Title of Invention

"FILM"

Abstract A multilayer film comprising at least three layers, two outer layers and a core layer independently comprising an LLDPE component and said core layer comprising a multimodal polyethylene component having a lower molecular weight component and a higher molecular weight component, wherein the density of the higher molecular weight component is less than 915 kg/m3 and the MFR2of the higher molecular weight component is less than 1 g/10 min.
Full Text Film
This invention relates to a multilayer film with
excellent optical and mechanical properties which can be
formed into a container, e.g. a pouch, based on
polyolefins which are easy to process. In particular,
the invention concerns a multilayer film or pouch
fashioned therefrom comprising a layer of multimodal
polyethylene, e.g. bimodal linear low density
polyethylene (LLDPE).
The polymer film manufacturer seeks films which
have excellent optical properties, have good sealing
properties and have excellent mechanical properties,
e.g. high impact strength and stiffness. The polymers
used to make the film must also have good
processability, i.e. during the extrusion procedure the
bubble formed must be stable and the extruded film
should have an even film distribution thickness.
In recent years, multilayer films have been formed
into standing pouches. The standing pouch market has
grown rapidly as more and more retailers offer their
products for sale in such pouches. Their use in the
food and drinks industry in particular has become
widespread. Such pouches generally replace blow moulded
polyolefin bottles on the supermarket shelves so the
retailer is expecting that the pouches he uses should
have comparable properties to such bottles at lower
cost.
These pouches are fabricated from multilayer
polymer films which require certain properties to be
effective. Thus, like the film producer, the pouch
manufacturer seeks products which have excellent
mechanical properties, e.g. high impact strength, tear
strength, puncture resistance and stiffness. Stiffness
is essential in order to allow pouches to stand without
collapsing under their own weight. Stiffness is also
essential to allow the end user to dispense the pouch
contents by pouring "Without the pouch deforming'under
the pressure of the user's grip. Higher stiffness also
allows an increase in the throughput in the pouch making
machinery.
The film and hence walls of a pouch must be
scalable in order to allow formation of the pouch from a
film sheet. The film and pouch manufacturer is thus
looking for products with good hot tack and broad
sealing windows.
Moreover, as mentioned above the polyolefins used
in the film and hence pouch construction must be readily
processable, e.g. must be readily extrudable.
Unfortunately, the skilled man faces the problem
that when improving one property, it seems inevitable
that another property is adversely affected.
For example, low density polyethylene (LDPE) gives
rise to films having good optical properties and can be
processed at low temperatures and pressures whilst
maintaining melt strength however films made from LDPE
have low stiffness.
Conventional unimodal Ziegler-Natta produced linear
low density polyethylenes (znLLDPE's) have excellent
tear strength and impact properties but stiffness and
impact remain poor and the films tend to be very hazy.
Optical properties have been improved by using
metallocene linear low density polyethylenes but at the
expense of processabilty. These polymers exhibit poor
bubble stability during film blowing.
Various blends of these materials have been
proposed in the art to try to maximise film performance
by combining the advantageous properties of certain
polymers. Thus for example, LDPE and mLLDPE have been
blended to form films however such films have poor
stiffness. Medium density polyethylene made by
metallocene catalysis has been blended with LDPE (EP-A-
1108749) to form films.
The skilled polymer chemist still seeks" therefore
films and pouches made therefrom having excellent
mechanical and processing properties, e.g. manifested by
excellent bubble stability during extrusion. In
addition, improved optical properties are desired, in
particular in film applications.
The present inventors have surprisingly found that
a multilayer film comprising at least three layers can
fulfil these requirements. The film comprises two outer
layers which are preferably identical and comprise a
LLDPE component which should exhibit good hot tack and
possess a broad sealing window, e.g. an mLLDPE component
optionally blended with an LDPE component, whilst the
core layer, i.e. a layer sandwiched between two outer
layers, comprises a multimodal polyethylene preferably
produced in a two stage process, e.g. a multimodal
LLDPE, having a low density, high molecular weight
component, optionally blended with mLLDPE or LDPE
components.
Thus, viewed from one aspect, the invention
provides a multilayer film comprising at least three
layers, two outer layers and a core layer, each outer
layer independently comprising an LLDPE component, e.g.
at least 50%wt of LLDPE component, preferably having a
density of less than 940 kg/m3 and said core layer
comprising a multimodal polyethylene component having a
lower molecular weight component and a higher molecular
weight component, wherein the density of the higher
molecular weight component is less than 915 kg/m3 and the
MFRa of the higher molecular weight component is less
than 1 g/10 min.
Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a
process for the preparation of a multilayer film as
hereinbefore described comprising coextruding a
composition comprising a LLDPE component, preferably
having a density of less than 940 kg/m3 to form two outer
layers and a multimodal polyethylene component having a
lower molecular weight component and a higher molecular
weight component, wherein the density of the higher
molecular weight component is less than 915 kg/m3 and the
MFR2 of the higher molecular weight component is less
than 1 g/10 min to form a core layer.
Viewed from another aspect the invention provides
use of a multilayer film as hereinbefore described in
packaging as well as an article packaged using said
film.
Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a
pouch formed from said multilayer film, preferably a
standing pouch.
The multilayer film of the invention has at least
three layers, e.g. 3, 5, 7 or 11 layers. Preferably
however the film should comprise only three layers, two
outer layers and a core layer and optionally a barrier
layer as described more fully below. By core layer is
meant a non outer layer, i.e. the core layer is not on
the surface of the formed film.
The outer layers may have differing compositions
although preferably the outer layers should be
identical. At least one of the outer layers may act as
a sealing layer to allow fabrication of articles from
the film, e.g. pouches. The other outer layer may be
laminated to a barrier layer. The outer layers may
comprise at least 50 wt% of a LLDPE component having a
density of less than 940 kg/m3. Preferably, the LLDPE is
a unimodal, especially a tnLLDPE (i.e. one produced using
single site, e.g. metallocene catalysis), most
especially a unimodal mLLDPE. By unimodal is meant that
the molecular weight profile of the polymer comprises a
single peak and is produced by one reactor and a single
catalyst. Especially preferably, the outer layers
comprise a unimodal mLLDPE component and an LDPE
component.
LLDPE's should preferably form at least 60 %wt,
more preferably at 75% by weight, e.g. at least 80% wt,
especially at least 85% wt of each outer layer.
The LLDPE may have a density of less than 945 kg/m3,
preferably less than 940 kg/m3, e.g. 905-940 kg/m3,
preferably in the range of from 915 to 934 kg/m3, such as
918 to 934 kg/m3, e.g. 920 to 930 kg/m3 (ISO 1183) .
The LLDPE of the outer layer is formed from
ethylene along with at least one C3.12 alpha-olefin
comonomer, e.g. butene, hexene or octene. Preferably,
the LLDPE is an ethylene hexene copolymer, ethylene
octene copolymer or ethylene butene copolymer. The
amount of. comonomer incorporated is preferably 0.5 to 12
mol%, e.g. 2 to 10% mole relative to ethylene,
especially 4 to 8% mole. Preferred comonomer contents
may also be 1.5 to 10 wt%, especially 2 to 8 wt%.
The MFR2 (melt flow rate ISO 1133 at 190°C under a
load of 2.16 kg) of the LLDPE should preferably be in
the range 0.5 to 10, preferably 0.8 to 6.0, e.g. 0.9 to
2.0 g/lOmin.
The LLDPE should preferably have a weight average
molecular weight (Mw) of 100,000-250,000, e.g. 110,000-
160,000 (GPC). The Mw/Mn value should preferably be 2
to 20, e.g. 2.5 to 4, especially 3.0 to 3.5 (GPC).
Ideally, the LLDPE is made by single site, e.g.
metallocene catalysis and is therefore designated an
mLLDPE. The use of metallocene catalysis to make
LLDPE's is known and widely described in the literature.
It is within the scope of the invention for the
LLDPE to be a multimodal LLDPE, e.g. a bimodal LLDPE, as
described fully in connection with the core layer below.
The possibility of using mixtures of LLDPE's is also
covered, e.g. a unimodal LLDPE and a bimodal LLDPE.
Suitable LLDPE'e are available commercially from
Borealis and other suppliers.
One or both outer layers of the multilayer film of
the invention may also contain an LDPE component. LDPE
is a prepared using "a well-known high pressure radical
process as will be known to the skilled man and is a
different polymer from an LLDPE.
The amount of LDPE present may range from 1 to 50%
wt, e.g. 3 to 40 wt%, preferably 5 to 35% by weight,
preferably 10 to 30 wt%, especially 15 to 20 wt% of the
outer layer in question. Conveniently therefore the
ratio LLPDE to LDPE in the outer layer is about 9:1.
The LDPE may have a density of 915-935 kg/m3,
especially 920-930 kg/m3, e.g. 922 to 930 kg/m3. The
MFR2 of the LDPE may range from 0.3 to 4 g/lOmin, e.g.
0.5 to 2.5 g/10 min, e.g. 1.0 to 2.0 g/10 min. Suitable
LDPE's are available commercially from Borealis and
other suppliers.
Such an outer layer construction is believed to
contribute to a low seal initiation temperature and
excellent hot tack properties.
The outer layers may also contain other polymer
components if necessary and may also contain minor
amounts of conventional additives such as antioxidants,
UV stabilisers, acid scavengers, nucleating agents,
anti-blocking agents, slip agents etc as well as polymer
processing agent (PPA). Polymer processing agents are
available from commercial suppliers such as Dynamar and
may include a fluoroelastomer component and can be added
to the outer layer blend as part of a masterbatch as is
known in the art.
A specific film may comprise a first outer layer
comprising a unimodal LLDPE and LDPE blend with the
other outer layer being formed from a multimodal LLDPE,
optionally combined with an LDPE component.
The core layer of the film of the invention is one
sandwiched between two outer layers. The core layer of
the multilayer film of the invention comprises a
multimodal polyethylene component having a lower
molecular weight component and a higher molecular weight
component, wherein the density of the higher molecular
weight component is less than 915 kg/m3, preferably less
than 905 kg/m3 and the MFR2 of the higher molecular
weight component is less than 1 g/10 min, e.g. a bimodal
LLDPE, preferably a Ziegler-Natta bimodal LLDPE.
Alternatively viewed the core layer of the
multilayer film of the invention comprises a multimodal
LLDPE, i.e. one with a higher and lower molecular weight
component.
Thus, viewed from another aspect, the invention
provides a multilayer film comprising at least three
layers, two outer layers and a core layer, each outer
layer independently comprising an LLDPE -component and
said core layer comprising a multimodal LLDPE component
For example, therefore, the film might be a multilayer
film comprising at least three layers, two outer layers
and a core layer, each outer layer independently
comprising a unimodal mLLDPE and LDPE and said core
layer comprising a multimodal LLDPE.
It has been surprisingly found that the core layer
polymer can provide the film with excellent mechanical
and processing properties. Moreover, the mLLDPE
component which may be used in the outer layers provides
excellent optical properties. The outer layers also
contribute to a low seal initiation temperature (110°C)
and excellent hot tack properties.
The multimodal polyethylene can be the only
polyolefin employed in the core layer and preferably the
core layer should comprise at least 50% wt, e.g. at
least 60% wt of the multimodal polyethylene. In
addition, the core layer may comprise up to 50% wt, e.g.
up to 40% wt, preferably up to 30% wt LDPE. Suitable
LDPE's are those described above in connection with the
outer layers of the multilayer film.
The core layer may alternatively comprise up to 25%
wt, e.g. up to 20% wt of unimodal LLDPE, e.g. mLLDPE as
described above.
The film as a whole should have a multimodal
polyethylene content of between 30 and 40 wt%, e.g.
about 35% wt. .
The polyethylene component, e.g. LLDPE, in this
core layer must be multimodal, preferably bimodal, i.e.
its molecular weight profile does not comprise a single
peak but instead comprises the combination of two or
more peaks (which may or may not be distinguishable)
centred about different average molecular weights as a
result of the fact that the polymer comprises two or
more separately produced components.
Multimodal polyethylenes are typically made in more
than one reactor each having different conditions. The
components are typically so different that they show
more than one peak or shoulder in the diagram usually
given as result of its GPC (gel permeation
chromatograph) curve, where d(log(MW)) is plotted as
ordinate vs log(MW), where MW is molecular weight.
Thus, the multimodal polyethylene comprises a
higher molecular weight component which preferably
corresponds to an ethylene copolymer (or terpolymer) of
a higher alpha-olefin comonomer and a lower molecular
weight component which preferably corresponds to an
ethylene homopolymer or an ethylene copolymer (or
terpolymer) of a lower alpha-olefin comonomer.
Preferably the polyethylene in the core layer is formed
from an ethylene homopolymer and an ethylene butene,
ethylene octene or ethylene hexene copolymer.
Such multimodal polymers may be prepared for
example by two or more stage polymerization or by the
use of two or more different polymerization catalysts in
a one stage polymerization. It is also possible to
employ a dualsite catalyst. It is important to ensure
that the higher and lower molecular weight components
are intimately mixed prior to extrusion to form a film.
This is most advantageously achieved by using a
multistage process or a dual site but could be achieved
through blending.
To maximise homogeneity, particularly when a blend
is employed, it is preferred if the multimodal
polyethylene used in the core layer is extruded prior to
being extruded to form the film of the invention. This
preextrusion step ensures that the higher molecular
weight component will be homogeneously distributed
though the core layer and minimises the possibility of
gel formation in the film.
Preferably the multimodal polyethylene is produced
in a two-stage polymerization using the same catalyst,
e.g. a metallocene catalyst or preferably a Ziegler-
Natta catalyst. Thus, two slurry reactors or two gas
phase reactors could be employed. Preferably however,
the multimodal polyethylene is made using a slurry
polymerization in a loop reactor followed by a gas phase
polymerization in a gas phase reactor.
A loop reactor - gas phase reactor system is
marketed by Borealis A/S, Denmark as a BORSTAR reactor
system. The multimodal polyethylene in the core layer
is thus preferably formed in a two stage process
comprising a first slurry loop polymerisation followed
by gas phase polymerisation in the presence of a
Ziegler-Natta catalyst.
The conditions used in such a process are well
known. For slurry reactors, the reaction temperature
will generally be in the range 60 to 110°C (e.g. 85-
110°C), the reactor pressure will generally be in the
range 5 to 80 bar (e.g. 50-65 bar), and the residence
time will generally be in the range 0.3 to 5 hours (e.g.
0.5 to 2 hours). The diluent used will generally be an
aliphatic hydrocarbon having a boiling point in the
range -70 to +100°C. In such reactors, polymerization
may if desired be effected under supercritical
conditions. Slurry polymerisation may also be carried
out in bulk where the reaction medium is formed from the
monomer being polymerised.
For gas phase reactors, the reaction temperature
used will generally be in the range 60 to 115°C (e.g. 70
to 110°C) , the reactor pressure will generally be in the
range 10 to 25 bar, and the residence time will
generally be 1 to 8 hours. The gas used will commonly
be a non-reactive gas such as nitrogen or low boiling
point hydrocarbons such as propane together with monomer
(e.g. ethylene) .
Preferably, the lower molecular weight polymer
fraction is produced in a continuously operating loop
reactor where ethylene is polymerised in the presence of
a polymerization catalyst as stated above and a chain
transfer agent such as hydrogen. The diluent is
typically an inert aliphatic hydrocarbon, preferably
isobutane or propane.
The higher molecular weight component can then be
formed in a gas phase reactor using the same catalyst.
The lower molecular weight component preferably has
a MPR2 of at least 50, preferably at least 100 g/lOmin,
preferably 110 to 3000 g/lOmin, e.g. 110 to 500 g/lOmin,
especially 150 to 400 g/lOmin. The molecular weight of
the low molecular weight component should preferably
range from 20,000 to 50,000, e.g. 25,000 to 40,000.
Preferred molecular weight distribution values for the
low molecular weight component range from 2 to 15, e.g.
3 to 12, preferably 5 to 8.
The density of the lower molecular weight component
may range from 940 to 980 kg/m3, e.g. 945 to 975 kg/m3
preferably 950 to 970 kg/m3, especially 960 to 970 kg/m3.
The lower molecular weight component should
preferably form 30 to 70 wt%, e.g. 40 to 60% by weight
of the multimodal polyethylene with the higher molecular
weight component forming 70 to 30 wt%, e.g. 40 to 60% by
weight.
The Higher molecular weight component should have a
lower MFR2 and a lower density than the lower molecular
weight component.
The higher molecular weight component should have
an MFR2 of less than 1 g/10 min, preferably less than 0.5
g/10 min, especially less than 0.2 g/lOmin, and a
density of less than 915 kg/m3, e.g. less than 910 kg/m3,
preferably less than 905 kg/m3. The Mw of the higher
molecular weight component may range from 100,000 to
1,000,000, preferably 250,000 to 500,000.
Where the higher molecular weight component is made
second in a multistage polymerisation it is not possible
to measure its properties directly. However, the
skilled man is able to determine the density, MFR2 etc of
the higher molecular weight component using Kim
McAuley's equations. Thus, both density and MFR2 can be
found using K. K. McAuley and J. F. McGregor: On-line
Inference of Polymer Properties in an Industrial
Polyethylene Reactor, AIChE Journal, June 1991, Vol. 37,
No, 6, pages 825-835.
The density is calculated from McAuley's equation
37, where final density and density after the first
reactor is known.
MFR2 is calculated from McAuley's equation 25, where
final MFR2 and MFR2 after the first reactor is
calculated. The use of these equations to calculate
polymer properties in multimodal polymers is common
place.
The multimodal polyethylene overall may have a
density of 900-945 kg/m3, e.g. 910 to 940 kg/m3,
preferably 915 to 935 kg/m3, preferably 920 to 930 kg/m3.
The MFRa should be in the range 0.05 to 1.2 g/lOmin, e.g.
0.1-0.8 g/lOmin. The MFR.^ should be in the range 5 to
100, preferably 10 to 60 g/lOmin, e.g. 15 to 30 g/10
min. The Mw of the multimodal polyethylene should be in
the range 150,000 to 300,000, preferably 230,000 to
270,000. Mw/Mn should be in the range 10 to 25, e.g. 15
to 25.
The comonomer used in the tnultimodal polyethylene
is preferably a C3.12 alpha olefin or a mixture of two or
more C3.12 alpha olefins, e.g. 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-
hexene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-heptene, 1-octene, 1-
nonene and 1-decene, with 1-butene and 1-hexene being
preferred. The amount of comonomer incorporated is
preferably 2 to 10% mole relative to ethylene, e.g. 2 to
8% mole, preferably 4 to 6 mol%. Preferred comonomer
contents may also be 1.5 to 10 wt%, especially 2 to 8
wt%.
The multimodal polyethylene may be made using
conventional single site or Ziegler-Natta catalysis as
is known in the art. Conventional cocatalysts,
supports/carriers, electron donors etc can be used.
Many multimodal or bimodal LLDPE's are commercially
available.
The core layer may also comprise other polymer
components if necessary and conventional additives such
as antioxidants, UV stabilisers, acid scavengers,
nucleating agents, anti-blocking agents etc as well as
polymer processing agent (PPA) as described above in
connection with the outer layers. The amounts of PPA
used may be the same as in the outer layer and can be
added to the core layer blend as part of a masterbatch
as is known in the art. The PPA is believed to act as a
lubricant, migrating to the polymer surface during
extrusion to prevent the extrudate sticking to the die.
The films of the invention may have a thickness of
10 to 250 microns, preferably 20 to 200 microns, e.g. 30
to 150 microns, such as e.g. 30 to 50 microns,
preferably 80 to 135 microns. The outer layers and core
layer may all be of equal thickness or alternatively the
core layer may be thicker than each outer layer. A
convenient film comprises two outer layers which each
form 10 to 35%, e.g. 15 to 25% of the thickness of the
film, the core layer forming the remaining thickness,
e.g. 30 to 70%.
For film formation using a polymer mixture it is
important that the different polymer components be
intimately mixed prior to extrusion and blowing of the
film as otherwise there is a risk of inhomogeneities,
e.g. gels, appearing in the film. Thus, it is
especially preferred to thoroughly blend the components,
for example using a twin screw extruder, preferably a
counter-rotating extruder prior to extrusion and film
blowing. Sufficient homogeneity can also be obtained by
selecting the screw design for the film extruder such
that it is designed for good mixing and homogenising.
The film of the invention will typically be
produced by extrusion through an annular die, blowing
into a tubular film by forming a bubble which is
collapsed between nip rollers after solidification.
This film can then be slit, cut or converted (e.g.
gusseted) as desired. Conventional film production
techniques may be used in this regard. Typically the
outer and core layer mixtures will be coextruded at a
temperature in the range 160°C to 240°C, and cooled by
blowing gas (generally air) at a temperature of 10 to
50°C to provide a frost line height of 1 or 2 to 8 times
the diameter of the die. The blow up ratio should
generally be in the range 1.5 to 4, e.g. 2 to 4,
preferably 2.5 to 3.
The films of the invention exhibit high dart impact
strengths and tear strengths, especially in the
transverse direction. Thus for a 40 micron film of the
invention, Dart drop F50 (ISO 7765/1) may be at least
180 g, preferably at least 250 g» Thus, Dart drop F50
(ISO 7765/1) may be at least 5 g/micron film thickness.
Elmendorr Tear strength in the machine/transverse
direction for a film of the invention may be at least
0.03N/micron (MD) and O.lSN/micron (TD) respectively
(ISO 6382-2} .
Elmendorf Tear resistances in the transverse direction
for a 40 micron film may be at least 6.5 N.
1% Secant modulus properties (ASTM D882) in the
machine/transverse direction should be at least 250
MPa/300MPa.
The films exhibit excellent haze properties, e.g.
less than 10%, preferably less than 8% (ASTM D1003) for
a 40 micron film whilst exhibiting high levels of gloss,
e.g. >100 (ASTM D2457).
The films may have high tensile strength at yield
in the transverse direction, e.g. at least 120 kg/cm2,
preferably at least 200 kg/cm2. The films may also have
high tensile strength at break in the machine/transverse
direction, e.g. at least 250/220 kg/cm2.
The films also possess a broad sealing window, e.g.
greater than 10°C, preferably greater than 15°C,
especially greater than 25°C.
The films of the invention may incorporate barrier
layers as is known in the art. For food and medical
applications for example, it may be necessary to
incorporate a barrier layer, i.e. a layer which is
impermeable to water and oxygen, into the film
structure. This can be achieved using conventional
lamination techniques. Suitable barrier layers are
known and include polyamide, ethylene vinyl alcohol, PET
and metallised Al layers.
Viewed from another aspect therefore the invention
provides a laminate comprising a multilayer film as
hereinbefore defined laminated onto a barrier layer.
In such an embodiment it may be convenient to
laminate the barrier layer onto two 3-layer films as
hereinbefore described thereby forming a 7 layer film in
which the barrier layer forms the middle layer.
The outer layer to be laminated to the barrier
layer can therefore be regarded as a lamination layer
with the outer layer which remains outermost to be
regarded as a sealing layer.
The' films of the invention can-also incorporate
polypropylene layers.
The films of the invention have a wide variety of
applications but are of particular interest in packaging
of food and drink, consumer and industrial goods,
medical devices and in heavy duty packaging. The films
may act as shrink films and are thus suitable for shrink
applications, e.g. to package goods for transportation.
Goods which may be packaged, especially in pouches
therefore include detergents, soaps, fabric softeners,
refill packets, fruit juices and especially oils and
water. It is envisaged that packages may be from 100 g
to 25 kg in size.
Pouches can be made from the films by known
thermoforming processes. It is especially preferred if
standing pouches are formed (i.e. self supporting
pouches) . Such pouches can be adapted to possess screw
caps and the like to allow easy access to the contents
of the pouch.
Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a
multilayer film comprising at least three layers, two
outer layers and a core layer, each outer layer
independently comprising at least 50%wt of a
polyethylene component having a density of less than 940
kg/m3 and said core layer comprising a multimodal
polyethylene component having a lower molecular weight
component and a higher molecular weight component,
wherein the density of the higher molecular weight
component is less than 915 kg/m3 and the MFR2 of the
higher molecular weight component is less than 1 g/10
min.
The invention will now be described further with
reference to the following non-limiting examples and
Figure. Figure 1 shows the hot tack tests results for
films 11 to 14.
Analytical Tests
Density is measured according to ISO 1183
MFR2/21 are measured according to ISO 1133 at 190°C at
loads of 2.16 and 21.6 kg respectively,
Mw/Mn/MWD are measured by GPC.
Haze is measured according to ASTM D 1003
Gloss is measured according to ASTM D 2457
Elongation at break is measured by ASTM D 882
Tensile Strain at break and tensile strength are
measured according to ISO 527-3
Sec modulus is measured according to ASTM D 882-A
Tensile stress at yield is measured according to ISO
527-3
Impact resistance is determined on Dart-drop (g/50%).
Dart-drop is measured using ISO 7765-1, method "A". A
dart with a 38 mm diameter hemispherical head is dropped
from a height of 0.66 m onto a film clamped over a hole.
If the specimen fails, the weight of the dart is reduced
and if it does not fail the weight is increased. At
least 20 specimens are tested. The weight resulting in
failure of 50% of the specimens is calculated.
Puncture resistance (determined in Ball puncture
(energy/J) at +230C. The method is according to ASTM D
5748. Puncture properties (resistance, energy to break,
penetration distance) are determined by the resistance
of film to the penetration of a probe (19 mm diameter)
at a given speed (250mm/min).
Tear resistance (determined as Elmendorf tear (N) )
The tear strength is measured using the ISO 6383 method.
The force required to propagate tearing across a film
specimen is measured using a pendulum device. The
pendulum swings under gravity through an arc, tearing
the specimen from pre-cut slit. The specimen is fixed
on one side by the pendulum and on the other side by a
stationary clamp. The tear strength is the force
required to tear the specimen.
Hot tack: Hot tack is a test method for measuring the
seal strength of the film just after sealing while the
seal is still hot. This property is measured on a DTC
International Hot tack tester model 52-D, w-4236
according to an internal method. Samples are cut with a
width of 15mm. The sealing time is O.Ssec, a delay time
is 0,lsec and a sealing pressure of 90N. The sealing at
different temperature is measured and for each test
temperature 5 parallels are taken. The specimens have
been conditioned in min- 24 hours before testing.
Example 1
The following Commercially available Borealis grades
were employed in Examples 1 and 2:
(Table Removed)
89%wt Grade A, 10%wt Grade B and 1% PPA (Dynamar FX-
5922X - added as masterbatch) are blended in two film
extruders. In addition 81%wt Grade D, 18%wt Grade A and
1% PPA (Dynamar FX-5922X) were blended in a film
extruder. The film was coextruded on a 3-layer
Windmoller&Moller coex.line with die diameter 200mm, at
a blow up ratio of 2.5, frost line height 600 mm, Die
gap 2.6 mm, Extruder temp setting : 210°C to form a 40
micron film.
Further 40 micron films 2 to 7 were prepared
analogously.
Film 1
Outer layers: 89% Grade A + 10% Grade B
Core layer: 81% Grade D + 18% Grade A
Film 2
Outer Layers: 89% Grade C + 10% Grade B
Core Layer: 81% Grade D + 18% Grade C
Film 3
Outer Layers: 89% Grade C + 10% Grade B
Core layer: 81% Grade D + 18% Grade C
Film 4
Outer layers: 89% Grade A + 10% Grade B
Core layer: 100% Grade E
Film 5
Outer layers: 80% Grade J + 20% K
Core layer: 80% Grade D + 20% Grade A
Film 6
Outer layers: 80% Grade J + 20% Grade K
Core layer: 80% Grade G + 20% Grade A
Film 7
Outer layers: 75% Grade A + 25% Grade B
Core layer: 100% Grade H
The films produced were tested and results presented in
table 2 below.
(Table Removed)
Example 2
The films of the invention have been compared
qualitatively to films as described in Table 3 below
(Table Removed)
Example 3
The following grades were employed in the manufacture of
films in Examples 3 to 5:
(Table Removed)
The following films were prepared by film blowing at BUR
(Blow Up Ratio) 2.5:1, temperature profile 190-225°C and
die lip of 2,2 mm:
Film 8. A: 25% - Sealing layer, 60/40 Siam
2045G/Cosmothene F210-6
B: 50% - 60/30/10 Grade D/ Cosmothene F210-6/
White Masterbatch
C: 25% - Lamination side, as layer A.
Film 9. A: 25% - Sealing layer, 60/40 Siam
2045G/Cosmothene F210-6
B: 45% - 60/30/10 Grade D/ Cosmothene F210-6/
White MB
C: 30% - Lamination side, Grade D - 100%.
Film 10. A: 33% - Sealing layer, 60/40 Siam
2045G/Cosmothene F210-6
B: 33% - 60/30/10 Grade D/ Cosmothene F210-6/
White MB
C: 33% - Lamination side, as layer A.
The films produced were tested and results presented in
table 5 below.
(Table Removed)
Example 4
Further films were produced under the same film blowing
conditions as example 3 in which the sealing layer had
the same composition in all films as in film 8 of
Example 3, but the core layers varied.
Four films were produced:
Film 11 - The core layer formed 50% of the film
thickness and consisted of .65% Siam 2045G, 25% HOPE
(Table 4) and 10% white masterbatch (mb). Each outer
layer was the same as aealiny layer. (In total 0% Grade
D). Each outside layer formed 25% of the film thickness
Film 12 - The core layer formed 34% of the film
thickness and consisted of 50% Grade D, 40% Cosmothene
F-210-6 and 10% white MB. Outer layer same as sealing
layer. Each outer layer formed 33% wt of the film
thickness. (In total 17wt% Grade D).
Film 13 - The core layer formed 50% of the film
thickness and consisted of 60% Grade D, 30% Cosmothene
F-210-6 and 10% white MB. Outer layer same as sealing
layer. Each outer layer formed 25%wt of the film
thickness (In total 30wt% Grade D).
Film 14 - The core layer formed 45% of the film
thickness and consisted of 60% Grade D, 30% Cosmothene
F-210-6 and 10% white MB. The sealing layer (forming 30%
of the film thickness) was as in film 8 but the outer
layer (lamination side) was 100% Grade D and formed 25%
of the film thickness (In total 57% Grade D).
The hot tack properties of these films are depicted in
Figure 1. Higher Grade D content gives broader sealing
range and higher seal strength.
Example 5
Two further films were prepared using the film blowing
conditions of example 3.
Comparative Film 15: Coex. LDPE (Cosmothene F210-6/C4-
LLDPE/C6-tnLLDPE
Film 16: Coex. Grade D/Grade D/C6-mLLDPE
(Table Removed)
The films of the invention exhibit excellent stiffness,
dart drop, tear strength, puncture resistance,
sealability and processability. Conventional films do
not possess all these properties.
Thus, whilst mLLDPE films have excellent dart drop, tear
strength, puncture resistance and sealability they have
poor processability and stiffness. LDPE films are not
stiff, have poor dart drop and lack sealing properties.
HOPE films have poor dart drop, tear strength, puncture
resistance and sealability.
Even a laminate of HDPE/LLDPE+LDPE/mLLDPE exhibits poor
dart drop and tear strength. The films of the invention
also show better puncture resistance, sealability and
processability than such a laminate film.





Claims
1. A multilayer film comprising at least three layers,
two outer layers and a core layer, each outer layer
independently comprising an LLDPE component and said
core layer comprising a multimodal polyethylene
component having a lower molecular weight component and
a higher molecular weight component, wherein the density
of the higher molecular weight component is less than
915 kg/m3 and the MFR2 of the higher molecular weight
component is less than 1 g/10 min.
2. A multilayer film comprising at least three layers,
two outer layers and a core layer, each outer layer
independently comprising a LLDPE component and said core
layer comprising a multimodal LLDPE.
3 . A film as claimed in claim 1 or 2 wherein the LLDPE
forms at least 50%wt of each outer layer and has a
density of less than 940 kg/m3.
4. A film as claimed in claim 1 to 3 wherein the LLDPE
of the outer layers is an mLLDPE.
5. A film as claimed in claim 4 wherein said mLLDPE is
unimodal.
6. A film as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5
wherein each outer layer additionally comprises an LDPE
component.
7. A film as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6
wherein the core layer comprises a bimodal LLDPE.
8. A film as claimed in claim 7 wherein said bimodal
LLDPE is made using Ziegler-Natta catalysis.
9. A film as claimed in claim l to 8—wherein said
multimodal polyethylene is made in a two stage process.
10. A film as claimed in claim 9 wherein the multimodal
polyethlyene is made in a two stage process comprising a
slurry phase polymerisation followed by a gas phase
polymerisation.
11. A film as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10
wherein the core layer additionally comprises an LDPE
component.
12. A film as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11
wherein the core layer additionally comprises a unimodal
mLLDPE component.
13. A film as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12
wherein the multimodal polyethylene employed in the core
layer comprises a higher molecular weight component
being an ethylene copolymer and a lower molecular weight
component being an ethylene homopolymer.
14. A film as claimed in claim 13 wherein said
copolymer is an ethylene hexene or ethylene butene
copolymer.
15. A film as claimed in any one of claims l to 14
comprising 3 layers.
16. A film as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15
wherein the outer layers are identical.
17. A film as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 16
laminated onto a barrier layer.
18. A pouch formed from a film of claims 1 to 17.
19. A pouch a claimed in claim 18 being a standing
pouch.
20. A process for the preparation of a multilayer film
as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 17 comprising
coextruding a composition comprising a LLDPE component
to form two outer layers and a multimodal polyethylene
component having a lower molecular weight component and
a higher molecular weight component, wherein the density
of the higher molecular weight component is less than
915 kg/m3 and the MFR2 of the higher molecular weight
component is less than 1 g/10 min to form a core layer.
21. Use of a film as claimed in any one of claims 1 to
17 in packaging.
22. An article packaged with the film of claims 1 to

Documents:

2629-DELNP-2006-Assignment.pdf

2629-DELNP-2006-Correspondence-Others.pdf

2629-DELNP-2006-Form-3.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Abstract-(08-02-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-abstract.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Claims-(08-02-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-claims.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Correspondance Others-(18-04-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-correspondece-others.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Correspondence Others-(08-02-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Correspondence Others-(16-07-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Correspondence Others-(22-05-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Correspondence-Others-(18-07-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Correspondence-Others-(25-09-2012).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Correspondence-Others-(27-05-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-description (complete).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-drawings.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-form-1.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Form-2-(08-02-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-form-2.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Form-3-(08-02-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Form-3-(18-07-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Form-3-(27-05-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-form-3.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-form-5.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-GPA-(16-07-2013).pdf

2629-delnp-2007-pct-237.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-pct-311.pdf

2629-delnp-2007-Petition-137-(18-07-2013).pdf


Patent Number 258291
Indian Patent Application Number 2629/DELNP/2007
PG Journal Number 52/2013
Publication Date 27-Dec-2013
Grant Date 26-Dec-2013
Date of Filing 09-Apr-2007
Name of Patentee BOREALIS TECHNOLOGY OY
Applicant Address P.O.BOX 330, FIN 06101 PORVOO,FINLAND
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 JOHANSEN, ARNO LAERER JOHNSENSVEI 2, 3960 STATHELLE, NORWAY
2 FOLLESTAD, ARILD DAMSTIEN 10, N-3960 STATHELLE, NORWAY
3 JOHANSEN, ARNO OLAV KYRRESVEI 21, N-3960 STATHELLE, NORWAY
4 DAVIKSNES, HANS, GEORG TRYMS VEI 8, N-3960 STATHELLE, NORWAY
PCT International Classification Number B32B 27/32
PCT International Application Number PCT/EP2005/010669
PCT International Filing date 2005-10-04
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 0421997.8 2004-10-04 U.K.
2 0508856.2 2005-04-29 U.K.