Title of Invention

"A SUCROSE SYNTHASE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS"

Abstract A sucrose synthase characterized by the SEQ ID NO: 12 for the production of transgenic plants.
Full Text The present invention relates to a sucrose synthase for the production of Transgenic Plants.
The invention relates to optimization of the production of recombinant sucrose synthase (SS) in soluble, active form employing an appropriate strain of Escherichia coli, the use of SS for making kits for determination of' sucrose, design of optimized forms of SS for the synthesis of ADPglucose (ADPG), and the production of transgenic plants whose leaves and storage tissues accumulate high levels of ADPG and amylose-enriched starch as a result of overproduction of cytosolic ADPG in plants which overexpress SS.
PRIOR ART
Starch is the main storage form of carbohydrates in plants. It accumulates in large amounts in organs such as seeds (wheat, barley, maize, pea, etc.) and tubers (potato and yam among others) and is a fundamental constituent of the human diet. Furthermore, starch is widely used in the paper, cosmetic, pharmaceutical and food industries, and is also used as an essential component for the manufacture of, biodegradable plastics and environment-friendly paints.'Since it. is made up of covalently bound glucose molecules, investigation of the processes involved in the synthesis of this polysaccharide is a top priority in various areas of industrial production.
ADPG is the universal precursor of starch biosynthesis in plants, both in heterotrophic organs' (Fig. 1A) and in leaves (Fig. 2A), and it is widely assumed that.its
production is controlled exclusively by the enzyme ADPG
pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) or ADPG synthase (EC
2.7.7.27) (Okita T.W. (1992) Is there an alternative
pathway for starch synthesis? Plant Physiol. 100 560-
56; Muller-Robber B. Stonewall U. Wurlitzer L.
(1992) Inhibition of the ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase
in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar-storing tubers
and influences tuber formation and expression of tuber
storage protein genes. EMBO J. 11 1229-1238; Stark
D.M. Timmerman K.P. Barry G.F. Press J.
Inshore G.M. (1992) Regulation of the amount of starch
in plant tissues by ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase.
Science 258 287-282; Neuhaus E.H. Hausler R.E.
Stonewall U. (2005) No time to shift the paradigm on
the metabolic pathway to transitory starch in leaves.
Trends Plant Sci. at press). The various applications
of the starch produced in a plant are based mainly on
the ratio of amylose and amylopectin which determines
the structure of the starch grain as well as its
viscosity in aqueous suspensions. This ratio of amylose
and amylopectin depends on among other things the
concentration of ADPG in the plant cell (Clarke B.R.
Denyer K. Jenner C.F. Smith A.M. (1999) The
relationship between the rate of starch synthesis the
adenosine 5'-diphosphoglucose concentration and the
amylose content of starch in developing pea embryos.
Planta 209 324-329).
SS (EC 2.4.1.13 SS) (UDP-glucose:D-fructose-2-glucosyl
transferase) is a reversible enzyme that catalyses the
production of UDPG and fructose from sucrose and UDP.
Although as shown in Fig. 1A SS has classically been
regarded as having the role of producing UDPG
metabolic processing of which eventually gives rise to
the production of starch in heterotrophic tissues such
as endosperm and tubers (Zrenner R. Salanoubat M.
Wurlitzer L. Stonewall U. (1995) Evidence for the
crucial role of sucrose synthase for sink strength
using transgenic potato plants. Plant J. 7 97-107;
Baroja-Fernandez E. Mufioz F.J. Saikusa T.
Rodriguez-Lopez M. Akazawa T. Pozueta-Romero J.
(2003) Sucrose synthase catalyzes the de novo
production of ADPglucose linked to starch biosynthesis
in heterotrophic tissues of plants. Plant Cell Physiol.
44 500-509; Pozueta-Romero J. Mufioz F.J.
Rodriguez-Lopez M. Baroja-Fernandez E. Akazawa T.
(August 2003) New waves in the starch field. Lett.
Plant Cell Physiol. 24-32) there are references to the
potential ability of the enzyme to use other nucleotide
diphosphates in vitro for the production of the
corresponding sugar nucleotides (Murata T. Sugiyama
T. Minamikawa T. Akazawa T. (1966) Enzymic
mechanism of starch synthesis in ripening rice grains.
Mechanism of the sucrose-starch conversion. Arch.
Biochem. Biophys. 113 34-44; Delmer D.P. (1972) The
purification and properties of sucrose synthase from
etiolated Phaseolus aureus seedlings. J. Biol. Chem.
247 3822-3828). Although of questionable physiological
relevance (Okita T.W. (1992) Is there an alternative
pathway for starch synthesis? Plant Physiol. 100 560-
56; Miiller-Rober B. Stonewall U. Wurlitzer L.
(1992) Inhibition of the ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase
in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar-storing tubers
and influences tuber formation and expression of tuber
storage protein genes. EMBO J. 11 1229-1238) it has
been suggested that SS is capable of producing ADPG
directly which can be used for the production of
starch both in heterotrophic tissues and in
photosynthetic tissues (Figs. IB and 2B) (Pozueta-
Romero J. Perata P. Akazawa T. (1999) Sucrosestarch
conversion in heterotrophic tissues of plants.
Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18 489-525; Baroja-Fernandez
E. Munoz F.J. Akazawa T. Pozueta-Romero J. (2001)
Reappraisal of the currently prevailing model of starch
biosynthesis in photosynthetic tissues: a proposal
involving the cytosolic production of ADPglucose by
sucrose synthase and occurrence of cyclic turnover of
starch in the chloroplast. Plant Cell Physiol. 42
1311-1320; Baroja-Fernandez E. Munoz F.J. Saikusa
1. Rodriguez-Lopez M. Akazawa T. Pozueta-Romero
J. (2003) Sucrose synthase catalyzes the de novo
production of ADPglucose linked to starch biosynthesis
in heterotrophic tissues of plants. Plant Cell Physiol.
44 500-509; Baroja-Fernandez E. Munoz F.J.
Zandueta-Criado A. Moran-Zorzano M.T. Viale A.M.
Alonso-Casajus N. Pozueta-Romero J. (2004) Most of
ADPglucose linked to starch biosynthesis occurs outside
the chloroplast in source leaves. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 101 13080-13085). According to this
hypothesis (based solely and circumstantially on
evidence of the biochemical type) SS is responsible
for the synthesis of an important pool of ADPG
molecules necessary for the biosynthesis of starch.
This hypothesis has not however been demonstrated
experimentally by genetic engineering or traditional
crop improvement techniques and is not consistent with
the countless tests of the genetic and molecular type
indicating that AGPase is the only source of ADPG in
plants (Okita T.W. (1992) Is there an alternative
pathway for starch synthesis? Plant Physiol. 100 560-
56; Miiller-Rober B. Stonewall U. Wurlitzer L.
(1992) Inhibition of the ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase
in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar-storing tubers
and influences tuber formation and expression of tuber
storage protein genes. EMBO J. 11 1229-1238; Neuhaus
E.H. Hausler R.E. Stonewall U. (2005) No time to
shift the paradigm on the metabolic pathway to
transitory starch in leaves. Trends Plant Sci. at
press).
Sugar nucleotides such as UDPG and ADPG are produced
commercially from pyrophosphorylase reactions catalysed
by enzymes such as UDPG pyrophosphorylase (UGPase) and
AGPase respectively based on the use of an expensive
substance called glucose-1-phosphate (G1P). An
alternative to this practice for production of sugar
nucleotides is based on the use of SS development of
which has largely been hampered by the limitations of
Escherichia coli for expressing and efficiently
processing a large number of eukaryotic proteins. This
limitation inspired some researchers to produce
recombinant SS by making use of biological factories of
the eukaryotic type such as yeasts (Zervosen A.
Romer U. Elling L. (1998) Application of recombinant
sucrose synthase-large scale synthesis of ADP-glucose.
J. Mol. Catalysis B: Enzymatic 5 25-28; Romer U.
Schrader H. Giinther N. Nettelstroth N. Frommer
W.B. Elling L. (2004) Expression purification and
characterization of recombinant sucrose synthase I from
Solanum tuberosum L. for carbohydrate engineering. J.
Biotechnology 107 135-149). Alternatively SS intended
for the production of sugar nucleotides has had to be
purified by expensive processes of purification of
proteins from plant extracts (patent DE4221595 (1993)
Purified sucrose synthase enzyme useful for production
of nucleotide-activated sugars or oligosaccharides).
This SS obtained from plant extracts has the
disadvantage that it has a predilection for UDP and
very low affinity for ADP (Pressey R (1969) Potato
sucrose synthase: purification properties and changes
in activity associated with maturation. Plant Physiol.
44 759-764; Nguyen-Quock B. Krivitzky M. Huber
S.C. Lecharny A. (1990) Sucrose synthase in
developing maize leaves. Plant Physiol. 94 516-523;
Morell M. Copeland L. (1985) Sucrose synthase of
soybean nodules. Plant Physiol. 78 149-154) .
Production of recombinant SS from cultures of E. coli
has recently been achieved (Nakai T. Tonouchi N.
Tsuchida T. Mori H. Sakai F. Hayashi T. (1997)
"Expression and characterization of sucrose synthase
from mung bean seedlings in Escherichia coli" Biosci.
Biotech. Biochem. 61 1500-1503; Nakai T. Konishi
T. Zhang Z-Q. Chollet R. Tonouchi N. Tsuchida
T. Yoshinaga F. Mori H. Sakai F. Hayashi T.
(1997) "An increase in apparent affinity for sucrose of
mung bean sucrose synthase is caused by in vitro
phosphorylation or directed mutagenesis of Serll" Plant
Cell Physiol. 39 1337-1341; Barratt D.H.P. Barber
L. Kruger N.J. Smith A.M. Wang T.L. Martin C.
(2001) Multiple distinct isoforms of sucrose synthase
in pea. Plant Physiol. 127 655-664; Christopher B.
William B. Robert H. "Bacterial sucrose synthase
compositions and methods of use" Patent W09803637) .
However the production of SS in this prokaryotic
system was associated with problems such as (1) the
amount of SS produced was very low (30 microgramsgram
of bacteria Nakai T. Tonouchi N. Tsuchida T.
Mori H. Sakai F. Hayashi T. (1997) "Expression and
characterization of sucrose synthase from mung bean
seedlings in Escherichia coli" Biosci. Biotech.
Biochem. 61 1500-1503; Li C.R. Zhang X.B. Hew
C.S. (2003) "Cloning characterization and expression
analysis of a sucrose synthase gene from tropical
epiphytic orchid Oncidium goldiana. Physiol. Plantarum
118 352-360) (2) the amount of active SS obtained was
very low or zero (0.05-1.5 unitsmg (Nakai T.
Tonouchi N. Tsuchida T. Mori H. Sakai F.
Hayashi T. (1997) "Expression and characterization of
sucrose synthase from mung bean seedlings in
Escherichia coli" Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 61 1500-
1503; Li C.R. Zhang X.B. Hew C.S. (2003) "Cloning
characterization and expression analysis of a sucrose
synthase gene from tropical epiphytic orchid Oncidium
goldiana. Physiol. Plantarum 118 352-360); 5.6 Umg
(Romer U. Schrader H. Gtinther N. Nettelstroth
N. Frommer W.B. Elling L. (2004) Expression
purification and characterization of recombinant
sucrose synthase I from Solanum tuberosum L. for
carbohydrate engineering. J. Biotechnology 107 135-
149) (3) the recombinant SS had to be purified by
conventional methods of purification of proteins such
as chromatography electrophoresis isoelectric
focusing etc. which combined prove expensive and do
not guarantee purification of the protein in a
homogeneous state and (4) most of the SS is sent to
inclusion bodies or is accumulated in the form of
inactive aggregates as a result of the inability of the
bacterium's machinery to fold the protein correctly
(Miroux B. Walker J.E. (1996) "Over-production of
proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow
synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular
proteins at high levels" J. Mol. Biol. 260 289-298).
The present invention describes the development of a
system based on the use of an appropriate strain of E.
coli and on the use of a suitable expression vector
that permits the large-scale production and fast and
easy purification of different variants of recombinant
SS in its active form. Some of these variants have
greater affinity for ADP than those obtained from plant
extracts and can be used both for the production of
UDPG and ADPG from inexpensive substances such as
sucrose UDP and ADP.
Chromatographic techniques constitute a powerful tool
for determining the sucrose content of complex samples
such as plant extracts sera urine fruit juice
wines fruit and foodstuffs (D'Aoust M-A. Yelle S
Nguyen-Quock B. (1999) Antisense inhibition of tomato
fruit sucrose synthase decreases fruit setting and the
sucrose unloading capacity of young fruit. Plant Cell
11 2407-2418; Tang G-Q. Sturm A. (1999) Antisense
repression of sucrose synthase in carrot affects growth
rather than sucrose partitioning. Plant Mol. Biol. 41
465-479; Frias J. Price K.R. Fenwich G.R. Hedley
C.L. Sorensen H. Vidal-Valverde C. (1996) J.
Chromatogr. A 719 213-219). Such techniques require
highly specialized technical personnel and involve a
large investment in equipment. Unfortunately
alternative methods based on hydrolysis of the sucrose
molecule by the action of the enzyme invertase and
subsequent spectrophotometric or fluorimetric
determination of the molecules of glucose andor
fructose (Sweetlove L.J. Burrell M.M. ap Rees T.
(1996) Starch metabolism in tubers of transgenic potato
with increased ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase. Biochem.
J. 320 493-498; Stitt M. Lilley R.M. Gerhardt R.
Heldt H.W. (1989) Metabolite levels in specific cells
and subcellular compartments of plant leaves. Methods
Enzymol. 174 518-552; Holmes E.W. (1997) Coupled
enzymatic assay for the determination of sucrose. Anal.
Biochem. 244 103-109; Methods of Analysis (1996) Code
of Practice for Evaluation of Fruit and Vegetable
Juices. Association of the Industry of Juices and
Nectars from Fruits and Vegetables of the European
Economic Community) are subject to limitations of a
technical nature such as subtraction of the
measurements corresponding to the endogenous glucose
andor fructose present in the sample. The abundance of
glucose andor fructose in the sample can add
background noise that hampers reliable and accurate
determination of sucrose. In the vast majority of cases
it is necessary to carry out exhaustive controls before
issuing a reliable statement on the true sucrose
content of a sample (Worrell A.C. Bruneau J-M.
Summerfelt K. Boersig M. Voelker T.A. (1991)
Expression of a maize sucrose phosphate synthase in
tomato alters leaf carbohydrate partitioning. Plant
Cell 3 1121-1130). Kits for determination of sucrose
based on the use of invertase are available from
companies such as Sigma Biopharm GmbH and Megazyme.
Alternatively an automated method of sucrose
determination has been developed based on
determination of the glucose-1-phosphate released by
the action of sucrose phosphorylase of bacterial origin
(Vinet B. Panzini B. Boucher M. Massicotte J.
(1998) Automated enzymatic assay for the determination
of sucrose in serum and urine and its use as a marker
of gastric damage. Clin. Chem. 44 2369-2371) . The
present invention describes the development of a
simple reliable and inexpensive alternative method for
the determination of sucrose in a sample based on the
use of SS and coupling enzymes which hydrolyse ADPG or
UDPG.
Considerations concerning the factors governing the
intracellular levels of ADPG have mainly revolved
around regulation of the synthesizing enzyme AGPase
(Press (1988) Biosynthesis of starch and its
regulation. The Biochemistry of Plants. Vol. 14
Academic Press New York p. 182-249; Pozueta-Romero
J. Perata P. Akazawa T. (1999) Sucrose-starch
conversion in heterotrophic tissues. Crit. Rev. Plant.
Sci. 18 489-525) . In fact a high proportion of the
patents and scientific publications concerning the
production of ADPG and the production of plants
producing starches of industrial interest revolve
around the use of AGPase (Stark D.M. Timmerman K.P.
Barry G.F. Press J. Inshore G.M. (1992)
Regulation of the amount of starch in plant tissues by
ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase. Science 258 287-282;
Slattery C.J. Kavakli H. Okita T.W. (2000)
Engineering starch for increased quantity and quality.
Trends Plant Sci. 5 291-298). However although they
are yet to be confirmed with evidence of the
geneticmolecular type recent scientific studies of a
biochemical type indicate that as shown in Figs. IB
and 2B SS might be involved in the direct synthesis of
ADPG necessary for the biosynthesis of starch (Baroja-
Fernandez E. Munoz F.J. Saikusa T. Rodriguez-
Lopez M. Akazawa T. Pozueta-Romero J. (2003)
Sucrose synthase catalyzes the de novo production of
ADPglucose linked to starch biosynthesis in
heterotrophic tissues of plants. Plant Cell Physiol.
44 500-509). This hypothesis is especially
controversial bearing in mind that (a) SS has never
been linked to starch production in leaves (b)
presence of an ADPG translocator is required in the
membranes of the plastids connecting the cytosolic
pool of the ADPG produced by SS to the starch synthase
present inside the plastid and (c) the involvement of
an ADPG producing source is in direct conflict
with many tests of the biochemicalgeneticmolecular
type which appear to show that AGPase is the only
source of ADPG (Okita T.W. (1992) Is there an
alternative pathway for starch synthesis? Plant
Physiol. 100 560-56; Muller-Robber B. Stonewall U.
Wurlitzer L. (1992) Inhibition of the ADPglucose
pyrophosphorylase in transgenic potatoes leads to
sugar-storing tubers and influences tuber formation and
expression of tuber storage protein genes. EMBO J. 11
1229-1238; Stark D.M. Timmerman K.P. Barry G.F.
Press J. Inshore G.M. (1992) Regulation of the
amount of starch in plant tissues by ADPglucose
pyrophosphorylase. Science 258 287-282; Neuhaus E.H.
Hausler R.E. Stonewall U. (2005) No time to shift
the paradigm on the metabolic pathway to transitory
starch in leaves. Trends Plant Sci. at press). Perhaps
for all these reasons to date plants have never been
designed that overexpress SS for the production of high
levels of starch. However the present invention
describes for the first time the production of
transgenic plants that overexpress SS for increasing
their production of ADPG and starch. Conversely we
show that plants that are deficient in starch as a
result of absence of AGPase possess normal ADPG levels.
This all shows that as shown in Figs. IB and 2B SS is
involved in the direct synthesis of the ADPG required
for the biosynthesis of starch and is responsible for
the synthesis of most of the ADPG accumulated in the
plant cell.
Although based on the approach presented in Fig. 1A
according to which SS is involved in the synthesis of
UDPG (but not ADPG) in storage tissues various works
have described the production of plants with reduced
content of starch as a consequence of decreased
activity of SS (Chourey P.S. Nelson O.E. (1976) The
enzymatic deficiency conditioned by the shrunken-1
mutations in maize. Biochem. Genet. 14 1041-1055;
Zrenner R. Salanoubat M. Wurlitzer L. Stonewall
U. (1995) Evidence for the crucial role of sucrose
synthase for sink strength using transgenic potato
plants. Plant J. 7 97-107; Tang G-Q. Sturm A.
(1999) Antisense repression of sucrose synthase in
carrot (Daucus carota L.) affects growth rather than
sucrose partitioning. Plant Mol. Biol. 41 465-479). In
this sense there is no experimental evidence that the
overexpression of SS could be used for the production
of plants with high starch content as a result of the
increase in levels of ADPG in accordance with the
metabolic schemes shown in Figs. IB and 2B. However
based on the ability of SS to produce the precursor
molecule of the biosynthesis of cell wall
polysaccharides (UDPG) works have been published and
patented which describe the production of cotton plants
with high fibre content or cereals with high content of
celluloses as a result of overexpression of SS
(Timothy H.J. Xiamomu N. Kanwarpal S.
"Manipulation of sucrose synthase genes to improve
stalk and grain quality" Patent W002067662; Robert F.
Danny L. Yong-Ling R. "Modification of sucrose
synthase gene expression in plant tissue and uses
therefor" Patent W00245485; Christopher B. William
B. Robert H. "Bacterial sucrose synthase compositions
and methods of use" Patent W09803637).
The invention relates firstly to the development and
optimization of a method of production of large amounts
of recombinant SS that is soluble can be purified
easily and has high specific activity based on the use
of a suitable strain of E. coli and on the use of an
expression vector that makes it possible to obtain SS
with a histidine tail. The invention further relates to
the procedure followed for making kits for
determination of sucrose based on the use of the enzyme
product with SS activity coupled to enzymes that
metabolize ADPG or UDPG. It further relates to
optimization of the production of sugar nucleotides
such as ADPG or UDPG starting from variants of SS
specially designed for this purpose. Finally details
are given of the design of transgenic plants with high
content of sucrose ADPG and starch and a high
amyloseamylopectin ratio following overexpression of
SS.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Amplification of a cDNA that encodes an SS
Knowing the nucleotide sequence of wild-type sucrose
synthase SS4 (Fu H. Park W.D. (1995) Sink- and
vascular-associated sucrose synthase functions are
encoded by different gene classes in potato. Plant Cell
7 1369-1385) two specific primers were created
corresponding to the 5' and 3' ends of the gene. Using
these primers a 2418 base pair DNA fragment
designated SSX from a potato-leaf cDNA library was
amplified by conventional PCR techniques. This PCR
fragment was inserted in the pSK Bluescript plasmid
(Stratagene) giving rise to the pSS construction (Fig.
3A) which was amplified in the host bacterium XLl
Blue.
Production of active recombinant SS from a special
strain of E. coli
pSS was digested with the Ncol and NotI restriction
enzymes. The fragment released (which contains the cDNA
encoding SS SSX) was cloned on the same restriction
sites of the pET-28a(+) expression plasmid (Novagen)
(Fig. 3B) which possesses a nucleotide sequence in the
polylinker region that encodes a histidine-rich
sequence which becomes fused with the recombinant
protein. The resulting plasmid (designated pET-SS Fig.
3C) was inserted by electroporation in various strains
of E. coli. The E. coli strain BLR(DE3) (Novagen)
transformed with pET-SS was deposited in the Spanish
Type Culture Collection on 29 October 2003 located in
the Research Building of Valencia University Burjassot
Campus Burjassot 46100 (Valencia Spain) with the
deposition number CECT:5850. The bacteria were
incubated at 20°C in LB medium. Overexpression of SSX
was effected by addition of 1 mM isopropyl-(3-Dthiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG) in 100 ml of cell culture
grown at 20°C. After six hours of induced culture the
bacteria were collected and resuspended in 4 ml of
binding buffer (Novagen His-bind purification kits)
then sonicated and centrifuged at 40000 g for 20
minutes. The supernatant which contains the
recombinant SS with an amino acid sequence rich in
histidine residues at the N-terminal end was passed
through an affinity column of the His-bind protein
purification kit from Novagen. Following the
instructions with the kit SS was eluted with 6 ml of
the recommended elution buffer which contained 200 mM
of imidazole instead of 1 mol. After elution the
protein was quickly submitted to dialysis to remove any
trace of imidazole which inactivates SS irreversibly.
Production of an isoform of SS optimized for production
of ADPG
Using suitable primers with pSS as template the
mutated variant SS5 was designed giving rise to the
construction pSS5. This was done using the QuikChange
Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). pSS5 was
digested with Ncol and Notl. The fragment released
(which contains SS5) was cloned on the same restriction
sites of the pET-28a(+) expression plasmid giving rise
to pET-SS5 which was inserted by electroporation in £.
coli BLR(DE3). The E. coli strain XL1 Blue transformed
with pSS5 was deposited in the Spanish Type Culture
Collection on 29 October 2003 located in the Research
Building of Valencia University Burjassot Campus
Burjassot 46100 (Valencia Spain) with the deposition
number CECT:5849.
Production of transgenic plants that overexpress SS4
In the present invention SS was overexpressed (a)
constitutively (b) specifically in leaves and (c)
specifically in storage organs such as tubers.
For the production of plants that overexpress SS
constitutively constructions were created that were
controlled by the action of the 35S constitutive
promoter of the tobacco mosaic virus. Successive
insertion in pSS of the 35S promoter and NOS terminator
in the 5' and 3' regions of SSX gave rise to the
production of the plasmid p35S-SS-NOS the restriction
map of which is shown in Fig. 4B.
So as to be able to transfer this construction to the
genome of the plants via Agrobacterium tumefaciens it
must first be cloned in a binary plasmid. For this
p35S-SS-NOS was digested successively with the enzymes
NotI T4 DNA polymerase and Hindlll and was cloned
within the binary plasmid pBIN20 (Fig. 4A) (Hennegan
K.P. Danna K.J. (1998) pBIN20: An improved binary
vector for Agrobacteriurn-mediated transformation. Plant
Mol. Biol. Rep. 16 129-131) which had previously been
digested successively with the enzymes EcoRI T4 DNA
polymerase and Hindlll. The plasmid thus obtained was
designated pBIN35S-SS-NOS (Fig. 4C).
To overexpress SS specifically in illuminated leaves
PCR was used for amplifying the promoter region
(designated RBCS) of the gene that encodes the small
subunit of RUBISCO (ribulose-15-bisphosphate
carboxylaseoxygenase) of tobacco (Barnes S.A.
Knight J.S. Gray J.C. (1994) Alteration of the
amount of the chloroplast phosphate translocator in
transgenic tobacco affects the distribution of
assimilate between starch and sugar. Plant Physiol.
106 1123-1129). This nucleotide seguence (which
confers specific expression in photosynthetically
active cells) was inserted in the pGEMT-easy vector
(Promega) giving rise to pGEMT-RBCSprom (Fig. 5A) .
This construction was digested with Hindlll and Ncol
and the fragment released was cloned in the
corresponding restriction sites of p35S-SS-NOS giving
rise to pRBCS-SS-NOS (Fig. 5B) . This construction was
digested successively with Hindlll T4 DNA polymerase
and Notl. The fragment released was cloned in pBIN20
digested successively with Hindlll T4 DNA polymerase
and EcoRI. The resulting construction was designated
pBINRBCS-SS-NOS (Fig. 5C).
After being amplified in E. coli (XL1 Blue) both
pBIN35S-SS-NOS and pBINRBCS-SS-NOS were inserted in A.
tumefaciens C58:GV2260 (Debleare R. Rytebier B. de
Greve H. Debroeck F. Schell J. van Montagu M.
Leemans J. (1985) "Efficient octopine Ti plasmidderived
vectors of Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer
to plants" Nucl. Acids Res. 13 4777-4788) which was
used for transforming species such as tomato
(Lycopersicon sculentum] tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)
potato (Solanum tuberosum) and rice by conventional
techniques (Horsch R.B. Fry J.E. Hoffmann N.L.
Eichholtz D. Rogers S.G. Fraley R.T. (1985) "A
simple and general method for transferring genes into
plants" Science 277 1229-1231; Pozueta-Romero J.
Houlne G. Schantz R. Chamarro J. (2001) "Enhanced
regeneration of tomato and pepper seedling explants for
Agrobacteriurn-mediated transformation" Plant Cell Tiss.
Org. Cult. 67 173-180; Hiei Y. Ohta S. Komari T.
Kumashiro. T. (1994) "Efficient transformation of rice
(Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and
sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant
J. 6 271-282). The strain of A. tumefaciens C58:GV2260
transformed with pBIN35S-SS-NOS was deposited in the
Spanish Type Culture Collection on 29 October 2003
located in the Research Building of Valencia
University Burjassot Campus Burjassot 46100
(Valencia Spain) with the deposition number
CECT:5851.
Preparation of assay kits for determination of sucrose
One of the kits designed for the determination of
sucrose shown in the following Scheme I of enzymatic
reactions involved in the kit for
spectrophotometricfluorimetric determination of
sucrose based on the conversion of sucrose to a sugar
nucleotide and then conversion of this to glucose-1-
phosphate glucose-6-phosphate and NAD(P)H.
Sucrose
The kit is based on the action of SS on the sucrose
molecule in the presence of a nucleotide diphosphate
(e.g. UDP or ADP) releasing equimolar amounts of
fructose and the corresponding sugar nucleotide. If the
resulting from the reaction is UDPG
this is submitted to the action of hydrolytic enzymes
of UDPG such as UDPG pyrophosphatase of the Nudix type
(EC 3.6.1.45) (Yagi T. Baroja-Fernandez E.
Yamamoto R. Munoz F.J. Akazawa T. Pozueta-Romero
J. (2003) Cloning expression and characterization of a
mammalian Nudix hydrolase-like enzyme that cleaves the
pyrophosphate bond of UDP-glucose. Biochem. J. 370
409-415) or UDPG hydrolase (Burns D.M. Beacham I.R.
(1986) Nucleotide sequence and transcriptional analysis
of the E. coli ushA gene encoding periplasmic UDPsugar
hydrolase (5'-nucleotidase): regulation of the
ushA gene and the signal sequence of its encoded
protein product. Nucl. Acids Res. 14 4325-4342) . The
G1P released by the action of these hydrolytic enzymes
is transformed by the action of phosphoglucomutase
(PGM) yielding glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) which in its
turn can be made to undergo a coupling reaction with
NAD(P)+ by the action of the enzyme G6P dehydrogenase
(G6PDH) producing 6-phosphogluconate and NAD(P)H
which can easily be determined by fluorimetry and by
spectrophotometry at 340 nm. In its turn the NAD(P)H
released can be coupled to the action of FMNoxidoreductase
luciferase yielding light which is
quantified spectrophotometrically.
Alternatively as shown in scheme II the UDPG produced
can be coupled with UDPG dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.22)
which in the presence of NAD gives rise to equimolar
amounts of UDP-glucuronate and NADH which can be
determined by fluorimetry or by spectrophotometry at
340 nm. In its turn the NADH released can be coupled
to the action of FMN-oxidoreductaseluciferase
yielding light which is quantified
spectrophotometrically.
of the reaction catalysed by the SS is
ADPG this is submitted to the action of hydrolytic
enzymes of ADPG such as bacterial ADPG pyrophosphatase
(EC 3.6.1.21) (Moreno-Bruna B. Baroja-Fernandez E.
Munoz F.J. Bastarrica-Berasategui A. Zandueta-
Criado A. Rodriguez-Lopez M. Lasa I. Akazawa T.
Pozueta-Romero J. (2001) Adenosine diphosphate sugar
pyrophosphatase prevents glycogen biosynthesis in
Escherichia coll. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 8128-
8132). The G1P released is transformed by the action of
phosphoglucomutase yielding glucose-6-phosphate (G6P)
which can in turn be made to undergo a coupling
reaction with NAD(P)+ by the action of the enzyme G6P
dehydrogenase producing 6-phosphogluconate and
NAD(P)H which can easily be determined by fluorimetry
or spectrophotometry at 340 ran.
In any case the schemes of enzymatic reactions coupled
to the production of a sugar nucleotide mediated by SS
are perfectly suitable for application to amperometric
detection.
EXAMPLES OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Examples are described below which show in detail the
procedure for cloning a cDNA that encodes an isoform of
SS of potato in a suitable expression vector and in a
strain of E. coli optimized for the production and
accumulation of the enzyme in its active form. Other
examples describe the use of the recombinant SS for
making assay kits for the determination of sucrose in
plant samples serum urine fruit juices sweetened
fruit drinks refreshing drinks etc. Another example
describes the use of variants of SS optimized for the
large-scale production of sugar nucleotides such as
UDPG and ADPG. Finally another example describes the
production of plants with high content of sucrose ADPG
and starch and a high amyloseamylopectin ratio as a
result of the high ADPG-producing activity in plants
that overexpress SS.
Example 1: Expression in Escheri.ch.ia coll BLR (DE3)
of a recombinant SS with a histidine tail which can be
purified easily and has high specific activity
Knowing the nucleotide sequence of the SS4 gene that
encodes an isoform of SS of potato it was possible to
create two specific primers whose sequences are in the
5' - 3' direction SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2. Using
these primers a DNA fragment designated as SSX was
amplified by conventional methods of PCR from a potato
tuber cDNA library and this was inserted in a pSK
Bluescript plasmid (Stratagene) which was amplified in
the host bacterium XL1 Blue. The nucleotide sequence of
SSX is SEQ ID NO: 3 which is slightly different from
SS4 (GenBank accession number U24087) . The amino acid
sequence deducted from SEQ ID NO: 3 is slightly
different from SS4 and is therefore designated SSX. The
amino acid sequence deducted after expression of SEQ ID
NO: 3 in the pET-28a( + ) plasmid is SEQ ID NO: 4 which
includes a histidine-rich sequence of 38 amino acids
fused with the amino-terminal end of the amino acid
sequence deducted from SEQ ID NO: 3.
Production of SSX in BL21(DE3) bacteria transformed
with pET-SS was induced on adding 1 mM IPTG. After six
additional hours of culture at 37°C it was observed
that the bacteria transformed with pET-SS accumulated a
protein in aggregated form the size of which
corresponds to SS. However these bacteria did not have
SS activity. This failure in the expression of an
active form of SS can be attributed to the problems
that E. coli has in the correct folding of certain
eukaryotic proteins of high molecular weight (Miroux
B. Walker J.E. (1996) "Over-production of proteins in
Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of
some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high
levels" J. Mol. Biol. 260 289-298). With the aim of
overcoming this problem the capacity for production of
active SS in other bacterial strains and at a
temperature of 20°C was investigated. In all of them
production of SSX was induced on adding 1 mM of IPTG.
After 6 hours of additional incubation the bacteria
were sonicated and centrifuged. The resulting
supernatant was analysed for SS activity. In these
conditions as shown in Fig. 6 the BLR(DES) strain
proved to be the most efficient from the standpoint of
production of soluble active SS. The E. coli strain
BLR(DE3) (Novagen) transformed with pET-SS was
deposited in the Spanish Type Culture Collection on 29
October 2003 with the deposition number CECT:5850. The
contribution of recombinant SSX in the total protein
pool of CECT:5850 is approximately 20% compared to the
very low productivity of recombinant SS (30 micrograms
per gram of bacteria) described in the literature
(Nakai T. Tonouchi N. Tsuchida T. Mori H.
Sakai F. Hayashi T. (1997) "Expression and
characterization of sucrose synthase from mung bean
seedlings in Escherichia coli" Biosci. Biotech.
Biochem. 61 1500-1503; Li C.R. Zhang X.B. Hew
C.S. (2003) "Cloning characterization and expression
analysis of a sucrose synthase gene from tropical
epiphytic orchid Oncidium goldiana. Physiol. Plantarum
_ O -1 _
118 352-360). The supernatant was passed through the
His-Bind affinity column (Novagen) in which the
recombinant protein possessing a histidine tail is
retained specifically. After eluting and dialysing the
purified SS it was incubated with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0
1 mM EDTA 20% polyethylene glycol 1 mM MgCl2 15
mM KC1 2 mM UDP. The specific activity determined in
terms of production of UDPG was 80 unitsmg of
protein much higher than the activity of 0.05-5
unitsmg of recombinant SS described in the literature
(Nakai T. Tonouchi N. Tsuchida T. Mori H.
Sakai F. Hayashi T. (1997) "Expression and
characterization of sucrose synthase from mung bean
seedlings in Escherichia coli" Biosci. Biotech.
Biochem. 61 1500-1503; Li C.R. Zhang X.B. Hew
C.S. (2003) "Cloning characterization and expression
analysis of a sucrose synthase gene from tropical
epiphytic orchid Oncidium goldiana. Physiol. Plantarum
118 352-360); Romer U. Schrader H. Giinther N.
Nettelstroth N. Frommer W.B. Elling L. (2004)
Expression purification and characterization of
recombinant sucrose synthase I from Solanum tuberosum
L. for carbohydrate engineering. J. Biotechnology 107
135-149) and greater than 3 unitsmg corresponding to
the SS purified from plant extracts (Pressey R (1969)
Potato sucrose synthase: purification properties and
changes in activity associated with maturation. Plant
Physiol. 44 759-764. The unit is defined as the amount
of enzyme that catalyses the production of one micromol
of UDPG per minute. The affinity for UDP in the
presence of 500 mM sucrose was Km(UDP) = 0.25 mM
whereas the Km for sucrose was 30 mM in the presence of
1 mM UDP. This affinity for sucrose in the presence of
UDP is significantly higher than that exhibited by the
recombinant SS obtained in yeasts (Km = 95 mM Romer
U. Schrader H. Giinther N. Nettelstroth N.
Frommer W.B. Elling L. (2004) Expression
purification and characterization of recombinant
sucrose synthase I from Solanum tuberosum L. for
carbohydrate engineering. J. Biotechnology 107 135-
149) .
Example 2: Large-scale production of UDPG and ADPG
based on the use of recombinant SS from E. coli
Three grams of UDPG of high purity was produced
efficiently and economically after incubation for 12
hours at 37°C of 100 millilitres of a solution
containing 1 M sucrose 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0 1 mM EDTA
20% polyethylene glycol 1 mM MgCl2 15 mM KC1
100 mM UDP and 30 units of recombinant SS from potato
obtained after expression of pET-SS in BLR(DE3) and
subsequent purification. Reaction came to an end after
heating the solution at 100°C for 90 seconds and then
centrifugation at 10000 g for 10 minutes. The
supernatant was applied to a preparative-scale HPLC
chromatograph (Waters Associates) and the UDPG was
purified as described in the literature (Rodriguez-
Lopez M. Baroja-Fernandez E. Zandueta-Criado A.
Pozueta-Romero J. (2000) Adenosine diphosphate glucose
pyrophosphatase: a plastidial phosphodiesterase that
prevents starch biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 97 8705-8710).
Production of ADPG required the generation of a mutated
form of SS with an affinity for ADP much greater than
that described for the SS extracted from plant tissues
(Pressey R (1969) Potato sucrose synthase:
purification properties and changes in activity
associated with maturation. Plant Physiol. 44 759-764;
Nguyen-Quock B. Krivitzky M. Huber S.C. Lecharny
A. (1990) Sucrose synthase in developing maize leaves.
Plant Physiol. 94 516-523; Morell M. Copeland L.
(1985) Sucrose synthase of soybean nodules. Plant
Physiol. 78 149-154).
This isoform designated SS5 was obtained by point
mutagenesis of SSX using the QuikChange Site-Directed
Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) and successive use of the
following pairs of primers whose sequences are [SEQ ID
NO: 5 SEQ ID NO: 6] [SEQ ID NO: 7 SEQ ID NO: 8] and
[SEQ ID NO: 9 SEQ ID NO: 10] . The nucleotide sequence
obtained designated SS5 is SEQ ID NO: 11. The changes
in the amino acid sequence of SS5 (Susy 5) relative to
SS4 -Susy 4- (present in databases) are shown shaded in
Table I. The amino acid sequence deducted after
expression of SEQ ID NO: 11 in the pET-28a( + ) plasmid
is SEQ ID NO: 12 which includes a histidine-rich
sequence of 38 amino acids fused with the aminoterminal
end of the amino acid sequence deducted from
SEQ ID NO: 11.
Table I includes said histidine-rich sequence of 38
The recombinant SS5 obtained after expression of pETSS5
had a Vmax of 80 unitsmg of protein and 65
unitsmg of protein in the presence of UDP and ADP
respectively. The affinities for UDP and ADP in the
presence of 500 mM sucrose were very similar (Km = 0.2
mM both for ADP and for UDP) whereas the Km for
sucrose was 30 mM and 100 mM in the presence of
saturated concentrations of UDP and ADP respectively.
These kinetic parameters are very different from those
described for the SS extracted from potato tuber and
other organs of other species according to which the
Vmax of the enzyme is 10 times higher in the presence
of UDP than in the presence of ADP (Pressey R (1969)
Potato sucrose synthase: purification properties and
changes in activity associated with maturation. Plant
Physiol. 44 759-764; Morell M. Copeland L. (1985)
Sucrose synthase of soybean nodules. Plant Physiol. 78
149-154; Nguyen-Quock B. Krivitzky M. Huber S.C.
Lecharny A. (1990) Sucrose synthase in developing
maize leaves. Plant Physiol. 94 516-523). The E. coli
strain XL1 Blue transformed with pSS5 was deposited in
the Spanish Type Culture Collection with the
deposition number CECT:5849.
Three grams of ADPG of high purity was produced
efficiently and economically after incubation for 12
hours at 37°C of 100 millilitres of a solution
containing 1 M sucrose 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0 1 mM EDTA
20% polyethylene glycol 1 mM MgCl2 15 mM KC1
100 mM ADP and 30 units of recombinant SS from potato
obtained after expression of pET-SS5 in BLR(DE3) and
subsequent purification in a His-bind column. Reaction
came to an end after heating the solution at 100°C for
90 seconds and then centrifugation at 10000 g for 10
minutes. The supernatant was applied to a preparativescale
HPLC chromatograph (Waters Associates) for
purification of the ADPG.
Example 3: Preparation of enzymatic kits for
determination of sucrose
For determination of sucrose the following reaction
cocktails were prepared with the following components
and final amountsconcentrations:
1. KITS BASED ON THE USE OF HYDROLYTIC ENZYMES OF SUGAR
NUCLEOTIDES:
a. 2 units of SS (recombinant or not)
b. 2 mM of ADP or UDP (depending on whether ADPG or
UDPG is being produced respectively)
c. 2 units of ADPG pyrophosphatase or 2 units of UDPG
pyrophosphatase (depending on whether it is to be
included in the ADP or UDP reaction cocktail
respectively)
d. 2 units of PGM
e. 2 units of G6PDH
f. 0.5 mM of NAD(P)
g. reaction buffer: 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0 1 mM EDTA
20% polyethylene glycol 1 mM MgCl2 15 mM KC1
h. previously filtered test sample
2. KIT BASED ON THE USE OF UDPG DEHYDROGENASE
a. 2 units of SS (recombinant or not)
b. 2 mM of UDP
c. 2 units of UDPG dehydrogenase
d. 0.5 mM of NAD
e. reaction buffer: 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0 1 mM EDTA
20% polyethylene glycol 1 mM MgCl2 15 mM KC1
f. previously filtered test sample
Determination of the amount of sucrose present in the
test sample is based on fluorimetric determination or
spectrophotometric determination (at 340 nm) of the
NAD(P)H produced according to the coupled reactions
shown in schemes I and II.
For determining the sucrose content of barley seeds
with different degrees of development (Fig. 7) the
reactions took place in 300-microlitre wells of an
ELISA plate for 3 minutes at 37°C. The volume of the
test sample was 20 microlitres and the volume of the
cocktail resulting from combination of reagents a-g
(kit #1) and a-e (kit #2) was 280 microlitres. The
blanks contained all the components of the cocktail
except SS. Measurement was carried out with a MultiSkan
spectrophotometer. The values obtained both with the
kit of type "1" and with the kit of type "2" were found
to be comparable to those determined using
chromatographic techniques described in the
introduction (Baroja-Fernandez E. Munoz F.J.
Saikusa T. Rodriguez-Lopez M. Akazawa T. Pozueta-
Romero J. (2003) Sucrose synthase catalyzes the de
novo production of ADPglucose linked to starch
biosynthesis in heterotrophic tissues of plants. Plant
Cell Physiol. 44 500-509).
Example 4: Production of transgenic plants that
overexpress SS
Figs. 8-10 present the results obtained in leaves of
potato plants that overexpress SS both constitutively
(35S-SS-NOS) and specifically (RBCS-SS-NOS).
As shown in Fig. 8 the SS activity in the leaves of
any of these plants is 2-10 times higher than in the
same organ of a wild-type plant (WT) . These leaves had
the following characteristics:
1. Clear correlation between the ADPG-producing SS
activity (Fig. 8) and levels of starch (Fig. 9) and
ADPG (Fig. 10). This characteristic was observed not
only in leaves but also in storage tissues such as
tubers and seeds (see below).
2. High starch content (Fig. 9) relative to leaves of
wild-type plants. For example the starch content of
a leaf of a "wild-type" potato plant grown in a
photoperiod of 8 hours light16 hours darkness and
at 20°C is 5 micromolgram of fresh weight whereas
a leaf of a transgenic plant that overexpresses SS
is 8 micromolgram fresh weight. The differences
between wild-type and transgenic plants are
accentuated when the photoperiod is long so that
the leaves of a plant that overexpresses SS contains
4 times more starch than those of a wild-type plant.
3. High ADPG content relative to the same tissue or
organ of the untransformed plant (Fig. 10) . The
average content in a leaf of a wild-type potato
plant grown in a photoperiod of 8 hours light16
hours darkness and at 20°C is 0.35 nanomolgram of
fresh weight whereas the leaves of the plants that
overexpress SS can have a content of 2.5
nanomolgram of fresh weight.
4. Both ADPG and starch exhibit transitory accumulation
over the photoperiod (Fig. 11) . The rate of
accumulation of both substances maintains a positive
correlation with the SS activity indicating that
contrary to what is suggested by the "classical"
model of starch biosynthesis (Fig. 2A) and
confirming the hypothesis of the "alternative" model
shown in Fig. 2B SS plays a fundamental role in the
production of ADPG and in the link between sucrose
metabolism and starch metabolism.
5. Normal levels of soluble sugars such as glucose and
fructose. However the levels of glucose-6-P and
sucrose in transgenic leaves are higher than those
observed in the wild-type potato leaves (Table 2).
Table 2: Levels of metabolites (expressed in nmolg
fresh weight) in leaves of control plants (WT) and 35SSuSy-
NOS source leaves. Values significantly different
from those observed in WT are shown in bold.
6. The external morphology of the plants that
overexpress SS is not aberrant when compared with
that of the untransformed plants.
Figs. 12-14 show the results obtained in potato tubers
that overexpress SS constitutively (35S-SS-NOS). These
results are essentially identical to those observed in
tubers that overexpress SS under the control of a
specific tuber promoter (promoter of the patatina
gene).
As shown in Fig. 12 the SS activity in the tubers of
any of these plants is ??? times greater than in the
same organ of a wild-type plant. These tubers had the
following characteristics:
1. Clear correlation between the ADPG-producing SS
activity (Fig. 12) and levels of starch (Fig. 13)
and ADPG (Fig. 14).
2. High starch content (Fig. 13) relative to tubers
of untransformed plants. For example the starch
content in the tuber of the "wild-type" plant is
approximately 300 micromolgram of fresh weight
(equivalent to 54 mg of starchgram of fresh
in a tuber that overexpresses SS
it is 450-600 micromolgram fresh weight.
3. High ADPG content relative to tubers of wild-type
plants (Fig. 14). The average content in a wildtype
tuber is 5 nanomolgram of fresh weight
whereas the tubers that overexpress SS can have a
content of 7-9 nanomolgram of fresh weight.
The results obtained in rice seeds tomato and tobacco
leaves as well as tomato fruits are qualitatively
similar to those shown in Figs. 8-14. In all cases
there was an increase in the content of starch and an
increase in the amyloseamylopectin ratio.
The production of plants with high content of ADPG and
starch following overexpression of SS is a result that
is totally unexpected according to the current ideas on
the biosynthesis of starch (illustrated in Figs. 1A and
2A) and perhaps explains why the design of plants that
overexpress SS has not previously been adopted as a
strategy for increasing starch production. The results
obtained on the basis of this work suggest that SS but
not AGPase is the fundamental source of ADPG that
accumulates in plants. According to the models that are
still current AGPase is the only source of ADPG.
Surprisingly however ADPG levels have never been
investigated in AGPase-deficient plants. To explore the
significance of our invention we analysed the levels
of ADPG and starch in Arabidopsis and potato plants
with reduced AGPase activity for the first time. As
shown in Fig. ISA the levels of starch in AGPasedeficient
TL25 Arabidopsis plants (Lin T.P. Caspar
T. Somerville C.R. Press J. (1988) Isolation and
characterization of a starchless mutant of Arabidopsis
thaliana lacking ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activity.
Plant Physiol. 88 1131-1135) are lower than those
observed in the WT plants. However the levels of ADPG
are normal (Fig. 15B). In contrast the levels of
starch in AGP62 and AGP85 potato plants (Muller-Robber
. Stonewall U. Wurlitzer L. (1992) Inhibition of
the ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase in transgenic potatoes
leads to sugar-storing tubers and influences tuber
formation and expression of tuber storage protein
genes. EMBO J. 11 1229-1238) are reduced relative to
those observed in leaves of wild-type plants (Fig.
16A). However the levels of ADPG are completely normal
(Fig. 16B). Taken together these observations (a) show
that SS and not AGPase is the principal source of
ADPG in plants and (b) highlight the significance of
our invention after demonstrating that overexpression
of SS gives rise to plants with high starch content.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DIAGRAMS
Fig. 1: Mechanisms of starch biosynthesis in
heterotrophic organs. (A) "Classical" mechanism
according to which SS is involved in the production of
UDPG which is eventually converted to starch after the
combined action of UDPG pyrophosphorylase (UGPase)
cytosolic phosphoglucomutase (PGM) plastidial
phosphoglucomutase ADPG pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) and
starch synthase. (B) "Alternative" mechanism according
to which SS is involved in the direct production of
ADPG in the cytosol. The ADPG is then transported to
the amyloplast by the action of a translocator. Once
inside the amyloplast the starch synthase utilizes the
ADPG for producing starch.
Fig. 2: Mechanisms of biosynthesis of starch in leaves.
(A) "Classical" mechanism according to which the entire
process of starch biosynthesis takes place inside the
chloroplast. According to this view starch metabolism
and sucrose are not connected. Moreover SS does not
take part in the gluconeogenic process.
(B) "Alternative" mechanism of starch biosynthesis
according to which SS is involved in the direct
synthesis of ADPG in the cytosol. The ADPG is then
transported to the interior of the plastid where the
starch synthase utilizes it as substrate for the
reaction of starch synthesis.
Fig. 3: Stages in construction of the pET-SS expression
plasmid from pET-28a(+) and pSS.
Fig. 4: Stages in construction of the pBIN35S-SS-NOS
expression plasmid from pBIN20 and p35S-SS-NOS.
Fig. 5: Stages in construction of the pRBCS-SS-NOS
expression plasmid from pGEMT-RBCSprom p35S-SS-NOS and
pBIN20.
Fig. 6: Expression of pET-SS in different strains of
Escherichia coll. (A) SS activity (in milliunits (mU)
per milligram of bacterial protein) in bacterial
extracts transformed with pET or with pET-SS. The
reaction took place in the direction of degradation of
sucrose and production of ADPG. The reaction cocktail
contained 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0) 1 mM EDTA 20%
polyethylene glycol 1 mM MgCl2 15 mM of KC1 and 2 mM
of ADP. Reaction took place for 10 minutes at 37°C.
(B) SDS-PAGE of protein extracts from the various
strains of E. coli transformed with pET and with pETSS.
The position of the recombinant SSX is indicated
with an asterisk.
Fig. 7: Determination of sucrose at different stages of
development of barley endosperm using the kit based on
the coupled reactions of SS ADPG (UDPG)
pyrophosphatase PGM and G6PDH. The results were
identical to those obtained in parallel by (a) use of a
kit based on the coupled reactions of SS and UDPG
dehydrogenase and (b) use of high-performance
chromatography (HPLC) with amperometric detection in a
DX-500 Dionex system connected to a Carbo-Pac PAl
column.
Abscissa: Days after flowering
Ordinate: Sucrose content (umolgFW)
Fig. 8: SS activity in leaves of wild-type (WT) potato
plants and potato plants that overexpress SSX following
integration of the constructions 35S-SS-NOS (by the
action of the strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens
CECT:5851) or RBCS-SS-NOS in their genome. Activity is
expressed in milliunits (mU) per gram of fresh weight.
The unit is defined as the amount of SS required for
producing one micromol of ADPG per minute.
Fig. 9: Content of starch in leaves of wild-type (WT)
potato plants and potato plants that overexpress SSX
following integration of the constructions 35S-SS-NOS
(by the action of the strain of Agrobacterium
tumefaciens CECT:5851) or RBCS-SS-NOS in their genome.
Fig. 10: Content of ADPG in leaves of wild-type (WT)
potato plants and potato plants that overexpress SSX
following integration of the constructions 35S-SS-NOS
(by the action of the strain of Agrobacterium
tumefaciens CECT:5851) or RBCS-SS-NOS in their genome.
Fig. 11: Transitory accumulation of (A) starch and (B)
ADPG during a photoperiod of 8 hours of light and 16
hours of darkness in leaves of WT plants (•) 35S-SSNOS
(•) and RBCS-SS-NOS (A).
Fig. 12: SS activity (referred to fresh weight FW) in
tubers of wild-type potato plants (WT) regeneration
controls (RG) and potato plants that overexpress SSX
(lines 4 5 6 and 12) after integration of the
construction 35S-SS-NOS in their genome (by the action
of the strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens CECT:5851).
The activity is expressed in milliunits (mU) per gram
of fresh weight. The unit is defined as the amount of
SS required for producing one micromol of ADPG per
minute.
Fig. 13: Content of starch (referred to fresh weight
FW) in tubers of wild-type potato plants (WT)
regeneration controls (RG) and potato plants that
overexpress SSX (lines 4 5 6 and 12) after
integration of the construction 35S-SS-NOS in their
genome (by the action of the strain of Agrobacterium
tumefaciens CECT:5851).
Fig. 14: Content of ADPG (referred to fresh weight FW)
in tubers of wild-type potato plants (WT) and potato
plants that overexpress SSX after integration of the
construction 35S-SS-NOS in their genome (by the action
of the strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens CECT:5851).
Fig. 15: Content of (A) starch and (B) ADPG in leaves
of AGPase-deficient Arabidopsis thaliana TL25.
Fig. 16: Content of (A) starch and (B) ADPG in leaves
of AGPase-deficient potato AGP62 and AGP85.








We claim:
1. A sucrose synthase characterized by the SEQ ID NO: 12.
2. Use of the sucrose synthase as claimed in claim 1 in the production of ADPG, wherein incubation of ADP and sucrose synthase potato isoform in suitable conditions, followed by isolation and purification of the ADPG produced.
3. The use as claimed in claim 2, wherein it comprises:
a) Incubating 100 ml of the following solution for 12 h at 37°C:
Sucrose 1M
HEPES, pH 7.0 50 mM
EDTA 1 mM
Polyethylene glycol 20%
MgCl2 1 mM
KC1 15 mM
ADP 100 mM
b) Stopping the reaction by heating, preferably at 100°C for 90 s
c) Centrifuging at 10000 g for 10 min
d) Chromatographing the supernatant by HPLC, eluting and purifying the ADPG by conventional methods.

4. Use of the sucrose synthase as claimed in claim 1 in the manufacture of assay kits for the spectrophotometric/fluorimetric/amperometric determination of sucrose.
5. The use as claimed in claim 4, wherin it comprises the following incubation medium:

a) 2 units of sucrose synthase.
b) 2 mM of ADP
c) 2 units of ADPG pyrophosphatase of plant, animal or microbial origin
d) 2 units of PGM
e) 2 units of G6PDH
f) 0.5 mM of NAD(P)
g) 100 ml of reaction buffer: 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.0 / 1 mM EDTA / 20% polyethylene glycol / 1 mM MgCl2 /15 mM KC1
h) Previously filtered test sample.
6. The use as claimed in claim 4, wherein it comprises the following incubation medium:
a) 2 units of sucrose synthase.
b) 2 mM of UDP
c) 2 units of UDPG pyrophosphatase of plant, animal or microbial origin

d) 2 units of PGM
e) 2 units of G6PDH
f) 0.5 mM of NAD(P)
g) 100 ml of reaction buffer: 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.0 / 1 mM EDTA / 20%
polyethylene glycol /1 mM MgCl2 /15 mM KC1
h) Previously filtered test sample.
7. The use as claimed in claim 4, wherein it comprises the following incubation medium:
a) 2 units of sucrose synthase.
b) 2 mM of UDP
c) 2 units of UDPG dehydrogenase
d) 0.5 mM of NAD

e) 100 ml of reaction buffer: 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.0 / 1 mM EDTA / 20% polyethylene glycol /1 mM MgCl2 /15 mM KC1
f) Previously filtered test sample.
8. Use of the DNA fragment characterized by SEQ NO: 11 in the production of transgenic plants that overexpress sucrose synthase, characterized by inserting a genetic construction that contains and expresses the DNA fragment of SEQ NO: 11 in a suitable vector and transferring said genetic construction to the genome of a plant.

Documents:

4128-DELNP-2006-Abstract-(02-05-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-abstract.pdf

4128-DELNP-2006-Claims-(02-05-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-claims.pdf

4128-DELNP-2006-Correspondence Others-(02-05-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-Correspondence Others-(15-10-2013).pdf

4128-DELNP-2006-Correspondence-Others-(28-07-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-correspondence-others-1.pdf

4128-delnp-2006-correspondence-others.pdf

4128-DELNP-2006-Description (Complete)-(02-05-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-description (complete).pdf

4128-DELNP-2006-Drawings-(02-05-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-drawings.pdf

4128-DELNP-2006-Form-1-(02-05-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-form-1.pdf

4128-delnp-2006-form-18.pdf

4128-DELNP-2006-Form-2-(02-05-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-form-2.pdf

4128-DELNP-2006-Form-3-(28-07-2011).pdf

4128-delnp-2006-form-3.pdf

4128-delnp-2006-form-5.pdf

4128-delnp-2006-GPA-(15-10-2013).pdf


Patent Number 257831
Indian Patent Application Number 4128/DELNP/2006
PG Journal Number 46/2013
Publication Date 15-Nov-2013
Grant Date 08-Nov-2013
Date of Filing 18-Jul-2006
Name of Patentee UNIVERSIDAD PUBLICA DE NAVARRA
Applicant Address CAMPUS DE ARROSADIA S/N, (OTRI) EDIFICIO EL SARIO, E-31006 PAMPLONA, SPAIN
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 FRANCISCO JOSE MUNOZ PEREZ CAMPUS DE ARROSADIA S/N, (OTRI) EDIFICIO EL SARIO, E-31006 PAMPLONA, SPAIN
2 MARIA TERESA MORAN ZORZANO CAMPUS DE ARROSADIA S/N, (OTRI) EDIFICIO EL SARIO, E-31006 PAMPLONA, SPAIN
3 MIREN EDURNE BAROJA FERNANDEZ CAMPUS DE ARROSADIA S/N, (OTRI) EDIFICIO EL SARIO, E-31006 PAMPLONA, SPAIN
4 FRANCISCO JAVIER POZUETA ROMERO CAMPUS DE ARROSADIA S/N, (OTRI) EDIFICIO EL SARIO, E-31006 PAMPLONA, SPAIN
5 NORA ALONSO CASAJUS CAMPUS DE ARROSADIA S/N, (OTRI) EDIFICIO EL SARIO, E-31006 PAMPLONA, SPAIN
PCT International Classification Number C12N 15/29
PCT International Application Number PCT/ES2005/070010
PCT International Filing date 2005-01-27
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 P200400257 2004-02-05 Spain