Title of Invention

A METHOD FOR PREPARING A MIXUTURE OF FRESH FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING CATALYSTS FOR USE IN AN FCCU OPERATION.

Abstract A method for preparing a mixture of FCC catalyst components for use in an FCCU, which comprises: performing an analysis of an FCCU operation; determining the catalyst requirements for the FCCU, based on said analysis; determining the catalytic properties of at least two FCC catalyst components selected from the group consisting of untreated equilibrium FCC catalyst, reactivated equilibrium FCC catalyst, demetallized equilibrium FCC catalyst, reactivated and demetallized equilibrium FCC catalyst and fresh high activity FCC catalyst containing a zeolite component; and blending said at least two components in proportions, based on the determined properties of said at least two components and the determined-catalyst requirements, to form a mixture of the components suitable for addition to the FCCU.
Full Text WO 2004I/033589 PCT/US2003/028561
A METHOD FOR PREPARING A SUBSTITUTE FOR FRESH FLUID
CATALYTIC CRACKING CATALYST
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[001] This invention relates to a method for improved fluid catalytic
cracking (FCC) catalyst management by preparing a mixture of two or more of
fresh, treated FCC equilibrium catalyst, untreated FCC equilibrium catalyst,
and one or more FCC additives for use as a substitute for fresh catalyst
addition to an FCC unit (FCCU) or for use as supplemental catalyst addition
along with a reduced amount of fresh catalyst addition to the FCCU.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[002] The fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process has been in
operation for over 50 years and has gone through many changes. These
changes have been in the well-known catalyst and additives employed in the
process, as well as mechanical and process changes. In the last decade
there has been a slow but constant pressure and realization that proper FCC
catalyst management can result in a significant reduction in the FCC
operating costs and improved FCC operating stability.
[003] A first significant disclosure for improved FCC catalyst
management was disclosed in my European Patent Application No. 0 408 606
B1 "Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Catalyst and Additive Loading Control
System" and in the Bartholic, Lippert U.S. Patent No. 5.389,236 "Method and
Apparatus for Controlling Introduction of Catalysts into FCC Units", which are
incorporated by reference in their entirety in this application. These two
publications disclose an improved method for adding fresh FCC catalyst and
FCC additives to an FCCU, Refiners who have employed these systems
have noted improvements in the operating stability of their FCC unit (FCCU)
and reduced catalyst/additive usage, which translates into reduced unit
operating costs, and more on-specification products. The use of these
1

WO 2O04/O33589 PCT/US2003/02856I
systems for FCC additive addition has been widely employed. However, the
use of these systems for fresh catalyst addition has not been widely accepted,
because it requires a fairly large capital expenditure and replacement of the
existing fresh catalyst storage hopper of the FCCU.
[004] In my U.S. Patent No. 5,888,919 "Process for Zeolitic Catalyst
Reactivation" and the Bartholic, Davis U.S. Patent No. 5,900,383 "Process for
Increasing the Activity of Zeolite Containing Particulate Solids", which are
incorporated by reference in their entirety in this application, there are
disclosed processes which enable for the reuse of FCC equilibrium catalyst by
Increasing the equilibrium catalyst activity through forming what is referred to
herein as "reactivated FCC equilibrium catalyst".
[005] There are also well-known processes for removing deposited
metals, primarily Ni and V, from equilibrium catalyst to form what is referred to
herein as "demetalized equilibrium FCC catalyst". One such process, known
as DEMET, was originally developed by ARCO in the 1950's and 1960's to
remove metals from high aluminia FCC equilibrium catalyst. This process
was further developed to remove metals from zeolitic FCC equilibrium
catalyst. An improved DEMET process is described in U.S. Patent No.
4,686,197, which is incorporated herein by reference. More recently, Coastal
Corporation, has further refined this process to remove metals
(demetalization) and increase the activity (reactivation) of zeolitic catalyst.
This latter process is referred to as the ACT Process and is described in U.S.
Patent No. 6.046,125, which is incorporated herein by reference. It should be
noted that demetalization refers to the removal of one or more metal elements
that are deposited on the catalyst from the feed and are considered to be
detrimental to the FCC catalyst activity or yield structure of the product of the
process. Among these metals are Ni, which increases hydrogen production,
and Na and V, which are also detrimental to catalyst activity.
[006] Up until now, the typical refiner has added fresh catalyst and
additives to maintain the desired catalyst activity in the FCCU and has
withdrawn excess equilibrium catalyst to maintain the desired unit inventory.
In an FCCU, I estimate that only about 30%, more or less, of the circulating
2

WO 2004/033589 PCT/US2OO3/O28561
catalyst inventory has a substantial catalytic activity. The other 70 wt%, more
or less, is relatively catalytically inert. Of the 30% active material, the activity
of the circulating catalyst particles ranges from a high of fresh catalyst activity
to very low activity. If one uses an activity test unit to quantify the activity
(defined as conversion to lower molecular weight hydrocarbons of a standard
gas oil feed in the activity test unit divided by the quantity {100- [conversion in
the activity test unit] }), the circulating catalyst inventory in a typical FCCU
might have an activity of 2.33 (for 70% conversion in activity test unit; i.e.,
70/100-70=2.33). The fresh catalyst activity might be 13.28 (for 93%
conversion) or 5.7 times as active as the circulating catalyst inventory, which
is sometimes referred to equilibrium catalyst or ECAT. The inert catalyst
particles in the circulating catalyst inventory might have an activity of 0.33 (for
25% conversion). More importantly, if one compares the coke yield on the
activity test for these activity ranges, one might find the coke yield for the
fresh catalyst to be 3 to 5 times higher than the coke yield on the ECAT. This
is important since it limits the zeolite content of fresh FCC catalyst to about
15-30% in the typical FCCU.
[007] Because of environmental concerns and disposal costs, most
refiners withdraw a minimum of equilibrium catalyst from their units. In this
case, the fresh catalyst added to the FCCU is typically selected and added to
maintain a desired yield structure and unit activity and to make up for unit
catalyst losses through the cyclones of the FCCU.
[008] Equilibrium catalyst or ECAT is defined as the catalyst that is
circulating in the FCCU and consists of the fresh FCC catalyst and FCC
additives which were just added to the unit plus the FCC catalyst and FCC
additives which have made more than one cycle between the reactor and the
regenerator of the FCCU and are less active than the fresh catalyst and
additives. In those units that process feedstocks which contain metals and
other catalyst poisons the equilibrium catalyst also has thereon metals and
poisons deposited from the feedstock.
[009] Some refiners processing high quality feeds (containing low
metals and catalyst poisons) may elect to add more fresh catalyst than the
3

WO 2OO4/033589 PCT/US2003/028561
amount lost from the unit. Therefore, they will withdraw ECAT that is usually
of high quality (low metals, higher than normal activity) that they will then sell
to operators of units which process residual oil or might be experiencing a
high catalyst loss problem. This high quality ECAT is typically sold at less
than 50% of the fresh catalyst selling price.
[010] Units processing residual oil that contains metals, such as Ni,
V, and Na, and other catalyst poisons in excessive amounts will require that
the refiner add fresh catalyst or high quality ECAT to maintain the unit ECAT
activity and metals level at some predetermined value that will give the
desired unit yield structure and profitability. In this case, usually the amount
of catalyst addition is more than the catalyst losses from the unit, so the
refiner must remove ECAT from the unit for disposal. Since this ECAT is of
poor quality, the refiner must pay for its disposal.
[011] In a typical FCCU adding fresh catalyst, a large percentage
(30-70%) of the fresh catalyst is lost through the cyclone system of the unit.
The majority of the initial loss is the catalyst fines and moisture contained in
the fresh catalyst, plus some loss by attrition. The rest of the loss of catalyst
from the unit is mainly equilibrium catalyst and the amount varies with the
cyclone efficiency, because the cyclones are less than 100% efficient in
separating the catalyst from the vapors. In FCC units that have metals in the
feed, the type and quantity of catalyst addition will be determined to control
both the equilibrium catalyst activity/selectivity and level of metals deposited
on the catalyst. Some refiners have added purchased equilibrium catalyst to
their unit to control the unit inventory, selectivity, metals level and/or activity of
the circulating catalyst inventory (note: ECAT losses are considerably less
than that of fresh catalyst, since the ECAT has very low fines and moisture
content and low attrition). Typically, these refiners will purchase low metals
equilibrium catalyst with an activity equal to or greater than the catalyst
activity in their units and add this purchased ECAT in place of fresh catalyst
addition.
[012] Up until now, because of limitations in FCCU catalyst
hopper/storage capacity to segregate catalyst types, the typical refiner has
4

WO 2004/033589 PCT/US2003/028561
amount lost from the unit. Therefore, they will withdraw ECAT that is usually
of high quality (low metals, higher than normal activity) that they will then sell
to operators of units which process residual oil or might be experiencing a
high catalyst loss problem. This high quality ECAT is typically sold at less
than 50% of the fresh catalyst selling price.
[010] Units processing residual oil that contains metals, such as Ni,
V, and Na, and other catalyst poisons in excessive amounts will require that
the refiner add fresh catalyst or high quality ECAT to maintain the unit ECAT
activity and metals level at some predetermined value that will give the
desired unit yield structure and profitability. In this case, usually the amount
of catalyst addition is more than the catalyst losses from the unit, so the
refiner must remove ECAT from the unit for disposal. Since this ECAT is of
poor quality, the refiner must pay for its disposal.
[011] In a typical FCCU adding fresh catalyst, a large percentage
(30-70%) of the fresh catalyst is lost through the cyclone system of the unit.
The majority of the initial loss is the catalyst fines and moisture contained in
the fresh catalyst, plus some loss by attrition. The rest of the loss of catalyst
from the unit is mainly equilibrium catalyst and the amount varies with the
cyclone efficiency, because the cyclones are less than 100% efficient in
separating the catalyst from the vapors. In FCC units that have metals in the
feed, the type and quantity of catalyst addition will be determined to control
both the equilibrium catalyst activity/selectivity and level of metals deposited
on the catalyst. Some refiners have added purchased equilibrium catalyst to
their unit to control the unit inventory, selectivity, metals level and/or activity of
the circulating catalyst inventory (note: ECAT losses are considerably less
than that of fresh catalyst, since the ECAT has very low fines and moisture
content and low attrition). Typically, these refiners will purchase low metals
equilibrium catalyst with an activity equal to or greater than the catalyst
activity in their units and add this purchased ECAT in place of fresh catalyst
addition.
[012] Up until now, because of limitations in FCCU catalyst
hopper/storage capacity to segregate catalyst types, the typical refiner has
4

WO 2004/0033589 PCT/US2003/028561
usually been restrained to the use of one fresh FCC catalyst or one outside
supply of FCC ECAT that is added from the fresh catalyst storage hopper of
the FCCU. That is, the typical FCCU has one fresh storage hopper and one
equilibrium storage hopper. Therefore, if the refiner purchases FCC ECAT
from an outside source, he must use the fresh catalyst storage hopper to add
this material. If he adds this outside-purchased material to the ECAT storage
hopper, there will be cross contamination with the unit's ECAT when unit
ECAT is withdrawn to maintain unit inventory or during a shutdown, when the
unit inventory is removed from the unit to the ECAT storage hopper. If the
refiner wants to add both fresh and outside ECAT to his unit, then he must
install another addition hopper for this outside ECAT.
[013] As the number of catalyst additives, fresh catalyst, and
equilibrium catalyst employed in the FCCU increases, the number of hoppers
for catalyst addition and catalyst storage increases, and the catalyst
management associated with this part of the FCCU operation takes up more
and more time and resources. Every time a new catalyst, fresh or equilibrium,
or catalyst additive, arrives at the refinery, it must be weighed on the refinery
scale, the hopper must be inventoried by transferring from the truck, rail car,
or container. This transfer requires depressuring the existing hopper, pulling
a vacuum on the hopper, connecting the truck, rail car, or container to the
hopper, connecting up pressuring air and conveying air, and manually
regulating the transfer of the material into the hopper. After the transfer is
complete, the hopper must be pressured and placed back in service, and the
above procedure reversed so that the truck, rail car, or container can be
weighed to determine the amount of catalyst delivered. Given the size of the
equipment involved, this procedure may take eight hours or more, and ties up
personnel that have other duties.
[014] The present invention concerns a method which improves
catalyst management so as to reduce the associated time required by the
refinery personnel. The present invention also reduces the overall catalyst
costs. A further objective of the present invention is to reduce catalyst
transportation costs. Also, the present invention enables the refiner to form
5

WO 2OO4/O33589 PCT/US2OO3/O2856I
an alliance with a single catalyst supplier, who would supply all the refiner's
requirements for fresh, equilibrium, demetalized, and reactivated FCC catalyst
and FCC additives. This is especially useful as more and more consolidation
in the refining industry occurs. Another object of this invention is to utilize the
weigh scale function as described in U.S. Patent No. 5,389,236 to supply
signals to an offsite location that can monitor the FCC unit inventory of fresh
catalyst and additives. In this way, the refiner can maintain minimum FCC
catalyst inventory (lower cost) and the supplier can deliver product only when
required. Another object of the present invention is to provide the refiner with
the ability to select from a multiple of sources (fresh, reactivated ECAT,
demetalized ECAT, additives) for the FCCU "fresh catalyst" (hereinafter
referred to as "intermediate fresh catalyst" or, IFC) that will result in the
desired unit yield structure and activity at the lowest possible price. Still
another object of the present invention is to reduce the refiner's capital
requirements, in that he will not be required to add more hoppers or build
on-site demetalization or reactivation systems. In addition, this invention
enables reuse of ECAT, which will result in the use of less raw materials and
energy, reduce unit catalyst losses, result in a higher unit activity than an
equivalent fresh catalyst, since more of the ECAT will remain in the unit
compared to fresh catalyst, and result in less disposal to landfill.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[015] What I have discovered is that, by utilizing sources of ECAT,
catalyst demetalization facilities, catalyst reactivation facilities, and/or the
ability to manufacture fresh catalyst with zeolite contents of greater than 20%,
and by blending the resulting materials, with or without FCC additives, an IFC
can be produced that will satisfy the refiner's FCC catalyst requirements at a
lower cost, e.g., 50% to 80% of the refiner's present fresh FCC catalyst cost.
This will also decrease the refiners catalyst management time, capital
requirements, number of additive hoppers at the FCCU, and the number of
catalyst shipments that need to be received by the refiner. In a preferred
embodiment of this invention, a signal from an FCCU's additive hopper(s) to a
6

WO 2004/033589 PCT/US2OO3/O2856I
remote location can be used to facilitate catalyst inventory control and reduce
operating costs.
[016] To achieve the objects of the present invention, there is
provided a method for preparing a mixture of FCC catalyst components for
use in an FCCU, which comprises: performing an analysis of an FCCU
operation; determining the catalyst requirements for the FCCU based on said
analysis; determining the catalytic properties of at least two FCC catalyst
components selected from the group consisting of untreated equilibrium FCC
catalyst, reactivated equilibrium FCC catalyst, demetallized equilibrium FCC
catalyst, reactivated and demetallized equilibrium FCC catalyst and fresh high
activity FCC catalyst containing a zeolite component; and blending said at
least two components in proportions, based on the determined properties of
said at least two components and the determined catalyst requirements, to
form a mixture of the components suitable for addition to the FCCU.
[017] Preferably, the mixture is added to the FCC unit through a
weighed catalyst addition system, and a signal from a weighing device is used
to control the inventory of the catalyst addition system. If the equilibrium
hopper is also equipped with weigh cells, the unit catalyst withdrawals can be
automated and the equilibrium catalyst hopper inventory continually
monitored, which will improve ECAT management. If the equilibrium hopper
is also equipped with weight cells, the unit catalyst withdrawals can be
automated and the continually equilibrium catalyst hopper inventory
monitored, which will improve ECAT management.
[018] The objectives of this invention can be realized by analyzing
the operation of an FCCU and determining the catalyst and additive
requirements for the operation, and then premixing all or part of the required
FCC catalyst and catalyst additive in an off-site facility, or the individual
components of the mixture can be mixed on-site in the addition hopper
located in the unit. In a preferred embodiment of this invention, the catalyst
addition hopper and ECAT hopper have weight cells or a weighing device that
gives a continuous readout of the weight of the catalyst in the hopper. This
device can generate a signal which can, if desired, also be supplied to an
7

WO 2004/O33589 PCT/US2OO3/O28561
offsite location, such as the catalyst supplier's offices, so that the supplier can
monitor the unit inventory of fresh catalyst, ECAT, and additives. In this way,
the refiner can maintain minimum catalyst inventory (lower cost) and the
supplier can deliver the necessary catalyst and additives and remove ECAT
only when required.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[019] The invention will be more fully understood from the-following
description thereof read with reference to the accompanying drawing,
wherein:
[020] Fig. 1 illustrates a preferred apparatus and flow diagram useful
in the practice of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
[021] In the practice of this invention, in order to determine what
properties must be associated with the IFC catalyst, the supplier and refiner
need to analyze the FCC operations. This would normally entail evaluating
the currently-used catalyst and additives being added to the unit and ECAT
properties (chemical and physical), such as, activity, zeolite content, pore
volume, surface area, particle size distribution, additive concentrations,
hydrogen production, carbon on catalyst, and the contents of rare earth,
sodium, iron, nickel, vanadium, and copper plus any other catalyst properties
that might be effecting the operation. One would also evaluate the unit yields
and product properties, the unit limitations, the unit's catalyst and additive
addition rates and withdrawals, and the refiner's objectives. In addition, the
feedstock source and properties, such as, gravity, sulfur, ramsbottom carbon,
nitrogen (basic and total), distillation, aniline point, PONA, and the amount of
nickel, vanadium, sodium, iron and copper plus any other feedstock related ,
details that might effect the operation should be known.
[022] From the above information, one can then make an IFC
catalyst that has properties between the catalyst added to the unit and the
ECAT in the unit that will result in an IFC catalyst that will produce the desired
unit yields and product properties at a cheaper cost and a significant reduction
8

WO 2004/033589 PCT/US2003/028561
in unit catalyst losses. Most likely the IFC catalyst requirements that will be
the most important will be activity, rare earth content, surface area, hydrogen
production, and nickel, vanadium, and sodium content.
[023] The ultimate supplier of the refinery FCC catalyst and catalyst
additives preferably has access to facilities needed to blend the components
needed to produce the desired IFC. The supplier preferably has access to
catalyst testing facilities and be able to produce or acquire high zeolitic
content FCC catalyst (which contains >20% demetalized ECAT, reactivated ECAT, demetalized-reactivated ECAT, ECAT
of various types, and FCC additives as blending components. These
components are then tested to determine properties such as for activity,
metals, surface area, pore volume, stability, yields, physical and chemical
properties, and blended to obtain the desired IFC. As an example, assume
that, based on the analysis of the FCCU operation, it is determined that the
refiner needs an IFC having an activity of 5.9, minimum nickel activity to
produce hydrogen, low vanadium levels, and an acceptable yield structure.
The supplier would then take the components' properties and blend the
components according to the following formula:
IFC Activity = sum of (Wt% of each component in blend) (Activity of
that component)
Where: Activity = (conversion in lab test unit)/ [100-(conversion in lab
test unit)]
IFC, wt ppm of vanadium = sum of (wt% of each component in
blend)(wt ppm vanadium of that component)
The components for the IFC blend may be selected from two or more
of the following:
a. Fresh catalyst - catalytic active material that is added to
the unit to affect the ECAT activity and unit yields and
product properties
b. Demetalized catalyst - ECAT that has been treated to
remove some portion of metals or catalyst poisons that
have been deposited on the ECAT from the feed
9

WO 2004/033589 PCT/US2OO3/O28561
c. Reactivated catalyst - Fresh or ECAT that has been
treated to increase its activity.
d. Demetalized-Reactivated Catalyst - ECAT that has been
treated to both increase its activity and remove some
portion of metals or catalyst poisons that have been
deposited on the ECAT from the feed.
e. Additives - any material, liquid or solid, that is added to
the FCC unit as a minor component of the circulating
ECAT to affect a specific operating characteristic of the
FCC operation (such as aid the burning of CO to CO2 in
the regenerator, reduce SOX emissions, increase gasoline
octane, etc.)
[024] It should be noted that, for example, a fresh catalyst with 40%
zeolite might have a fresh activity of 19; a reactivated ECAT, an activity of 3.0;
and a demetalized ECAT, an activity of 2.3. Therefore a blend of these three
materials to obtain a 5.9 IFC activity would contain 20% high activity fresh
catalyst, 40% of reactivated ECAT, and 40% of demetalized ECAT. This IFC
might cost 60% of the equivalent fresh catalyst.
[025] The supplier would then make a laboratory IFC blend of the
components and test the IFC blend for the refiner's criteria. Any reactivated
ECAT, even that from the refiner's unit would be higher activity than the
starting ECAT as shown in the above-mentioned referenced catalyst
reactivation patents, so the percentage of high activity fresh catalyst required
should be a small percentage of the total blend. Since the manufacturing cost
of high zeolite content fresh catalyst is almost identical to lower zeolite content
catalyst and the other component costs are a percentage of fresh catalyst, the
cost of producing these IFC mixtures with these less expensive components
will always be less than the fresh catalyst it is replacing.
[026] If the nickel activity of the blend is too high (i.e. demetalized
ECAT is not available or because it is more costly and complicated to remove
nickel than V, the ECAT was only treated to remove V) antimony, bismuth or
another nickel treatment could be applied to the blend to reduce the nickel
activity. Another advantage of this invention is that the blend can be treated
or adjusted as required before it is shipped.
10

WO 2004/033589 PCT/US2OO3/O28561
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[027] Fig. 1 depicts a preferred catalyst addition apparatus 10. A
suitably sized and shaped weigh hopper 12 contains an inventory of IFC
material 14. A support system 16 for the weigh hopper 12 is provided with a
weighing device 18 such as load cells or scales. The weighing device 18 is
preferably connected to a weigh indicator 20 such as a digital display 22. In
effect, the weighing device 18 weighs both the weigh hopper 12 and the
catalyst inventory 14 contained in said hopper. The weigh indicator 20 can be
adapted to display the combined weight of the weigh hopper 12 and catalyst
inventory 14. In the alternative, the empty weight of the weigh hopper 12 can
be automatically subtracted from the combined weight of the weigh hopper 12
and catalyst inventory 14 so that a read-out display 22 of the weigh indicator
20 shows only the weight of the catalyst inventory 14. In either case, the
weighing device 18 will detect changes in the weight of the catalyst inventory
14 over time as catalyst is taken from the weigh hopper 12 and added to a
FCC unit not shown in Fig. 1.
[028] The signal to weigh indicator 20 can be routed both locally and
to a remote location, such as, off-site at the IFC's supplier's facility or where
the catalyst management personnel are located. By monitoring this signal,
one can tell such things as the addition rate per day. the present inventory,
and predict when a new shipment of IFC should arrive at the unit and
schedule accordingly. For management of withdrawn ECAT inventory, the
catalyst management personnel would determine when the ECAT inventory
was at its limit and schedule to have this ECAT removed from the hopper and
sold or disposed of according to the present guidelines.
[029] In one preferred embodiment of this invention, IFC from a
source not shown in Fig. 1 is added to the catalyst inventory 14 via a hopper
loading valve 26 and catalyst injection pipe 28. The catalyst injection pipe 28
might also serve as a hopper venting system through the use of an
appropriate hopper vent valve 30 (which is preferably equipped with a silencer
device 32).
11

WO 2OO4/O33589 PCT/US2003/028561
[030] Plant air 34 is delivered to the catalyst addition apparatus 10
via an air conduit system 36 such as the flexible hose and pipe system
depicted in Fig. 1. The air conduit system 36 also is more preferably provided
with various valves, e.g., valves 38,40,42,44, and 46 in order to provide a
means for distributing the plant air 34 to various parts of the catalyst addition
apparatus 10. The air conduit system 36 is preferably provided with a
pressure gauge 48 and pressure gauge 50 for respectively measuring the air
pressure outside and inside the weigh hopper 12. In any case, one'of the
main functions of the plant air 34 is to entrain the catalyst 14 and transfer it to
an FCC unit. An air line 52 (especially on provided with a non-return valve
54) carrying plant air stream 34 will most preferably pass under the hopper
12. The bottom of the hopper 12 will be provided with a valve such as a ball
valve 56 (preferably one provided with a so-called Thompson valve 58) so
that catalyst 14 can be withdrawn from the bottom of the weigh hopper 12 and
entrained in the plant air stream 34 when valve 56 is open. The stream of
plant air 34 containing the catalyst 14 is then directed to the FCC unit via lines
60 and 62. Line 62 also can be provided with a non-return valve 64 and ball
valve 66 as indicated. Line 62 might also be provided with a metering
indicator 68 to further check upon the function of the delivery system.
[031] Again, the entrainment of the catalyst 14 into the stream of
plant air 34 is preferably controlled by valve 58 which is, in turn, most
preferably regulated and monitored by a computer memory and control device
70. Most preferably, the computer memory and control device 70 also will be
associated with those mechanical and electrical control and indicator devices
normally associated with such processes and equipment in ways which are
well known to this art. For example, the memory and control device 70 could
be associated with an air supply indicator 72, a valve indicator 74, a manual
test button 76, a drain 78, an air supply 79, a remote input 80, a Thompson
valve signal 82, a pneumatic control device 84, and an override indicator 86
generally depicted in Fig. 1.
[032] In one preferred embodiment of this invention, a remote signal
from the IFC addition hopper 12 would be sent to a remote location so that the
12

WO 2OO4/O33589 PCT/US2OO3/O2856I
supplier would be able to ship the IFC to the refiner only as it is required. It is
also possible to send separately each of the blending components to the
refinery so that they can be blended in the addition hopper. This might be the
case if any of the available components were available at another offsite
facility.
[033] In a preferred embodiment, the total FCC catalyst management
system, the refiner's ECAT hopper would also be equipped with a catalyst
weigh scale. This would allow the refiner to have an accurate record of the
FCC unit withdrawals. Combining this withdrawal record with periodic ECAT
analysis would allow the refiner to calculate the activity and composition of the
ECAT hopper inventory. In a preferred embodiment, the ECAT hopper weigh
scale system would send a signal to a remote location so that the ECAT
hopper inventory could be controlled. Better still, it would allow for the IFC
supplier to determine if the ECAT has a use as a blending component (after
reactivation/demetalization) or should be sent to disposal, both of which could
be arranged by catalyst management. Up until now, to determine the amount
of ECAT withdrawal from the FCCU or the amount of ECAT in the ECAT
hopper, the hopper would need to be depressured and measured by dropping
a weighed measuring device from the top of the hopper to the ECAT level to
get an outage. This outage was then converted to weight on a calculated
graph. It is very evident, that this method is less than accurate.
[034] Having described preferred embodiments of the present
invention, it is to be understood that these are only exemplary, and the scope
of the invention is to be determined by the appended claims and their
equivalents.
13

WO 2004/033589 PCT/US2OO3/O28561
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method for preparing a mixture of FCC catalyst components
for use in an FCCU, which comprises:
performing an analysis of an FCCU operation;
determining the catalyst requirements for the FCCU, based on said
analysis;
determining the catalytic properties of at least two FCC catalyst
components selected from the group consisting of untreated equilibrium FCC
catalyst, reactivated equilibrium FCC catalyst, demetallized equilibrium FCC
catalyst, reactivated and demetallized equilibrium FCC catalyst and fresh high
activity FCC catalyst containing a zeolite component; and
blending said at least two components in proportions, based on the
determined properties of said at least two components and the determined
catalyst requirements, to form a mixture of the components suitable for
addition to the FCCU.
2. The method of claim 1, further including adding the mixture to
the FCCU through a weighed catalyst addition - storage system.
3. The method of claim 1, further including adding one or more
FCC additives to the mixture.
4. The method of claim 1, where said high activity fresh catalyst
contains more than 20% zeolite.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending is performed at the
site of the FCCU.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the blending is performed at a
location remote from the site of the FCCU.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the FCCU includes an FCC
catalyst addition system, and a signal from an on-site weighing device is used
to control the catalyst inventory of the addition system.
14

WO 2004/0033589 PCT/US2003/O28561
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the FCCU includes a weighing
device on an equilibrium catalyst hopper, the weighing device is used to
control unit catalyst withdrawals from equilibrium catalyst hopper inventory,
and/or catalyst disposal requirements.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein said at least two components
are blended at the site of the FCCU in a weighed catalyst addition system.
15

A method for preparing a mixture
of FCC catalyst components for use in an FCCU,
which comprises: performing an analysis of an FCCU
operation; determining the catalyst requirements for the
FCCU, based on said analysis; determining the catalytic
properties of at least two FCC catalyst components
selected from the group consisting of untreated
equilibrium FCC catalyst, reactivated equilibrium
FCC catalyst, demetallized equilibrium FCC catalyst,
reactivated and demetallized equilibrium FCC catalyst
and fresh high activity FCC catalyst containing a zeolite
component; and blending said at least two components
in proportions, based on the determined properties of
said at least two components and the determined-catalyst
requirements, to form a mixture of the components
suitable for addition to the FCCU.

Documents:


Patent Number 214234
Indian Patent Application Number 00654/KOLNP/2005
PG Journal Number 06/2008
Publication Date 08-Feb-2008
Grant Date 07-Feb-2008
Date of Filing 18-Apr-2005
Name of Patentee BARTHOLIC DAVID B
Applicant Address 75 WETUMPKA LANE, WATCHUNG, NJ 07060, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 BARTHOLIC DAVID B 75 WETUMPKA LANE, WATCHUNG, NJ 07060, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
PCT International Classification Number C10G 11/18
PCT International Application Number PCT/US2003/028561
PCT International Filing date 2003-10-03
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 10/265,249 2002-10-07 U.S.A.