Title of Invention

"IMPROVED ANTITUMORAL TREATMENTS"

Abstract Title; "A synergistic antitumour pharmaceutical composition". The present invention relates to a synergistic antitumour pharmaceutical composition comprising aplidine or an aplidine analogue and other drug effective in the treatment of cancer.
Full Text FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a synergistic antitumour pharmaceutical composition. The present invention also relates to combinations of aplidine or aplidine analogues with other antitumoral agents, and the use of these combinations in the treatment of cancer, in particular in the treatment of leukemias and lymphomas.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Aplidine (Dehydrodidemnin B) is a cyclic depsipeptide that was isolated from a Mediterranean marine tunicate, Aplidium albicans, and it is the subject of WO 9109485. It is related to compounds known as didemnins, and has the following structure:
(Formula Removed)
More information on aplidine, aplidine analogues, their uses, formulations and synthesis can be found in patent applications WO 98 1352, WO 99 42125, WO 01 76616, WO 01 35974, WO 02 30441 and WO 02 02596. We incorporate by specific reference the content of each of these PCT texts.


In both animal and human preclinical studies and in clinical Phase I studies this agent has been shown to have cytotoxic potential against a broad spectrum of tumor types including leukemia and lymphoma. See for example :
Faircloth, G. et at: "Dehydrodidemnin B (DDE) a new marine derived anticancer agent with activity against experimental tumour models", 9th NC1-EORTC Symp New Drugs Cancer Ther (March 12-15, Amsterdam) 1996, Abst 111;
Faircloth, G. et at: "Preclinical characterization of aplidine, a new marine anticancer depsipeptide", Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res 1997, 38: Abst 692;
Depenbrock H, Peter R, Faircloth GT, Manzanares I, Jimeno J, Hanauske AR.: "In vitro activity of Aplidine, a new marine-derived anti-cancer compound, on freshly explanted clonogenic human tumour cells and haematopoietic precursor cells" Br. J. Cancer, 1998; 78: 739-744; Faircloth G, Grant W, Nam S, Jimeno J, Manzanares I, Rinehart K.: "Schedule-dependency of Aplidine, a marine depsipeptide with antitumor activity3", Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 1999; 40: 394; Broggini M, Marchini S, Dlncalci M, Taraboletti G, Giavazzi R, Faircloth G, Jimeno J.: "Aplidine blocks VEGF secretion and VEGF/VEGF-R1 autocrine loop in a human leukemic cell line", Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6 (suppl): 4509;
Erba E, Bassano L, Di Liberti G, Muradore I, Chiorino G, Ubezio P, Vignati S, Codegoni A, Desiderio MA, Faircloth G, Jimeno J and Dlncalci M.: "Cell cycle phase perturbations and apoptosis in tumour cells induced by aplidine", BrJ Cancer 2002; 86: 1510-1517; Paz-Ares L, Anthony A, Pronk L, Twelves C, Alonso S, Cortes-Funes H, Celli N, Gomez C, Lopez-Lasaro L, Guzman C, Jimeno J, Kaye S.: "Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of aplidine, a new marine didemnin, administered as 24-hour infusion weekly* Clin. Cancer Res. 2000; 6 (suppl}: 4509;

Raymond E, Ady-Vago N, Baudin E, Ribrag V, Faivre S, Lecot F, Wright T, Lopez Lazaro L, Guzman C, Jimeno J, Ducreux M, Le Chevalier T, Armand JP.: "A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of aplidine given as a 24-hour continuous infusion every other week in patients with solid tumor and lymphoma", Clin. Cancer Res. 2000; 6 (suppl): 4510; Maroun J, Belanger K, Seymour L, Soulieres D, Charpentier D, Goel R, Stewart D, Tomiak E, Jimeno J, Matthews S. :"Phase I study of aplidine in a 5 day bolus q 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors and lymphomas", Clin. Cancer Res. 2000; 6 (suppl): 4509; Izquierdo MA, Bowman A, Martinez M, Cicchella B, Jimeno J, Guzman C, Germa J, Smyth J.: "Phase I trial of Aplidine given as a 1 hour intravenous weekly infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma", Clin. Cancer Res. 2000; 6 (suppl): 4509.
Mechanistic studies indicate that aplidine can block VEGF secretion in ALL-MOLT4 cells and in vitro cytotoxic activity at low concentrations (5nM) has been observed in AML and ALL samples from pediatric patients with de novo or relapsed ALL and AML. Aplidine appears to induce both a Gl and a G2 arrest in drug treated leukemia cells in vitro. Apart from down regulation of the VEGF receptor, little else is known about the mode(s) of action of aplidine.
In phase I clinical studies with aplidine, L-carnitine was given as a 24 hour pretreatment or co-administered to prevent myelotoxicity, see for example WO 02 30441. Co-administration of L-carnitine was proven to be able to improve the recovery of the drug induced muscular toxicity and has allowed for dose escalation of aplidine.
Thus in clinical Phase I studies aplidine was not myelotosic at maximum tolerated doses, except for mild lymphopenia. These characteristics make aplidine a potentially useful agent for the

treatment of leukemia. Adding aplidine to the current chemotherapy for leukemia could improve efficacy without the necessity of dose reductions of drugs with proven antileukemic activity, because of increased myelotozicity. This seems especially relevant for the treatment of relapsed ALL and newly diagnosed and relapsed AML, since these are diseases with a relatively poor prognosis, which are currently being treated with myelotosic drug combinations.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
We have for the first time established that aplidine and aplidine analogues potentiate other anticancer agents and therefore can be successfully used in combination therapy for the treatment of cancer. This invention is directed to pharmaceutical compositions, pharmaceutical dosage forms, kits and methods for the treatment of cancer using these combination therapies.
In accordance with one aspect of this invention, we provide effective combination therapies based on aplidine and aplidine analogues, using other drugs which are effective in the treatment of cancer. Preferably the other drug is effective in the treatment of leukemia and/or lymphoma. Most preferably the other drug is selected from the group consisting of methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone, vinblastine, methylprednisolone and doxorubicin.
In another embodiment the invention encompasses a method of treating primary and/or metastatic cancer comprising administering to a patient in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of aplidine or an aplidine analogue, or a pharmaceutically acceptable prodrug, salt, solvate or hydrate thereof, and a therapeutically effective

amount of another drug which is effective in the treatment of cancer or a pharmaceutically acceptable prodrug, salt, solvate or hydrate thereof, administered prior, during, or after administering aplidine or aplidine analogue.
Preferably the other drug is effective in the treatment of leukemia and/or lymphoma. Most preferably the other drug is selected from the group consisting of methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, mitosantrone, vinblastine, methylprednisolone and doxorubicin. The other drugs may form part of the same composition, or be provided as a separate composition for administration at the same time or at a different time.
The cancer to be treated is preferably a leukemia or a lymphoma, most preferably ALL, AML , CML, MML or CLL.
In another aspect the invention encompasses a method of increasing the therapeutic efficacy of a drug effective in the treament of cancer, preferably a drug effective in the treatment of leukemia and/or lymphoma, most preferably a drug selected from the group consisting of methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone, vinblastine, methylprednisolone and doxorubicin, or a pharmaceutically acceptable prodrug, salt, solvate or hydrate thereof, which comprises administering to a patient in need thereof an amount of aplidine or an aplidine analogue, or a pharmaceutically acceptable prodrug, salt, solvate or hydrate thereof. Aplidine or the aplidine analogue is administered prior, during, or after administering the other drug.
Aplidine or an aplidine analogue is able to increase the therapeutic efficacy of some cancer drugs. In one aspect, the result is synergism, rather than additive. Such synergistic combinations represent a preferred aspect of the present invention. Synergism may

7
be indicated by use of the Chou-Talalay method, or other methods. In other instances, antagonism may be found.
In a further aspect the invention encompasses a pharmaceutical composition comprising aplidine or an aplidine analogue, or a pharmaceutically acceptable prodrug, salt, solvate or hydrate thereof, and another drug effective in the treatment of cancer. Preferably the other drug is effective in the treatment of leukemia and/or lymphoma. Most preferably the other drug is selected from the group consisting of methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone, vinblastine, methylprednisolone and doxorubicin.
The invention also encompasses a kit for use in the treatment or prevention of cancer which comprises a dosage form of aplidine or an aplidine analogue, or a pharmaceutically acceptable prodrug, salt, solvate or hydrate thereof, a dosage form of another drug effective in the treatment of cancer, or a pharmaceutically acceptable prodrug, salt, solvate or hydrate thereof, and instructions for the use of each actor in combination for the treatment or prevention of cancer. Preferably the other drug is effective in the treatment of leukemia and/or lymphoma. Most preferably the other drug is selected from the group consisting of methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone, vinblastine, methylprednisolone and doxorubicin.
In a further aspect, the invention is directed to the use of aplidine for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Fig. 1. Aplidine inhibits growth of CLL cells in culture

a
Fig. 2. Aplidine is a potent inhibitor of preB-ALL cells in culture
Fig. 3. The cytotoxic dose-response curve of CCRF-CEM (Fig. 3A),
SKI-DLCL (Fig. 3B) and K562 (3C) cells following aplidine treatment for
96 hours
Fig. 4. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and AraC
in CCRF-CEM cells
1%. 5. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and AraC
in SKI-DLCL cells
Fig. 6. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and
mitoxantrone in CCRF-CEM cells
Fig. 7. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and
mitoxantrone in SKI-DLCL cells
Fig. 8. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and
methotrexate in CCRF-CEM ceUs
Fig. 9. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and
doxorubicin in CCRF-CEM cells
Fig. 10. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and
vinblastine in CCRF-CEM cells
Fig. 11. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and
doxorubicin in SKI-DLCL cells
Fig. 12. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and
vinblastine in SKI-DLCL cells
Fig. 13. Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and
methylprednisolone in SKI-DLCL cells
Fig. 14. Combination of IC20 of aplidine lowered the IC50 of AraC in
CCRF-CEM (Fig. 12A) and SKI-DLCL (Fig. 12B) cells after incubation for
96 hours
Fig. 15. The effect of aplidine on in vivo tumor size as a single agent
and in combination with AraC

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
By cancer it is meant to include tumors, neoplasias, and any other malignant tissue or cells. The present invention is directed to the use of aplidine or an aplidine analogue in combination for the treatments of cancer in general, but more preferably for the treatment of different leukemias and lymphomas.
In order to study the possible potentiation of other anticancer agents with aplidine we have initiated a systematic study of drug combinations for possible use in leukemias and lymphomas. Aplidine was found to be an effective in vitro cytotoxic agent against primary cells from a patient with preB-ALL (DM4) as well as against fresh cells obtained from six chronic tymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. The IC50 value was 10 nM for 3 day exposure with the DM4 line and after a 11 day exposure with the primary CLL samples.
Drug combination studies were carried out on established cell lines rather than primary cells. We studied three cell lines viz. K562, CCRF-CEM and SKI-DLCL representing acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoblastic lymphoma and diffuse B cell large cell lymphoma respectively. The data in the examples show that Aplidine potentiates the effect of methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone, vinblastine, methylprednisolone as well as doxorubicin in K562, CCRF-CEM and SKI-DLCL cells by lowering the IC50s for the drugs.
Thus we have found that aplidine is a potent cytotoxic agent against cells of several hematologic malignancies. Significantly, we have established for the first time that aplidine inhibits growth of CLL cells in culture. We also found that aplidine enhances the cytotoxicity of agents used in the treatment of leukemias, such as methotrexate

10
(MTX), cytosine arabonoside (AraC), mitoxantrone (Mitox), vinblastine (Vinb), methylprednisolone (Metpred) and doxorubicin (DOX).
Leukemia is classified by how quickly it progresses. Acute leukemia is fast-growing and can overrun the body within a few weeks or months. By contrast, chronic leukemia is slow-growing and progressively worsens over years.
The blood-forming (hematopoietic) cells of acute leukemia remain in an immature state, so they reproduce and accumulate very rapidly. Therefore, acute leukemia needs to be treated immediately, otherwise the disease may be fatal within a few months. Fortunately, some subtypes of acute leukemia respond to available therapies and they are curable. Children often develop acute forms of leukemia, which are managed differently from leukemia in adults.
In chronic leukemia, the blood-forming cells eventually mature, or differentiate, but they are not "normal". They remain in the bloodstream much longer than normal white blood cells, and they are unable to combat infection well.
Leukemia also is classified according to the type of white blood cell that is multiplying - that is, lymphocytes (immune system cells), granulocytes (bacteria-destroying cells), or monocytes (macrophage-forming cells). If the abnormal white blood cells are primarily granulocytes or monocytes, the leukemia is categorized as myelogenous, or myeloid, leukemia. On the other hand, if the abnormal blood cells arise from bone marrow lymphocytes, the cancer is called lymphocytic leukemia.
Other cancers, known as lymphomas, develop from lymphocytes within the lymph nodes, spleen, and other organs. Such cancers do not originate in the bone marrow and have a biological behavior that is different from lymphocytic leukemia.

11
There are over a dozen different types of leukemia, but four types occur most frequently. These classifications are based upon whether the leukemia is acute versus chronic and myelogenous versus lymphocytic, that is:
Acute mvelogenous leukemia (AML): also known as acute nonJymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) - is the most common form of adult leukemia. Most patients are of retirement age (average age at diagnosis = 65 years), and more men are affected than women. Fortunately, because of recent advances in treatment, AML can be kept in remission (lessening of the disease) in approximately 60% to 70% of adults who undergo appropriate therapy. Initial response rates are approximately. 65-75% but the overall cure rates are more on the order of 40-50%.
Chronic mvelogenous leukemia (CML) is known as a myeloproliferative disorder - that is, it is a disease in which bone marrow cells proliferate (multiply) outside of the bone marrow tissue. CML is easy to diagnose, since it has a genetic peculiarity, or marker, that is readily identifiable under a microscope. About 95% of CML patients have a genetic translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 in their leukemic cells. The Philadelphia chromosome causes uncontrolled reproduction and proliferation of all types of white blood cells and platelets (blood clotting factors). CML is not yet curable by standard methods of chemotherapy or immunotherapy.
Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) - also known as acute lymphoblastic leukemia - is a malignant disease caused by the abnormal growth and development of early nongranular white blood cells, or lymphocytes. The leukemia originates in the blast cells of the bone marrow (B-cells), thymus (T-cells), and lymph nodes. ALL occurs predominantly in children, peaking at 4 years of age.

Chronic Iymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in North America and in Europe. It is a disease of older adults and is very rare among people who are younger than 50 years of age. Men with CLL outnumber women by a 2-to-l average. CLL is thought to result from the gradual accumulation of mature, long-lived lymphocytes. Therefore, this cancer is caused not so much by overgrowth as it is by the extreme longevity and build-up of malignant cells. Although the rate of accumulation varies among individuals, the extensive tumor burden eventually causes complications in all CLL patients.
The compositions of the present invention may comprise both components (drugs) in a single pharmaceutically acceptable formulation. Alternatively, the components may be formulated separately and administered in combination with one another. Various pharmaceutically acceptable formulations well known to those of skill in the art can be used in the present invention. Selection of an appropriate formulation for use in the present invention can be performed routinely by those skilled in the art based upon the mode of administration and the solubility characteristics of the components of the composition.
Examples of pharmaceutical compositions containing Aplidine or an aplidine analogue include liquid (solutions, suspensions or emulsions) with suitable composition for intravenous administration, and they may contain the pure compound or in combination with any carrier or other pharmacologically active compounds. Solubilised aplidine shows substantial degradation under heat and light stress testing conditions, and a lyophilised dosage form was developed, see W099/42125 incorporated herein by reference.
Administration of aplidine or compositions of the present invention is based on a Dosing Protocol preferably by intravenous

infusion. We prefer that infusion times of up to 72 hours are used, more preferably 1 to 24 hours, with about 1, about 3 or about 24 hours most preferred. Short infusion times which allow treatment to be carried out without an overnight stay in hospital are especially desirable. However, infusion may be around 24 hours or even longer if required. Infusion may be carried out at suitable intervals with varying patterns, illustratively once a week, twice a week, or more frequently per week, repeated each week optionally with gaps of typically one week.
The correct dosage of the compounds of the combination will vary according to the particular formulation, the mode of application, and the particular situs, host and tumour being treated. Other factors like age, body weight, sex, diet, time of administration, rate of excretion, condition of the host, drug combinations, reaction sensitivities and severity of the disease shall be taken into account. Administration can be carried out continuously or periodically within the maximum tolerated dose. Further guidance for the administration of aplidine is given in WO 0135974 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
For the present invention, analogues of aplidine can be used in place of APL, aplidine itself. Typically such compounds are as defined in WO 0202596. Examples of compounds for the present invention include the preferred compounds given in WO 0202596, and in particular we import into this patent specification the discussion of preferred compounds and related aspects given in WO 0202596. More preferably, the analogues are structurally close to aplidine, and usually differ from aplidine in respect of one amino acid or the terminal sidechain. The different amino acid can be in the cyclic part of the molecule or in the sidechain. Many examples of such compounds are

given in WO 0202596, and they are candidates for use in the present invention.
A pharmaceutical composition comprising aplidine or an aplidine analogue and another drug effective in the treatment of cancer, of the present invention, shows outstanding results. Therefore the pharmaceutical composition is found to be synergistic.
EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1
Aplidine was tested against various primary cells from patients with hematologic malignancies. The cells used were:
- fresh cells obtained from six chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients
- primary cell from a patient with preB-ALL (DM4)
Patient samples were obtained with prior consent and CLL cells were isolated by density gradient centrifugation over histopaque. The media used was RPMI supplemented with 10% autologues serum and L-glutamine. The cultures were incubated with 10 nM aplidine and cell viability was measured days 3, 7, 11 and 18 and compared with viability of untreated cells and STI 571 (0.5mM).
The results of these studies are shown in figures 1-2.
Example 2
In order to study the possible potentiation of other anticancer agents we undertook a study of drug combinations for possible use in leukemias and lymphomas.
Drug combination studies were carried out on established cell lines rather than primary cells. We studied three cell lines, viz. K562 as a model for acute myeloid leukemia, CEM representing acute lymphocytic leukemia and SKI-DLCL representing diffuse large cell

15
lymphoma. Combination studies with IC20 and 1C 50 dose of aplidine with a dose range of methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside and doxorubicin were tested to determine if aplidine could potentiate the effect of these drugs.
The results are shown in table 1:

Additional Drug No Aplidine IC20 Aplidine (O.SnM) ICSO Dox 18nM InM ICSO MIX SnM SOOpM ICSO Ara-C 30 nM 6nM
p Clearly, these data show that aplidine potentiates the effect of doxorubicin, methotrexate and cytosine arabinoside by lowering very significantly the IC50s for the drugs.
Example 3: In vitro studies to determine the effect of aplidine as a single agent on CCRF-CEM, SKI-DLCL and K562 cell lines.
CCRF-CEMS, SKI-DLCL and K562 cells are maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10%FCS. To determine the cytotoxic effect of aplidine on all cell lines and to obtain the IC50 of aplidine in these cell lines, cells were plated into 96 well plates and incubated for 96 hours in humidified and 5%CO2 containing incubator. Cell viability is measured by XTT assay in an automated plate reader. We found aplidine to be cytotoxic to all cell lines with an ICso dose of 0.5-1.0 nM (figure 3).
Example 4: Studies on in vitro effect of aplidine + drug combination with fixed doses of IC50:lC50 on all cell lines.

16
Methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside C (ara-C), mitoxantrone, methylprednisolone, vinblastine and doxorubicin were tested in combination with aplidine.
Chou-Talalay analysis was used to analyze the drug combinations. When Combination Index (CI) obtained by this analysis is less than 1, the drugs are synergistic; when CI is 1, the drugs are additive; and, if CI is greater than 1, the drugs are antagonistic.
All the citotoxicity studies were performed by using XTT or MTS. We first determined the IC50 dose of these drugs in SKI-DLCL, CCRF-CEM and K562 cell lines. We investigated drug combinations using IC50(Aplidine):IC50(DrugX) fixed ratio.
In table 2 is shown the combination of aplidine and Ara-C with the dose of (IC50:lC50) in CCRF-CEM cells.
Table 2

Ratio Dose of APL Dose of AraC Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) 0.5 nM 0 52.7
IC50(AraC) 0 10 nM 56.4
x16 8nM 160nM 4.7
x8 4nM 80 nM 7.9
x4 2nM 40 nM 7.6
x2 1nM 20 nM 7.8
1050:1050 0.5 nM 10 nM 10.6
x1/2 0.25 nM 5nM 16.2
x1/4 1.125nM 2.5 nM 36.7
x1/8 0.0625 nM 1.25nM 70.8

The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and Ara-C in CCRF-CEM cells can be seen in figure 4. The CI for this combination in CCRF-CEM cells is 0.469.
In table 3 is shown the combination of aplidine and Ara-C with the dose of (IC50:lC50) in SKI-DLCL cells.
Table 3

Ratio Dose of APL Dose of AraC Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) 0.5 nM 0 50
IC50(AraC) 0 30 nM 50
x16 8nM 480 nM 12
x8 4nM 240 nM 10.7
x4 2nM 120 nM 14.1
x2 1 nM 60 nM 17.4
IC50:IC50 0.5 nM 30 nM 23.1
x1/2 0.25 nM 15 nM 25.4
x1/4 1.125nM 7.5 nM 25.5
x1/8 0.0625 nM 3.75 nM 50.8
The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and Ara-C in SKI-DLCL cells can be seen in figure 5. The CI for this combination in SKI-DLCL cells is 0.306.
In table 4 is shown the combination of aplidine and Ara-C with the dose of (IC50:lC50) in K562 cells.

Ratio Dose of APL Dose of AraCT Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100

IC50(APL) 1 nM 0 50
IC50(AraC) 0 30 nM 50
x16 16nM 480 nM 11.8
xS 8nM 240 nM 15.2
x4 4nM 120 nM 15.5
x2 2nM 60 nM 17
IQ50:IC50 1 nW SQnftfl 22.1
x1/2 0.5 nM 15 nM 25.6
x1/4 0.25nM 7.5 nM 31.1
x1/8 0.125nM 3.75 nM 44.2
The CI for this combination in K562 cells is 0.502.
In table 5 is shown the combination of aplidine and mitoxantrone with the dose of (IC50:lC50) in CCRF-CEM cells.

Ratio Dose of APL Dose of Mitoxantrone Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) 0.5 nM 0 50
IC50(Mitox) 0 30 nM 56
x16 8nM 480 nM 9.9
x8 4nM 240 nM 11.6
x4 2nM 120 nM 11.9
x2 1 nM 60 nM 13.8
IC50:IC50 0.5 nM 30 nM 20.6
X1/2 0.25 nM 15 nM 39.7
x1/4 1.125 nM 7.5 nM 60.7
x1/8 0.0625 nM 3.75 nM 76.5

The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and mitoxantrone in CCRF-CEM cells can be seen in figure 6. The CI for this combination in CCRF-CEM cells is 0.911.
In table 6 is shown the combination of aplidine and mitoxantrone with the dose of (IC50:IC50) in SKI-DLCL cells.

Dose of APL DosĀ® of Mitoxantrone Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) 0.5 nM 0 50
IC50(Mltox) 0 5nM 50
x16 8nM 80 nM 17
x8 4nM 40 nM 29
x4 2nM 20 nM 22.6
x2 1nM 10 nM 19.9
IC50:IC50 0.5 nM 5nM 32.2
x1/2 0.25 nM 2.5 nM 53.1
x1/4 1.125nM 1.25nM 58.6
x1/8 0.0625 nM 0.625 nM 70.1
The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and mitoxantrone in SKI-DLCL cells can be seen in figure 7. The CI for this combination in SKI-DLCL cells is 0.646.
In table 7 is shown the combination of aplidine and mitoxantrone with the dose of (IC50:IC50) in K562cells.

Dose of APL Dose of Mitoxantrone Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) InM 0 50
IC50(Mltox) 0 7.5nft x16 16 nM 120 nM 9.9
x8 8nM 60 nM 11.6

ze>

x4 4nM 30 nM 11.0
x2 2nM 15 nM 13.8
IG50:IG50 imtf. 7.5 nRfl 20.6
x1/2 0.5 nM 3.75 nM 39.7
x1/4 0.25nM 1.8 nM 60.7
x 1/8 0.125 nM 0.9 nM 76.5
The CI for this combination in K562 cells is 0.487.
In table 8 is shown the combination of alidine and mthotrexate with the dose of (IC50:lC50) in CCRF-CEM cells.

Ratio Dose of APL Dose of Metotrexate Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) 0.5 nM 0 50
IC50(MTX) 0 10 nM 50
x16 8nM 160 nM 5
x8 4nM 80 nM 13
x4 2nM 40 nM 11
x2 1nM 20 nM 12
IC50:IC50 0.5 nM 10 nM 20
x1/2 0.25 nM 5nM 30
X1/4 1.125nM 2.5 nM 88
x1/8 0.0625 nM 1.25nM 100
The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of alidine and mthotrexate in CCRF-CEM cells can be seen in figure 8. The CI for this combination in CCRF-CEM cells is 0.950.
The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of aplidine and Doxorubicin in CCRF-CEM cells can be seen in figure 9. The CI for this combination in CCRF-CEM cells is 1.952.

21
The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of Aplidine and vnblastine in CCRF-CEM cells can be seen in figure 10. The CI for this combination in CCRF-CEM cells is 2.046.
In table 9 is shown the combination of alidine and dxorubicin with the dose of (IC50:IC50) in SKI-DLCL cells.

Ratio Dose of APL Dose of Doxorubicin Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) 0.5 nM 0 50
IC50(Doxo) 0 5nM 50
x16 8nM 80 nM 9.4 .
x8 4nM 40 nM 8.6
x4 2nM 20 nM 8
x2 1 nM 10 nM 9.7
IC50:IC50 0.5 nM 5nM 21
x1/2 0.25 nM 2.5 nM 40
x1/4 1.125 nM 1.25nM 45
X1/8 0.0625 nM 0.625 nM 49
The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of alidine and dxorubicin in SKI-DLCL cells can be seen in figure 11. The CI for this combination in SKI-DLCL cells is 0.478.
In table 10 is shown the combination of alidine and vnblastine with the dose of (IC50:or lC50) in SKI-DLCL cells.

Ratio Dose of APL DoseofVinbiastine Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) 0.5 nM 0 50
IC50(Vinb) 0 4nM 50

x16 8nM 64 nM 15
x8 4nM 32 nM 17
X4 2nM 16 nM 17
x2 , 1nM 8nM 21
IC50:IC50 Q.onM 4nM 29
xl/2 0.25 nM 2nM 25
x 1/4 1.125nM InM 28
x1/8 0.0625 nM 0.5 nM 38
The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of alidine and vnblastine in SKI-DLCL cells can be seen in figure 12. The CI for this combination in SKI-DLCL cells is 0.760.
In table 11 is shown the combination of alidine and mthylprednisolone with the dose of (IC50:lC50) in SKI-DLCL cells.

Dose of APL Dose of methylprednlsolone Viability (% of control)
Control 0 0 100
IC50(APL) 0.5 nM 0 50 .
IC50(Metpred) 0 160 nM 51
x16 8nM 2560 nM 10.8
x8 4nM 1280 nM 17.3
x4 2nM 640 nM 16.7
x2 1 nM 320 nM 17.4
IC50:IC50 0.5 nM 160 nM 24.7
x1/2 0.25 nM 80 nM 32.4
X1/4 1.125 nM 40 nM 39.1
x1/8 0.0625 nM 20 nM 50

The results of Chou-Talalay analysis of combination of alidine and mthylprednisolone in SKI-DLCL cells can be seen in figure 13. The CI for this combination in SKI-DLCL cells is 0.646.
Example 5.
We have also investigated the cytotosic effect of combination of IC20 (APL) with a variable dose of AraC on CCRF-CEM and SKI-DLCL cell lines. Aplidine in both cell lines potentiated the effect of AraC, the IC50 dose of AraC was reduced from. 30 nM to 1.6 nM in SKI-DLCL cell line, and from 10 nM to 0.8 nM in CCRF-CEM. cell line respectively (figure 14). Data was obtained after cell incubation for 96 hours and using XTT asay. The results represent means of three different experiments.
Example 6. In vivo studies.
We have performed in vivo experiments to study the effect of alidine alone and in combination with other drugs for rymphoid malignancies.
Determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD)in C.B.-17 sdd/scid rSCID mice)
We have used an in vivo model of human lymphoma in SCID mice for this purpose. Specifically, we have used CCRF-CEMS cells and CB.17 sdd/sdd mice. We have experience with this model and have evaluated drug treatments using this xenograft (Lacerda J.F. et al. Blood 85 (10): 2675-2679 (1995)). We found that a total dose of 1

mg/kg/ week given in five daily doses is the aplidine maximum dose that can be tolerated by mice.
Determination of in vivo antirumor effect of alidine as a single agent and in comnbination with AraC in SCID mice xenograft model
SCID mice were inoculated subcutaneously in the right flank with 107 CEM-T leukemic cells. They were observed twice weekly for tumor formation at the site of inoculation. After establishment of palpable tumor, alidine was injected as single agent and in combination with several doses of AraC to determine the antitumor effect. Mice were randomized to receive alidine alone at doses of 0.75 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, AraC alone at 50 mg/kg, or combination of Aplidine and AraC for all dose combinations. The AraC dose chosen for this combination is the dose at which the tumor growth was inhibited but no tumor regression occurred. All drugs were administered intra-peritoneally, and tumor size was compared to a control group of mice not receiving any treatment and for combination groups, compared to tumor sizes with single agent treatment.
The most effective combination was found to be AraC-50 mg/kg + alidine-0.75 mg/kg (figure 15).
These findings in respect of aplidine can be extended to aplidine analogues, derivatives and related compounds. For example, the present invention provides a combination of a compound such as those of WO 02 02596 with an anticancer drug, preferably an anti-leukemia drug or anti-lymphoma drug, notably methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone, vinblastine, methylprednisolone or doxorubicin.





We Claim :
1. A synergistic antitumour pharmaceutical composition comprising aplidine or an aplidine analogue and another anticancer drug selected from the group consisting of rnethotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone, vinblastine, methylprednisolone and doxorubicin, wherein Combination Index (CI) obtained by Chou-Talalay analysis is less than 1.
1. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 1,
wherein the aplidine or the aplidine analogue and the other
anticancer drug form part of the same medicament.
2. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 1,
wherein the aplidine or the aplidine analogue and the other
anticancer drug are provided as separate medicaments.
3. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 3.
wherein the separate medicament containing aplidine or the aplidine
analogue is for administration at the same time as the medicamenl
containing the other anticancer drug .
4. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 3,
wherein the separate medicament containing aplidine or the aplidine
analogue is for administration at a different time than the
medicament containing the other anticancer drug .
5. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any
preceding claims, wherein the cancer is leukaemia.
6. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any of
claims 1 to 5, wherein the cancer is lyrnphoma.

7. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any of
claims 1 to 7, wherein the aplidine or the aplidine analogue is
aplidine.
8. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any of
claims 1 to 8, wherein the other drug is methotrexate.
9. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any of
claims 1 to 8, wherein the other drug is cytosine arabinoside.

10. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any of
claims 1 to 8, wherein the other drug is mitoxantrone.
11. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any ol
claims 1 to 8, wherein the other drug is vinblastine.
12. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any of
claims 1 to 8, wherein the other drug is methylprednisolone.
13. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in any of
claims 1 to 8, wherein the other drug is doxorubicin.
14. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 1,
as and when used for the preparation of a kit together with
instructions for the use of each actor in combination for the
treatment of cancer.
15. A synergistic pharmaceutical composition and/or a kit for use in
the treatment substantially as herein described with reference to the
foregoing examples and accompanying drawings.

Documents:

3666-DELNP-2005-Abstract-(21-08-2008).pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Abstract-(23-12-2008).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-abstract.pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Claims-(21-08-2008).pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Claims-(23-12-2008).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-claims.pdf

3666-delnp-2005-correspondence-others (26.02.2009).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-correspondence-others-(19-01-2009).pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Correspondence-Others-(21-08-2008).pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Correspondence-Others-(23-12-2008).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-correspondence-others.pdf

3666-delnp-2005-description (complete)-21-08-2008.pdf

3666-delnp-2005-description (complete).pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Drawings-(21-08-2008).pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Drawings-(23-12-2008).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-drawings.pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Form-1-(21-08-2008).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-form-1.pdf

3666-delnp-2005-form-18.pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Form-2-(21-08-2008).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-form-2.pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Form-26-(21-08-2008).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-form-26.pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Form-3-(21-08-2008).pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Form-3-(23-12-2008).pdf

3666-delnp-2005-form-3.pdf

3666-delnp-2005-form-5.pdf

3666-delnp-2005-others-document-(19-01-2009).pdf

3666-DELNP-2005-Petition-137-(21-08-2008).pdf


Patent Number 235779
Indian Patent Application Number 3666/DELNP/2005
PG Journal Number 36/2009
Publication Date 04-Sep-2009
Grant Date 26-Aug-2009
Date of Filing 18-Aug-2005
Name of Patentee PHARMA MAR, S.A.
Applicant Address POLIGONO INDUSTRIAL LA MINA, AVDA. DE LOS REYES, 1, COLMENAR VIEJO, E-28770 MADRID, SPAIN.
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 BERTINO, JOSEPH R. , BARNEJEE, DEBABRATA AND GURAY, SAYDAM THE CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY, ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 195 LITTLE ALBANY STREET, NEW BRUNSWICK, NEEW JERSEY 08903, U.S.A.
2 JIMENO, JOSE PHARMA MAR S. A., CALLE DE LA CALERA, 3 POLIGONO INDUSTRIAL DE TRES CANTOS, TRES CANTOS 28760 MADRID, SPAIN.
3 FAIRCLOTH, GLYNN THOMAS PHARMA MAR U.S. A., INC., 320 PUTNAM AVENUE, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139-4616, U.S.A.
PCT International Classification Number A61K
PCT International Application Number PCT/US2004/007606
PCT International Filing date 2004-03-12
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 60/454,125 2003-03-12 U.S.A.