The magnitude of the Lorentz force is proportional to the square of that current.
In engines operating at normal pressures (i.e., a maximum of about 120 psi), traveling
spark igniters provide significant advantages over conventional spark plugs due to the
large plasma volume they generate, typically some 100-200 times larger than in a
conventional spark plug, for comparable discharge energy. Increased efficiency and
reduced emissions are attainable.
For higher engine operating pressures, however, the breakdown voltage required
for initiating the discharge between the electrodes of the igniter is significantly higher
than in engines operating at conventional pressures. This creates problems for TSIs, as
for any spark plug. The electrodes in a TSI, as in a conventional spark plug, are
maintained in a spaced apart relationship by a member called an isolator, which is
formed of an insulating material such as a ceramic. The higher breakdown voltage
causes problems for both the isolator and the electrodes.
Along the surface of the isolator running between the electrodes, the breakdown
voltage is lower than it is further along the electrodes in a TSI, or in any conventional
spark plug with a similar gap between the electrodes. Indeed, this difference in
breakdown voltages varies directly with increasing pressure in the combustion chamber.
Consequently, although the breakdown voltage along the isolator surface increases with
pressure, that increase is less than the increase in the breakdown voltage between the
exposed part of the electrodes away from the isolator surface. When breakdown occurs
(as a result of which the resistance through the plasma rapidly drops), the current rises
rapidly and a very large current is conducted in the forming plasma along the isolator
surface, thus giving rise to the Lorentz force acting on the plasma. Such rapidly rising
current, though, creates not only a very high temperature plasma, but also a powerful
shock wave in the vicinity of the surface of the isolator. The larger the current, the more

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-3-
rapid the plasma expansion and the resulting shock wave. These combined effects can
cause deformation and/or breakage of the isolator.
Additionally, the high current produces very rapid erosion of the electrodes in the
vicinity of the isolator surface, where they are attacked by the high current, thermal
heating and thermionic emission that results thereirom.
Similar problems have been manifest with igniters based on the University of
Texas "railplug" design which generates a Lorentz force in a plasma traveling along a
high aspect ratio discharge gap (as contrasted with a TSI, which has a low aspect ratio
discharge gap).
Although both the railplug and the TSI generate significant plasma motion at
relatively low pressures, when the combustion chamber pressure is increased to a high
pressure, the plasma behaves differently and it is this difference in behavior that leads to
unsatisfactory results. In a low pressure environment, the force exerted on the plasma by
the pressure is relatively small. The plasma moves easily along the electrodes in
response to the Lorentz force. As the ignition chamber pressure is increased, however,
that pressure provides a force of significant magnitude that resists the Lorentz force and,
thus, plasma motion. Consequently, the plasma tends to become more concentrated, and
to collapse on itself; instead of having a diffused plasma cloud, a very localized plasma -
an arc - is formed between the electrodes below a certain current threshold. This arc,
though occupying a much smaller volume than the plasma cloud of the low-pressure
case, receives similar energy. As a result, the current density is higher and at the
electrodes, where the arc exists, there is a higher localized temperature and more power
density at the arc-electrode interfaces. That is, the current density is quite high at those
interfaces, producing more localized heating of the electrodes than in the low pressure
environment. The localized heating of the electrodes, in turn, produces thermionic
emission of electrons and ions. The observed effect is that the arc appears to "attach"
itself at relatively fixed locations on the electrodes, producing erosion of the electrodes
as the entire discharge energy is deposited at the "attachment point;" this is to be
contrasted with the low pressure environment where a lower density, diffused area of
plasma contact moves along the electrodes without significantly damaging them.
Concurrently, the plasma, affected by the Lorentz and thermal forces, bows out
from the arc attachment points. This causes the magnetic field lines to no longer be
orthogonal to the current flow between the electrodes, reducing the magnitude of the

WO 2006/113850

PCTAJS2006/014840

-4-
Lorentz force produced by a given current. So, in addition to the other problems, there is
a loss in motive force applied to the plasma.
Overall, there is a reduction in plasma motion as compared with the lower
pressure environments, and dramatically increased electrode wear at the arc attachment
points.
Accordingly, a variety of needs exist, including needs for plasma generators, in
general, needs for improved ignition.systems, needs for ignition systems for use in
internal combustion engines and needs for an ignition system and method which
generates a large ignition kernel and which is usable with high pressure engines, and is
commercially practical.
If a traveling spark igniter is to be used in a high pressure combustion
environment, a need further exists to overcome the above negative effects on the isolator
material and electrodes of the igniter. See US Patents Nos. 5704321, 6131542, 6321733,
6474321, 6662793, and 6553981, for example, incorporated by reference herein. That is,
a need exists for an igniter and ignition system for use in high pressure combustion
engines, wherein the isolator and electrodes exhibit substantial lifetimes (preferably
comparable to that, of conventional spark plugs in low pressure engines) without being
destroyed by the discharge process. Desirably, such a traveling spark igniter and ignition
system will be usable and useful in internal combustion engines operating not only at
high and very high pressures (i.e., several hundred psi), but also at lower, conventional
pressures.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
The above and other needs are addressed, and advantages provided, with a new
method, and corresponding apparatus, for generating and smtaining a plasma, operating
a traveling spark igniter and providing an ignition for internal combustion and other
engines, particularly high pressure internal combustion engines. Typically, a high initial
breakdown voltage is applied to the igniter to initiate a plasma kernel in a plasma
initiation region of the igniter, but preferably at a current lower than that previously
employed with TSI ignitions, as the breakdown current need not produce a large Lorentz
force. After the breakdown current pulse, various mechanisms may be employed to
prolong the plasma while recombination is occurring and to allow the plasma to become

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-5-
easily detached (or detachable) from the the initiation region (typically, on or adjacent
the surface of an isolator between the igniter electrodes. Before the plasma has a chance
to recombine completely, the current is turned on again to provide a short follow-on
pulse of energy (preferably at a current substantially less than that of the breakdown
pulse). The follow-on current pulse generates a corresponding pulse of Lorentz force to
move the plasma away from its previous location, further along the electrodes of the
igniter. A number of such follow-on pulses may be provided, with an "off' interval
between successive pulses, during which interval one or more mechanisms prolong the
plasma and allow only partial recombination of the plasma. This is called "simmering."
Prior to total recombination of the plasma, the next follow-on pulse of current "kicks"
the plasma even further along the electrodes; and the final follow-on pulse ejects the
plasma from the electrodes. One mechanism for producing simmering is to reduce the
current through the igniter to a relatively low (but non-zero) level, called a "simmer
current." Alternatively, if a summer current is not applied, similar effects may be
obtained by using any of a number of other techniques for prolonging recombination and
preventing "total" recombination of the plasma kernel by the time the next follow-on
pulse arrives. For example, the follow-on pulses may be timed and possibly even
waveform-shaped to more closely follow each other so that only partial recombination
occurs between pulses; or each follow-on pulse may be preceded by a high sub-
breakdown voltage; or the plasma may be excited by RF or laser energy. That is,
numerous ways are contemplated of preventing toal plasma recombination. By "total" in
reference to recombination is meant that the plasma effectively has been extinguished
and high energy is needed to reignite it.
The invention is manifested in several ways, or aspects, and example
implementations are presented below. Other ways of practicing the invention will
become apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects may be practiced alone
or in any of many combinations, all of which cannot be reasonably enumerated here. It
is intended that features of various embodiments be practiced in combinations other than
those illustrated, not all features being shown in connection with all embodiments, for
brevity.
Aspects of the invention include the following, at least:
A method of plasma generation, comprising applying a high voltage to an igniter,
said high voltage being of amplitude sufficient to cause breakdown to occur between the

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-6-
electrodes, resulting in a high current electrical discharge in the igniter in an initiation
region, and formation of a plasma kernel adjacent said initiation region; and following
breakdown, applying to said electrodes a sequence of at least two relatively lower
voltage follow-on pulses, whereby the plasma kernel is forced to move toward a free end
of said electrodes by said follow-on pulses.
A method of plasma generation, comprising applying a high voltage to an igniter,
said high voltage being of amplitude sufficient to cause breakdown to occur between the
electrodes, resulting in a high current electrical discharge in the igniter in an initiation
region, and formation of a plasma kernel adjacent said initiation region; and following
breakdown, applying to said electrodes a sequence of one or more relatively lower
voltage follow-on pulses of current sufficiently low as to maintain a diffuse attachment
of the current arc to the electrodes, whereby the plasma kernel is forced to, and can,
move toward a free end of said electrodes under the influence of said follow-on pulses.
The initiation region may be on or adjacent the surface of an isolator disposed
between said electrodes. A current of the follow-on pulses, for an internal combustion
engine, may be between about 3 and 450 Amperes. The method may include preventing
total kernel recombination of the plasma prior to at least one follow-on pulse. This may
be done in various was, including between pulses of the sequence, maintaining a simmer
current between the igniter electrodes sufficient to prevent total recombination of the
plasma kernel. It also may include, in an interval between follow-on pulses, for at least
part of said interval maintaining a voltage across electrodes of the igniter below a
breakdown voltage but sufficient to sustain enough current to prevent total
recombination before the end of the interval. The igniter may be a traveling spark
igniter. Successive pulses in said sequence are separated by intervals of about 2-600
microseconds and preferably about 20-250 microseconds, most preferably 50-100
microseconds.. Each of said follow-on pulses may have a maximum amplitude of about
3-450 Amperes. The amplitudes may not be uniform. The follow-on pulses may have
a maximum amplitude of about 20-120 Amperes, which may not be uniform. Each of
said follow-on current pulses preferably may have an average duration of less than about
200 microseconds, which may not be uniform. The follow-on pulses may have an
amplitude of about 10-5000 V and preferably about 20-275 V. The follow-on pulses
need not all have the same polarity of voltage and current and the currents of the follow-
on pulses need not be constant.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-7-
A fuel ignition method, comprising applying a high voltage to an igniter in the presence
of a combustible fuel, said high voltage being of amplitude sufficient to cause
breakdown to occur between the electrodes of the igniter, resulting in a high current
electrical discharge in the igniter in an initiation region, and formation of a plasma kernel
adjacent said initiation region; and following breakdown, applying to said electrodes a
sequence of two or more relatively lower voltage follow-on pulses, whereby the plasma
kernel is forced to move toward a free end of said electrodes by said follow-on pulses.
The initiation region may be on or adjacent the surface of an isolator disposed between
said electrodes. The igniter may be in an internal combustion engine. A current of the
follow-on pulses for a gasoline-fueled internal combustion engine, may be between
about 3 and 450 Amperes. Preferably, said method includes preventing total kernel
recombination of the plasma prior to a follow-on pulse
Preventing total recombination may include, between pulses of the sequence, comprises
maintaining a current (termed a simmer current) through the plasma kernel sufficient to
prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel. Preventing total recombination of the
plasma kernel also may include, in an interval between follow-on pulses, for at least part
of said interval maintaining a voltage across electrodes of the igniter below a breakdown
voltage but sufficient to sustain enough current through the plasma to prevent total
recombination before the end of the interval.
Follow-on pulses need not all have the same polarity of voltage and current, which
need not be constant.
The igniter may be in an internal combustion engine in which there is a relatively
high pressure at the time of ignition.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-8-
The methods may further include, after a follow-on pulse, re-triggering or re-striking the
plasma kernel at a time an ionization level of the plasma kernel has fallen below a
desired level, with a current and at a relatively low voltage sufficient to cause the plasma
kernel to grow before total recombination occurs, followed by a next follow-on pulse.
The metjhods also may include simmering the plasma kernel between at least some
follow-on pulse pairs.
An ignition circuit for powering an igniter in an internal combustion engine, comprising
means for providing a high voltage capable causing an electrical breakdown discharge,
at a high current, between electrodes of an igniter, in an initiation region between said
electrodes, when said igniter is disposed in a fuel-air mixture of an engine, whereby a
plasma kernel is formed in said region by said discharge; and means for providing a
sequence of one or more relatively lower voltage and lower current pulses having voltage
and current amplitude and timing sufficient to force the plasma kernel to move toward a
free end of said electrodes by said lower voltage, lower current pulses. The means for
providing a high voltage capable of causing electrical breakdown discharge may include
a high voltage, low inductance ignition coil having a primary winding and a secondary
winding, the secondary winding having a lead for connection to one electrode of an
igniter, and a circuit for triggering a signal in the primary winding to induce a high
voltage pulse in the secondary winding. The means for providing a sequence of relatively
low voltage pulses may comprise a relatively low voltage source and, for each said pulse,
a capacitor charged by the relatively low voltage source and a pulse transformer having a
secondary winding connected to said lead and a primary winding through which the
capacitor is discharged in response to a trigger signal, inducing said pulse in said lead.
The ignition circuit may further include means for providing to the igniter, in an interval
between the breakdown discharge and a first follow-on pulse a simmer current sufficient
to prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel in said interval. It also may include
means for providing to the igniter, in an interval between each successive pair of follow-
on pulses a simmer current sufficient to prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel
in said interval. The ignition coil preferably includes a saturable core on which the
primary and secondary windings are formed and the core substantially saturates when

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-9-
said electrical breakdown occurs, whereby the secondary winding thereafter has
substantially reduced inductance.
An ignition circuit for powering an igniter in an internal combustion engine, comprising
a high voltage pulse generator which generates on an output for connection to an igniter
a pulse whose maximum voltage, when delivered to the igniter, is capable causing a
breakdown discharge and consequent high current between electrodes of the igniter, in
an initiation region between the electrodes, when said igniter is disposed in a fuel-air
mixture, whereby a plasma kernel is formed adjacent said surface by said discharge; and
a lower voltage pulse generator which generates on the output a sequence of one or more
relatively lower voltage and lower current follow-on pulses having voltage and current
amplitude and timing sufficient to force the plasma kernel to move toward a free end of
said electrodes by said lower voltage, lower current pulses. There may also be included
a simmer current source which supplies on the output line, in an interval between the
breakdown discharge and a first follow-on pulse a simmer current sufficient to prevent
total recombination of the plasma kernel in said interval. As well, ther may be a voltage
source which maintains between follow-on pulses, for at least a portion of an interval
between said follow-on pulses, a voltage on the igniter electrodes below a breakdown
voltage but sufficient to prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel during said
interval.
An ignition circuit substantially as shown and described in the drawing figures,
particularly any of Figs. 8-10.
The ignition circuit also may include means operable after a follow-on pulse, for
re-triggering or re-striking the plasma kernel at a time an ionization level of the plasma
kernel has fallen below a desired level, with a current and at a relatively low voltage
sufficient to cause the plasma kernel to grow before total recombination occurs, followed
by a next follow-on pulse.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-10-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the
drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various
figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component
may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration, in cross section, of a prior art traveling spark
igniter, illustrating the principle of its operation;
FIG. 2 is a part-schematic, part-block diagram of a typical prior art ignition
circuit for the TSI of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a generalized representation of the voltage between the electrodes of an
igniter as shown in FIG.l, using an ignition circuit of the type shown in FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic illustration of the creation of a plasma cloud by a
current pulse in a TSI, and the subsequent collapse of the plasma, in a TSI operating in a
high pressure environment;
Fig. 5 is a waveform of an example of a drive current applied to a TSI in
accordance with the teachings of the present invention;
Figs. 6 and 7 are diagrammatic illustrations of the motion of the plasma cloud of
Fig. 4 in a TSI which is operated in accordance with the principles exemplified in the
waveform of Fig. 5;
Fig. 8 is a simplified schematic circuit diagram for an example of an ignition
drive circuit usable to generate a current drive waveform for a TSI as taught herein,
including, for example, the waveform or drive signal of Fig. 5;
Fig. 9 is a simplified part-block, part schematic circuit diagram of another
embodiment of an ignition circuit for generating an ignition drive to a TSI as taught
herein;

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-11-
Fig. 10 is a simplified part-block, part schematic circuit diagram of yet another
embodiment of an ignition circuit for generating an ignition drive to a TSI as taught
herein; and
Fig. 11 is a simplified part-block, part schematic circuit diagram of a still further
embodiment of an ignition circuit for generating an ignition drive to a TSI as taught
herein.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Herein are explained in greater detail numerous aspects of the invention; the
problems addressed by the invention, in greater detail than above; and a single
embodiment of an example of an ignition circuit for practicing aspects of the invention.
According to a first aspect, there will be shown a method of operating an igniter
in an internal combustion engine, comprising: applying a high voltage to electrodes of
the igniter, said high voltage being of amplitude sufficient to cause electrical discharge
breakdown to occur between the electrodes, in an initiation region (e.g., over a surface of
an isolator) between the electrodes, resulting in a high current electrical discharge in the
igniter, and formation of a plasma kernel in an air or fuel-air mixture adjacent said
surface; and following breakdown, applying to said electrodes (preferably a simmer
current) and a sequence of one or more lower voltage and lower current pulses, whereby
the plasma kernel is forced to move toward a free end of said electrodes by said lower
voltage, lower current pulses.
Between breakdown and a first pulse of the sequence, and between pulses of the
sequence, a current desirably is maintained through the plasma kernel sufficient to
prevent total recombination of the plasma. Alternatively, such a current need not be
maintained, if the intervals between breakdown and the first pulse of the sequence, and
between additional follow-on pulses of the sequence, are sufficiently short, such that
total recombination does not occur prior to the start of such pulses . (If total
recombination occurs, then.a high breakdown voltage is needed to restart the plasma
formation process.) If total recombination is avoided (no matter how) before the start of a
follow-on pulse, the follow-on pulse can be a relatively low current pulse (compared to a
number of previous approaches, but still appreciable) and it will still provide a suitable

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-12-
Lorentz force to advance the plasma, and it will, itself, create a current arc that can move
along the electrodes. As another alternative, recombination can be slowed by imposing a
relatively high (but less than breakdown) voltage across the electrodes prior to the start
of a follow-on pulse. All three mechanisms facilitate the establishment of a moving
plasma kernel without requiring re-generation of a high energy breakdown condition,
reducing the tendency of the current path to "re-attach" to the electrodes at fixed
locations. The number of follow-on pulses varying according to design requirements
and/or operating conditions.
The igniter is preferably a traveling spark igniter.
Desirably, a first pulse of the sequence follows the breakdown discharge by an
interval of from about 2 to about 100 microseconds, preferably from about 10 to about
20 microseconds, but this will depend on the recombination time for a plasma in the
particular kind of fuel mixture being employed. Desirably, each of said follow-on pulses
has a maximum amplitude of about 5 - 200 Amperes. But the amplitudes need not be
uniform. Preferably, said lower voltage, lower current pulses have a maximum
amplitude of about 25-105 Amperes, and more preferably about 40-80 Amperes. The
pulses may have a duration of from about 2 to about 200 microseconds. Successive
pulses in said sequence preferably are separated by intervals of about 10-500
microseconds and even more preferably, 40-120 microseconds, but the intervals may not
be uniform. In terms of voltage, each of said pulses typically may have an amplitude of
about 50-5000 V and, more preferably, about 300-500 V. All pulses need not have the
same polarity of voltage or current; and neither the voltage nor the current in a pulse
need be constant. The foregoing numbers are all representative only and are not intended
to reflect any inherent limits on the invention. Other ranges may be employed in
appropriate embodiments. These numbers may be useful, though, as an aid to
identifying differences with other ignition systems and methods.
The invention is intended for use in high pressure engines, but is not so limited.
According to a related aspect, an ignition circuit is provided for powering an
igniter in an internal combustion engine, the circuit comprising means for providing a
high voltage capable of causing a breakdown discharge, at a relatively high current (but
preferably lower than prior TST ignitions have used), between electrodes of an igniter,
and in an initiation region (e.g., on or over a surface of an isolator which separates the
electrodes), when said igniter is disposed in a fuel-air mixture, whereby a plasma kernel

WO 2006/113850

PCT7US2006/014840

-13-
is formed adjacent said surface by said discharge; and means for providing a sequence of
one or more relatively lower voltage and lower current follow-on pulses having voltage
and current amplitude and tirning sufficient to create Lorentz force pulses causing the
plasma kernel to move toward a free end of said electrodes by said follow-on pulses.
The means for providing a high voltage capable of causing breakdown may include a
high voltage, low inductance ignition coil having a primary winding and a secondary
winding, the secondary winding having a lead for connection to one electrode of an
igniter, and a circuit for triggering a signal in the primary winding to induce a high
voltage pulse in the secondary winding.
The means for providing a sequence of relatively lower voltage (i.e., sub-
breakdown voltage) pulses may comprise a low voltage source and, for each said pulse, a
capacitor charged by the low voltage source and a pulse transformer having a first
winding connected to said lead and a second winding through which the capacitor is
discharged in response to a trigger signal, inducing said pulse in said lead. The ignition
circuit may further include means for providing to the igniter, in an interval between the
breakdown discharge and a first lower voltage pulse a simmer current sufficient to
prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel in said interval. It also may include
means for providing to the igniter, in an interval between successive follow-on pulses a
simmer current sufficient to prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel in said
interval. Alternatively the means for providing a sequence of relatively low voltage
pulses includes means for providing pulses separated in time by an interval sufficiently
short that total recombination of the plasma kernel does not occur in said interval. As
another alternative, the means for providing a sequence of relatively low voltage pulses
may comprise a means for preceding each such follow-on pulse by a high, sub-
breakdown voltage.
According to a further aspect, an ignition circuit is shown for powering an igniter
in an internal combustion engine, the circuit comprising a high voltage pulse generator
which generates on an output for connection to an igniter a pulse whose maximum
voltage, when delivered to the igniter, is capable causing a breakdown discharge, at a
high current, in an initiation region between electrodes of the igniter (e.g., adjacent a
surface of an isolator which separates the electrodes), when said igniter is disposed in a
fuel-air mixture, whereby a plasma kernel is formed adjacent said surface by said

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-14-
discharge; and a low voltage pulse generator which generates on the output a sequence of
one or more lower voltage and lower current pulses having voltage and current amplitude
and timing sufficient to force the plasma kernel to move toward a free end of said
electrodes by said lower voltage, lower current pulses. The ignition circuit may further
include a simmer current source which supplies on the output, in an interval between the
breakdown discharge and a first lower voltage pulse, a simmer current sufficient to
prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel in said interval. Alternatively, the
circuit may include a follow-on pulse generator that supplies, on the output, follow-on
pulses which follow each other so closely (i.e., are separated by a sufficiently short
interval) that total recombination of the plasma does not occur in the interval between
such pulses. As another alternative, the circuit may include a pulse source providing a
sequence of relatively low voltage pulses and a high voltage source which provides,
preceding each such follow-on pulse, a sub-breakdown high voltage sufficient to delay
total recombination such that total recombination has not occurred when the relatively
low voltage pulse starts.
Thus, this invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction
and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in
the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or
of being carried out in various ways. Any embodiments are presented by way of
example only. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of
description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of "including,"
"comprising," or "having," "containing," "involving," and variations thereof herein, is
meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as
additional items.
It is useful, now, to attempt to better understand the problems encountered when
one attempts to operate an igniter in a high pressure engine. A traveling spark igniter
(TST) is an ignition device which is in the nature of a small plasma gun. A typical TSI is
illustrated in Fig. 1, taken from U.S. patent no. 6,321,733. An isolator (e.g., ceramic)
material 14 maintains electrode spacing. A plasma 16 is created along the surface of the
isolator, due to a high voltage breakdown process occurring there. As the discharge
current passes through the plasma, the temperature and volume of the plasma increase,
leading to a further decrease in plasma resistivity and resistance. This increases the

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-15-.
current in the plasma, which is limited primarily by the impedance of the electrical
discharge circuit that produces the current supplied to the igniter.
A typical ignition circuit for operating a TSI is shown in Fig. 2, which is also
taken from U.S. patent 6,321,733. The circuit consists of two main parts: (l)a
conventional ignition system 42 and (2) a follow-on current generator comprising
capacitors such as 46 and 48, a low voltage power supply 44 and diode 50. The
conventional ignition system 42 provides a high voltage for creating a breakdown (at a
high current) in the spark gap along the isolator surface 56 between the electrodes 18 and
20, to form an initial plasma in the gaseous combustion mixture near that surface. The
follow-on current generator provides a current through the initial plasma, in the spark
gap, after breakdown discharge, forming a much larger plasma volume. Resistor 54 may
(but need not) be used to limit the maximum current from capacitor 48. A typical
voltage discharge profile (not to scale) is shown in Fig. 3, taken from U.S.
patent 6,474,321.
The conventional ignition system 42 initiates discharge in the discharge gap at
time t = to- As a result, the voltage in a secondary coil in the high voltage (HV) ignition
•transformer therein rises until it reaches the breakdown voltage in the spark gap at t = ti.
After breakdown occurs at t = ti the voltage across the discharge gap drops rapidly to
value of about 500 volts or less at t = ti, corresponding to low plasma resistivity. The
voltage is substantially constant until a time t -13, when just about all the energy from
capacitors 46 and 48 has been transferred, following which the voltage and current
rapidly diminish to a near-zero value at time t = U- For simplicity, we shall assume that
the interval from t3 to t4 is negligibly short. The interval At = t3 -12 is related to the
energy stored in capacitors 46 and 48 as well as the voltage of the follow-on current
through the discharge gap after breakdown occurred. The following energy balance
equation relates the variables:

where V(t) is the voltage as a function of time, between the electrodes defining the
discharge gap, such voltage having an initial value Vt2 at time t2 and a final value Vt2 ~ 0
at t>t4, i(t) is the current in the spark gap as a function of time and C is the sum of the

WO 2006/113850 PCT/US2006/014840
-16-
discharging capacitance (here, the sum of capacitances of capacitors 46 and 48). In the
time interval Δt = t3 - t2, one can assume, as a first approximation, that V(t) ~ V0 and is
roughly constant, therefore, Vt22 - Vt42, ~ V02. If one further assumes that the plasma
resistivity is constant, one can make the assumption i(t) ~ i0. One can use these
simplifying assumptions to obtain a basic relationship between Δt (Δt ~ t4 -t2 because t4 -
t3,« Δt) and the circuit parameters described by C, V0, and i0:
Δt=CV0/2i0
This simple relationship provides information about pulse duration as a function of
capacitance and average current io during discharge, for a given operating (relatively
low) voltage Vo on the capacitors. For a given energy provided to the igniter (hence,
given Vo and C), this relationship teaches that for current io to increase, the pulse
duration At has to decrease. However, increasing current io also increases the Lorentz
force FL- Increasing the Lorentz force moves the plasma away from the isolator surface
faster, toward the end of the electrodes, into the combustion chamber of the engine.
Pressure in the combustion chamber, however, provides a countervailing pressure force
Fp in the igniter. Force Fp works against the Lorentz force preventing the speed of the
plasma from increasing above some limiting value, independent of the length £ of the
electrodes (i.e., I is the distance between the surface of the isolator and the free end of
electrodes facing into the combustion chamber).
The net force available to move the plasma is the difference between the Lorentz
force FL and the pressure force Fp (assuming one can ignore the thermal force on the
plasma as it is significant only at the earlier stages of plasma propagation and diminishes
quickly as the plasma moves away from the isolator surface). It is useful to develop a
model of the forces in order to understand how to overcome the pressure force. The
Lorentz force FL can be represented as a magnetic pressure pe on the plasma, given by
the well-known relationship pB = B2/8Π, multiplied by the effective plasma surface area,


WO 2006/113850 PCT/US2006/014840
-17-
The gas pressure force Fp can be presented in the form Fp =pSpt, where p is the effective
gas pressure from the combustion mixture (facing the plasma during its movement).
Hence, one can write the equation for the net force governing plasma movement can be
presented as:
(FL - Fp) = mpt. dvpt/dt,
where v>pt is plasma velocity and nipt is plasma mass. In turn, plasma mass can be
presented as the product of plasma mass density ppi and plasma volume Vpt - S^A^,
where b&pt is a fraction representing the portion of the electrode length occupied
momentarily by the plasma.
The net force equation can be simplified, and useful relationships derived from it,
by making some rough assumptions. One can assume that the plasma volume, after its
formation, is constant as the plasma propagates along the electrodes; thus, S^, b£pt and
ppi are constant and forces FL and Vp are also constant. Then, by integrating one obtains:



where it was assumed that the initial plasma velocity t>t2 was much smaller than its final
velocity, ty.

From this equation, one observes that for relatively small pressure (i.e., p « ccio2), At IQ
« constant; and in this range of parameters, increasing z0 leads to decreasing At. Then

WO 2006/113850

PCTAJS2006/014840

-18-
from the above relationships, one can see that the plasma can be moved faster with
increasing z'o without really increasing the discharge energy (of course, this is only true
for PptAZpi « const.; with increasing z"o, Pptklpt may also increase, so some additional
energy may be required).
However, when it is not true that p « cdo2 (i.e., the assumption fails), then
increasing pressure p could lead to p/ou2 > 1 and the plasma could stop moving
altogether. In such a case, it will be necessary to increase i > k to the point that p/at2 1. This requires a significant increase in energy, though, due to increased At and /.
Recombination processes in the plasma pose a further hurdle. The front portion
of the hot plasma that is in contact with a relatively cold combustion mixture cools
rapidly. The plasma recombination rate at high pressure is a function of plasma
temperature, T, that varies as 1/T . Hence, at low temperature, plasma recombination
occurs very fast at its propagation front where it interacts with the cold gaseous mixture.
At high pressures, such recombination rate could be as fast as the plasma propagation
velocity, meaning that the Lorentz force - induced movement would be entirely negated
by the speed of recombination, effectively causing the plasma to stand still. In such a
situation, the net plasma velocity along the electrodes is substantially zero and the
plasma will seem to stay near the surface of the isolator during the entire discharge. The
plasma, of course, recombines near the surface of the isolator, as well, though at a much
slower rate because the gas there is much hotter than at the plasma's front edge
Consequently, plasma resistivity near the isolator surface is lower than at the front edge
of the plasma and most of the discharge current will be concentrated in that region,
preventing further plasma recombination near the isolator.
As shown above, increasing operating combustion chamber pressure lowers the
net motive force on the plasma so it moves more slowly and the time it takes for the
plasma to move to the combustion chamber thus increases. Therefore, for sufficiently
large pressures, the plasma may never succeed in reaching the end of the igniter.
To prevent the plasma from slowing down so much, the discharge current has to
be raised, in order to increase the energy being fed into the plasma The increased
energy input, though, is concentrated near the isolator. That is quite problematic. There
are thermal stresses imposed on the isolator and shock waves are generated that can
damage the isolator. There are also large thermal effects on the portions of the electrodes
near the isolator. Assuming the ignition circuit supplies sufficient energy to create a net

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-19-
force that will effectively move the plasma, then the higher the pressure in the
combustion chamber, the worse the negative effects on the isolator and electrodes.
These conditions decrease isolator and electrode longevity in high pressure
environments, unless something is done to prevent those negative impacts.
The problem of decreasing longevity of traveling spark igniters with increasing
gas (i.e., combustion mixture) pressure is significantly decreased, or even eliminated, at
least in part by decreasing the difference between the speed of recombination at the front
of the plasma (facing the combustion chamber) and the back of the plasma (facing the
isolator). By making plasma recombination more symmetrical, a significant net force on
the plasma is directed into the combustion chamber.
FIG. 4 diagrammatically illustrates the problem. A relatively short first current
pulse forms a volume of plasma 42, as indicated by the dashed line. During that first
pulse, the center of the plasma moves to the right, away from isolator 14, under the
influence of the Lorentz force. As the pulse is of relatively short duration, neither the
isolator surface nor the gas near the surface is heated significantly. Therefore, after the
first current pulse ends, the plasma recombines at its back (left) side and its front (right)
side fairly symmetrically, leaving a relatively narrow plasma kernel 44. The narrow
plasma kernel still can support an arc, as explained above.
The present invention improves the symmetry of plasma recombination by using
a different approach to energizing the igniter. Several short current discharge bursts
(follow-on pulses) are applied after the breakdown pulse, between times t^ and t3. The
follow-on pulses have moderately high peak current amplitude, but significantly less
than the breakdown pulse. Between the breakdown pulse and the first follow-on pulse,
and between follow-on pulses, the (simmer) current preferably is maintained at a low,
non-zero value, to prevent total recombination.
In Fig. 5, in which the waveform is shown for one example of an igniter current
that may be used to excite a TSI as explained above, breakdown occurs at time ti (peak
voltage, followed by maximum current) and is complete at time ti . Beginning at time tj,
a series of (one or more) lower amplitude current pulses 52A - 52E (i.e., five pulses, in
this example, though the number of pulses is variable) are provided between the
electrodes of the igniter. The discharge interval ends at time t3, when the plasma reaches
the end of the electrodes. The plasma started at the isolator at time ti. The durations TI,
%2... xn of the respective pulses 52 and their peak current magnitude, io, should be

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-20-
chosen according to igniter design and gas pressure p. In a traveling spark igniter, the
pulse durations and magnitudes are selected, preferably, in accordance with the length of
the electrodes and the gap between them. Experimentation is a satisfactory way, and for
the moment probably the best way, of setting the values of those parameters for a given
igniter design and maximum pressure of its operation.
. The time between pulses also depends on igniter design and pressure. The time
+
between the breakdown current, when it reaches near-zero level at ti and the first
follow-on pulse 52A, indicated as At^i, depends on the breakdown voltage and the
specifics of the isolator between the electrodes. The simmer current is is non-zero and,
as such, helps avoid total plasma recombination; otherwise, a large voltage (comparable
to the breakdown voltage) would be needed for initiating the next pulse. So, the current
is facilitates each subsequence pulse and allows its formation without the need for an
additional breakdown pulse. The following table provides parameter values which have
been found useful with TSI igniters operating in a simulated combustion chamber at 400
psi pressure:
Electrode length: £ — 2.5 mm
Peak pulse current: k « 20 - 40Amperes,
Duration of the k - pulse: T^ « 10 - 20 microseconds,
Time between two consecutive pulses k and k + 1: At^k+i « 50 —100 microseconds,
n (i.e., number of pulses) « 3 to 4,
Simmer current: is~ 1 - 3 Amperes,
Time between end of breakdown and the first follow-on pulse:Atb,i ~ 5 - 20
microseconds.
These parameters can be significantly different for different design of spark plugs
or values of pressure p. For example, for a TSI similar to the one in the previous example
and operating at pressure p = 900 psi, suitable parameters that have been found useful
are:


WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-21-
Though the peak pulse values io and pulse durations Xk and the times between
individual pulses Atkjc+i have been shown as constant, they need not be uniform or
constant. For example, they could actually increase or decrease as a function of time.
FIGS. 6 and 7 diagrammatically illustrate the operation produced by this pulsed
drive scheme. It is assumed the breakdown pulse has already occurred and the first
follow-on pulse is in a position Aft away from the surface of the isolator, as in FIG. 4.
After a time interval Atj;2 following the first pulse, the next pulse x2 occurs, after which
the plasma is in a new position b£% away from the surface of the isolator. With each
successive pulse, the plasma kernel is moved to the right and then at the end of the pulse,
allowed to recombine (FIG. 6, showing the plasma position after two pulses), until
eventually (FIG. 7) the plasma reaches the end of the electrodes after n current pulses,
and is ejected into the combustion chamber. The number of follow-on pulses, n, will
depend on the pressure p in chamber, igniter parameters (e.g., the length of the
electrodes, the gap between the electrodes, and the shape of the electrodes) and current
discharge parameters (e.g., peak values of pulses, their durations, the inter-pulse
intervals, and minimum current value between pulses). Some experimentation may be
required to find suitable values.
Although the current pulses are shown as positive pulses in Fig. 5, it should be
realized that negative pulses can also be used, or alternating pulses or some other pattern
of pluralities. The Lorentz force FL is proportional to the square of the surrent and is,
therefore, independent of current polarity. Additionally, the discharge current pulses,
shown as rectangular in Fig. 5, could have any suitable waveform, such as triangular
shape or sinusoidal shape.
As stated above, with increased operating pressure, the breakdown of voltage
along the surface of the isolator also increases. Increase in breakdown voltage has a
negative impact on the lifetimes of the isolator and electrodes. Such negative effects can
be avoided or significantly reduced by limiting the breakdown current. For example,
introducing a resistor into the high voltage circuit, as described below, limits breakdown
current without wasting significantly energy when the breakdown discharge is of short
duration in comparison with the total interval of follow-on discharge pulses. Limiting
the current causes the mode of operation to differ substantially from that of prior TSI
systems. In prior TSI systems, such as those shown in U.S. patents 6,321,733 and
6,474,321, it was desired that a high breakdown current be followed immediately by high

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-22-
current from capacitors to create maximum acceleration and plasma speed. The goal was
to get the plasma to reach the end of the electrodes and move into the combustion
chamber in a single discharge pulse. In contrast, in a high pressure environment, plasma
motion is small following breakdown. Thus, it is acceptable to limit the breakdown
current since the breakdown current is only used to create the plasma near the isolator
surface, rather than to actually produce significant plasma motion.
The interval between the end of the breakdown current pulse and the first follow-
on current pulse, Atb; ti depends on the peak value of the discharge current. Assuming
that a resistor Rb is used to achieve this current limiting effect, than the delay time
depends on the value of that resistor, which depends on the applied breakdown voltage
which, in turn, depends upon the pressure p. Thus, the value of resistor Rb can be chosen
to minimize stress on the isolator and electrode wear.
Fig. 8 shows a partial schematic circuit diagram for an example of an electronic
circuit for producing the breakdown pulse and follow-on pulses as depicted in Fig. 5. In
Fig. 8, circuitry is shown for generating only the breakdown pulse and one follow-on
pulse. For each additional follow-on pulse that is desired, the circuitry 110 enclosed in a
dashed line can be replicated and all such circuits can be connected with the secondary
windings of their boost transformers 102 in series, so that each such circuit will, in turn,
deliver one of the sequenced pulses to the igniter. (Note that ta parallel arrangement is
also possible.)
A high voltage, for providing breakdown discharge is generated by a high energy
ignition coil 100, triggered by a signal applied at 104 to cause switching of SCR 104A.
Coil 100 may be any suitable ignition coil such as, but not limited to, coil model 8261
sold by Autotronic Controls Corporation of El Paso, Texas, d/b/a MSD Ignition. Though
usually referred to in the industry as an "ignition coil," element 100 actually is a
transformer. The aforementioned model 8261 ignition coil has a low inductance primary
and provides a 42-43kV output from its secondary coil when the primary coil is
energized. The secondary coil of transformer 100 is directly connected (through
secondary coil 102B of boost transformer 102) to one or more electrodes of igniter 101,
another electrode of which is grounded.
The string 106 of diodes, each paralleled by a high resistance, limits the output
voltage of the ignition coil 100 to a single polarity and prevents ringing.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-23-
After the breakdown pulse, a trigger signal is applied at 105 to cause a follow-on
pulse to be generated. The boost transformer 102 feeds the high voltage line (HVL) to
igniter 101 with a pulse of current induced by discharging capacitor 103. Capacitor 103
is charged to a relatively low voltage such as, for example, about 500V and then
discharged through the primary coil 102A of transformer 102 to ground through the SCR
105 A.
The trigger signals can be generated by any suitable circuit that may provide
either fixed or programmable parameters.
The igniter electrode(s) connected to the high voltage line are also connected,
through a string of diodes 107, and an RC network 111, to a low voltage supply, such as
the indicated 500V supply. The resistor values in network 111 are set to deliver the
simmer current, is
The ignition circuit of Fig. 8, it will be appreciated, represents just one way to
generate the breakdown voltage and to deliver the initial current and the follow-on pulses
of current that are desired. Any other suitable mechanism may be employed that
generates comparable pulsing. For example, a resonant current circuit that could provide
oscillating current pulses, such as sinusoidal current pulses, could be used instead of the
indicated plurality of sub-circuits, each of which generates a single pulse. Moreover, by
proper inversion of polarities of voltage and diodes, the circuit of Fig. 8 could be used to
generate negative pulses instead of positive pulses.
Another example of an ignition circuit architecture (in simplified form) is shown
in Fig. 9 at 130. Only the basic circuit components are shown, it being understood that a
practical implementation may require other customary components. Power supply 132
supplies a voltage (termed the "high" voltage for purposes of distinguishing it, only).
The voltage is high enough so that it can generate, when stepped up by transformer 134,
a breakdown voltage sufficient to create a plasma at the igniter (not shown). Power
supply is connected to a first end of primary winding 134A through a diode 136, to
charge a capacitor 138, connected between the other end of the primary winding and
ground. A pulse generator 142 supplies a train or sequence of pulses. On a first pulse,
an output signal from pulse generator 142 closes electronically controlled switch 144.
This action grounds the anode of diode 136, effectively disconnecting supply 132 so that
it is not short-circuited, and allows capacitor 138 to discharge through the primary

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-24-
winding, Transformer 134 is a saturable-core step-up transformer. The HV supply 132
typically has an output voltage of a few hundred volts. The closing of switch 144
generates a large voltage swing across the transformer primary. Typically, a turns ratio
of about 1:35 -1:40 may be used in the transformer, and this will step up the several
hundred volt swing on the primary up to the range of tens of thousands of volts across
the secondary winding, 134B. This latter voltage is sufficient to produce breakdown
when applied to an igniter (connected to one end of the secondary winding, but not
shown).
The aforesaid pulse preferably also saturates the core of transformer 134.
Due to the core saturation, if a next pulse is supplied by the pulse generator 142
before the saturation ebbs totally, such pulse will not generate a breakdown-level output
voltage on output line 152.
The other end of primary winding 134B, at 154, and one end of a capacitor, 156,
are tied to ground via a diode 158. Capacitor 156 is charged by a "low voltage" (LV)
supply through a protective diode 164. When a pulse from pulse generator 142 is
received by electronic switch 166, node 168 is grounded and capacitor 156 is grounded
through series-connected diode 172, resistor 174 and switch 168.
Low Voltage supply 162 may typically supply a voltage in the range of 0 -1000
volts. Capacitor 156 is a large capacitance in a typical ignition system and resistor 174
may be sized to limit the discharge current (pulled through the secondary winding 134 of
the transformer) to about 50 Amperes (less if a lower current will suffice in the follow-on
pulses).
Diodes 182 and 184 merely protect their respective switches from reverse
polarity spikes that could be destructive to them.
Supplies 132 and 162 are shown as separate but a single supply may be used in
some applications. Also, the terms low voltage and high voltage are not intended to
require that the output of supply 132 be at a higher voltage than the output of supply 162,
though that is most typical.
Diode 164 is included for the same reason as diode 136, to protect its associated
power supply from having a short-circuited output when the associated switch is closed.
Depending on the exact construction of the supplies 132,162, it also may be
desirable to place a resistance in series between the one or both of the supplies and

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-25-
corresponding switch 144 or 166, as applicable, to limit the output current of the supply
and the charging time of the corresponding capacitor.
Switches 144,166 may be implemented using various semiconductors, such as
SCRs, IGBTs (especially for switch 144), MCTs and other high voltage switching
elements as now or in the future may exist.
A small capacitor, 159, may bypass diode 158, providing a low impedance path
to ground for rapid voltage changes and protecting diode 158 against large reverse
spikes.
Other variations are possible. For example, instead of a single pulse generator
actuating switches 144 and 166, each switch may be actuated by a different pulse
generator, or one pulse generator may be employed with different outputs or differently
conditioned output signals (possibly derived from a common signal) driving the
switches. Or, one switch may be used, instead of two switches, as shown in Fig. 10,
referring to switching element (e.g., MCT) 186. (In Fig. 10, the resistors R are expressly
shown though they may not be needed, depending on power supply details.) If different
pulse generators drive each of the switches, they can be controlled independently and
this will permit a variety of modes of operation to be accommodated.
In Fig. 9, resistor 174 is shown in a dashed-line box, to indicate it is optional.
Irrespective of the fact that supply 162 may be set in conjunction with capacitor 156 to
control the desired amplitude of follow-on current pulses, all of the energy stored in
capacitor 156 cannot be transferred to the arc. To sustain a current in the follow-on
pulses over the interval of each pulse, the capacitor 156 must be discharged at a
controlled rate. One way to do this is to discharge the capacitor through a resistor, such
as resistor 174. Unfortunately, the use of resistor 174 results in the dissipation of a lot of
the stored energy as heat. Indeed, more energy may be lost as heat in resistor 156 than is
expended in the movement of the plasma. Hence this circuit suffers from inefficient use
of energy.
It is possible to improve the efficiency of the circuit and to reduce the heat
dissipation by making the switch element 166 a controlled current drainage path. Then,
instead of using resistance 174 to limit the current drain off of capacitor 156, the switch
transistor (or like element) takes care of that need, providing controlled discharge. More
specifically, as shown in Fig. 11, an active switching element (here indicated as a
MOSFET166'), is connected from node 168 to ground through a resistor 192. The

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-26-
voltage across that resistor is sensed as a proxy for measuring the actual current through
transistor 166'. Gate drive logic 194 interposed between the pulse generator and the gate
of transistor 166', responsive to the voltage on resistor 192, operates the transistor as a
switching regulator, with variable duty cycle and a resulting lower power dissipation
than that arising from the use of resistor 174. Drive logic 194 may be implemented in
various ways and may include fixed logic or it may include programmable logic,
possibly including a microcontroller to operate the logic. An advantage of using a
microcontroller is that the logic can then be configured to operate the circuit to perform
in the various modes discussed herein - e.g., with or without simmer current.
Note that although the generation of pulses of positive polarity will result from
the illustrated examples of ignition circuits, those skilled in the art of electronics will
readily be able to derive therefrom ignition circuits that will produce negative polarity
pulses and even pulses of varied polarities, should it be desired to have same. It may
also be desirable that some or all trigger pulses be o polarity differing from the output
pulses.
The detailed design of the drive logic and the parameters for the breakdown
voltage, follow-on pulses, igniter, etc. will all depend on the particular engine
specifications which the ignition system is required to meet. Those requirements, and
considerations such as cost, component availability, and so forth will influence
component selection, as well. Determination of some of these parameters may require a
degree of experimentation on a model of the engine(s) for which the ignition system or
circuit is intended.
Although the problems and their solution have been discussed using just one
form of TSI, both apply equally to other TSI designs, using both parallel and coaxial
electrodes.
While certain methods and apparatus have been discussed herein for use with
internal combustion engines operating at high and very high pressures, it will be
understood that this technology also can be used with traveling spark igniters in internal
combustion engines operating at lower, conventional pressures, or even with
conventional spark plugs. The advantages, however, probably will be greatest with
traveling spark igniters.
Also, it should be understood that although a theory of operation has been
presented, there are number of simplifying assumptions which may very much limit

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-27-
application of this theory. Nevertheless, the invention, as claimed, does produce a
working ignition system in a simulated high pressure engine environment, and any
simplifications or errors in analysis will be understood not to detract from the value of
the invention.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this
invention, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and improvements
will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and
improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the
spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings
are by way of example only.
What is claimed is:

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-28-
CLAIMS
1. A method of plasma generation, comprising:
a. applying a high voltage to an igniter, said high voltage being of amplitude
sufficient to cause breakdown to occur between the electrodes, resulting
in a high current electrical discharge in the igniter in an initiation region,
and formation of a plasma kernel adjacent said initiation region; and
b. following breakdown, applying to said electrodes a sequence of at least
two relatively lower voltage follow-on pulses,
whereby the plasma kernel is forced to move toward a free end of said electrodes by said
follow-on pulses.
2. A method of plasma generation, comprising:
a. applying a high voltage to an igniter, said high voltage being of amplitude
sufficient to cause breakdown to occur between the electrodes, resulting
in a high current electrical discharge in the igniter in an initiation region,
and formation of a plasma kernel adjacent said initiation region; and
b. following breakdown, applying to said electrodes a sequence of one or
more relatively lower voltage follow-on pulses of current sufficiently low
as to maintain a diffuse attachment of the current arc to the electrodes,
whereby the plasma kernel is forced to, and can, move toward a free end of said
electrodes under the influence of said follow-on pulses.
3. The method of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the initiation region is on or adjacent
the surface of an isolator disposed between said electrodes.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein a current of the follow-on pulses, for an internal
combustion engine, is between about 3 and 450 Amperes.
5. The method of claim 1 or claim 2, further including, preventing total kernel
recombination of the plasma prior to at least one follow-on pulse.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-29-
6. The method of claim 5, wherein preventing total recombination includes, between
pulses of the sequence, mamtaining a simmer current between the igniter electrodes
sufficient to prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein preventing total recombination of the plasma kernel
includes, in an interval between follow-on pulses, for at least part of said interval
maintaining a voltage across electrodes of the igniter below a breakdown voltage but
sufficient to sustain enough current to prevent total recombination before the end of
the interval.
8. The method of any of claims 1, 2, 4, 6 or 7, wherein the igniter is a traveling spark
igniter.

9. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein successive pulses in said sequence are
separated by intervals of about 2-600 microseconds
10. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein successive pulses in said sequence are
separated by intervals of about 20-250 microseconds
11. The method of claim 9 wherein each of said follow-on pulses has a maximum
amplitude of about 3 - 450 Amperes.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein said amplitudes are not uniform.
13. The method of claim 11 wherein said follow-on pulses have a maximum amplitude
of about 20-120 Amperes.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein said amplitudes are not uniform.
15. The method of claim 9 wherein each of said follow-on current pulses has an average
duration of less than about 200 microseconds.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-30-
16. The method of claim 9, wherein said intervals are not uniform
17. The method of claim 10, wherein said intervals are not uniform.
18. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein successive pulses in said sequence are
separated by intervals of about 50-100 microseconds.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein said intervals are not uniform.
20. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the follow-on pulses have an amplitude
of about 10-5000 V.
21. The method of claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the follow-on pulses have an average
amplitude of about 20-275 V.
22. The method of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the follow-on pulses do not all have the
same polarity of voltage and current.
23. The method of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the currents of the follow-on pulses are
not constant.
24. The method of claim 4, wherein the igniter is a traveling spark igniter.
25. A fuel ignition method, comprising:
a. applying a high voltage to an igniter in the presence of a combustible fuel,
said high voltage being of amplitude sufficient to cause breakdown to
occur between the electrodes of the igniter, resulting in a high current
electrical discharge in the igniter in an initiation region, and formation of
a plasma kernel adjacent said initiation region; and
b. following breakdown, applying to said electrodes a sequence of two or
more relatively lower voltage follow-on pulses,
whereby the plasma kernel is forced to move toward a free end of said electrodes by said
follow-on pulses.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-31-
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the initiation region is on or adjacent the surface of
an isolator disposed between said electrodes.
27. The method of claim 25 wherein the igniter is in an internal combustion engine.
28. The method of claim 27, wherein a current of the follow-on pulses, for a
gasoline-fueled internal combustion engine, is between about 3 and 450 Amperes.
29. The method of any of claims 25-28, further including, preventing total kernel
recombination of the plasma prior to a follow-on pulse
30. The method of claim 29, wherein preventing total recombination includes, between
pulses of the sequence, comprises maintaining a current (termed a simmer current)
through the plasma kernel sufficient to prevent total recombination of the plasma
kernel.
31. The method of claim 29, wherein preventing total recombination of the plasma kernel
includes, in an interval between follow-on pulses, for at least part of said interval
maintaining a voltage across electrodes of the igniter below a breakdown voltage but
sufficient to sustain enough current through the plasma to prevent total
recombination before the end of the interval.
32. The method of any of claims 25-28, wherein the igniter is a traveling spark igniter.

33. The method of claim 25 wherein successive pulses in said sequence are separated
by intervals of less than about 600 microseconds.
34. The method of claim 33, wherein said interval is from about 20 to about 250
microseconds.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-32-
35. The method of claim 33 wherein each of said follow-on pulses has a maximum
amplitude of about 3 - 450 Amperes.
36. The method of claim 35 wherein said follow-on pulses have a maximum amplitude
of about 20-120 Amperes.
37. The method of claim 35 or 36 wherein said amplitudes are not uniform.
38. The method of claim 35 wherein each of said follow-on current pulses has a
duration of less than about 200 microseconds.
39. The method of claim 25 wherein successive pulses in said sequence are separated
by intervals of about 10-500 microseconds.
40. The method of claim 33, wherein said intervals are not uniform.
41. The method of claim 25 wherein successive pulses in said sequence are separated
by intervals of about 50-100 microseconds.
42. The method of claim 41, wherein said intervals are not uniform.
43. The method of claim 25 wherein the follow-on pulses have an amplitude of about
50-5000 V.
44. The method of claim 25 wherein the follow-on pulses have an average amplitude of
about 20 - 275 V.
45. The method of claim 25, wherein the follow-on pulses do not all have the same
polarity of voltage and current.

WO 2006/113850 PCT/US2006/014840
-33-
46. The method of claim 25, wherein the currents of the follow-on pulses are not
constant.
47. The method of claim 25 wherein the igniter is in an internal combustion engine in
which there is a relatively high pressure at the time of ignition.
48. The method of any of claims 1, 2 and 25 further including, after a follow-on pulse,
re-triggering or re-striking the plasma kernel at a time an ionization level of the
plasma kernel has fallen below a desired level, with a current and at a relatively low
voltage sufficient to cause the plasma kernel to grow before total recombination
occurs, followed by a next follow-on pulse.
49. The method of claim 48 further including simmering the plasma kernel between at
least some follow-on pulse pairs.
50. An ignition circuit for powering an igniter in an internal combustion engine,
comprising:
a. means for providing a high voltage capable causing an electrical
breakdown discharge, at a high current, between electrodes of an igniter,
in an initiation regjon between said electrodes, when said igniter is
disposed in a fuel-air mixture of an engine, whereby a plasma kernel is
formed in said region by said discharge; and
b. means for providing a sequence of one or more relatively lower voltage
and lower current pulses having voltage and current amplitude and timing
sufficient to force the plasma kernel to move toward a free end of said
electrodes by said lower voltage, lower current pulses.
51. The ignition circuit of claim 24, wherein the means for providing a high voltage
capable of causing electrical breakdown discharge includes a high voltage, low
inductance ignition coil having a primary winding and a secondary winding, the
secondary winding having a lead for connection to one electrode of an igniter, and a
circuit for triggering a signal in the primary winding to induce a high voltage pulse in
the secondary winding.

Wt) 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-34-
52. The ignition circuit of claim 25, wherein the means for providing a sequence of
relatively low voltage pulses comprises a relatively low voltage source and, for each
said pulse, a capacitor charged by the relatively low voltage source and a pulse
transformer having a secondary winding connected to said lead and a primary
winding through which the capacitor is discharged in response to a trigger signal,
inducing said pulse in said lead.
53. The ignition circuit of any of claims 24-26 further including means for providing to
the igniter, in an interval between the breakdown discharge and a first follow-on
pulse a simmer current sufficient to prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel
in said interval.
54. The ignition circuit of claim 27, further including means for providing to the igniter,
in an interval between each successive pair of follow-on pulses a simmer current
sufficient to prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel in said interval.
55. The ignition circuit of any of claims 25-26wherein the ignition coil includes a
saturable core on which the primary and secondary windings are formed and the core
substantially saturates when said electrical breakdown occurs, whereby the secondary
winding thereafter has substantially reduced inductance.
56. An ignition circuit for powering an igniter in an internal combustion engine,
comprising:
a. a high voltage pulse generator which generates on an output for
connection to an igniter a pulse whose maximum voltage, when delivered
to the igniter, is capable causing a breakdown discharge and consequent
high current between electrodes of the igniter, in an initiation region
between the electrodes, when said igniter is disposed in a fuel-air mixture,
whereby a plasma kernel is formed adjacent said surface by said
discharge; and
b. a lower voltage pulse generator which generates on the output a sequence
of one or more relatively lower voltage and lower current follow-on
pulses having voltage and current amplitude and timing sufficient to force
the plasma kernel to move toward a free end of said electrodes by said
lower voltage, lower current pulses.

WO 2006/113850

PCT/US2006/014840

-35-
57. The ignition circuit of claim 56, further including a simmer current source which
supplies on the output line, in an interval between the breakdown discharge and a
first follow-on pulse a simmer current sufficient to prevent total recombination of the
plasma kernel in said interval.
58. The ignition circuit of claim 56, further including a voltage source which maintains
between follow-on pulses, for at least a portion of an interval between said follow-on
pulses, a voltage on the igniter electrodes below a breakdown voltage but sufficient
to prevent total recombination of the plasma kernel during said interval.
59. An ignition circuit substantially as shown and described in the drawing figures,
particularly any of Figs. 8-10.
60. The ignition circuit of any of claims 50-59 including means operable after a follow-
on pulse, for re-triggering or re-striking the plasma kernel at a time an ionization
level of the plasma kernel has fallen below a desired level, with a current and at a
relatively low voltage sufficient to cause the plasma kernel to grow before total
recombination occurs, followed by a next follow-on pulse.

An ignition circuit and a method of operating an igniter (preferably a traveling spark igniter) in an internal combustion engine, including a high pressure engine. A high voltage is applied to electrodes of the igniter, sufficient to cause breakdown to occur between the electrodes, resulting in a high current electrical discharge in the igniter, over a surface of an isolator between the electrodes, and formation of a plasma kernel in a fuel-air mixture adjacent said surface. Following breakdown, a sequence of one or more lower voltage and lower current pulses is applied to said electrodes, with a low "simmer" current being sustained through the plasma between pulses, preventing total plasma recombination and allowing the plasma kernel to move toward a free end of the electrodes with each pulse.

Documents:

http://ipindiaonline.gov.in/patentsearch/GrantedSearch/viewdoc.aspx?id=SwMDzg02xEd9xyw7QV/hMQ==&loc=wDBSZCsAt7zoiVrqcFJsRw==


Patent Number 272381
Indian Patent Application Number 4419/KOLNP/2007
PG Journal Number 14/2016
Publication Date 01-Apr-2016
Grant Date 30-Mar-2016
Date of Filing 16-Nov-2007
Name of Patentee KNITE, INC.
Applicant Address 1H DEER PARK DRIVE MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 SUCKEWER, ARTUR 67 DELEON CIRCLE, FRANKLIN PARK, NJ 08823
2 SELMON FREDERICK H, III 5 CARNEGIE AVENUE, HAMILTON, NJ 08619
3 SUCKEWER SZYMON 10 MACLEAN CIRCLE, PRINCETON, NJ 08540
PCT International Classification Number H01T 13/50
PCT International Application Number PCT/US2006/014840
PCT International Filing date 2006-04-19
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 60/672892 2005-04-19 U.S.A.