Title of Invention

A PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING ANTIOXIDANTS FROM SUGAR CANE AND BEET

Abstract A process for the manufacture of antioxidants enriched antioxidative functional foods from aqueous sugar containing solution functional food products with excellent anti oxidative strength have been prepared from natural sugar cane and beet. The processes used include one or more of the following: clarification, crystallization, chromatographic separation process, adsorption on/desorption from adsorbents, Ion exchange resin decolorization and regeneration, and Ultra-Nano membrane filtration. The anti oxidative capacities of the products are quantified in term of ORAC (Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity) unit as per analytical method developed at the Agricultural Research Services of U. S. Department of agriculture.
Full Text The invention relates to a process for manufacturing antioxidants from sugar cane and beet.
Antioxidants have been reported to have beneficial effect as stabilizers for food and potentially useful in prevention and/or treatment of some diseases. Various attempts have been made to produce antioxidants: (a) Zilliken has patented methods to produce antioxidants (USPTNO: 4,218,489 and 4,232,122) from fermented soybean product. However, the process involved extraction using petroleum based solvents which are difficult to operate/handle and render product quality problem related to the use of solvents, (b) Nguyen, et al patented a process (USPTNO: 5,017,397) for extracting antioxidants from Labiatae herbs. The process has limited practical applications because of the use of supercritical fluid extraction and fractionation with carbon dioxide. The process would be expensive both in capital and in operating costs, and (c) Gudin, et al patented a process (USPTNO: 5,179,012) for production of antioxidants from a microorganism culture in a photobioreactor by photosynthesis. The process involves complex operations and is subject to strict process control to make desired products. All the above processes also have limitations in producing large quantity of products.
This invention has the following advantages over the above mentioned existing arts: (a) the processes use well established unit operations/technologies with innovative modifications, (b) the sources of raw material are sugar cane and beet. Since sugar cane is known to be the most productive plant in production of carbohydrate per unit of farm land, the supply of raw material for antioxidants production is unlimited and inexpensive, and most importantly, (c) the antioxidants are from natural plant extracts-sugar cane and beets.

It has been well documented that sugar cane and beet plants derived compounds include flavonoids, substituted phenolics and polyphenolics. Farber and Carpenter (I); reviewed the literature on the subject of phenolics in sugar cane till 1972. Godshall and Roberts summarized the role of phenolics in sugar product in relation to the nature of colorants (2). The structure of colorants which partially derived from phenolic based plants pigments was discussed by Margaret A. Clark (3). More recently, Richard Riffer (4) described phenolics as a small but important part of non-sugar in the sugar processing of raw sugar and reported four flavonals and 25 flavones had been identified in sugar cane. A total of over 4000 flavonoids was reported to constitute a major dietary antioxidants considered to be responsible for a large part of antioxidative power of fruits and vegetables as reported by Judy McBride of Agricultural Research Service (5). In addition, a number of naturally occurring pigments in sugar cane, such as chlorogenic acid, hydroxy cinnamic acid, were identified by Farber (6). These compounds were reported to be very effective in antioxidative power (7, 8). Although these compounds are well known phytochemicals widely distributed in plants, including sugar cane and beets, and extensively studied by researchers in the sugar industry, however to-date, no attempt has ever been made by sugar researchers to correlate these findings to anti-oxidative activities as related to heath. All the studies have focused on the relationship between these substances and color in the sugar juice/sugar liquor, and the mechanism of their removal as part of colorants in sugar refining/manufacturing process to make white/refined sugar. This inventor is the first, to the best of my knowledge, to discover the excellent beneficial antioxidative capabilities of antioxidants from sugar cane and beets, and methods to produce it.

Food rich in antioxidants, as measured in ORAC unit, may protect cells and their components from oxidative damage based on studies of animals and human blood at the Agricultural Research Service's Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tuft University in Boston (9). ARS is the chief scientific agency of U.S. Department of Agriculture. ORAC, the abbreviation of Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity, is a laboratory analytical method for determination of total antioxidative fiinction of food and other substances. The method is developed by USDA scientists Drs. Guohum Cao and Donald L. Prior. Intake of high ORAC foods may help to reduce risk of diseases associated with aging of both body and brain. Cao and Prior suggested that daily intake of 3000 to 5000 ORAC imits should have significant impact on plasma and tissue anti-oxidative capacity. The ORAC values of top-scoring fruit and vegetable, prunes and kale, were reported to be 5770 and 1770 per 100 grams respectively (9).
In literature search covering all field only one paper, published in August 2001 (10) by a Japanese company, describes the physiological fiinction of sugar cane extracts. In this study, four extracts were obtained using chromatographic separation process, ion exchange resin process and hot water extraction of cane bagasse respectively. Certain extracts were found to exhibit phylotic effect, vaccine adjuvant effect and protection effects on liver injuries on studies using rat. Two extracts were shown to have super-oxide anion scavenging activities (SOD), a measure of antioxidative capacity according to the authors. However, the authors concluded that relationship between anti-oxidative capacity of the extracts and other physiological fiinction is not clear, as is the mechanism of such effect. It is unknown the correlation between SOD activity and ORAC unit.

In this patent application, the inventor describes methods to separate, enrich & concentrate antioxidants from sugar products to prepare high-ORAC functional food products for human consumption.
Sugar cane and beet embody highly color substances containing polyphenolics flavonoids and other compounds with significant anti-oxidative capacities. The beneficial health effect of plants* antioxidants has been widely reported in the literature. However, no patent reference is available citing sugar cane/beets as the sources for productions of antioxidants as functional food products. This inventor is the first to study and develop processes to produce functional food products with exceptional antioxidative capabilities from sugar cane and beets. The antioxidative power is quantified in term of ORAC unit, the abbreviation of Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity, a laboratory analytical method developed by USDA scientists for determination of total antioxidative function of food and other substances.
The invention covers the preparation of high ORAC, antioxidants enriched functional food products from sugar cane and beets employing a single or combination of standard chemical engineering separation processes, with modifications when needed: clarification, evaporation, crystallization, chromatographic techniques, adsorption/desorption, ion exchange decolorization and regeneration, and membrane Ultra- and Nano-filtrations.
Any and/or combination of the above processes can be used to produce antioxidants enriched functional food products from aqueous sugar containing solution from sugar cane and beets.
With reference to the accompanying drawings
Figure 1 is a simplified flow diagram for raw sugar and plantation white sugar production.

Figure 2 is a simplified flow diagram for production of refined sugar.
The figures depict processes for sugar production. The same principle of each process is used as part of processes for production of high ORAC, antioxidants enriched products.
To illustrate preparation of high ORAC antioxidants enriched products, an understanding of sugar manufacturing processes is essential as shown in figure 1 & 2. These standard processes, such as clarifications, decolorization/adsorption, ion exchange process, crystallization can be found in textbooks in great details (12,13). Figure 1 shows a simplified flow diagram for raw sugar and plantation white sugar production. Figure 2 shows a simplified flow diagram for production of "refined sugar".
(A) Clarification: As shown in figure 1, sugar juice is extracted fi"om sugar cane or beet either by milling or diffusion after initial crushing and/or shredding. The sugar juice normally has a color of between 5000 ICU (intemational color unit) to 25,000 ICU, which consists of about 78 to 90% sucrose and the balance of non-sucrose on dried basis. The non-sucrose fi^action includes ash, polysaccharide, gum, waxes, colorants, polyphenolics, flavonoids and other antioxidants etc. The sugar juice at about 15 brix (% dry solid) is then clarified, generally by three different processes. To make raw sugar with color ranging fi-om 700 to 8000 ICU, simple liming clarification is used.
To make plantation white sugar with color ranging fi'om 80 to 250 ICU, either sulfitation or carbonation process can be used. Raw sugar is subject to further refining process to make white sugar with color ranging fi-om 10 to 65 ICU. Plantation white sugar is for direct consumption, generally in developing

countries. Simple liming clarification removes the least non-sucrose, including color and other organic matters, among three processes. In general all three clarification processes are followed by a filtration step as needed in order to meet requirements as food grade products, Beet juice is clarified by carbonation. The sulfitation processes generally include first sulfitation and second sulfitation, and reduce up to 40% of juice color. The carbonation process normally is to be followed by another simple sulfitation and remove up to 65% color. Since color is a degree of measurement of antioxidants, processes with high color removal efficient, such as carbonation would result in clarified juice with less antioxidants constituents.
All the food grade products for human consumption need to be manufactured in accordance to regulatory requirements with respect to GMP (god manufacturing practice), use of direct and indirect additives, and processing aids, etc. Therefore, raw sugar juice, which is fiill of suspended solids and microbes, need to be clarified first before further processing by evaporation, crystallization and centrifijgation. The processes most used are simple liming, sulfitation, phosphatation and carbonation. As discussed earlier, certain clarification process, such as carbonation, absorbs/removes significant quantity of colorants/antioxidants fi'om sugar stream and disposed off as carbonate cake. For example, the total phenolics contents of a cane mixed juice is 1127ppm, the carbonated clarified juice has a content of 298ppm, a 73.5% removal rate. Another sample with initial phenolics contents of l,966ppm, it dropped to 280ppm, an 85.8% reduction after carbonation. Therefore, appropriate processes must be developed to clarify raw juice without significant removal of high ORAC constituents, such as polyphenolics, flavonolds, etc. We found that, clarification by simple liming and/or soda, ash preserved/retained high ORAC constituents in the clarified juice as shown below:

The details of clarification of raw juice or sugar liquor are described in several textbooks, such as Cane Sugar Handbook (13). In general, raw juice/sugar liquor at temperature of 50°C to 80 °C is coarse screened to remove large suspended particles, followed by addition of about lOOppm to 1 % of processing aids and reheated to between 85^C to llO'^C before entering a clarifier. The retention time in clarifier range from 30 minutes to 3 hours. The time, temperature and amount of processing aids depend on the purity of sugar solution being treated. Since sugar juices purity usually varies from 78 to 90% depending on weather, crop seasons and farm region, the important criteria is to select conditions which would produce clear clarified sugar solution without removing significant amount of high ORAC anti-oxidants. We have found through out the tests that processing aids dosage of less than 1 % meet the requirements.
Example: We have found that a coarse screened raw syrup has a very high ORAC value of 35,600 unit/100 gram of dry soHd Another sample produced an ORAC value of 27,226 units /100 gram. The inventor was pleasantly shocked to find such a high ORAC unit for the cane juice. Previous findings for "B" and "C" molasses from a carbonation factory only gave 5,755 and 4,835 ORAC units per 100 gram on dried basis. However, these products are not food grade because the sugar solution is not clarified. For comparison purposes, it should be noted again that the ORAC value of prunes, oranges, kale and spinach are 5,770, 750, 1,770 and 1,260 per 100 gram of sample as received. If these units were converted to dry solid basis, the value would be much higher for these fruits and vegetables. These data are published with copy right by Agricultural Research Service in USDA Agricultural Research Magazine on February 1999 issue.

Example: (a) A sample of cane syrup clarified to meet food grade requirements, by lime addition as processing aid produced an ORAC value of 36,051 unit /100 gram dried solid, (b) Another sample of cane syrup clarified by lime addition had an ORAC value of 29,830 unit, (c) A sample of cane juice clarified with soda ash produced an ORAC value of 36,491 units per 100 grams of dried solid, (d) Another soda ash treated sample has an ORAC value of 25,228 units. With all the processing aids used for clarification, such as liming, soda ash addition, carbonation, sulfitation, and phosphatation, the carbonation with large quantity of lime followed by gassing with carbon dioxide for pH control, removes the most color/antioxidants. Therefore, conventional carbonation is not suitable for preparation of high ORAC product. For example, (e) a carbonated syrup only gave 4,835 units of ORAC even after concentration twice by crystallization.
Treatment of sugar containing solution using chemical processing aids, such as lime, sulfur dioxide, soda ash or phosphoric acid, removes macromolecules and suspended solid, including microbes without significant removal of antioxidants.
The phosphation and carbonation in the second step of sugar refining remove approximately 55 to 60% colorant and therefore the antioxidants. Since the resulting carbonate cake or phosphate scum is subsequently discarded/ disposed off. It is very difficult, at least economically, to recover antioxidants from those waste streams.
(B) Crystallization: Referring back to Figure 1, the clarified juice is further subject to crystallization in vacuum pans after evaporation. The massecuite fi'om crystallization in a vacuum pan is then centrifuged to separate mother liquor

from crystal sugar. Since crystallization is one of the best purification steps, with about 50% yield of sucrose, the colorants/anti-oxidants normally remained in the mother liquor. Therefore, crystallization is an excellent way to enrich/concentrate antioxidants for production of high-ORAC functional food products.
Referring to figure 2, for refining of raw sugar to make refined sugar, the first step is affination, which involves mechanically "washing" the raw sugar with recycled affination syrup. The affination process mechanically removes about 75 to 85% of total non-sucrose, including colorants/antioxidants, from the surface of raw sugar crystal, indicating exclusion of non-sugar during the crystallization. This again indicates the effectiveness of crystallization step as an excellent way for concentration of anti-oxidants into the mother liquor.
Example: Crystallization of "A" syrup with ORAC unit of 4,046 gave a B molasses with enriched ORAC of 6,604 and a sugar depleted with ORAC at 1867 unit.
(C) Chromatographic separation process: The process is widely used in the beet industries to recover additional sucrose from molasses. It basically separates the molasses into two fractions: sucrose fraction with about 90% recovery and a second fraction of non-sucrose stream, which include organic and inorganic constituents. In case of cane molasses a small third fraction of invert sugars is also obtained. In practice any process stream in a sugar plant can be subjected to chromatographic fractionation to obtain a non-sugar fraction. It is well accepted that, the concentration factors for non-sugar fractions from a conventional chromatographic separation process are six and two respectively for cane juice and molasses.

Example: A "C" molasses with ORAC of 5,755 would give a nonsugar fraction with ORAC value of 11,510 units.
(D) Adsorption/Desorption: The secondary decolorization step in figure 2 involved the use of adsorbents, such as granular carbon and/or bone char. These processes remove, by adsorption onto their surface, over 80% of colorants/ antioxidants from sugar containing solution. In sugar plants, these exhausted granular carbon and bone char are thermally regenerated/reactivated by burning off adsorbed colorants and other organic matter under limited oxygen atmosphere at about 1800 °F and 1100 ^F respectively. We have developed an economical way to desorb or to strip off the colorants/antioxidants from these adsorbents using alkaline solution, to give concentrated high-ORAC. antioxidants enriched products.
Since many colorants, including polyphenolics and flavonoids, posses aromatic character, they are easily adsorbed onto hydrophobic carbon surface. After the "decolorization" or adsorption of color onto its surface, the carbon can be washed with water and then the remaining colorants/antioxidants can be de-sorbed, eluted, or strip off the carbon surface using 0.5 to 2% sodium hydroxide solution. This adsorption/desorption phenomenon was described in some detail by Chou and Rizzato (II). Although Amberlite XAD-2 (made by Rohm and Haas Company) were used in their study, the adsorbent is known to have similar hydrophobic nature as carbon and follow the general theory of adsorption (12). Adsorbents such as XAD-2 and XAD-1150 (Rohm and Haas) have minimal ftinctional groups for ion exchange, but have excellent adsorption capacities through their hydrophobic surface similar to carbon.
We have discovered that the use of carbon and other similar adsorbents, such as Amberlite XAD-2, XAD-1150 via adsorption/desorption process

described above is exceptionally effective for preparation of concentrated antioxidants mixtures from aqueous sugar containing solution. For further purification and concentration of these antioxidants mixtures contained in the eluents from the desorption process, or desorbed/ stripped off solutions, strong acid cation (SAC) exchange resin in hydrogen form (H"^ form), such as Tulsion T-42MP H"^, is used to remove the ash (deashing) including NaOH used for elutions, from the eluents or desorbed/strlpped off solutions.
Example: (1) XAD adsorbents column test: (a), twenty liters of clarified cane syrup, with an initial ORAC value of 54,172 unit per 100 gram dried solid, at 60 brix and 65°C was pumped through a 2.5 x 60 cm column filled with Rohm and Hass XAD-1150 as adsorbent, (b) the column was then wash/desweetened off with deionized hot water, (c) the water washed column was then elutedAvashed with 1 to 2% NaOH solution, (d) the antioxidants containing effluents (eluents/ desorbed solutions) from above step (c) is then passed through another column filled with deashing strong acid cation resin (SAC), TulsionT-42MP H^ form, to remove ash including NaOH in the eluents, (e) the eluents from above step (d) was concentrated to give a functional food products containing exceptionally high antioxidants with final ORAC value of 1.26 millions per 100 gram on dried solid basis.
It should be noted from this test that there was a 23.2 folds (times) increase in the antioxidants concentration produced by this adsorption/ desorption process.
(2) Granular activated carbon (GAC) column test: (a), twenty liters of clarified cane syrup, with an initial ORAC value of 54,172 unit per 100 gram dried solid, at 60 brix and 65°C was pumped through a 2,5 x 60 cm column

filled with granular activated carbon (GAC), (b) the column was then washed/desweetened off with deionized hot water, (c) the water washed column was then eluted/washed with 1 to 2% NaOH, solution, (d) the antioxidants containing effluents (eluents/ desorbed/stripped off solutions) from above step (c) is then passed through another column filled with deashing strong acid cation (SAC) resin. Tulsion T-42MP H^ form, to remove ash including NaOH in the eluents, (e) the eluents from above step (d) was concentrated to give a functional food products containing high antioxidants with ORAC value of 64,230 unit per 100 gram on dried solid basis. The adsorption/desorption process using granular carbon adsorbents still produced significantly higher antioxidants product.
(3) Granular activated carbon (GAC) batch test, (a) A 30 brix "C"
molasses with an initial ORAC of 5,755 unit is mixed with granulated activated
carbon (GAC) at 80*^C for two hour, (b) After filtering out the sugar solution,
the carbon is first washed/desweetened with hot water, (c) the washed carbon
was then mixed with sodium hydroxide solution for two hour at pH 9 to
desorb/strip off antioxidants from carbon surface and then filtered. The filtrate
has an enriched ORAC of 18,036 unit on dried basis, at the same purity of 50%
as that of "C molasses.
(4) A repeated test of above (3) gave a product with an ORAC unit of
18,436 as compared to 18,036 ORAC unit of test (3).
(E) Ion Exchange Resin decolorization and regeneration. In sugar processing, ion exchange resin, exhausted with color exchange capacity, is reactivated/regenerated with about 8% sodium chloride and 0.5% caustic soda brine solution (regenerant). About 90% of colorants exchanged on to the resin is desorbed and concentrated in the brine regenerants. This regenerant would be a good source of antioxidants if a nano-membrane process or strong acid cation

(SAC) resin is used to separate/remove sodium chloride, caustic soda and other ash from colorants/antioxidants.
Example: A 60 purity "B" molasses with an initial ORAC value of 4,186 was passed through ion exchange resin at 65 brix and 80°C. After the resin was exhausted with colorants/ antioxidants, the resin was washed with hot water and then regenerated by elution with caustic brine solution to desorb and strip off colorants/antioxidants. The brine solution containing antioxidants (regenerant) has an ORAC value of 16,744 at the same 60% purity of "B" molasses, a four-time increase in antioxidants concentration. The antioxidants mixture can further be purified/concentrated by nano membrane filtration or by strong acid cation (SAC) deashing resin as discussed before.
(F) Cross flow tangential membrane Ultra- and Nano-filtration process is another good way to produce high ORAC food products from sugar processing stream. Cross flow tangential membrane filtration is widely used in the com industries for specialty products manufacturing. The theory and practices of the processes can be found in the Ultrafiltration Handbook by Munir Chervan (14). Membrane filtration by definition, is a process to separate two or more components from a fluid stream. The degree of separation will depend on the particle or molecular size (or molecular weight) of the components and the pore size of the membrane. Many vendors supply a series of membranes with various molecular weight cut-off limits. For example, Koch membrane system K-131 has a molecular weight (MW) cut-off limit of MW=10,000. Most antioxidants with molecular weight larger than 10,000 will be retained and concentrated on the retentate side. Sucrose (MW=342), glucose, fructose, water and inorganic ash will pass through the membrane as permeates stream. K-328, MPF-36 and MPF-34 membranes have molecular weight cut-off limits of 5000, 1000 and 200 respectively. You can select the type of membranes to achieve your

separation objectives. Strength of antioxidants in the retentate can also be controlled by the concentration factor of the membrane separation process. Concentration factor of IX represent 50% recovery, concentration factor of lOX represent 90% recovery.
Example: A "B" molasses with an initial ORAC value of 6,604 unit was diluted to 10 brix and passed through UF membrane with a molecular weight cut off limit of 50,000 to 100,000. The test gave an antioxidants enriched retantate with an ORAC of 6,651 at one (1) X concentration factor and 12,015 at concentration factor of nine (9) X. Another test gave a retantate with ORAC value of 8,807 unit at a concentration factor of nine (9) X. Although there were some increase of ORAC value for the retantate at a concentration factor of 1 X in these tests. It is obvious that a membrane with less than 50,000 molecular weight cut off limits will be needed to be more effective in concentrating antioxidants.



We claim:
1. A process for the manufacture of antioxidants enriched antioxidative
functional foods from aqueous sugar containing solution, extracted from sugar
cane or sugar beet, containing sugar, organic and inorganic non sugar, said
process comprising the steps of clarification with processing aid(s) and/or one
or more of the following processes selected from
crystallization/recrystallization, chromatographic separation, adsorption and
desorption using adsorbents, regeneration from ion exchange decolorization
resin, cross flow tangential ultra membrane filtration and nano membrane
filtration, to enrich, purify, and obtain concentrate high antioxidants functional
foods.
2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the said aqueous sugar solution is clarified, using one or more of the following processing aids selected from lime, soda ash, sulfur dioxide, aluminum chloride and carbon dioxide to produce clarified sugar containing solution rich in antioxidants as functional food products.
3. The process according to claim 2, wherein the clarified sugar containing solution is converted into antioxidants enriched functional food products, either in diluted or in concentrated or in dried form, and crystal sugar depleted with antioxidants.
4. The process according to claim 2, wherein the clarified sugar containing
solution is subjected to a chromatographic process to give antioxidants enriched
functional food products, either in diluted or in concentrated or in dried form.

5. The process according to claim 4, wherein the high antioxidants enriched hquid products are further subjected to ion exchange deashing resin or nano membrane filtration, to remove ash components and give low ash high antioxidants enriched food products, either in diluted or in concentrated or in dried form.
6. The process according to claim 2, wherein the clarified sugar containing solution is subjected to an adsorption process by passing through, or in contact with adsorbents, such as granular or powdered carbon, bone char and other adsorbents, such as Rohm and Haas XAD-series products.
7. The process according to claim 6, wherein the adsorption process
comprises extraction or elution from stripped off with alkaline solution, such as
caustic soda, soda ash solution to give a high antioxidants enriched functional
food products, either in diluted or in concentrated or in dried form.
8. The process according to claim 6, wherein the high antioxidants extracts/
eluents from adsorbents is further subjected to ion exchange deashing resin or
nano-membrane filtration to remove ash components to give low ash high
antioxidants enriched food products, either in diluted or in concentrated or in
dried form.
9. The process according to claim 2, wherein the clarified sugar containing
solution is subjected to ion exchange processes by passing through or in contact
with ion exchange resins, followed by regeneration or elution of adsorbed
and/or exchanged antioxidants from the ion exchange resins using an alkaline

brine solution containing about 8% sodium chloride and about 1% sodium hydroxide, to give high antioxidants enriched functional food products, either in diluted or in concentrated or in dried form.
10. The process according to claim 9, wherein the high antioxidants
regenerant/eluents are further subjected to ion exchange deashing resin or nano-
membrane filtration to remove ash components give low ash high antioxidants
enriched food products, either in diluted or in concentrated or in dried form.
11. The process according to claim 2, wherein the clarified sugar containing
solution is subjected to ultra- or nano- membrane filtration with maximum pore
size equivalent to molecular cut-off limit of 75,000 to give a high antioxidants
enriched food retentate product, and a food permeate product, either in diluted
or in concentrated or in dried forms.
12. A process for the manufacture of antioxidants enriched antioxidative
functional foods from aqueous sugar containing solution, substantially as
hereinabove described and exemplified.

Documents:

0322-che-2003 abstract duplicate.pdf

0322-che-2003 claims duplicate.pdf

0322-che-2003 description (complete) duplicate.pdf

0322-che-2003 drawings duplicate.pdf

322-che-2003-abstract.pdf

322-che-2003-claims.pdf

322-che-2003-correspondnece-others.pdf

322-che-2003-correspondnece-po.pdf

322-che-2003-description(complete).pdf

322-che-2003-drawings.pdf

322-che-2003-form 1.pdf

322-che-2003-form 18.pdf

322-che-2003-form 26.pdf

322-che-2003-form 3.pdf


Patent Number 230486
Indian Patent Application Number 322/CHE/2003
PG Journal Number 13/2009
Publication Date 27-Mar-2009
Grant Date 26-Feb-2009
Date of Filing 16-Apr-2003
Name of Patentee E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD
Applicant Address BIO PRODUCTS DIVISION, DARE HOUSE, 243, N.S.C. BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 001,
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 CHUNG CHI CHOU 103A,PIDGEON HILL ROAD, SOUTH HUNTINGTON,
PCT International Classification Number A61K35/78
PCT International Application Number N/A
PCT International Filing date
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 10/127,141 2002-04-22 U.S.A.