Title of Invention

A RADAR SYSTEM FOR THE DETECTION OF LOW RCS OBJECTS

Abstract The invention discloses a radar system (100) for the detection of low RCS-objects (110, 140, 150, 160, 190) such as forest fires, said system comprising a first plurality of stations (120) for transmitting radar energy, said stations having mechanically fixed antennas (220), and a second plurality of receive stations (130) for receiving reflections of radar energy transmitted from the transmit stations, said stations having mechanically fixed antennas (220). The antennas (220) of said transmit and receive stations have a main beam (221) which is essentially parallel to the ground, and at least a sub-set of the receive stations is equipped with means for recording a first and a second received signal, and means for subtracting one of said signals from the other of said signals. Said transmit and receive stations are arranged to function within the frequency range of 10 - 100 MHz.
Full Text TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention discloses a radar system for the detection of low Radar
Cross Section-objects such as forest fires, the system comprising a first plurality of
transmit stations for transmitting radar energy which have mechanically fixed
antennas. The system also comprises a second plurality of receive stations for
receiving reflections of radar energy transmitted from the transmit stations, said
stations having mechanically fixed antennas. In the system of the invention, the
antennas of said transmit and receive stations have a main beam which is
essentially parallel to the ground.
BACKGROUND ART
Current methods for detecting forest fires are relatively expensive and
complicated. A "manual" method of detecting forest fires is by means of
overflights of small aircraft, which is expensive. A known automated system for
detecting forest fires is disclosed in US 5, 959, 589. Some drawbacks which this
system seems to suffer from are that the system is relatively complicated in that it
involves moving parts and sensors of different kinds.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
There is thus a need for an automated fire detection system which is less expensive
and more efficient than those currently known. One way of keeping costs down
would be to provide a system which can be used for a plurality of purposes, i.e. not
only for the detection of fires, but also for detection of other objects with low
observability which other users than fire protection agencies would desire to
detect. In such a system, costs could be shared between the various users of the
system.
Examples of such users could be military users wishing to detect low-observability
objects such as stealth aircraft, or other civilian users such as rescue services who
might wish to detect, for example, avalanche victims or people who have gone
missing in remote areas.
2

Such a system is provided by the present invention in that it provides a radar
system for the detection of low RCS-objects (Radar Cross Section) such as forest
fires, the system comprising a first plurality of transmit stations for transmitting
radar energy, said stations having mechanically fixed antennas, and a second
plurality of receive stations for receiving reflections of radar energy transmitted
from the transmit stations, said stations having mechanically fixed antennas.
The antennas of the transmit and receive stations have a main beam which is
essentially parallel to the ground, and at least a sub-set of the receive stations is
equipped with processing means for recording a first and a second received signal,
and processing means for subtracting one of said signals from the other of said
signals. Also, the transmit and receive stations are arranged to function within the
frequency range of 10 - 800 MHz, preferably within the frequency range of 10 -
100 MHz.
It should be pointed out the at that one or both of the processing means
mentioned above can be co-located with the receive stations, or located at a site
remote from the stations.
By means of the system of the invention, detection of low observability targets
becomes possible by means of a plurality of individual stations which are simple
and thus inexpensive, which require low maintenance and are inexpensive to
deploy.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention will be described in more detail in the following description, with
reference to the appended drawings, in which
Fig l shows an overview of a system according to the invention, and
Fig 2 shows an antenna for use in a system of the invention, and
Fig 3 shows a series of signals recorded by a system of the present invention.
3

EMBODIMENTS
In fig 1, a system 100 of the present invention is schematically shown. The drawing
comprises objects to be detected by the system, such as a surface craft no, an
avalanche 140, a sensitive object 150, such as, for example, a power plant, a forest
fire 160, and an aircraft 170, in this example an aircraft with low Radar Cross
Section (RCS). Since the system of the invention has the ability to detect objects
with low RCS, the system also inherently has the ability to detect objects with
larger RCS.
Also shown in the drawing are examples of system components, with reference
numbers as follows: transmit stations 120 and receive stations 130, said stations
being intended for transmitting and receiving, respectively, electromagnetic
energy.
The continuous line shown in fig 1 depicts a coastal line, and the dotted line in fig
1 shows a border between two areas, countries etc.
Thus, fig 1 shows an example of low RCS-objects which it might be desired to
detect, such as "stealth" aircraft 170, forest fires 160, avalanches 140 (in order to
be able to be able to warn or to launch rescue efforts for victims.) etcetera.
Examples of other objects which it might be desired to locate using the present
invention are persons who have lost their way in remote areas, or the victims of
the mentioned avalanches. The system of the invention could also be used as a
surveillance system for sensitive installations such as the power plant 150.
In order to cover a large area, the system of the invention needs to propagate
electromagnetic energy over such a large area. Needless to say, this should be done
in a manner which is as easy and inexpensive as possible. Fig 1 shows how this is
accomplished by means of the invention: in the area which it is desired to cover
with the system, there is deployed a plurality of transmit stations 120 for
transmitting electromagnetic energy, radar energy.
4

As can be seen in fig l, the system also comprises a plurality of receive stations
130, which are not necessarily co-located with the transmit stations 120. In
addition, there is no need for the amount of transmit stations to be the same as the
amount of receive stations. Preferably, the number of transmit stations 120 is
greater than that of the receive stations 130.
The receive stations 130 are intended to receive energy which has been
transmitted from the transmit stations 120 and which has then been reflected
form objects in the area which is covered by the system 100. Energy which has
been received in the receive stations 130 directly from the transmit stations,
without any intermediate reflections, may be used as reference signals in
subsequent signal processing.
Since the system 100 comprises what could be a rather large number of transmit
and receive stations, it is important to keep the cost of these stations down.
According to the invention, one way of doing this is to equip the transmit and
receive stations with simple mechanically fixed antennas, in contrast to most
known radar stations which utilize moving antennas on turntables.
One, several, or all of the transmit stations may be used to transmit
simultaneously. Similarly, a more or less arbitrary number of the transmit stations
may be used at any one time. One method which may be used for transmitting is
the previously known method of "Time Division Multiplex", i.e. each station is
allotted a time slot in which it may transmit, the stations transmitting on one and
the same frequency or on a number of different frequencies.
Another transmission method which may be mentioned are "Code Division
Multiplex", i.e. a number of different stations transmit at the same time and on the
same frequency, but with coded signals which allow the receive stations to
differentiate between the received signals.
Yet another method for achieving resolution between the signals transmitted by
the various transmit stations is Frequency Division Multiplex, i.e. each transmit
5

station is assigned its own transmit frequency. All of these methods can be
employed alone, or in combination with any of the other methods.
Fig 2 shows an example of an antenna 210 of a previously used kind. As shown in
the drawing, the known antenna has elevated beams 211 with respect to the
ground level. This is due to the fact that elevated beams suppress ground
reflections to a higher extent than reflections from, for example, aircraft.
Fig 2 also shows examples of embodiments of the antennas of the transmit 120
and receive 130 stations of the system 100 of the invention: as stated previously,
the antennas both of the transmit and receive stations are suitably but not
necessarily of the stationary kind. The antennas can be dipole antennas or
monopole antennas. Also, array antennas are conceivable within the scope of the
invention. One possible advantage of an array antenna could be that it
transmits/receives in azimuth sectors, which could facilitate any subsequent
signal processing.
Fig 2 shows the antenna beams 221 of the transmit and receive station antennas
220 of the invention. As shown, these beams 211 are not elevated, rather they are
terrain-illuminating. A definition of a ground-illuminating beam could be that a
line from the phase centre of the antenna through the maximum of the main beam
of the antenna is basically parallel to the ground plane in the vicinity of the
antenna.
A beneficial side-effect of this feature of the antennas of the transmit and send
stations of the system of the invention is that antennas with terrain-illuminating
beams are considerably easier and less expensive to manufacture than antennas
with elevated beams. Thus, the cost of the system is reduced by the proposed
antennas 220.
However, as an alternative, antennas which employ so called "beam tilting" should
not be excluded. This can be carried out either electrically or even mechanically.
6

Another beneficial aspect of the antennas 220 of the system is that they can be
realized as simple dipole antennas, with a feed connection at one end of the
antenna.
Although the beams 221 of the antennas 220 are basically ground-illuminating, it
should be noted that most aircraft will still be illuminated by these antennas, and
will thus be detectable by the system 100.
However, an obvious implication of the use of ground-illuminating antennas is
that returns will be received not only from those objects which it is desired to
protect, but also from a wide variety of objects in the terrain surrounding the send
and/or transmit stations of the system 100. Thus, a solution must be found to cope
with the unwanted returns.
Until now, the description has mainly focused on the antennas 220 of the transmit
120 and receive 130 stations of the system. However, the system 100 of the
invention also comprises means in or connected to the transmit and (mainly)
receive stations for processing the returns received in a desirable manner.
Said processing means can either be located at a number of receive stations, or as
an alternative, the receive stations can merely forward the signals that are received
to a central processing station that is connected to the receive stations. There can
also be variations or combinations of this, i.e. some or all of the receive stations
can comprise some of the processing means, and a central processing station will
then receive data that is "semi-processed". All of these combinations are within
the scope of the invention.
The processing means of the invention work according to the following principle:
the radar returns from the terrain when no targets are present, or when targets are
present and known by other means, are recorded in the processing means as a
"background definition". At a later point in time, when it is desired to detect
targets, this "background definition" is used to subtract from the radar returns
7

received at that point in time. In this way, terrain echoes will be suppressed, and
radar "echoes" from low-observability objects will emerge clearly.
As a variation on the method of background subtraction, less stable background
echoes can also be eliminated, by means of the following: the processing means in
the receive station/s can be equipped to record a series of background responses.
Response by response may then be subtracted from each other in such a way that
various well known integration techniques can be applied to the remaining array
of differences in order to suppress the background echoes which it is desired to
block out.
A schematic way of background subtraction is shown in fig 3: beginning at a first
point in time, Ti, a number of radar returns Xi-xn are received, spaced apart in
time by an interval Ati. At Ti, and for the duration of the time during which the
returns are received, it is known that there are no forest fires etc in the area which
is covered by the system 100.
At a later point in time T2, when it is desired to detect the objects described above,
i.e. forest fires etc, a second series of radar returns x2i-x3i is recorded, the returns
in the second series being spaced apart in time by an interval At2, the time
intervals Ati and At2 not necessarily being the same.
Then, the returns in the first series are subtracted from the returns in the second
series in the following manner: X21-X1, x22-x2 X31-X11, with possible differences in
the returns being indicative of the presence of an object which it is desired to
detect. A threshold can be set so that the presence of an object will be indicated if
the amplitude of such a difference exceeds the threshold.
Other methods of signal processing apart from those mentioned above may also be
employed in the processing means of the invention. Such signal processing
methods may include one or more of such techniques as Doppler processing, time-
variable attenuators, receivers with a large dynamic range or adaptive filters.
8

WE CLAIM;
1. A radar system (100) for the detection of low RCS-objects (no, 140, 150, 160,
190) such as forest fires, said system comprising:
- a first plurality of stations (120) for transmitting radar energy, said stations
having mechanically fixed antennas (220),
- a second plurality of receive stations (130) for receiving reflections of radar
energy transmitted from the transmit stations, said stations having mechanically
fixed antennas (220),
- the antennas (220) of said transmit and receive stations having a main beam
(221) which is essentially parallel to the ground,
in which system at least a sub-set of the receive stations is equipped with
processing means for recording a first and a second received signal, and
processing means for subtracting one of said signals from the other of said signals,
and said transmit and receive stations are arranged to function within the
frequency range of 10 - 800 MHz, the system being characterized in that the
antennas (220) of the transmit (120) and receive (130) stations are one of the
following kinds of antennas:
- dipole antennas with a centre feed.
- monopole antennas with a feed from one end, and in that
- said sub-set of receive stations is equipped with processing means for recording a
plurality of received signals, and with processing means for extracting the
difference between one signal and a previous one of said signals, and also with
means for integrating said differences.
2. A radar system (100) for the detection of low RCS-objects (no, 140, 150, 160,
190) such as forest fires, said system comprising:
- a first plurality of stations (120) for transmitting radar energy, said stations
having mechanically fixed antennas (220),
- a second plurality of receive stations (130) for receiving reflections of radar
energy transmitted from the transmit stations, said stations having mechanically
fixed antennas (220),
9

- the antennas (220) of said transmit and receive stations having a main beam
(221) which is essentially parallel to the ground,
in which system at least a sub-set of the receive stations is equipped with
processing means for recording a first and a second received signal, and
processing means for subtracting one of said signals from the other of said signals,
and said transmit and receive stations are arranged to function within the
frequency range of 10 - 800 MHz, the system being characterized in that at least
one of the antennas is an array antenna, and in that said sub-set of receive stations
is equipped with processing means for recording a plurality of received signals,
and with processing means for extracting the difference between one signal and a
previous one of said signals, and also with means for integrating said differences.
10
3. The radar system (100) of claim 1 or 2, in which said transmit (120) and receive
(130) stations are arranged to function within the frequency range of 10 - 100
MHz.

The invention discloses a radar system (100) for the detection of low RCS-objects
(110, 140, 150, 160, 190) such as forest fires, said system comprising a first
plurality of stations (120) for transmitting radar energy, said stations having
mechanically fixed antennas (220), and a second plurality of receive stations (130)
for receiving reflections of radar energy transmitted from the transmit stations,
said stations having mechanically fixed antennas (220). The antennas (220) of
said transmit and receive stations have a main beam (221) which is essentially
parallel to the ground, and at least a sub-set of the receive stations is equipped
with means for recording a first and a second received signal, and means for
subtracting one of said signals from the other of said signals. Said transmit and
receive stations are arranged to function within the frequency range of 10 - 100
MHz.

Documents:

02368-kolnp-2007-abstract.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-claims.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-correspondence others 1.1.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-correspondence others.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-description complete.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-drawings.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-form 1.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-form 2.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-form 3.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-form 5.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-international publication.pdf

02368-kolnp-2007-pct request form.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(07-05-2012)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(07-05-2012)-FORM-3.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(11-12-2012)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(16-11-2011)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(16-11-2011)-FORM-3.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(19-08-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(19-08-2013)-OTHERS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(26-08-2011)-ABSTRACT.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(26-08-2011)-AMANDED CLAIMS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(26-08-2011)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(26-08-2011)-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(26-08-2011)-DRAWINGS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(26-08-2011)-FORM 2.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(26-08-2011)-OTHERS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(28-05-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-(28-05-2013)-FORM 3.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-ABSTRACT 1.1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-AMANDED CLAIMS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE 1.1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE 1.3.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE 1.4.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE 1.6.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE-1.2.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE-1.5.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE-1.7.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE-1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE.1.3.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-DECISION.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE) 1.1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-DRAWINGS 1.1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-FORM 1.1.1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-FORM 2.1.1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-FORM 3.1.1.pdf

2368-kolnp-2007-form-18.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-ABSTRACT.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-CLAIMS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-DRAWINGS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-FORM 1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-FORM 2.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-FORM 3.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-FORM 5.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-GRANTED-SPECIFICATION-COMPLETE.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-INTERNATIONAL SEARCH REPORT & OTHERS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-OTHERS 1.1.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-OTHERS DOCUMENTS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-OTHERS.pdf

2368-KOLNP-2007-REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

abstract-02368-kolnp-2007.jpg


Patent Number 258237
Indian Patent Application Number 2368/KOLNP/2007
PG Journal Number 51/2013
Publication Date 20-Dec-2013
Grant Date 19-Dec-2013
Date of Filing 27-Jun-2007
Name of Patentee TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (publ)
Applicant Address S-164 83 STOCKHOLM
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 HÖÖK, ANDERS KLÅDDEGÄRDEVÄGEN 27, S-430 63 HINDÅS, SWEDEN
2 RIVAS, CONRADO SÖRLYCKAN 47, S-433 69 SÄVEDALEN
3 RIVAS, PATRIK KLOCKARENS VÄG 20, S-441 60 ALINGSÅS, SWEDEN
PCT International Classification Number G01S 7/41,G01S 13/00
PCT International Application Number PCT/SE2004/001763
PCT International Filing date 2004-11-30
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 NA