|Title of Invention||
" A REFRIGERANT COMPOSITION"
|Abstract||The present invention relates to a refrigerant composition which comprises: (a) pentafluore thane, trifluoromethoxydifluoromethane or hexafluorocyclopropane, or a mixture of two or more thereof, in an amount of 83 to 88% based on the weight of the composition, (b) 1,1,1,2- or 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, or trifluoromethoxypentafluoroethane, or a mixture of two or more thereof, in an amount of 7.5% to 15% by weight based on the weight of the composition, and (c) isobutane in an amount from 1% to 4%|
|Full Text||The present invention relates to refrigerant compositions, particularly low temperature refrigerants for use in cold stores.
There is a need for a low temperature refrigerant for use in cold stores. Prior to the Montreal Protocol, this function was filled by R502, an azeotrope of Rl 15 and R22. This refrigerant was particularly attractive in low temperature situations where R12 (CCI2F2) or R22 were reaching their effective working limits. At these low temperatures it was possible to achieve a significant increase in capacity over that obtainable with R22 with a major benefit being operation at considerably lower discharge temperatures. However, since R502 contains Rl 15, which is a sfrong ozone depleter, it is now no longer available for use.
Subsequently, this requirement has been partially met by using two blends containing R143a. The first is R404A, which consists of R125(44%w/w), R143a(52%w/w) and R134a(4%w/w). The second is R507A, which consists of an azeotropic mixture of R125 (50%w/w) and R143a (50%w/w).
The problem with these blends is that they have very high global warming potentials (GWP).
The concept of a Global Wanning Potential (GWP) has been developed to compare the ability of a greenhouse gas to trap heat in the atmosphere relative to another gas. Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been chosen as the reference gas. Since GWP's are ratios, they are dimensionless. The GWP's quoted below are those given in IPCC -1995 for 100 year time horizons. The GWP's for blends axe calculated by summing the products of the mass"fraction times the individual cumponent GWP:
A greenhouse gas is a gas that causes the Earth's atmosphere to trap heat. The greenhouse gas allows the sun's radiation to reach the Earth's surface. The Earth's surface is heated by this radiation and emits longer wavelength infra-red radiation due to the heating. The greenhouse gas now prevents this radiation from escaping back into space by absorbing it and hence traps it in the atmosphere.
R507 has a GWP of 3300 and R404A is only slightly less at 3260. These high GWP's are due to the presence of R143a. Pure R143a has a GWP of 3800 compared to that ofthe other maiu component, R125, which is only 2800.
R22 alone has also been used, but this is an ozone depleter that will be phased out over the next decade. Also, the efficiency of R22 at the low temperatures required for cold storage is poor.
There is now considerable concern about global wanning and, hence, it is important to use blends with as low a GWP as possible. Clearly there is a need to find a substitute for R502, which is not an ozone depleter, has a low GWP and can operate more efficiently at the low temperatures required than R22, R404A or R507.
According to the present invention there is provided a refrigerant composition which comprises:
(a) pentafluorethane, trifluoromethoxydifluoromethane or hexafluoro-cyclopropane, or a mixture of two or more thereof, in an amount of at least 75% based on the weight of the composition,
(b) 1,1,1,2- or 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, trifluoromethoxypentafluoroethane, 1,1,1,2,3,3-heptafluoropropane or a mixture of two or more thereof, in an amount of from 5 to 24% by weight based on the weight of the composition and
(c) an ethylenically unsaturated or saturated hydrocarbon, optionally containing one or more oxygen atoms, with a boiling point from -50°C to +35 °C, or a mixture thereof, in an amount from 1% to 4% by weight based on the weight of the composition, the weight ratio of component (a): component (b) being at least 3:1.
The percentages quoted above refer, in particular, to the liquid phase. The corresponding ranges for the vapour phase are as follows:
(a) at least 85%, (b) 2 to 12% and (c) 0.8 to 3%, all by weight based on the weight of the composition. These percentages preferably apply both in the liquid and vapor phases.
The present invention also provides a process for producing refrigeration which comprises condensing a composition of the present invention and thereafter evaporating the composition in the vicinity of a body to be cooled. The invention also provides a refrigeration apparatus containing, as refrigerant, a composition of the present invention.
Component (a) is present in an amount of at least 75% by weight based on the
weight of the composition. In practice, the concentration will generally be at least 80% by weight with a preferred range of 80 to 90 to % by weight, especially 83 to 88% by weight, in particular about 85% by weight. Preferably, component (a) is R125 (pentafluorethane) or a mixture containing at least an half, especially at least three quarters (by mass) of R125. Most preferably component (a) is R125 (alone). Generally the cooling capacity of the composition increase with increasing R125 content; the best cooling capacity and efficiency can be obtained with about 85% R125
Component (b) is present in the composition in an amount from 5 to 24% by weight based on the weight of the composition. Typically, the component is present in an amount from 7.5% to 20%, generally 10% to 15%, by weight, especially about 11.5% by weight. Component (b) is preferably a mixture containing at least an half, especially at least three quarters (by mass) of R134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). Most preferably component (b) is R134a (alone).
The weight ratio of component (a): component (b) is at least 3:1, generally at least 4:1, preferably 5:1 to 10:1 and especially 7:1 to 9:1.
Component (c) is a saturated or ethylenicaily unsaturated hydrocarbon, optionally containing one or more oxygen atoms, in particular one oxygen atom, with a boiling point from -50 °C to +35 °C or a mixture thereof. Preferred hydrocarbons which can be used possess three to five carbon atoms. Tliey can be acyclic or cyclic. Acyclic hydrocarbons which can be used include propane, n-butane, isobutane, pentane, isopentane and dimethyl and ethylmethyl ether as well as propane. Cyclic hydrocarbons which can be used include cyclo butane, cyclo propane, methyl cyclo propane and oxetan. Preferred hydrocarbons include n-butane and isobutane, with iso-butane being especially preferred. Isobutane is particularly suited to producing a non-flammable mixture in a worst case fractionation due to a leak.
The presence of at least one further component in the composition is not excluded. Thus although, typically, the composition will comprise the three essential components, a fourth component, at least, can also be present. Typical fiirther components include other fluorocarbons and, in particular, hydrofluorocarbons, such as those having a boiling point at atmospheric pressure of at most -40 "C, preferably
at most -49 °C, especially those where the F/H ratio in the molecule is at least 1, preferably R23, trifluoromethane and, most preferably, R32, difluoromethane. In general, the maximum concentration of these other ingredients does not exceed 10% and especially not exceeding 5% and more especially not exceeding 2%,by weight, based on the sum of the weights of components (a), (b) and (c). The presence of hydro fluorocarbons generally has a neutral effect on the desired properties of the formulation. Desirably one or more butanes, especially n-butane or iso-butane, represents at least 70%, preferably at least 80% and more preferably at 90%), by weight of the total weight of hydrocarbons in the composition. It will be appreciated that it is preferable to avoid perhalocarbons so as to minimise any greenhouse effect and to avoid hydrohalogenocarbons with one or more halogen heavier than fluorine. The total amount of such halocarbons should advantageously not exceed 2%), especially 1% and more preferably 0.5%, by weight.
It has been found that the compositions of the present invention are highly compatible with the mineral oil lubricants which have been conventionally used with CFC refrigerants. Accordingly the compositions of the present invention can be used not only with fully syntlietic lubricants such as polyol esters (POE), polyalkyleneglycols (PAG) and polyoxypropylene glycols or with fluorinated oil as disclosed in EP-A-399817 but also with mineral oil and alkyl benzene lubricants including naphthenic oils, paraffin oils and silicone oils and mixtures of such oils and lubricants with fully synthetic lubricants and fluorinated oil.
The usual additives can be used including "extreme pressure" and antiwear additives, oxidation and thermal stability improvers, corrosion inhibitors, viscosity index improvers, pour point depressants, detergents, anti-foaming agents and viscosity adjusters. Examples of suitable additives are included in Table D in US-A-4755316.
The following Examples further illustrate the present invention.
Determination of vapour pressure/temperature relationship for the blends to be
The samples used for testing are detailed in Table 1.
Equipment and experimental
The equipment used for determining the vapour pressure/temperature relationship consisted of a 1 litre Parr reactor immersed completely in a thermostatically controlled water bath. The bath temperature was measured using a calibrated platinum resistance thermometer with an Isotech TT11 indicator. The resolution of the thermometer is 0 01°C. The pressure (press) was read with a calibrated pressure transducer with an experimental accuracy of 0.0lbara and read on a Druck DRl instrument.
Approximately, 1.2kg of the refrigerant was charged into the Parr reactor. The reactor was then cooled overnight. When it had reached temperature, the pressure and temperatures were recorded every ten minutes until constant.
The data obtained does not give the dew point and hence does not give the glide. An approximate evaluation of the glide can be obtained by using the REFPROP 6 program. The relationship of the glide to the bubble point is usually nearly linear and can be represented by a linear equation. In the case of R407C, a binomial equation had to be used. These equations can now be used to give an approximate glide for the experimentally determined bubble points. This is effectively a normalisation of the calculated glide to the experimentally determmed data. The pressure of the dew point can now be approximated by applying the relationship for temperature/pressure, which was found for the bubble point. The glide equations obtained are also shown in Table 2. These equations can now be used to obtain vapour pressure/temperature tables.
Determination of the performance of the refrigerants on the low temperature (LT) calorimeter.
Equipement and general operating conditions
The performance of the refrigerants was determined on the low temperature (LT) calorimeter. The LT calorimeter is fitted with a Bitzer semi-hermetic condensing imit containing Shell SD oil. The hot vapour passes out of the compressor, through an oil separator and into the condenser. The discharge pressure at the exit of the compressor is kept constant by means of a packed gland shut-off valve. The refrigerant then travels along the liquid line to the evaporator.
The evaporator is constructed from 15mm Cu tubing coiled around the edges of a well insulated 32 litre SS bath. The bath is filled with 50:50 glycol:water solution and heat is supplied to it by 3x1 kW heaters controlled by a PID controller. A stirrer with a large paddle ensures that the heat is evenly distributed. The evaporating pressxire is controlled by an automatic expansion valve.
The refrigerant vapour returns to the compressor through a suction line heat exchanger.
Twelve temperature readings, five pressure readings, compressor power and heat input are all recorded automatically using Dasylab.
The tests were run at a condensing temperature of 40'C and an evaporator superheat of 8°C(±0.5°C).
For R22 the temperature at the end of the evaporator was maintained at 8°C above the temperature equivalent to the evaporating pressure.
For the other refrigerants the temperature at the end of the evaporator was maintained at S^C above the temperature equivalent to the evaporating pressure (Dew point)
The mean evaporator temperature (ev. temp) for these refrigerants was calculated by taking the temperature equivalent to the evaporator pressure from the bubble point table and adding to that half the glide at that temperature.
Initially, the pressure was roughly set and then the temperature of the bath was set. The pressure would then be readjusted to ensure that there was 8°C superheat present. The superheat was measured from the third evaporator outlet. No adjustments were made during the run, except for possibly minor changes to the
valve at the exit of the compressor, in order to keep the conditions as constant as possible. The test was then continued for at least one hour during which time 6 readings were taken i.e. every 10 minutes. If these readings were stable, then their average was calculated.
Specific experimental details for each refrigerant
The refrigerant list is given in the order in which the measurements were carried out.
R22: R22 (3.477kg) was charged into the hquid receiver. Since this was the first time that the LT calorimeter had been used since a major modification base data for R22 was required. Accordingly, eight data points were obtained between the evaporating temperatures of-33°C to -21 °C.
75% R125: Approximately 3.54kg were charged into the liquid receiver. Four data points were obtained between the mean evaporating temperatures of -31 °C to -23 °C respectively. At a mean evaporating temperature of-23°C the expansion valve was fully opened.
85% R125: Approximately 3.55kg were charged into the liquid receiver. Four data points were obtained between the mean evaporating temperatures of -31 °C and -25°C. At a mean evaporating temperature of-26°C the expansion valve was fiilly opened.
85% R125 (R600a): Approximately 3.56kg were charged into the liquid receiver. Five data points were obtained between the mean evaporating temperatures of-44.5°Cand-28°C.
R407C: Approximately 3.59kg were charged into the liquid receiver Five data points were obtained between mean evaporating temperatures of-32°C to -20°C.
70% R125: Approximately 3.5kg were charged into the liquid receiver. Five data points were obtained between the mean evaporating temperatures of-32°C to -2 PC.
R404A: Approximately 3.51 kg were charged into the liquid receiver. Five data points were obtained between the mean evaporating temperatures of-33°C to -25°C.
The results obtained are summarised in Tables 3-8. Mean Ev. Temp = Mean evaporation temperature; Air On Condenser = temperature of the air in the room that is blown over the air cooled condenser, measured just prior to the air blowing over the condenser; Press = pressure.
Comments and discussion on the experimental results
Graph 1 shows a comparison of capacities at a mean evaporating temperature of -30°C, compared to R404A. This evaporating temperature is considered to be fairly typical of where a low temperature refrigerant would be expected to operate. It can be seen that 85% R125 and 85% R125 (R600a) have a slightly better relative capacity than R404A, whereas the other refrigerants tested are poorer. R22 and 75% R125 are the next best. At this temperature R407C is the poorest, but it improves relatively as the mean evaporating temperature increases. Generally, there is an improvement in cooling capacity as the R125 content increases.
Graph 2 shows the COP results obtained. It shows that 85% R125 and 85% R125 (R600a) give the best efficiency at -30°C and are the only refrigerants better than R404A.
Graphs 3 and 4 show the capacity and COP for any given refrigerant relative to R22. These again show the similarity of 85% R125 and 85% R125 (R600a) to R404A, which are all 5-10% up on R22.
The preferred formulations are therefore 85% R125 and 85%) R125 (R600a). Assuming that n-butane and isobutane have the same GWP as methane (21). This is 22% less than that of R404a and 23% less than that of R507.
The preferred compositions are 85%)w/w R125, 11.5%w/w R134a and
3 5%w/w butane or isobutane. These have a vapour pressure-temperature relationship very close to that of R404A. For example, at -30°C the R404A liquid has a vapour pressure of 0.209MPa (30.3psia) and the preferred compositions have a vapour pressurre above the liquid of 0.2I8MPa (31 6psi) for butane and 0.223MPa (32.3psia) for isobutane i.e. only 4-6 % higher.
Table 1 Details of test refrigerants (Table Removed)
Table 2 Results of the experimental SVP measurements and the glide from REFPROP6 (Table Removed)
(1) In this equation x=l/T where T is the bubble point in Kelvin: y= ln(p), where p is the saturated vapour pressure in psia
(2) In this equation x=t, where t is liquid temperature (bubble point) in degree C and y==glide in deg C at the bubble point temperature ,
(3) The data used was from Refprop, but was in agreement with that from the Ashrae handbook and from I CI.
(4) The vapour pressures for R22 were obtained from the Ashrae handbook by intepolation.
(5) Table 3 R22 CONDENSING AT 40°C IN LT-CALORIMETER
(6) Table 4 70% R125 (69.98% R125 / 26.51% R134a / 3.51% R600) CONDENSING
(7) Table 5 75% R125 (75.02% R125 / 21.48% R134a / 3.50% R600)
(8) Table 6 85% R125 (85.05% R125 /11.45% R134a / 3.50% R600)
(9) Table 7 R407C (23.02% R32 / 25.04% R125 / 51.94% R134a)
(10) Table 8 R404A (44% R125 / 52% R143a / 4% R134a)
Table 9 85% R125 (R600a) (85% R125/H.45% R134a/3.50% R600a)
1. A refrigerant composition which comprises:
(a) pentafluore thane, trifluoromethoxydifluoromethane or hexafluorocyclopropane, or a mixture of two or more thereof, in an amount of 83 to 88% based on the weight of the composition,
(b) 1,1,1,2- or 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane, or trifluoromethoxypentafluoroethane, or a mixture of two or more thereof, in an amount of 7.5% to 15% by weight based on the weight of the composition, and
(c) isobutane in an amount from 1% to 4%.
2. A composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein component (c) is present in an amount from 3 to 4% by weight based on the weight of the composition.
3. A composition as claimed in claim 2 wherein component (c) is present in an amount of about 3.5% by weight based on the weight of the composition.
4. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein (a) is pentafluoroethane.
5. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein component (b) is 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
6. A composition as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein component (b) is present in an amount from 10 to 15% by weight based on the weight of the composition.
7. A composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the composition optionally comprises hydrofluorocarbon in an amount less than or equal to 5% by weight based on the weight of (a), (b) and (c).
8. A composition as claimed in claim 7 wherein the hydrofluorocarbon is difluoromethane or trifluoromethane.
9. A composition as claimed in claim 7 wherein hydrofluorocarbon is present in an amount less than or equal to 2% by weight based on the weight of (a), (b)and(c).
10. A refrigeration composition as claimed in claims 1 to 9 for use as refrigerant in the refrigerant apparatus.
11. A refrigerant composition as claimed in claim 1 which comprises:
(a) pentafluorethane in an amount of 83 to 88% based on the weight of the composition,
(b) 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane in an amount of 7.5% to 15% by weight based on the weight of the composition, and
(c) isobutane in an amount from 1% to 4%; and optionally including one or more component selected from lubricants, additives, difluoromethane or trifluorome thane.
1540-delnp-2005-complete specification (as,files).pdf
1540-delnp-2005-complete specification (granted).pdf
|Indian Patent Application Number||1540/DELNP/2005|
|PG Journal Number||14/2010|
|Date of Filing||15-Apr-2005|
|Name of Patentee||E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY|
|Applicant Address||1007 MARKET STREET, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19898, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA|
|PCT International Classification Number||C09K 5/04|
|PCT International Application Number||PCT/GB2003/004421|
|PCT International Filing date||2003-10-13|