Title of Invention	A METHODS FOR STABILIZING PROTEINS AND A COMPOSITION COMPRISING PROTEIN
Abstract	The invention relates to methods and kits for stabilizing or solubilising a protein, characterized by contacting the protein with a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not being an a β -or γ -cyclodextrin. Inulin derivatives and glucoside derivatives are suitable sugar polymer derivatives for use in methods and kits of the invention.

Full Text

Methods and Kits for Stabilising. Protecting and Solubilising Proteins Technical Field The present invention relates to methods, kits and reagents for stabilising protein conformation, protecting proteins from aggregation and/or degradation, and/or for improving protein solubility. Background to the Invention The biological function of a protein is dependent on its three dimensional structure. Proteins are formed as linear chains of amino acids, termed polypeptides. In vivo, in the appropriate conditions within the cell, the linear polypeptide chain is folded, a process which may be assisted by proteins called chaperones. A mature folded protein has an active three dimensional conformation, known as the native structure. The structure depends on weak forces such as hydrogen bonding, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. These forces are affected by the protein environment, so changes in the environment may cause structural disruption resulting in denaturation and/or degradation of the protein and loss of function. Such problems are encountered during processing of proteins and on storage of proteins. The production of proteins by genetic engineering often results in the accumulation of non-active protein aggregates as inclusion bodies. After isolation and purification from the host cells, proteins or inclusion bodies have to be unfolded (denatured) and subsequently refolded (renatured) so that the proteins regain their native structure and bioactivity. Traditional protein folding methods involve denaturant dilution or column-based approaches. Denatured protein is commonly refolded by diluting the denaturant This induces a hydrophobic collapse of the protein molecule and in doing so the protein shields its hydrophobic patches in the core of the molecule, Unfortunately, on hydrophobic collapse, proteins do not always form the native bioactive conformation; two competing reactions occur; refolding and aggregation, it is suggested that a driver for protein aggregation is hydrophobic amino acid residues exposed at the surface. Aggregation is undesirable and reduces the yield of functional, native protein. Refolding is known as a first order reaction {Rate = K * [prot])) but the aggregation reaction is favoured over refolding at high concentration as it is a higher order reaction (n) (Rate = K' * [prot]1*). The proportion of protein refolding:protein aggregation is strongly dependant on the protein concentration. At process scale this concentration dependency can result in increased aggregation, and thus reduced refolding yield. This can be due to imperfect mixing patterns in the protein solution. Processing large protein molecules is particularly difficult as they diffuse more slowly than the smaller denaturant molecules, thus creating micro-environments containing high localised protein concentrations and low denaturant concentration, that is, an environment that favours protein aggregation over protein refolding. For proteins with disulphide bonds the native protein often needs to be "matured"; during maturation, non-aggregated monomeric protein molecules with non-native disulphide bonds may be created initially; then, using a protein specific nedox couple, the disulphide bonds shuffle and the protein matures to a functional protein molecule with native disulphide bonds. Refolding processes usually involve dispersing the denatured protein molecules in a buffer in the presence of "refolding aids" to enhance renaturation. Folding aids usually increase the solubility of the folding intermediates and/or change the relative reaction rates of the folding and aggregation reactions. Polyethylene glyco! and various sugars, e.g. sucrose, glucose, N-acetylglucosamine, and detergents, e.g. Chaps, Tween, SDS, Dodecylmalioside have been employed as refolding aids {De Bernadez Clark (1998) Current Opinion Biotechnot, 9, 157-163). α ,β and γ cyciodextrins (CDs) have been reported to be useful in stabilisation, solubfiisation and affinity purification of certain enzymes, but both the nature of the interactions between these CDs and proteins, and their effect on bioactivity remain unclear, α ,β and γ-cyclodextrins have been used as artificial chaperones to aid protein refolding in both detergent-free (Sharma et al, EP 0 871 651, US 5,728,804) and detergent-containing refolding environments (Gellman & Rozerna, US 5,563,057). Cyciodextrins are cyclic otigosaccharides composed of multiple giucose residues. They are classified according to the number of sugar residues within the ring structure, α ,-cyclodextrin has 6 glucose residues, β -cyclodextrin has 7 glucose residues and γ-cycbdextrin has 8 glucose residues. Cyciodextrins can be modified by derivatisation to produce derivatives. The inner cavity of cyciodextrins is hydrophobic whereas the outer surface is hydrophitic. The hydrophobic interior is capable of encapsulating poorly soluble drugs. The hydrophitic exterior assists in solubilisation, so cyciodextrins are useful adjuncts in pharmaceutical formulation, EP 0 094 157 & US 4,659,696 (Hirai er a/) describe the use of α ,β and γ cyclodextrin derivatives in pharmaceutical compositions consisting essentially of a physical mixture of a hydrophilic, physiologically active (folded, native) peptide and a cyclodextrin derivative, the composition being a uniform mixture in dosage form. EP 0 437 678 B1, US 5,730,969 and US 5,997,856 (Hora) describe methods for the solubilisation and/or stabilisation of polypeptides, especially proteins, using specified cyclodextrin derivatives: hydroxypropyl, hydroxyethyl, glucosyl, maltosyl, and maltotriosyl derivatives of β and γ-cyciodextrin; the hydroxypropy}-j3-cyclodextrin derivative being preferred. Also disclosed are aqueous and lyophilised compositions comprising a polypeptide, optionally a protein, and the above specified cyclodextrin derivatives. EP 0 871 651 & US 5,728,804 (Sharma et al) are concerned with a method for ranaturing an unfolded or aggregated protein in a detergent-free aqueous medium with an amount of a cyclodextrin effective to renature said unfolded or aggregated protein, In this instance, the protein is present at a low concentration selected to minimise aggregation, preferably at around 0.05 mg/ml, and spontaneously refolds in a refolding buffer containing cyclodextrin. After refolding the cyclodextrin is removed by dialysis. US 5,563,057 (Geliman & Rozema) describes a method for refolding an enzyme from a misfolded configuration to a second native active configuration by adding a detergent having a linear alkyl non-polar portion, e.g. CTA8 and Triton^-X 100 (Octoxynol-9), to misfolded enzyme to form an enzyrne-detergent complex, which is then contacted with a cyclodextrin to allow the enzyme to assume a second active conformation. Hinrichs et al (2001). International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 215, 163-174, describes the use of non-derivatised inulins, inuiin SC 95 (DPn/DPw = 5.5/8.0), inulin RS (DPn/DPw - 14.2/19.4), and inulin EXL 608 (DPn/DPw 23.0/26.2) to protect alkaline phosphatase from degradation during freeze drying and subsequent storage of the dried protein. WO 96/41870 (Gombac et al) describe frozen, dried or lyophilized hydrosoluble collagenase compositions containing isomait and/or inuiin (non-derivatised) to stabilise the coilagenase. Inuiins are D-fructans, generally consisting of chains of polyfructose in which the fructose units are connected to each other mostly or exclusively by beta (2-1) linkages. Inuiin occurs in nature, in general, as a polydisperse mixture of polyfructose chains most of which are ending in one glucosy! unit. Inuiin can be obtained from bacteria! syntheses, extracted from plants or can be made in vitro by enzymatic synthesis starting from sucrose. Inulin produced by bacteria is more branched than inulin from plant origin and commonly has a higher molecular weight (ranging from about 2,000 up to about 20,000,000), whereas inulin from plant origin is generally composed of linear or slightly branched polyfructose chains, or mixtures thereof, with a molecular weight commonly ranging from about 600 to about 20,000. Inulin can be represented, depending from the terminal carbohydrate unit, by the general formulae GF.n or F.n, wherein G represents a glucosyl unit, F a fructosyl unit, and n is an integer representing the number of fructosyl units linked to each other in the carbohydrate chain. The number of saccharide units (fructose and glucose units) in one inufin molecule, i.e. the value of n in the formulae above, is referred to as the degree of polymerisation, represented by (DP). Often, the parameter (number) average degree of polymerisation, represented by (DP), is used too, which is the value corresponding to the total number of saccharide units (G and F units) in a given inulin composition divided by the total number of inulin molecules present in said inulin composition, without taking into account the possibly present monosaccharicies glucose (G) and fructose (F), and the dlsaccharide sucrose (GF). The average degree of polymerisation (DP) can be determined, for example, by the method described by L De Leenheer (Starch, 46 (5), 193-196, (1994), and Carbohydrates as Organic Raw Materials, Vol. ill, p. 67-92, (1996)). Inulin is commonly prepared from plant sources, mainly from roots of Chicory (Glchorium intybus) and from tubers of Jerusalem artichoke (Helfanthus tuberosus), in which inulin can be present in concentrations of about 10 to 20% w/w on fresh plant material. Inulin from plant origin is usually a polydisperse mixture of linear and slightly branched poiysaccharide chains with a degree of • polymerisation (DP) ranging from 2 to about 100, In accordance with known techniques, inulin can be readily extracted from said plant parts, purified and optionally fractionated to remove impurities, mono- and disaccharides and undesired oligosaccharides, in order to provide various grades of inuiin, e.g. as described in EP 0 769 026 and EP 0 670 850. Inulin is commercially available, typically with a (DP) ranging from about 6 to about 40. Inulin from chicory is for example available as RAFTIUNE® from Orafti (Tienen, Belgium) in various grades. Typical RAFTILlNE® grades include RAFTILINE® ST {with a (DP) of about 10 and containing in total up to about 8% by weight glucose, fructose and sucrose), RAFTiLlNE® LS (with a (DP) of about 10 but containing in total less than 1% by weight glucose, fructose and sucrose), and RAFTIUNE®. RTM. HP (with a (DP) of at least 23, commonly with a (DP) of about 25, and virtually free of glucose, fructose and sucrose). lnutec®N25, a non-derivatised inulin with a DP of 25, is available from Orafti, Inulins with a lower degree of polymerisation, usually defined as a (DP) Various inulin derivatives and methods for the preparation of inulin derivatives are described in US 6,534,647 (Stevens et al), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Inulins derivatised with hydrophobic alky! chains on the poiyfructose backbone are commercially available, for example Inutec^SPI (SP1) from Orafti (Tienen, Belgium). Starch is a well-known carbohydrate that is abundantly present in many plants as a biodegradable reserve polysaccharide. Starch molecules are polymers composed of D-glucosyl units which are linked to one another by α -1,4 glucosyl- glucosyl bonds, thus forming a linear chain starch structure (termed amylose) or by αct-1,4 and α-1,6 glucosy! bonds thus forming a branched chain starch structure (termed amyiopectin) having a α-1,6 glucosyl-giucosyl bond at the branching point. Starch occurs in nature as a pofydisperse mixture of polymeric molecules which have, depending on the plant source, mainiy a linear structure or mainly a branched structure. Starch can also occur in nature as a polydieperse mixture of molecules with said structures. The degree of polymerisation (DP), i. e. the number of glucosy! units linked to one another in a starch molecule, may widely vary and it largely depends on the plant source and the harvesting time. The linkages between the glucosyl units are sensitive to hydrolysis, heat and shearing forces. This phenomenon is industrially exploited to prepare various starch derivatives, generically termed herein starch hydrolysates, through acidic hydrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis, thermal treatment or shearing, or through combinations of said treatments. Depending on the source of the starch, the hydrolysis catalyst, the hydrolysis conditions, the thermal treatment and/or the shearing conditions, a wide variety of starch hydrolysates can be obtained, ranging from a product essentially composed of glucose, over products commonly termed glucose syrups, to products commonly termed maltodextrins and dextrins. Starch hydrolysates are well known in the art. D-glucose (dextrose) presents strong reducing power. Starch hydrolysates are polydisperse mixtures, composed of D-g!ucose, alfgomeric (DP 10) molecules composed of D-giucosyl chains, which also present reducing power resulting from the presence of D-glucose and reducing sugar units (which are essentially terminal glucosyi units) on the oligomeric and polymeric molecules. As a result, starting from a given starch product, the greater the extent of the hydrolysis, the more molecules (monomeric D-glucose, oiigomeric and remaining polymeric molecules) will be present in the hydrolysate, and thus the higher the reducing powder of the starch hydrolysate obtained. Accordingly, the reducing power of starch hydrolysates has become the distinguishing feature of choice to differentiate and designate the various starch hydrolysate products. The reducing power is expressed as dextrose equivalents (D. E.) which formally corresponds to the grams of D-g!ucose (dextrose) per 100 grams of dry substance. D-glucose having per definition a D. E. of 100, the D. E. indicates the amount of D-glucose and reducing sugar units (expressed as dextrose) in a given product on a dry product basis. Thus the D. E. is in fact also a measurement of the extent of hydrolysis of the starch and also a relative indication of the average molecular weight of the glucose polymers in the starch hydrolysate. The D. E. of starch hydrolysates, apart from hydrolysates composed essentially of D-glucosef may range from 1 to about 96 and starch hydrolysates are commercially available in a wide variety of grades based on the D. E. Hydrolysates with a D. E. greater than 20 are commonly termed glucose syrups. Glucose syrups with a D. E. up to 47 can be dried by conventional techniques, for example by spray drying, to yield so-called "dried glucose syrups" in powder form, containing a maximum of about 5 wt% humidity. Hydrolysates with a D. E. of 20 or less are commonly termed maitodextrins and dextrins. The manufacturing process usually involves a spray drying step at the end, yielding these hydrolysate products in powder form also containing a maximum of about 5 wt% humidity (wt% indicates % by weight). Glucose syrups, maitodextrins and dextrins are made industrially at large scale from various starch sources under controiled hydrolysis conditions according to well-known methods. The various grades of starch hydrolysates obtained are usually defined by their starch source material and by their D. E. value, often in combination with an indication of the method of manufacture (e.g. maltodextrins/dextrins). Although following certain Regulations the term "maltodextrins" is reserved to designate products derived from corn starch, the term maltodextrin (s) used herein is not limited to hydrolysates of corn starch, but indicates herein starch hydrolysates with a D. E, of 20 or less obtained from starch from any source. Typical commercial sources of starch are corn, potato, tapioca, rice, sorgum and wheat However, the starch hydrolysates suitable for use in connection with the present invention are not limited to starch from said sources, they extend to starch hydrolysates obtained from starch from any source. Glucose syrups, maltodextrins and dextrins are well known and commercially available. For example, the production, properties and applications of glucose syrups and maltodextrins have been described in review articles in the book Starch Hydrolysis Products, Worldwide Technology, Production and Applications, Weinheirn VCH Publishers inc. (1992), Furthermore, in the technical brochure "GLUCIDEX Brochure 8/ 09.98" from the company Roquette, describes maltodextrins and drted glucose syrups are described and various grades are offered for sale/ Controlling the stability of proteins during processing and on storage is recognised as a problem in many industries, in particular the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Difficulties encountered with proteins may make manufacture of proteins difficult result in low yields and render processes uneconomic Proteins are exposed to conditions during processing that may result in degradation of the protein and loss of function, thus there is a need to improve methods of protein processing to protect the protein and minimise damage or loss of protein. Additionally there is a need to improve protein solubility and reduce protein aggregation. There is also a desire to improve methods that involve processing of proteins in solution, so that processing can be performed at higher protein concentration, thereby reducing volumes. Unfortunately, aggregation is generally promoted at high protein concentration and regions of high local protein concentration are hard to eliminate in large reaction vessels. Detergents or chaotropes can be used to maintain protein solubility, but detergents are extremely difficult to remove during downstream processing, and there are additional drawbacks with the chemicals used, for example the denaturant guanidine hydrochloride is toxic and corrodes the stainless steel vessels and pipes of protein production equipment Long exposure of a protein to the denaturant urea may result in modification of amino acids, e.g. carbamylation. Detergents and solubilising agents such as arginine are incompatible with several of the most common analytical techniques used in protein laboratories (e.g. Bradford Assay, SDS-PAGE gels, RP-HPLC). Buffer exchange to remove such contaminants is possible, but results in an unknown dilution or loss of the sample and may cause protein aggregation. Problems addressed by the present invention include stabiiisafion of proteins against conformationat change (e.g. maintaining protein in a denatured conformation, or native conformation), thereby reducing aggregation of proteins, improving protein solubility and protecting proteins against degradation. The present invention also seeks to improve solubility of proteins so that they are maintained in solution, in a denatured or native non-aggregated form, with reduced adherence to the vessel or other protein molecules, and reduced propensity to aggregate. ft is an object of the present invention to provide methods for stabilisation, protection and solubilisation of proteins, that can be used in methods of protein processing, in particular in methods involving protein folding, purification, concentration and/or storage such that the disadvantages associated with present methods are alleviated. Disclosure of invention In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of stabilising a protein, characterised by contacting the protein with a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not being an α-,β or-γ -cyclodextrin. In preferred stabilising methods, the protein and sugar polymer derivative are contacted in aqueous solution. A stabilising method may further involve desiccation, dehydration, evaporation, or lyophilisation (freeze drying) of the aqueous solution. In stabilising methods of the invention the protein is stabilised against oonformafiona} change. The protein can be stabilised in a denatured form, which can be unfolded or partially folded, or can be stabilised in native conformation. In methods involving protein in native conformation, the protein is stabilised against denaturation. In stabilising methods of the invention the protein is stabilised against aggregation. Stabilising methods of the invention are also useful to protect protein against degradation. In a second aspect, the invention provides a method of solubilising a protein, characterised by contacting the protein with a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not being an α-β or γ cyclodextrin. Stabilising and solubilising methods according to the invention are useful in methods of protein processing, in particular those which comprise or consist of a method of folding protein, Stabilising and solubilising methods according to the invention can be employed in protein processing methods that comprise one or more protein purification step{s), e.g. dialysis, dlafiltration, ultrafiltration and/or chromatography. (n a third aspect, the present invention provides the use of a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not being an α-β or γ-cyclodextrin, to stabilise a protein against aggregation, conformational change and/or degradation. According to the invention, a sugar polymer derivative is used to stabilise protein against conformationai changes, such as denaturation of native protein or renaturation of denatured (unfolded or partially folded) protein, helping to maintain the protein in the desired configuration. A sugar polymer derivative will act to stabilise proteins against degradation, e.g. by hest, electromagnetic radiation, shear stress, proteolysis, or by chemical modification such as reduction, oxidation, or carbamylation. In methods of the invention, a sugar polymer derivative can be used to stabilise a protein in aqueous solution, or in dry form, e.g. produced by desiccation, dehydration, evaporation or iyophilisation (freeze drying) of an aqueous solution. In a fourth aspect, the invention provides the use of a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not being an α-β or γ cyclodextrin, to sotubilise a protein. The term "protein" as used herein encompasses proteins, peptides, pofypeptjdes and oligopeptides. Proteins may be synthetic or naturally occurring, and may be obtained by chemical synthesis, or by recombinant or non-recombinant methods. The protein may be produced using DNA recombination or mutation techniques. The protein may be produced in vivo in a whole animal, or in a eukaryotic or prokaryotic cell; alternatively, the protein may be generated using an in vitro method such as cell-free in vitro translation e.g. using E.coli lysate, wheat germ extract, or rabbit rettoulocyte. Cell free in vitro translation methods can be employed following in vitro transcription, e.g. following phage or ribosome display. A denatured protein can be fully denatured, or partially denatured or renatured such that the protein is in non-native form as unfolded protein and/or partially folded refolding intermediate(s). An aqueous solution or dried sample comprising denatured protein may contain one or more of these forms. A native protein is in a folded, functional conformation. Some protein may also be present in aqueous solution, or in a dried sample, in the form of contaminating aggregates and/or inclusion bodies. Sugar polymers derivatives suitable for use in methods of the invention are those which, at an appropnate concentration and in appropriate conditions, can maintain a denatured protein in solution in a non-native, unfolded or partially-folded soluble state. The term "sugar polymer derivative" excludes α-β or γ cydodextrin and derivatives thereof. One, or more (I.e. a mixture of), sugar polymer derivative(S) may be employed in methods or uses of the invention. Suitable sugar polymer derivatives are those which are capable of shielding hydrophobjc amino acid side chains or modifying the net protein charge or hydrogen bonding characteristics. The term "sugar polymer derivative" as used herein encompasses polymeric and oligomeric saccharide molecules comprising three or more monosaccharide units. The sugar polymer derivative can be a linear or non-linear amphipathic sugar poiymer derivative. Sugar polymer derivatives employed in methods of the invention may comprise one or more sugar(s) selected from the group consisting of: erythrose, threose, ribose, arabinose, xylose, lyxose, allose, allose, glucose, mannose, gulose, idose, galactose, talose, psicose, fructose, sorbose, tagatose, xylulose and ribulose. Of these sugars, glucose, fructose, mannose and/or galactose, are the four most common simple (monomer) sugar units. The sugar polymer derivative can be a dextran, cellulose, amylose, starch, pullulan, mannan, ohifc'n, chitosan, tnulin, levan, xylan, cyclodextrin (provided that it is not an alpha, beta or gamma cyclodextrin), cyctoarnylose or a derivative thereof. Suitable sugar polymer derivatives are disclosed in US 5,202,433 and 5,204,457, the entire contents of which are Incorporated herein by reference. Amphipathic sugar polymers are capable of hydrophobic interaction with native and/or denatured protein. Derivatisation of the sugar polymer with appropriate substituents enhances the amphipathic nature and strength of interaction with the protein. Suitable substituents for sugar polymer derivatives used in the methods, uses and kits of the invention include substituents selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, atkenyt and aikynyl groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms, hatoaikyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, cycloalkyl groups having from 3 to 9 carbon atoms, aryl groups having from 5 to 14 carbon atoms, aralkyl groups comprising alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms which are substituted with 1 or more aryl groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms, fatty add groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and polyols having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms. One or more substltuents per carbohydrate molecule can be present. The alkyi, alkenyl, alkynyl, haloalkyl, aralkyl, fatty acid and polyol groups may be straight chain or branched chain groups. Preferably, the substituents are selected from alkyl, alkenyl and alkyny! groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms, more preferably they are selected from alkyl, alkenyl and aikynyl groups having from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably they are selected from alkyl, alkenyi and alkynyl groups having from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. The sugar polymer derivative can be a cyclic sugar polymer derivative comprising 3 or more saccharide units, which may be a glucosan, such as a cyclodextrin derivative, excluding α-β and γ- cyclodextrins. When the sugar polymer derivative Is a cyclic sugar polymer derivative such as a glucosan, e.g. a cyclodextrin derivative, the concentration used in methods of the invention to stabilise protein is preferably 100 to 10,000 times the molar concentration of protein present, more preferably from 100 to 5,000 times the molar concentration of protein present, yet more preferably from 100 to 2,000 times the molar concentration of protein present, further preferably from 500 to 1,500 times the molar concentration of protein present, most preferably about 1,000 times the molar concentration of protein present. In methods and uses according to the invention, the sugar polymer derivative is preferably a linear or branched sugar polymer derivative comprising three or more monosaccharide units, such as a fructosan, e.g. an inu!in derivative, or a glucoside such as a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative. Preferred derivatives include inulfn derivatives of formula (I) and glucoside hydrocarbyl derivatives of formula (II) as described herein. A glucoside hydrocarby! derivative of formula (II) is preferably a hydrocarbyi urethane of a starch hydrolysaie, particularly preferably a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative of formula (lla) composed of units of formula (II!) as defined herein, Suitably an inulin derivative or glucoside hydrocarbyl has a degree of polymerisation of from about 3 to 500, 3 to 250 or 3 to 100, preferably from 3 to 50, more preferably from 10 to 50, yet more preferably from 15 to 40, further preferably from 20 to 30, e.g. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 23, 29, 30. It is preferred that inulin derivatives or glucoside hydrocarby! derivatives are derlvatised by one or more type(s) of non-polar hydrocarbyl group, e.g. those selected from the group consisting of: alky! groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, alkenyl and alkynyl groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms, haloalkyi groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, cycloalkyl groups having from 3 to 9 carbon atoms, aryl groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms, aralkyl groups comprising alky! groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms which are substituted with 1 or more aryi groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms, fatty acid groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and polyols having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms. Preferably, the one or more non-polar hydrocarbyl group is selected from: alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, and aikenyl and alkynyl groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbon atoms. The or a non-polar hydrocarbyl group can be an alky! group having from 1 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 13 carbon atoms, and/or the or a non-polar hydrocarbyl group can be an alkenyl or aikynyl group having from 2 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Sugar polymer derivatives suitable for the methods and uses described herein typically have an average degree of substitution per saccharide unit of from 0.01 to 3.0 or 0.02 to 3.0, preferably from 0.05 to 1.0, most preferably from 0.05 to 0.5. Preferred inuiin derivatives typically have an average degree of substitution per saccharide unit in the range of from 0.01 to 3.0, or 0.02 to 3.0, preferably from 0.02 to 1.0 or 0.05 to 1.0, most preferably from 0.05 to 0.5 or 0.03 to 0.3. Preferred glucoside hydrocarbyl derivatives generally have a degree of substitution in the range of from 0.01 to 2.0, preferably 0.02 to 1.0, more preferably 0.03 to 0.3. In a preferred aspect, the invention provides a method of stabilizing a protein characterised by contacting the protein with an inulin derivative. Preferably, the protein and inulin derivative are contacted in aqueous solution. Methods of stabilisation of protein in aqueous solution may further comprise desiccation, dehydration, evaporation or lyophilisation (freeze drying) of the aqueous solution to produce a dried protein/inulin derivative composition. Drying is particularly useful to help maintain the protein conformation, integrity (and, if native, function), if the protein is to be stored for a length of time. In such methods the protein is stabilised by the inulin derivative against conformational change. The protein to be stabilised can be in the form of a denatured protein, or in native conformation. Denatured proteins are stabilised against aggregation, native proteins are stabilised against denaturation. Both denatured and native protein are protected against degradation. In a further preferred aspect, the invention provides a method of solubilising a protein, characterised by contacting the protein with an inulin derivative. Also provided is a method for stabilising protein in non-native configuration comprising providing to an aqueous solution of protein in non-native conformation, an inulin derivative at a concentration sufficient to inhibit protein folding. The invention further provides a method for stabilising protein in native conformation comprising providing to an aqueous solution of protein in native conformation an inulin derivative at a concentration sufficient to maintain the protein in native conformation. A concentration of sugar polymer derivative, e.g. inulin derivative, sufficient to inhibit protein folding is a concentration at which renaturation of denatured protein is retarded. At appropriate concentrations, there is less return of structure than would occur if the sugar polymer derivative were not present, because the sugar polymer derivative helps to maintain the protein in non-native configuration. The presence of the sugar polymer derivative reduces the rate of refolding compared to that which would be observed if the derivative was not present. The concentration of inuiin derivative for stabilising a given protein in a given conformation (denatured or native) wili depend on various factors such as the temperature,, solution conditions protein concentration and the protein itself. Suitable concentrations can be determined readily by the skilled person. The concentration of the inulin derivative for stabilising protein will generally fall within the range of from about 0,1 to about 1000 times the molar concentration of protein, preferably about 0.5 to about 500, about 1 to about 300, about 1 to about 100, about 1 to about 50, about 1 to about 30, about 1 to about 25, or about 1 to about 20 times the molar concentration of protein. Typically, the inulin derivative(s) is present in solution at a concentration of from about 0.002 mg/ml to about 100 mg/ml, preferably about 0.01 mg/ml to about 50 mg/ml, about 0.02 mg/ml to about 10 mg/ml or about 0.25 to 2.5 mg/ml. The upper limit for concentration of an inulin derivative in aqueous solution is governed by the solubility of that inulin derivative in the solution. Methods of the invention in which an inulin derivative is employed to stabilise and protect protein are useful in -methods of protein processing, e.g. in protein folding methods and/or processing involving one or more protein purification step{s)J such as dialysis, diafiltration, uitrafiltration and chromatography. The invention provides the use of an inulin derivative to stabilise a protein against conformational change and/or degradation, and can be used to stabilise a protein in aqueous solution or in dry form. A suitable inuiin derivative for use in methods and uses of the invention is inutec® SP1 (Oraffi, Belgium). A preferred inulin derivative for a method or use of the invention is a compound of formula (I): G(O-CO-NH-R1)a[F(O-CO-NH-R2)a]n (I) wherein: G is a terminal glucosyl unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R1); R1 is a hydrocarbyl group selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups, alkenyl groups, alkynyl groups, haloalkyi groups, cycloalkyl groups, aryl groups and aralkyl groups and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R1) group on the glucosyl unit, each R1 group may be the same or different; a is an integer of from 0 to 4; F is a fructosy) unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R2); R2 is a hydrocarbyl group selected from the group consisting of alky' groups, alkenyl groups, aikynyi groups, haloalkyi groups, cycloalkyl groups, aryl groups and aralkyl groups and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R2) group on the fructosyl unit, each R2 group may be the same or different; b is an integer of from 0 to 3 and from 0 to 4 for the terminal fructosy! unit; n is an integer of from 2 to 499 preferably of from 2 to 249, 2 to 99, 2 to 49, 9 to 49, 14 to 39, 19 to 29, or 19 to 24, each unit of formula F(O-CO-NH-R2)b may be the same or different from any other unit of formula F{O-CO-NH-R2)b; and the average degree of substitution per glucosyl or fructosyl unit is from 0.01 to 3.0. Where R1 or Rz is an alkyi group, it is a linear or branched chain alkyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms; preferably, it has from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Where R1 or R2 is an alkenyl group, it is a linear or branched chain alkenyl group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms; preferably, it has from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Where R1 or R2 is an alkynyl group, it is a linear or branched chain alkyny! group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms; preferably, It has from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Where R1 or R2 is a haloalkyl group, it is an alkyl group as defined above which is substituted with 1 or more halogen atoms (e.g. fluorine, chlorine or bromine atoms). Preferably, said haloalkyl groups have from 1 to 3 halogen atom substituents, more preferably from 1 to 3 fluorine or chlorine atom substituents. Preferably, said haioalkyl groups have from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Where R1 or R2 is a cycloalkyl group, It is a cyclic aikyl group having from 3 to 9 carbon atoms; preferably, said cycioalkyl groups have from 3 to 7 carbon atoms and most preferably from 4 to 6 carbon atoms. Where R1 or R2 Is an aryl group, it is an aromatic group having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms in one or more rings, e.g. a phenyl group or a naphthyl group. Where R1 or R2 is an aralkyl group, it is an alkyl group as defined above that is substituted with one or more aromatic groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms in one or more rings, e.g. a benzyl group or a triphenylmethyl group. Each group R1 and R2 may be selected from alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, and alkenyl and alkynyl groups having from 2 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbon atoms. One or more of the groups R1 and R2 can be an alkyl group having from 1 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbon atoms; suitably one or more of groups R1 and R2 is an afkenyl or alkynyi group having from 2 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Each aikyl group R1 and R2 can be a linear alkyl group having from 1 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbons or branched alkyl group having from 3 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbons. The average degree of substitution per glucosyi or fructosyl unit is suitably from in the range of from 0.01 to 3.0, or 0.02 to 3.0, preferably from 0.02 to 1.0 or 0.05 to 1,0, most preferably from 0.05 to 0.5 or 0.03 to 0.3. The compound of formula (I) can be a polydisperse linear or slightly branched inulin N- alkylurethane, e.g. selected from the group consisting of inulin N-n-octyl carbamates, inulin N-n-dodecylcarbamates and inulin N-n octadecylcarbamates. In a further aspect, the present invention provides a method of stabilising a protein, characterised by contacting the protein with a glucoside derivative,such as a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative, In preferred stabilising methods of the present invention, the protein and glucoside derivative, e.g. glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative are contacted in aqueous solution. A stabilising method may further involve desiccation, dehydration, evaporation, or lyophilisation (freeze drying) of the aqueous solution. In such stabilising methods of the invention the giucoside derivative (e.g. glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative) act© to stabilise the protein against conforrnational change. The protein can be stabilised in a denatured fqrm, which can be unfolded or partially folded, or can be stabilised in native conformation. In methods involving contacting the giucoside derivative (e.g. glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative) with protein in native conformation, the protein The is stabilised against denaturation. In stabilising methods of the invention protein is stabilised against aggregation by the glucoside derivative, whfch is suitably a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative. Stabilising methods of the invention in which glucosida derivative(s) (e.g. glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative(s)) are used are also useful to protect protein against degradation. In a yet further aspect, the invention provides a method of solubilising a protein, characterised by contacting the protein with a glucoside derivative(e.g. glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative). Stabilising and solubilising methods according to the invention in which glucoside derivative(s), such as glucoside hydrocarbyi derivative(s), are used are useful in methods of protein processing, in particular those which comprise or consist of a method of folding protein. Such stabilising and solubflising methods according to the invention can be employed in protein processing methods that comprise one or more protein purification step(s), e.g. dialysis, diaflltration, ultrafiltration and/or chromatography, In an additional aspect, the present invention provides the use of a glucoside derivative, such as a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative, to stabilise a protein against aggregation, conformational change and/or degradation. According to the invention, a glucoside derivative, which is preferably a glucoside hydrocarbyi derivative, is used to stabilise protein against conformational changesr such as denaturation of native protein or renaturation of denatured (unfolded or partially folded) protein, helping to maintain the protein in the desired configuration. A giucoside derivative will act to stabilise proteins against degradation, e.g. by heat, electromagnetic radiation, shear stress, proteoEysis, or by chemical modification such as reduction, oxidation, or carbamylation. in methods of the invention, a glucoside derivative,, glucoside hydrocarbyi derivative, can be used to stabilise a protein in aqueous solution, or in dry form, e.g. produced by desiccation, dehydration, evaporation or lyophllisation (freeze drying) of an aqueous solution* In a still further aspect, the invention provides the use of a glucoside derivative, suitably a glucoside hydrocarbyi derivative, to solubiiise a protein. The glucoside derivative is preferably a glucoside hydrocarbyi derivative and is further preferably a glucoside hydrocarbyi derivative of formula (II): [G(O-CO-NH-R1)a]n (li) wherein: G is a glucosyl unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R1); R1 is a hydrocarbyi group selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups, alkenyl groups, alkynyl groups, haloalkyl groups, cycloalkyf groups, ary) groups and aralkyi groups and, where there is more than one (0-CO-NH-R1) group on each glucosyl unit, each R1 group may be the same or different; a is an integer of from 0 to 4 for a terminal glucosyi unit, 0 to 3 for a non-branched, non-terminal glucosyf unit and 0 to 2 for a branched, non-terminal glucosyl unit; n is an integer of from 3 to 499 preferably of from 3 to 249, 3 to 99, 3 to 49, 9 to 48,14 to 39, 19 to 29, or 19 to 24, each unit of formula G(O-CO-NH-R1)a may be the same or different from any other unit of formula G(O-CO-NH-R1)a; and the average degree of substitution per glucosyl unit is from 0.01 to 2.0. Where R1 is an alky} group, it is a linear or branched chain alkyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms; preferably, it has from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Where R1 is an alkenyl group, it is a linear or branched chain alkenyl group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms; preferably, it has from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Where R1 is an alkynyl group, it is a linear or branched chain alkynyl group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms; preferably, it has from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Where R1 is a haloalkyl group, it is an alkyl group as defined above which is substituted with 1 or more halogen atoms (e.g. fluorine, chlorine or bromine atoms). Preferably, said hatoalkyl groups have from 1 to 3 halogen atom substituents, more preferably from 1 to 3 fluorine or chlorine atom substituents. Preferably, said haloalkyl groups have from 3 to 22 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Where R1 is a cydoalkyl group, R is a cyclic alkyl group having from 3 to 9 carbon atoms; preferably, said cycloalkyi groups have from 3 to 7 carbon atoms and most preferably from 4 to 6 carbon atoms. Where R1 is an aryl group, it is an aromatic group having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms in one or more rings, e.g. a phenyl group or a napnthyl group. Where R1 is an aralkyl group, it is an alkyl group as defined above that is substituted with one or more aromatic groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms In one or more rings, e.g. a benzyl group or a triphenylmethyl group. Preferably, one or more of the groups R1 can be a linear or branched chain alkyl group having from 1 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbon atoms and/or one or more of groups R1 can be an alkenyl or alkynyl group having from 2 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbon atoms. Suitably each alkyl group R1 is a linear alkyl group having from 1 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferably 3 to 18 carbons or a branched alkyl group having from 3 to 25, preferably 3 to 22, most preferabfy 3 to 18 carbons. In a compound of formula (II), the average degree of substitution per glucosyl unit is from 0.01 to 2.0, preferably from 0.02 to 1.0, and most preferably from D.03 to 0.3. The compound of formula (II) can be a polydisperse linear or branched glucoside N-hydrocarbyl urethane. Each glucosyl unit G may be a D-glucosyl or U-glucosyl unit, preferably a D-glucosyl unit. The glucosyl units can be linked via 1,4-linkages or 1,6-linkages, and each linkage can be an α--linkage or a β-linkage. In preferred embodiments of the methods and uses of the present invention, said compounds of formula (11) are hydrocarbyl urethanes of starch hydrolysates. Particularly preferred hydrocarbyl urethanes of starch hydrolysates are glucoside hydrocarbyl derivatives of formula (lla) composed of units of formula Oil): G' (O-CO-NH-R1)b (III) Wherein G' represents a giucosyi unit of a starch hydrolysate molecule, the starch hydrolysate having a Dextrose Equivalent (D. E.) ranging from 1 to 47, R1 is a hydrocarbyl group as defined above, and b represents the number of hydrocarbyl carbamate groups per glucosyl unit, which number is commonly expressed as the degree of substitution (DS), i.e. the average number of hydrocarbyl substituents per glucosyl unit of the glucoside hydrocarbyl urethane of formula (IIa), with said DS value ranging from 0.01 to 2.0. The number of hydroxyl groups per glucosyl unit of the subject glucoside molecules which theoretically can be substituted by a carbamate group is, for a non-terminal, non-branched glucosyl unit, a maximum of 3, whereas the number for a terminal or for a non-terminal branched glucosyl unit Is, respectively, 4 or 2. Furthermore, since the DS represents an average number of substitusnts per glucosyl unit, it is evident that in a glucoside N-hydrocarbyl carbamate (lla) molecule there may be glucosyl units present which are not substituted by a hydrocarbyl carbamate group (thus b in formula (Hi) being zero for said glucosyl unit). Starch hydrolysates commonly appear in the form of a polydisperse mixture of glucoside molecuies. Accordingly, when such a mixture is used, as is usually the case, as starting material for the preparation of a glucoside hydrocarbyl urethane (IIa), the product obtained is also a corresponding polydisperse mixture of glucoside hydrocarbyl urethanes (lla). Such polydisperse mixtures constitute a preferred embodiment of the glucoside hydrocarbyl urethanes (ila) for utilisation in the methods and uses of the present invention. Commercial grades of starch hydrolysates, composed of said polydisperse mixture of glucoside molecules and having a D. E. ranging from 1 to 47 are very suitable for the preparation of glucoside hydrocarbyi urethanes (Ha), Typically suitable starch hydrolysates for use in the preparation of glucoside N-hydrocarbyl urethanes (IIa) of the invention are for example GLUCIDEX® maltodextrins and GLUCIDEX® dried glucose syrups which are available from ROQUETTE company, such as the maltodextrins of type 1 (potato based with D. E. max 5), type 2 (Waxy Maize based with D. E. max 5), type 6 (Waxy Maize based with D. E. 5 to 8), type 9 (Potato based with D. E. 8 to 10), and maJtodextrins of type 12 (D. E. 11 to 14), type 17 (D. E. 15 to 18) and type 19 (D. E. 13 to 20), as well as dried glucose syrups of type 21 (D. E. 20 to 23), type 28E (D, E. 28 to 31), type 29 (D. E. 28 to 31), type 32 (D. E. 31 to 34), type 33 (D. E. 31 to 34), type 38 (D. E. 36 to 40), type 39 (D. E. 38 to 41), type 40 (D. E. 38 to 42) and type 47 (D. E. 43 to 47). The hydrocarbyi group of the hydrocarbyi urethanes (IIa) of the present invention, i.e. the R1 group in formula (HI) defined herein above, is preferably a saturated C3-C22 alky] group, more preferably a saturated CVC18 alkyl group, even more preferably a saturated linear C4-C1B alkyl group, most preferably a saturated linear C6-C13 alkyl group, Typically suitable alkyl groups include butyl, hexyl, octyl, decyl, dodecyl, tetradecyl, hexadecyl and octadecyf groups. In another preferred embodiment, the hydrocarbyl group is a C3-C22 alkenyl group, preferably a C4-C15 alkeny! group, most preferably a linear C8-C18 alkenyl group. Typically suitable alkenyl groups include butenyl, hexanyl, octenyl, decenyl, dodecenyl, tetradecenyl, hexadecenyl and octadecenyl groups. In the urethane (lla) of the invention, all R1 groups of the units of formula (III) may be the same or different The latter urethanes (lla) can be easily prepared, according to the method described below, by reacting a starch hydrolysate with an isocyanate of formula R1-NCO which is in fact a mixture of two or more isocyanates bearing different R1 groups defined above. Saturated alkyl isocyanates can be prepared conventionally, e.g. by reacting a primary or secondary alkyl-amine with phosgene, Unsaturated alkylisocyanates can be prepared similarly from alkenyl-amines. α,β -unsaturated alkylisocyanates of formula R2R3C=CH-NCO (IV) wherein the radical R2R3C=CH- corresponds to the group R1 of formula (III) and wherein R2 represents hydrogen or an alkyl group and R3 represents an alkyi or vinyl group, can be prepared by condensation of the aldehyde R2R3CH-CHO with Me3C-NH2, followed by reaction of the resultant Schiff base (in equilibrium with its enamine form) with phosgene, and thermal elimination of MesC-CI as disclosed by K. Koenig et a/. (Angew. Chem., 21 (4), 334-335 (1979)). Furthermore, various unsaturated alkylisocyanates are disclosed, inter alia in US 3, 890, 383 and US 3, 803, 062 of Dow Chemical Co. Many alkyl cyanates of formula R1-N=C=0 (R1 as defined above) are commercially available. Glucoside hydrocarbyl urethanes (lla) in accordance with the present invention have a degree of substitution (DS) per glucosyl unit of formula (III) ranging from 0.01 to 2.0, preferably from 0.02 to 1.0, and most preferably from 0.03 to 0.3. The hydrocarbyl carbamate substituent or substituents can be located at various positions on the giucosyl units of the glucoside hydrocarbyl urethanes (ila). The glucoside hydrocarbyl urethanes (ila) of the present invention can be prepared in analogy with conventional methods for the preparation of urethanes of monosaccharides, disaccharides, and pojysaocharides, for example, by reacting the starch hydrolysate with the selected hydrocarbyl isocyanate or mixture of hydrocarbyl isocyanates, in solution in a solvent which is inert with respect to the starch hydroiysate, the isocyanate and the reaction product. Suitable solvents include solvents or solvent mixtures which are free of reactive hydroxyl and amine groups, such as for example dimethyl formamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP). The reaction between the starch hydroiysate and the hydrocarbylisocyanate is preferably performed under anhydrous conditions. In view of this, the starch hydroiysate as well as the solvent(s) are dried, preferably to a water content of less than 0.5 wt%, prior to bringing them into contact with the hydrocarbyi isocyanate. Drying can be carried out by conventional techniques, including, for example by heating the starch hydroiysate in a stream of dry air, or by heating the starch hydroiysate under reduced pressure, or by removing the water through azeotropic distillation, optionally under reduced pressure, from a solution of the starch hydroiysate In the solvent chosen for the reaction. During drying a maximum temperature, depending on the nature of the starch hydrotysate and the solvent, should not be exceeded in order to avoid any decomposition or side reaction. Preferably said temperature should be kept below about 80'C. The reaction is typically carried out by bringing the starch hydroiysate dissolved in a suitable solvent into contact, under gentle to vigorous stirring, with the hydrocarbyi isocyanate In neat form or dissolved in an anhydrous solvent The reaction can be carried out over a wide temperature range, typically from room temperature up to about 80oC, or the reflux temperature of the reaction mixture if it is lower, preferably at a temperature between about 60oC and about 80oC. Typically, the starch hydroiysate is dissolved in a suitable solvent, where necessary under heating. Accordingly, the hydrocarbyi isocyanate (optionally dissolved in the same or in another inert solvent, but which is preferably miscible with the former solvent) is added slowly under stirring to the dissolved glucoside. The desired degree of substitution of the glucoside hydrocarbyi urethane (lla) can be obtained by controlling the ratio of the reactants. Since the reaction of an hydrocarbyl isocyanate with an alcoholic hydroxyl group to form an urethane is a quantitative reaction, the degree of substitution of the urethane (Ha) can be controlled by the selection of the proper molar ratio of the hydrocarbyl isocyanate per glucosyl unit of the starch hydrolysate, Usually the reaction mixture is heated with stirring for a time period, usually from about 30 minutes to about 24 hours, in order to complete the reaction between the reagents. The reaction mixture is then worked up by conventional techniques, for example, by precipitating the formed urethane (lla) through pouring the reaction mixture, usually after cooling to room temperature, in a precipitant solvent, which is a solvent that is miscible with the solvent or solvents used to dissolve the reagents but in which the glucoside alkyl urethane (lla) is not or very poorly soluble. The urethane (lla) is then physically isolated from the reaction mixture, for example by filtration or centrifugation, washed with a suitable solvent in which the urethane (lla) is not or only very slightly soluble, and dried using any common technique. A further convenient method to synthesise a desired urethane (lla) according to the present invention, can be performed in an analogous manner to the one described by W. Gerhardt, Abh. Dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, KL Chem, Geol. Bioi., Vol 1966 (6), 24-36, (1967) (C. A..6S, 14323). It involves the transformation in a one-pot reaction in dimethyl formamide of the starch hydrolysate with potassium cyanate and with a selected hydrocarbyl halogenide, preferably an hydrocarbyl bromide. Methods and uses of sugar polymer derivatives, in particular inulin derivatives and glucoside hydrocarbyl derivatives as described herein can be beneficially applied to stabilisation, protection and solubilisation of proteins which are to be used in foodstuffs, nutritional supplements, cosmetics or pharmaceutical preparations. In this context non-toxic sugar polymer derivatives are usually used, particularly if an appreciable amount of the sugar polymer derivative is to be present in the protein product, if the presence of a significant concentration of the sugar polymer derivative is not desired 5n the protein product, then the sugar polymer derivative can be readily separated from protein, Methods and uses of the invention are useful as the sugar polymer derivatives employed influence protein analytical techniques to a much lesser extent than traditional denaturants, solubilisers and protectants e.g. detergents, arginine and guanidine hydrochloride. Sugar polymer derivatives are generally less expensive than chaperone proteins, so the invention provides a cost effective means of maintaining or improving solubility, particularly in scale-up of processes, where prior art methods may prove uneconomic. In methods of the invention, aggregation is suppressed without compromising downstream applications of the protern. Methods of the invention are suitable to enhance protein stability on storage, improve chromatographic purifications, minimise losses during protein concentration and reduce protein aggregation during dialysis. The invention can be applied in all protein processing areas, to increase yields and decrease solution volumes, meaning that capital expenditure is reduced and the efficiency of production processes can be improved. Kits are provided for performing methods of the invention, kits will generally contain a supply of sugar polymer derivative, e.g. one or more inulin derivative(s) and/or one or more gluooside hydrocarbyl derivative(s) as described herein, preferably one or more inulin derivative(s) of formula (1) and/or one or more glucoside hydrocsrbyl derivative(s) of formula (II), optionally together with additional reagents, consumables such as vials, pipette tips and spun columns, and/or instructions for use of the kit The kit may also contain buffers and other reagents suitable for use in performing a method of the invention. The invention also provides a composition comprising a protein, and an inulin derivative with a degree of polymerisation of from about 3 to 500, 3 to 250 or 3 to 100, preferably from 3 to 50, more preferably from 10 to 50, yet more preferably from 15 to 40, further preferably from 20 to 30, e.g. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30. In a composition of the invention, the inulin derivative may be lnutec®SP1. Inulin derivatives useful in such compositions include those derivatised by one or more type(s) of non-polar hydrocarbyl group selected from the group consisting of: the group consisting of; alky) groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, alkenyl and alkynyl groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms, haJoaikyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, cycloalkyl groups having from 3 to 9 carbon atoms, aryl groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms, ara!kyl groups comprising alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms which are substituted with 1 or more aryl groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms, fatty acid groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and polyols having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms. In such compositions the inulin derivative can be a compound of formula (I), thus the invention provides a composition comprising a protein, and an inulin derivative of formula (!); G(O-CO-NH-R1)8-[F(O-CO-NH-R2)b]n (I) wherein: G is a terminal glucosyl unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R1); R1 is a straight or branched chain saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R1) group on the glucosyl unit, each R1 group may be the same or different; a is an integer of from 0 to 4; F is a fructosyi unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with s group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R2); R2 is a straight or branched chain saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms and, where there is more than one (0-CO-NH-R2) group on the fructosyl unit, each R2 group may be the same or different; b is an integer of from 0 to 3 and from 0 to 4 for the terminal fructosyl unit; n is an integer of from 2 to 499 preferably of from 2 to 249, 2 to 99, 2 to 49, 9 to 49, 14 to 39, 19 to 29, or 19 to 24, each unit of formula F(0-C0-NH-R2)b may be the same or different from any other unit of formula F(O-CO-NH-R2)b; and the average degree of substitution per glucosyl or fructosyl unit is from 0.D1 to 3.0. In a composition according to this aspect of the invention the compound of formula (I) can be a polydisperse linear or slightly branched inulin N-alkylurethane, and may be selected from the group consisting of inulin N-n-octyl-carbarnates, inuiin N-n-dodecylcarbamates and inulin N-n-octadecylcarbamates. A composition according to the invention may comprise a protein, and a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative of formula (II): [G{0-C0-NH-R1)8]n (II) wherein: G is a glucosyl unit in which one or more hydroxy! groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (0-CO-NH-R1); R1 is a hydrocarbyl group selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups, alkenyl groups, alkynyl groups, haloalkyl groups, cycloalkyl groups, aryl groups and aralkyl groups and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R1) group on each glucosyl unit, each R1 group may be the same or different; a is an integer of from 0 to 4 for a terminal glucosyl unit, 0 to 3 for a non-branched, non-terminal glucosyl unit and 0 to 2 for a branched, non-terminal glucosyl unit; n is an integer of from 3 to 499 preferably of from 3 to 249, 3 to 99, 3 to 49, 9 to 49, 14 to 39, 19 to 29, or 19 to 24, each unit of formula G(O-CO-NH-R1)a may be the same or different from any other unit of formula G(O-CO-NH-R1)8; and the average degree of substitution per glucosyl unft is from 0.01 to 2.0. In compositions of the invention, the molar concentration of the inulin derivative or glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative is generally in the range of from about 0.1 to about 1000 times the molar concentration of protein, preferably about 0.5 to about 500, about 1 to about 300, about 1 to about 100, about 1 to about 50, about 1 to about 30, about 1 to about 25, or about 1 to 20 times the molar concentration of protein. Compositions can be in liquid, e.g. aqueous form, or can be in dried form. In a preferred embodiment the composnon is a pharmaceutical composition, e.g. in aqueous form, which may be SUITABLE administration by injection, ingestion, inhalation or topical application, or in dried form for reconstitution in a suitable liquid (such as sterile distilled water, saline, or a pharmaceutically acceptable buffer) for administration, e.g. by njection, ingestion, inhalation or topical administration. Compositions according to the invention, are suitable for use in the diagnosis, treatment, prophylaxis or monitoring of disease in humans and/or animals. Pharmaceutical compositions according to the invention may comprise, for example, therapeutic proteins such as insulin, erythropoietin, antibodies or antibody fragments. Pharmaceutical compositions may contain sjntigenic proteins for immunisation. List of Figures Figure 1 shows protein aggregation as a function of alkyl-inulin concentration in the solution used to dilute the denatured protein. The final lysozyme concentration was 0.75 mg /ml. The y-axis shows the A492 measurement (aggregation) and the x-axis indicates the alkyl-inuiin concentration in rng/mi. Figure 2 shows the relative reduction in protein aggregation as a function of alkyl-inulin concentration in the solution used to dilute the denatured protein. The final lysozyme concentration was 0.75 mg /ml. The y-axis shows the percentage reduction in aggregation and the x-axis indicates the alkyl-inulin concentration in mg/ml. Figure 3 shows protein aggregation as a function of alkyl-inulin concentration in the solution used to dilute the denatured protein. The final citrate synthase concentration is 0.25 mg/ml. The y-axis shows the A492 measurement (aggregation) and the x-axis indicates the alkyl-inulin concentration in mg/ml. Figure 4 shows the relative reduction in protein aggregation as a function of alkyl-inulin concentration in the solution used to dilute the denatured protein. The final citrate synthase concentration was 0.25 mg /ml. The y-axis shows the percentage reduction in aggregation and the x-axis indicates the afkyl-inulin concentration in mg/ml. Examples Example 1 Stabilisation and protection of protein, aggregation suppression during dilution of denatured lysozyma The test protein, hen egg white lysozyme (Fiuka, #62971), was dissolved at a concentration of 15 mg/ml in denaturation buffer, 8 M Urea, 0.1 M Tris-HCI, 32 mM DTT at pH 8.2. The protein was denatured overnight at 4°C, The denatured protein was then diluted 20 times into solutions of 0.1 mM Tris-HCI, 5 mM GSSG at pH 8.2 containing various concentrations of Inutec® SP1 (alkyl-inuiin). Aggregation was monitored by measuring the solution turbidity through adsorption of light at 492 nm (A492) after 15 min incubation at room temperature. The results are shown in figures 1 and 2. Example 2 Stabilisation and protection of protein, aggregation suppression during dilution of denatured citrate synthase The test protein, porcine heart citrate synthase (Sigma, #C3260), was dissolved in denaturation buffer, 8 M Urea, 0.1 M Tris-HCI, 32 mM DTT at pH 8.2. The solution was prepared to give a final concentration of 5 mg/ml protein using an ultrafiltration device (Vivaspin 500 PES 10 kDa MWCO, Fisher, #FDP875010X) to perform a buffer exchange into the denaturation buffer. The protein was denatured overnight at 4°C. The denatured protein was then diluted 20 times into solutions of 0.1 mM Tris-HCI, 5 mM GSSG at pH 8.2 containing various concentrations of alkyMnuiin. Aggregation was monitored by measuring the solution turbidity thorough adsorption of light at 492 nm (A492) after 15 min incubation at room temperature. The results are shown in figures 3 and 4. CLAIMS: 1. A method of stabilising a protein, characterised by contacting the protein with a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not being an a-, - or y-cydodextrin. 2. A method according to claim 1, characterised in that the protein and 3. sugar polymer derivative are contacted in aqueous solution. 4. A method according to claim 2, further comprising drying of the aqueous 5. solution by desiccation, dehydration, evaporation or lyophilisation. 6. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the protein is 7. stabilised against conformationaf change, 8. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the protein is a 9. denatured protein, 10. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the protein is in 11. native conformation. 12. A method according to claim 6, wherein the protein is stabilised against 13. denaturation. 14. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the protein is 15. stabilised against aggregation. 16. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the protein is 17. protected against degradation. 18. A method of solubilising a protein, characterised by contacting the 19. protein with a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not being 20. an α -β - or γ-cyclodextrin. 21. A method of protein processing comprising a method according to any 22. preceding claim. 23. A method according to claim 11, comprising or consisting of a method of 24. folding protein. 25. A method according to claim 11 or claim 12, comprising one or more 26. protein purification step(s). 27. A method according to claim 13, wherein said protein purification step(s) 28. is/are selected from the group consisting of; dialysis, diafiltration, ultrafiltratlon 29. and chromatography. 30. The use of a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not 31. being an a-, £- or ycyclodextrin, to stabilise a protein against aggregation, 32. conformational change and/or degradation, 33. A use according to claim 15, to stabilise a protein in aqueous solution. 34. A use according to claim 15, to stabilise a protein in dry form. 35. The use of a sugar polymer derivative, said sugar polymer derivative not 36. being an α -β - or γcyclodextrin, to soiubilise a protein. 37. A method or use according to any preceding claim, wherein the sugar 38. polymer derivative comprises one or more sugar(s) selected from the group 39. consisting of: erythrose, threose, ribose, arabinose, xylose, lyxose, altose, 40. altrose, glucose, mannose, gulose, tdose, galactose, talose, psicose, fructose, 41. sorbose, tagatose, xylulose and ribulose. 42. A method or use according to claim 19, wherein the sugar polymer 43. derivative is a dextran, cellulose, amylose, starch, pulluianr mannan, chltrn, 44. chitosan, inulin, levan, xylan, cyclodextrin or cycloamylose, 45. A method or use according any preceding claim, wherein the sugar 46. polymer derivative is a cyclic sugar polymer derivative comprising 3 or more 47. monoeaccharide units. 48. A method or use according to claim 21, wherein the cycliG sugar polymer 49. derivative is a glucosan, 50. A method or use according to claim 21 or 22, wherein the cyclic sugar 51. polymer derivative is a cyclodextrin derivative. 52. A method or use according to any one of claims 21 to 23, wherejn the 53. molar concentration of sugar polymer derivative is in the range of from about 10 54. to about 10,000 times the molar concentration of protein, 55. A method or use according to any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein the 56. sugar polymer derivative is a linear or branched sugar polymer derivative 57. comprising three or more monosaccharide units. 58. A method or use according to claim 25, wherein the sugar polymer 59. derivative is a fructosan or a glucosan. 60. A method or use apcording to claim 26, wherein the sugar polymer 61. derivative is an inulln derivative. 62. A method or use according to claim 26, wherein the sugar potymer 63. derivative is a glucoside derivative. 64. A method or use according to claim 28, wherein the inulin derivative or 65. giucoside derivative has a degree of polymerisation of from about 3 to about 500, about 3 to about 250, about 3 to about 100, about 3 to about 50, about 10 to about 50, about 15 to about 40, or from about 20 to about 30. 30. A method or use according to any preceding claim, wherein the sugar 31. polymer derivative is derivatised by one or more type(s) of non-polar 32. hydrocarbyl group. 33. A method or use according to any preceding claim, wherein the sugar 34. polymer derivative is derivatised by one or more type(s) of non-polar 35. hydrocarby! group selected from the group consisting of: alky) groups having 36. from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, alkenyl and alkynyl groups having from 2 to 25 37. carbon atoms, halo alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, cycloalkyl 38. groups having from 3 to 9 carbon atoms, aryl groups having from 6 to 14 carbon 39. atoms, a alkyl groups comprising alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms 40. which are substituted with 1 or more aryl groups having from 6 to 14 carbon 41. atoms, fatty acid groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and polyo is having 42. from 1 to 25 carbon atoms. 43. A method or use according to claim 30 or claim 31, wherein the one or 44. more non-polar hydrocarbyl group is selected from: alkyl groups having from 1 45. to 25 carbon atoms and alkenyl and alkynyl groups having from 2 to 25 carbon 46. atoms. 47. A method or use according to any one of claim 30 to 32, wherein the or a 48. non-polar hydrocarbyl group is an alkyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon 49. atoms. 50. A method or use according to any one of claim 30 to 33, wherein the or a 51. non-polar hydrocarbyl group is an alkenyl or alkynyl group having from 2 to 25 52. carbon atoms. 53. A method according to any preceding claims, wherein when the sugar 54. polymer derivative is an inulin derivative, the average degree of substitution per 55. saccharide unit is from 0.01 to 3.0. 56. A method of stabilising a protein according to claim 1, characterised by 57. contacting the protein with an inulin derivative. , 37. A method according to claim 36, characterised in that the protein and Inulin derivative are contacted in aqueous solution. 38. A method according to claim 37, further comprising drying the solution by 39. desiccation, dehydration, evaporation or lyophliisation. 40. A method according to any one of claims 36 to 38, wherein the protein is stabilised against conformational change. 40. A method according to any one of claims 36 to 39, wherein the protein Is a denatured protein. 41- A method according to any one of claims 36 to 39, wherein the protein is in native conformation. 42. A method according to claim 41, wherein the protein is stabilised against 43. denaturation. 44. A method according to any one of claims 36 to 42, wherein the protein Is 45. stabilised against aggregation. 44. A method according to any one of claims 36 to 43 wherein the protein is protected against degradation. 45. A method of solubilising a protein, characterised by contacting the protein with an inulin derivative. 46. A method for stabilising protein in non-native configuration comprising 47. providing to an aqueous solution comprising protein in non-native conformation, 48. an inulin derivative at a concentration sufficient to inhibit protein folding. 49. A method for stabilising protein in native conformation comprising 50. providing to an aqueous solution comprising protein in native conformation, an 51. inulin derivative at a concentration sufficient to maintain the protein in native 52. conformation. 53. A method according to claim 47 or claim 48, further comprising drying the 54. solution thus obtained by desiccation, dehydration, evaporation or lyophilisation. 55. A method according to any one of claims 36 to 48, wherein the 56. concentration of the inulin derivative is in the range of from about 0.1 to about 57. 1000 times the molar concentration of protein. 50 A method according to any one of claims 36 to 49, wherein the inulin derivative is present at a concentration of from about 0.002 mg/m! to 100 mg/mt. 51. A method of protein processing comprising a method according to any 52. one of claims 36 to 50. 53. A method according to claim 51, comprising a method of folding protein. 54. A method according to claim 51 or claim 52, comprising one or more 55. protein purification step(S). 56. A method according to claim 53, wherein said protein purification step(s) 57. is/are selected from the group consisting of: dialysis, diafiltration, ultrafiltration 58. and chromatography. 59. The use of an inulin derivative to stabilise a protein against 60. conformationsl change and/or degradation. 61. A use according to claim 55, to stabilise a protein in aqueous solution. 62. A use according to claim 55 or claim 56, to stabilise a protein in dry form. 63. A method or use according to any one of claims 36 to 57, wherein the 64. inulin derivative has a degree of polymerisation of from about 3 to 500, 3 to 250 65. or 3 to 100, preferably from 3 to 50, more preferably from 10 to 50, yet more 66. preferably from 15 to 40, further preferably from 20 to 30. 67. A method according to any one of claims 35 to 58, wherein the inulin 68. derivative Is derivatised by one or more type{s) of non-polar hydrocarbyl group. 69. A method according to claim 59, wherein the inulin derivative is 70. derivatised by one or more type(s) of non-polar hydrocarbyl group selected from 71. the group consisting of a linear alkyl derivative(S), a branched alkyl 72. derivative(s), an aromatic group(s), a polyol(s) and a fatty acid(s). 73. A method according to any one of claims 36 to 60, wherein the inulin 74. derivative is a compound of formula (I): G(O-CO-NH-R1)a-[F(O-CO-NH-R2)b]n (I) wherein: G is a terminal giucosyl unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R1); R1 is selected from the group comprising alkyl groups, alkenyl groups, alkynyl groups, haloalkyl groups, cycloalkyl groups, aryl groups and aralkyl groups and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R1) group on the giucosyl unit, each R1 group may be the same or different; a la an integer of from 0 to 4; F is a fructosyl unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (OCO-NH-R2); R2 is selected from the group comprising alkyl groups, alkenyl groups, alkynyl groups, haloalkyl groups, cycloalkyl groups, aryl groups and aralkyl groups and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R2) group on the fructosyl unit, each Rz group may bs the same or different; b is an integer of from 0 to 3 and from 0 to 4 for the terminal fructosyl unit; n is an integer of from 2 to 499 preferably of from 2 to 249, 2 to 99, 2 to 49,9 to 49,14 to 39, 19 to 29, or 19 to 24, each unit of formula F(O-CO-NH-R2)b may be the same or different from any other unit of formula F(O-CO-NH-R2)b; and the average degree of substitution per glucosy) or fructosyl unit is from 0.01 to 3.0. 62. A method according to claim 61, wherein each group R1 and R2 is 63. selected from alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms.and alkenyi and 64. alkynyl groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms, 65. A method according to claim 61 or claim 62, wherein one or more of the 66. groups R"1 and R2 is an alkyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms. 54. A method according to any one of claims 61 to 63, wherein one or more of groups R1 and R2 is an alkenyi or alkynyl group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms. 65. A method according to claim 61, wherein each alky! group R1 and R2 is a 66. linear alkyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms or a branched alkyl group 67. having from 3 to 25 carbon atoms. 68. A method according to any one of claims 61 to 65, wherein in said 69. compound of formula (II) one or more of the R1 group(s) is a haloalkyl group 70. having one or more halogen atoms. 71. A method according to any one of claims 61 to 66, wherein in said 72. compound of formula (li) one or more of the R1 group(s) is a cycloalkyl group. 73. A method according to any one of claims 51 to 67, wherein in said 74. compound of formula (H) one or more of the R1 group(s) is an aryl group, 75. A method according to any one of claims 61 to 68, wherein in said 76. compound of formula (I!) one or more of the R1 group(s) is an aralkyl group. 77. A method according to any one of claims 61 to 69, wherein the average 78. degree of substitution per glucosyl or fructosyl unit is from 0.02 to 1.0. 79. A method according to any one of claims 61 to 70, wherein the 80. compound of formula (I) is a poiydisperss linear or slightly branched inulin N- 81. alkyluretnane. 82. A method according to any one of claims 61 to 71, wherein the 83. compound of formula (I) is selected from the group consisting of inulin N-n- 84. octyl-carbamates, inulin N-n-dodecylcarbamates and inulin N-n- 85. octadecylcarbamates. 86. A method according to any one of claims 58 to 60, wherein the inuiin 87. derivative is lnutec®SP1. 88. A method of stabilising a protein according to claim 1, characterised by 89. contacting the protein with a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative. 90. A method according to claim 74, characterised in that the protein and 91. glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative are contacted in aqueous solution. 92. A method according to claim 75, further comprising drying the solution by 93. desiccation, dehydration, evaporation or lyophilisation. 94. A method according to any one of claims 74 to 76, wherein the protein is 95. stabilised against conformational change. 96. A method according to any one of claims 74 to 77, wherein the protein is 97. a denatured protein. 98. A method according to any one of claims 74 to 77, wherein the protein is 99. in native conformation. 100. A method according to claim 79, wherein the protein is stabilised against 101. denaturation. 102. A method according to any one of claims 74 to 80, wherein the protein is 103. stabilised against aggregation. 104. A method according to any one of claims 74 to 80, wherein the protein is 105. protected against degradation. 106. A method of solubilising a protein, characterised by contacting the 107. protein with a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative. 108. A method for stabilising protein in non-native configuration comprising 109. providing to an aqueous solution comprising protein in non-native conformation, 110. an glucoslde hydrocarbyl derivative at a concentration sufficient to inhibit protein 111. folding. 112. A method for stabilising protein in native conformation comprising 113. providing to an aqueous solution comprising protein in native conformation, an 114. glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative at a concentration sufficient to maintain the 115. protein in native conformation. 86, A method according to claim 84 or claim 85, further comprising drying the solution thus obtained by desiccation, dehydration, evaporation or lyophilisation, 87. A method according to any one of claims 74 to 86, wherein the concentration of the glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative is in the range of from about 0.1 to about 1000 times the molar concentration of protein. 88 A method according to any one of claims 74 to 87, wherein the inulin derivative is present at a concentration of from about 0.002 mg/mi to 100 mg/ml. 89. A method of protein processing comprising a method according to any 90. one of claims 74 to 88. 91. A method according to claim 89, comprising a method of folding protein, 92. A method according to claim 89 or claim 90, comprising one or more 93. protein purification step(s). 94. A method according to claim 91, wherein said protein purification step(s) 95. is/are selected from the group consisting of: dialysis, diafiltration, ultrafiltration 96. and chromatography. 97. The use of a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative to stabilise a protein 98. against conformation change and/or degradation. 99. A use according to claim 90, to stabilise a protein in aqueous solution- 100. A use according to claim 93 or claim 94, to stabilise a protein in dry form. 101. A method or use according to any one of claims 74 to 95, wherein the 102. glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative has a degree of polymerisation of from about 3 103. to 500, 3 to 250 or 3 to 100f preferably from 3 to 50, more preferably from 10 to 104. 50t yet more preferably from 15 to 40, further preferably from 20 to 30. 105. A method according to any one of claims 74 to 96, wherein the glucoside 106. hydrocarbyl derivative is derivatised by one or more type(s) of non-polar 107. hydrocarbyl group. 108. A method according to claim 97, wherein the glucoside hydrocarbyl 109. derivative is derivatised by one or more type(s) of non-polar hydrocarbyl group 110. selected from the group consisting of: alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon 111. atoms, alkenyl and aikyny! groups having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms, haloalkyl 112. groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms, cycloalkyl groups having from 3 to 9 113. carbon atoms, aryl groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms, aralkyl groups 114. comprising alkyl groups having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms which are substituted 115. with 1 or more aryl groups having from 6 to 14 carbon atoms, fatty acid groups 116. having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and polyols having from 1 to 25 carbon 117. atoms. 118. A method according to any one of claims 74 to 98 wherein the or a sugar 119. polymer derivative is a glucoside hydrocarbyl derivative of formula (ii): [G(O-CO-NH-R1)a]n (II) wherein: G is a glucosyl unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R1); R1 is a hydrocarbyl group selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups, alkeny! groups, atkynyl groups, hatoalkyl groups, cydoalkyl groups, aryl groups and aralkyl groups and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R1) group on each glucosyl unit, each R1 group may be the same or different; a is an integer of from 0 to 4 for a terminal glucosyl unit, 0 to 3 for a non-branched, non-terminal glucosyl unit and 0 to 2 for a branched, non-terminal glucosyl unit; n is an integer of from 3 to 499 preferably of from 3 to 249, 3 to 99, 3 to 49, 9 to 49, 14 to 39, 19 to 29, or 19 to 24, each unit of formuia G(O-CO-NH-R1)a may be the same or different from any other unit of formula GtO-CO-NH-R1)a, and the average degree of substitution per glucosyl unit is from 0.01 to 2.0. 100. A method according to claim 99, wherein in said compound of formula (II) 101. one or more R1 group is an alkyl group selected from a linear alkyl group having 102. from 1 to 25 carbon atoms and a branched chain alkyl group having from 3 to 103. 25 carbon atoms, 104. A method according to claim 99 or claim 100, wherein in said compound 105. of formula (II) one or more R1 group is an alkenyl group selected from a linear 106. alkenyi group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and a branched chain alkenyl 107. group having from 3 to 25 carbon atoms. 108. A method according to any one of claims 99 to 101, wherein in said 109. compound of formula (II) one or more R1 group is an alkynyl group selected 110. from a linear alkynyl group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and a branched 111. chain alkenyl group having from 3 to 25 carbon atoms. 112. A method according to any one of claims 99 to102, wherein In said 113. compound of formula (II) one or more of the R1 group(s) is a haloalkyl group 114. having one or more haiogen atoms. 115. A method according to any one of claims 99 to 103, wherein in said 116. compound of formula (II) one or more of the R1 group(s) is a cycloalkyl group. 117. A method according to any one of claims 99 to 104, wherein in said 118. compound of formula (II) one or more of the R1 group(s) is an aryl group. 119. A method according to any one of claims 99 to 105, wherein in said 120. compound of formula (il) one or more of the R1 group(s) is an aralkyl group. 121. A method according to any one of claims 99 to 106, wherein in said 122. compound of formula ((I), the average degree of substitution per glucosyl unit is 123. from 0.02 to 1.0. 124. A method according to any one of claims 99 to 107, wherein said 125. compound of formula (I!) is a polydisperse linear or branched glucoside N- 126. hydrocarbyl urethane. 127. A method according to claim 106, wherein said compounds of formula (H) 128. is a hydrocarbyl urethane of a starch hydrolysate. 129. A method according to claim 109, wherein the compound of formula (II) 130. is a glucoside hydrocarbyi derivative composed of units of formula (ill): G1 (O-CO-NH-R1)b (III) wherein, G' represents a glucosyl unit of a starch hydrolysate molecule, the starch hydrolysate having a Dextrose Equivalent (D. E.) ranging from 1 to 47, R1 is a hydrocarbyl group as defined above, and b represents the number of hydrocarbyl carbamate groups per glucosyl unit, which number is commonly expressed as the degree of substitution (DS), i.e. the average number of hydrocarbyl substituents per glucosyl unit of the glucoside hydrocarby! urethane of formula (lla), with said DS value ranging from 0,01 to 2.0. 111. A method according to claim 110, wherein in said compound of formula 112. (II) one or more R1 group is an alky! group selected from a linear alkyl group 113. having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms and a branched chain alkyl group having from 114. 3 to 25 carbon atoms. 115. A method according to claim 110 or claim 111, wherein in said 116. compound of formula (II) one or more R1 group is an alkenyl group selected from a linear alkenyl group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and a branched chain alkenyl group having from 3 to 25 carbon atoms. 113. A method according to any one of claims 110 to 112, wherein in said 114. compound of formula (II) one or more R1 group is an alkynyl group selected 115. from a linear alkynyl group having from 2 to 25 carbon atoms and a branched 116. chain alkenyl group having from 3 to 25 carbon atoms. 117. A method according to any one of claims 110 to 113, wherein in said 118. compound of formula (I!) one or more of the R1 group(s) is a haloalkyl group 119. having one or more halogen atoms. 120. A method according to any one of claims 110 to 114, wherein in said 121. compound of formula (II) one or more of said R1 group(s) is a cycloalkyl group. 122. A method according to any one of claims 110 to 115, wherein in said 123. compound of formula (II) one or more of the R1 group{s) is an aryl group, 124. A method according to any one of claims 110 to 116, wherein in said 125. compound of formula (ii) one or more of the R1 group(s) is an aralkyl group. 126. A method according to any one of claims 110 to 117, wherein in sa5d 127. compound of formula (II) the DS value is from 0.02 to 1.0. 128. A kit for performing a method or use according to any one of claims 1 to 129. 118. 130. A kit according to claim 119, comprising a one or more inulin 131. derivative(s) of formula (I) and/or one or more glucoside hydrocarbyl 132. derivative(s) of formula (II). 133. A composition comprising a protein and an inulin derivative of formula (I): wherein: G Is a terminal glucosyl unit in which on© or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R1); R1 is a straight or branched chain saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R1) group on the glucosyl unit, each R1 group may be the same or different; a is an integer of from 0 to 4; F is a fructosyl unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R2); R2 is a straight or branched chain saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl group having from 1 to 25 carbon atoms and, where there is more than one (0-CO-NH-R2) group on the fructosyl unit, each Rz group may be the same or different; b is an integer of from 0 to 3 and from 0 to 4 for the terminal fructosy! unit; n is an Integer of from 2 to 499 preferably of from 2 to 249, 2 to 99, 2 to 49, 9 to 49,14 to 39, 19 to 29, or 19 to 24, each unit of formula F(O-CO-NH-R2)b may be the same or different from any other unit of formula F(O-CO-NH-R2)b; and the average degree of substitution per glucosyl or fructosy! unit is from 0.01 to 3.0, 122. A composition according to claim 121, wherein the compound of formula 123. (I) is a polydisperse linear or slightly branched inulin N-alkylurethane. 124. A composition according to claim 121 or clam 122, wherein the 125. compound of formula (I) is selected from the group consisting of inulin N-n- 126. octyl-carbamates, inulin N-n-dodecylcarbarnates and inulin N-n- 127. octadecylcarbamates. 124. A composition comprising a protein, and a glucoslde hydrocarbyl derivative of formula (!i): [GfO-CO-NH-R1)a]n (II) wherein: G is a glucosyl unit in which one or more hydroxyl groups thereof may be substituted with a group or groups of formula (O-CO-NH-R1); R1 is a hydrocarbyl group selected from the group consisting of alkyl groups, alkenyl groups, alkynyl groups, haloalky! groups, cycloalkyl groups, aryl groups and aralkyl groups and, where there is more than one (O-CO-NH-R1) group on each glucosyl unit, each R1 group may be the same or different; a is an integer of from 0 to 4 for a terminal glucosyl unit, 0 to 3 for a non-branched, non-terminal glucosyl unit and 0 to 2 for a branched, non-terminal glucosyl unit; n is an integer of from 3 to 499 preferably of from 3 to 249, 3 to 99, 3 to 49, 9 to 49,14 to 39,19 to 29, or 19 to 24, each unit of formula G(OCO-NH-R1)a may be the same or different from any other unit of formula G{O-CO-NH-R1)B; and the average degree of substitution per glucosyl unit is from 0.01 to 2,0. 125. A composition according any one of claims 120 to 124, wherein the 126. molar concentration of the inulin derivative or glucosids hydrocarbyl derivative is 127. In the range of from about 0.1 to about 1000 times the molar concentration of 128. protein. 129. A composition according to any one of claims 120 to 125 which is an 130. aqueous solution. 127. A composition according to any one of claims 120 to 125 in dry form. 128. A composition according to any one of claims 120 to 127, which is a pharmaceutical composition.

Documents:

3896-CHENP-2006 AMENDED PAGES OF SPECIFICATION 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 AMENDED CLAIMS 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 07-03-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 16-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECEIVED 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 FORM-1 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 FORM-3 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 OTHER PATENT DOCUMENT 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 OTHER PATENT DOCUMENT 1 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 OTHERS 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 POWER OF ATTORNEY 07-03-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 POWER OF ATTORNEY 18-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 AMENDED PAGES OF SPECIFICATION 16-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 FORM-1 16-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 FORM-13 16-01-2013.pdf

3896-CHENP-2006 OTHERS 16-01-2013.pdf

3896-chenp-2006-abstract.pdf

3896-chenp-2006-claims.pdf

3896-chenp-2006-correspondnece-others.pdf

3896-chenp-2006-description(complete).pdf

3896-chenp-2006-drawings.pdf

3896-chenp-2006-form 1.pdf

3896-chenp-2006-form 3.pdf

3896-chenp-2006-form 5.pdf

3896-chenp-2006-pct.pdf