Title of Invention

A METHOD OF OPERATING A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, A FIRST STATION AND A SECOND STATION THEREOF

Abstract A communication system (50) comprises a first station (100), and a plurality of second stations (200). Each second station (200) transmits a first indication of one or more transmission formats currently available for reception by it, and one or more of the second stations (200) transmit a second indication of a transmission format to be vetoed. The first station (100) receives the indications and uses the first and second indications to select a transmission format, where the selection is made from those transmission formats that are available to all second stations (200) and those available to only a sub-set of the second stations (200), and excludes each vetoed transmission format. The first station (100) then transmits data using the selected transmission format. The data is received by one or more of the second stations (200) and forwarded to a destination (400).
Full Text

DESCRIPTION
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, STATIONS FOR USE THEREIN, AND METHOD OF OPERATING A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
The invention relates to a communication system, to stations for use in a communication system, and to methods of operating the system and stations. The invention has particular application in mobile communications, for example in the transmission of data from a mobile station to a fixed node during soft handover between a plurality of base stations.
It is known for cellular mobile communication systems to use soft handover in which a mobile station communicates with base stations in more than one cell. This may occur, for example, when transferring from one cell to another, in which case soft handover can minimise any disruption to ongoing communications. Data transmitted by the mobile station can be routed to a destination via any of those base stations.
It is known for a base station to be equipped to operate any of a plurality of transmission formats, and for the transmission format to be used for a particular transmission to be negotiated between a base station and mobile station. A transmission format comprises one or more parameters relating to a transmitted signal, such as modulation scheme, bit rate, coding, and interleaving depth.
It is desirable to be able to select a transmission format for use during soft handover.
It is an object of the invention to enable the selection of a transmission format for use during soft handover.

According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method of
operating a communication system comprising a first station, and a plurality of
second stations, the method comprising:
at each second station, transmitting a first indication of one or more
transmission formats currently available for reception by the respective second
station;
at one or more of the second stations, transmitting a second indication of a
transmission format to be vetoed;
at the first station:
receiving the indications;
using the first and second indications to select a transmission format, where the selection is made from those transmission formats that are available to all second stations and those available to only a sub-set of the second stations, and excludes each vetoed transmission format; transmitting data using the selected transmission format; and
receiving the data at one or more of the second stations.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a first
station for use in a communication system comprising a plurality of second
stations, the first station comprising:
means for receiving from each of a plurality of second stations a first
indication of one or more transmission formats currently available for
reception by the respective second station;
means for receiving from one or more of the second stations a second
indication of a transmission format to be vetoed;
means for using the first and second indications to select a
transmission format, where the selection is made from those
transmission formats that are available to all second stations and
those available to only a sub-set of the second stations, and excludes
each vetoed transmission format;
means for transmitting data using the selected transmission format.

According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a second station for use in a communication system comprising a first station and a plurality of second stations, the second station comprising:
means for transmitting a first indication of one or more transmission
formats currently available for reception by the second station;
means for transmitting a second indication of a transmission format to
be vetoed; and
means for receiving data transmitted by a first station. According to a fourth aspect of the invention there is provided a communication system comprising a first station according to the second aspect of the invention and a plurality of second stations according to the third aspect of the invention.
By indicating which transmission formats are currently available for reception, the second station provides information to enable the first station to select a format that at least one second station has available to it. The term "available for reception" means that the second station is equipped to receive data using the indicated transmission format and that the reception quality using that transmission format is assessed to be adequate, according to a criterion, for receiving the data. Parameters that may be used alone or in combination for assessing reception quality are, for example, signal level, bit error rate, block error rate, signal-to-interference ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, delay, loading, buffer occupancy, the value of received power control commands and current transmit power. Other parameters may be used.
By indicating a transmission format which is to be vetoed, the second station is able to indicate those transmission formats that, if used by other of the second stations, are assessed to generate unacceptable interference according to a criterion. The parameters that may be used for assessing the acceptability of interference are the same as those listed above for assessing reception quality.
By selecting a transmission format from those transmission formats that are available to all second stations and those available to only a sub-set of the second stations, and excluding each vetoed transmission format, the number

of transmission formats available for selection is maximised, which has the advantage that a transmission format may be selected that enables higher efficiency, for example a higher data rate or a higher signal quality.
In one embodiment second stations receiving the transmitted data in the selected format, despite indicating that the selected format was not available, may transmit an acknowledgement. The acknowledgement may be a positive or a negative acknowledgement. Such a situation can arise, for example, if reception conditions improve before the data is transmitted. This embodiment has the advantage that the number of second stations at which the transmitted data may be received is maximised, thereby increasing efficiency. In this embodiment the first station is adapted to receive an acknowledgement from a second station that indicated the selected transmission format as available and from a second station that did not indicate the selected transmission format as available.
In a variation of the above embodiment, an acknowledgement transmitted by second stations in response to receiving data using a transmission format that it indicated as not available is restricted to a positive acknowledgement.
The invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein;
Figure 1 is a block schematic diagram of a communication system; Figure 2 is a flow chart of a method of communicating data packets;
Referring to Figure 1, there is illustrated a radio communication system 50 comprising a first station 100, and a plurality of second stations 200 coupled to a destination node apparatus 400. The first station 100 may be, for example, a mobile communications equipment and the second stations 200 may be base stations in a mobile communications network. The term "node apparatus" is used to refer to any apparatus coupled to each of the plurality of second stations 200 to which data is to be routed.

The first station 100 comprises a transmitter 110 for transmitting data on an uplink 310. The transmitter 110 has an output coupled to an* antenna 120 via coupling means 130 which may be, for example, a circulator or changeover switch. The coupling means 130 is also coupled to an input of a receiver 140 for receiving downlink 320 signals from the antenna 120. Coupled to the transmitter 110 and the receiver 140 is a control means 150, for example a processor, for processing signals received from the second stations 200.
The second stations 200 each comprise a receiver 240 for receiving data transmitted by the first station 100 on the uplink 310. The receiver 240 has an input coupled to an antenna 220 via coupling means 230 which may be, for example, a circulator or changeover switch. The coupling means 230 is also coupled to an output of a transmitter 210 for transmitting downlink signals via the antenna 220. Coupled to the transmitter 210 and the receiver 240 is a control means 250, for example a processor, for processing data signals received from the first station 100. The control means 250 includes storage means 260.
The node apparatus 400 comprises a receiver 410 for receiving data forwarded by the second stations 200. It also comprises additional elements for acting on received data, such as means for storing, forwarding or processing. These are not shown in Figure 1 as they are not material to the invention.
The operation of the radio communication system 50 will now be described with reference to the flow chart of Figure 2. In Figure 2, steps on the left hand side of the flow chart relate to steps performed by the first station 100, and the steps on the right hand side relate to steps performed by each of the second stations 200. Steps shown in blocks having a broken line are optional steps.
At step 500, the control means 250 of each second station 200 determines which transmission formats are currently available to the second station 200 for reception of data. A list of such formats may be predetermined or determined dynamically using assessment parameters as described above, and stored in the storage means 260. Also at step 500 the control means 250

of each second station 200 determines any transmission formats that, if used by other of the second stations, are assessed to generate unacceptable interference. Possible parameters for this assessment are described above. These latter transmission formats are those to be vetoed, and a list of these formats may be stored in the storage means 260. The formats that a second station 200 selects to be vetoed may be a subset of the formats which are not currently available to the respective second station 200 for reception of data.
At step 510, each second station transmits via the transmitter 210 a first indication of one or more transmission formats currently available for reception of data by the respective second station, and a second indication of any transmission format to be vetoed, if any.
At step 520, the first station 100 receives the indications from each of the second stations 200 via its receiver 140.
At step 530, the control means 150 uses the received first and second indications to select a transmission format. The selection is made from those transmission formats that are available to all second stations 200 and those available to only a sub-set of the second stations 200, and excludes each vetoed transmission format.
At step 540, the first station 100 transmits, via the transmitter 110, data using the selected transmission format.
At step 550, the data is received at one or more of the second stations 200.
At step 560, the received data is forwarded to a destination by one or more of the second stations 200 that received the data. In Figure 1 the destination is the node apparatus 400.
At optional step 570, the second stations 200 that received the data and forwarded the data to the node apparatus 400 transmit an acknowledgement. The acknowledgement may be either a positive acknowledgement, indicating successful receipt of the data, or a negative acknowledgement indicating unsuccessful receipt of the data. Optionally, second stations 200 receiving the transmitted data in the selected format, despite indicating that the selected format was not available, may transmit an acknowledgement; in a further

option, transmission of such an acknowledgement may be limited to only positive acknowledgements.
At optional step 580 the first station 100 receives the acknowledgements via receiver 140. The receiver 140 may optionally be adapted to receive the acknowledgements both from those second stations that indicated the selected transmission format as available and also from those second stations that did not indicate the selected transmission format as available. For example, if the receiver 140 is a receiver for code division multiple access (CDMA) acknowledgement signals, the receiver may be adapted to correlate for the codes used by all of the second stations 200, not merely the codes used by those second stations 200 that indicated the selected transmission format as available.
After step 580 the first station 100 may decide whether or not to retransmit the data, according to whether it received a positive acknowledgement.
In the present specification and claims the word "a" or "an" preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. Further, the word "comprising" does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps than those listed.
The inclusion of reference signs in parentheses in the claims is intended to aid understanding and is not intended to be limiting.
From reading the present disclosure, other modifications will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. Such modifications may involve other features which are already known in the art of communication systems, apparatus and operating methods and which may be used instead of or in addition to features already described herein.






CLAIMS
1. A method of operating a communication system (50) comprising
a first station (100), and a plurality of second stations (200), the method
comprising:
at each second station (200), transmitting a first indication of one or more
transmission formats currently available for reception by the respective second
station (200);
at one or more of the second stations (200), transmitting a second indication of
a transmission format to be vetoed;
at the first station (100):
receiving the indications;
using the first and second indications to select a transmission format,
where the selection is made from those transmission formats that are
available to all second stations (200) and those available to only a
sub-set of the second stations (200), and excludes each vetoed
transmission format;
transmitting data using the selected transmission format; and
receiving the data at one or more of the second stations (200).
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising at at least one second station which indicated the selected transmission format as available and at at least one second station which did not indicate the selected transmission format as available (200), transmitting an acknowledgement in response to receiving the transmitted data, and at the first station (100), receiving the acknowledgements from those second stations (200) that indicated the selected transmission format as available and those second stations (200) that did not indicate the selected transmission format as available.
3. A first station (100) for use in a communication system (50) comprising a plurality of second stations (200), the first station comprising:

means (140) for receiving from each of a plurality of second stations
(200) a first indication of one or more transmission formats currently
available for reception by the respective second station (200);
means (140) for receiving from one or more of the second stations a
second indication of a transmission format to be vetoed;
means (150) for using the first and second indications to select a
transmission format, where the selection is made from those
transmission formats that are available to all second stations (200) and
those available to only a sub-set of the second stations (200), and
excludes each vetoed transmission format;
means (110) for transmitting data using the selected transmission
format.
4. A second station (200) for use in a communication system (50)
comprising a first station (100) and a plurality of second stations (200), the
second station (200) comprising: means (210) adapted to transmit a first
indication of one or more transmission formats currently available for
reception by the second station (200);
means (210) adapted to transmit a second indication of a transmission
format to be vetoed; and
means (240) for receiving data transmitted by a first station (100).
5. A second station (200) as claimed in claim 4, wherein the means
(240) for receiving is adapted to receive the data transmitted by the first station
(100) in a format which is not currently indicated as being available for
reception by the second station (200).


Documents:

4104-CHENP-2006 AMENDED CLAIMS 14-10-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECEIVED 14-10-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECEIVED 25-11-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 AMENDED PAGES OF SPECIFICATION 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 AMENDED CLAIMS 25-11-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 AMENDED CLAIMS 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 31-07-2012.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 01-04-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 ENGLISH TRANSLATION 14-10-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-1 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-13 16-04-2007.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-3 14-10-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-3 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-3 31-07-2012.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-5 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-6 17-01-2008.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 OTHER PATENT DOCUMENT 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 OTHERS 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 POWER OF ATTORNEY 14-10-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECEIVED 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-18.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 FORM-6.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 PCT.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 POWER OF ATTORNEY 04-09-2013.pdf

4104-CHENP-2006 POWER OF ATTORNEY.pdf

4104-chenp-2006 correspondence-others.pdf

4104-chenp-2006 form-3.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-abstract.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-claims.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-correspondnece-others.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-description(complete).pdf

4104-chenp-2006-drawings.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-form 1.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-form 26.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-form 3.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-form 5.pdf

4104-chenp-2006-pct.pdf


Patent Number 258126
Indian Patent Application Number 4104/CHENP/2006
PG Journal Number 50/2013
Publication Date 13-Dec-2013
Grant Date 06-Dec-2013
Date of Filing 07-Nov-2006
Name of Patentee NXP B.V.
Applicant Address GROENEWOUDSEWEG 1, NL-5621 BA EINDHOVEN, NETHERLANDS
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 MOULSLEY, TIMOTHY, J PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS, CROSS OAK LANE, REDHILL, SURREY RH1 5HA, UK
2 BAKER, MATTHEW, P, J PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS, CROSS OAK LANE, REDHILL, SURREY RH1 5HA, UK
3 BUCKNELL, PAUL PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS, CROSS OAK LANE, REDHILL, SURREY RH1 5HA, UK
PCT International Classification Number H04Q 7/32
PCT International Application Number PCT/IB05/51484
PCT International Filing date 2005-05-06
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 0410210.9 2004-05-07 U.K.
2 0413307.0 2004-06-15 U.K.