Title of Invention

A METHOD, A SYSTEM AND AN INTERMEDITE NODE FOR PROVIDING MULTIUSER STREAMING IN A TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Abstract The invention provides a solution for performing multicast for streaming transmission in a telecommunication system. An intermediate node is proposed which is able to connect the functionality of a broadcast/multicast server and of a streaming node. Further the intermediate node is responsible for the establishment of a bearer for multicast transmission. The establishment of a session is done by means of a translation the on- demand single-use signalling into multi-user push signalling. Furthermore an adaptation of the streaming flow for a whole multicast group or for individual subgroups of a multicast group is performed.
Full Text Technical field of the invention
The present invention relates to a method, a system and an intermediate node for providing
multiuser streaming in a telecommunication system.
Especially the present application is applicable in a wireless packet-switched

telecommunication network.
Background
Universal Mobile Telecommunication System UMTS is being developed to offer wireless
wideband multimedia services. However streaming is also applicable to GSM, even though
with a lower bandwidth. Images, voice, audio and video content are examples of mobile
multimedia services, which are delivered to clients via media streaming and download
techniques. It means once the content has been put onto a media server, it can be delivered on-
demand via download or streaming. To download content, the user clicks for example on a
link and waits for the content to be downloaded and playback to begin. Content streaming is
done towards a single user by means of a unicast connection, when the user has requested
this. The unicast connection is also called point-to-point communication.
Multicast is a service that permits sources to send a single copy of the same data to an address
that causes the data to be delivered to multiple recipients. With multicast only a single copy of
a data item passes over any link in a network and copies of the data item are made only where
paths diverge. From the network perspective, multicast dramatically reduces overall
bandwidth consumption, since the data is replicated in the network at appropriate points rather
than in the end-systems. Furthermore, a server that uses multicast to distribute the content to
multiple receivers, must manage only one session.
Local area networks have supported multicasting for many years. For networks, where nodes
share a common communication medium multicasting is easy to support. A specially
addressed packet can be read off the communication medium by multiple hosts.


Multicasting in the internetworking between a fixed network, like for example the Internet or
any other IP-based backbone network and a mobile network like, General Packet Radio
System GPRS or Universal Mobile Telecommunication System UMTS is currently
developed, because especially in the wireless network new challenges occur. These challenges
are for example the mobility of the end users and low transmission bandwidth of the mobile
network on the air interface, but also the lower reliability due to the packet loss on the radio
interface compared to the fixed networks.
The currently discussed multicast/broadcast integration into UMTS and GSM is depicted in
figure 1, which shows the architecture of multimedia broadcast/multicast. In figure 1 the most
relevant nodes of GPRS or UMTS network and examples of the different access networks,
like UTRAN and GERAN, are presented. The access networks are handled by means of a
serving node, SGSN that communicates with an edge node, the GGSN that is responsible for
connection to the external networks, like Internet. The BM-SC entity is responsible for the
provision of multicast/broadcast, like for example for bearer establishment and data
forwarding. However there is currently no solution existing, which works for multicasting of
streaming. Since the idea is that the current BM-SC proposals simply forward the content.
The functionality for handling a streaming flow is not included in the BM-SC.
Currently the signalling and transmission of the streaming flow for a single user is performed
in a wireless network by means of a Packet Switched Streaming architecture, which has a
streaming server distributing the streaming flow to a streaming node, which can be realised by
means of network integration nodes NINs. There are also solution, in which a content servers
distributes the streaming content directly to the streaming clients on the user's side. These
content servers are either the streaming servers or the NINs. The streaming nodes
communicate with the GGSN that forwards the stream to the SGSN and then via the radio
network to a user.
Simply aggregating both solutions would lead to a system in which a streaming session is
established for every user interested in receiving the streaming flow, implying that such a
service will be very inefficiently deployed, especially in wireless networks, since it does not
utilize the scarce radio resources in an optimal way. Furthermore although the transport may
be multicast, a separate streaming session would be established per client with dedicated on-

demand signalling messages. Further the adaptation will be done for the whole group and not
on a per subgroup base, implying that the adaptation is general and not optimized for the
different subgroups. Currently an individual adaptation can be achieved because all users have
a separate and dedicated streaming session, wherein this solution leads to wasting of network
resources.
Therefore currently there is no integration between the multicast and the unicast streaming
transmission, providing an efficient and effective solution.
Summary and description of the invention
It is an object of the present invention to provide an efficient solution for providing multicast
for streaming transmission within a telecommunication network.
The invention is embodied in a method as disclosed in claims 1,15 and 16. Advantageous
embodiments are described in the dependent claims.
The method of the basic idea for providing multicast for streaming transmission from a
streaming server to a multicast group is disclosed in claim 1. The streaming server providing
the streaming content can be located within the mobile network or in an external network. A
multicast/broadcast server is responsible for providing multicast transmission. The task of
said server is for example administration of the established multicast group, forwarding of the
multicast data. A streaming node supports a streaming transmission. The streaming node is
currently responsible for establishing a connection to a single user by means of an on-demand
single-user signalling and optionally for an adaptation of the received streaming flow to the
conditions of the network connection for the user. Further the streaming node can take care of
the billing and charging procedure for the streaming receivers. On the basis of the known
functionality the present invention proposes to integrate logically or/and physically the
streaming node and the multicast/broadcast server building an intermediate node and to add
the following functionality.
The intermediate node receives a message initiating an establishment of a multicast bearer
according to the requirements for streaming transmission. The intermediate node establishes a

session on the multicast bearer by translating the on-demand single-user signalling received
from the streaming server into multi-user push signalling being sent to the group members.
An important advantage of the multi-user push signalling is the achievement of the
synchronisation of the multicast group members. The intermediate node has the functionality
of adapting the received streaming flow to the multicast transmission according to the needs
of a multicast group or a subgroup. Further the intermediate node replicates the received
streaming transmission according the number of the multicast subgroups.
In the following the term intermediate node describes a logical or a physical combination of
the streaming node and of the multicast/broadcast server for the purpose of the present
invention.
There are different ways of ordering the broadcast/multicast server and the streaming node
within the intermediate node.
In one embodiment of the invention the streaming node communicating with the server adapts
the streaming transmission and forwards the adapted streaming transmission to the
multicast/broadcast server, which replicates the received streaming transmission among the
subgroups of a multicast group. The advantage of this solution is that the streaming node
performs an adaptation for the whole group or a subgroup, it means before the replication is
done in the multicast/broadcast server.
In a further embodiment the multicast/broadcast server communicating with the server
replicates the received streaming transmission among the subgroups of a multicast group and
forwards each replicated streaming transmission to the streaming node, which adapts each
streaming transmission. The smallest subgroup consists of one user. The advantage of this
solution is that the streaming node is able to do a dedicated adaptation for specific subgroups
with the same characteristics, like for example all users served by the same SGSN or all users
receiving the service in the same access network, for example GSM or WCDMA.
Furthermore, the multicast/broadcast server may select different streaming nodes for the
different replications of a stream, like for example for load balancing reasons or because the
streaming nodes have different capabilities.

In a further embodiment the intermediate node has a decision unit for deciding whether the
received streaming flow is to be directed first to the multicast/broadcast server or to the
streaming node. It means the deciding unit decides either to direct the streaming flow to the
multicast/broadcast server and then to the streaming node or it directs it to the streaming node
and then to the multicast/broadcast server. The flow can also be directed only to the
multicast/broadcast server. It can be also decided that no replication in the multicast/broadcast
server is needed, because for example all users are in the same cell. The decision can also be
that the involvement of a multicast/broadcast server or a streaming node is not required at all.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention there are different streaming nodes being
identified by means of addresses and the streaming nodes may differ regarding different
capabilities. The multicast/broadcast server knows the addresses and the different capabilities
and said multicast/broadcast server has the capability to select an appropriate streaming node
for performing an appropriate adaptation of the streaming flow.
In an embodiment of the present invention, in which a hierarchical coding is used, the
streaming flows are differentiated in the sense that a different number of layers are sent to
different streaming nodes. In the hierarchical coding there is the base layer being sent to every
user and additionally there are enhancement layers on top that can for example increase frame
rate or spatial resolution for users requesting it. The multicast groups can be distinguished
regarding the number of levels being able and/or willing to receive.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the intermediate node handles the received
address(es) identifying the receiver(s) of the streaming flow. It may be required to perform a
translation of a unicast address into a multicast address. The unicast address can be included
in an on-demand single-user signalling received from the server. It is also possible that the
received address from the server is a multicast address, implying that the translation between
two different multicast addresses may be needed. This case occurs, when the
broadcast/multicast server is part of a multicast group receiving content from the server,
because the operator has several broadcast/multicast servers and the distribution of the content
to all broadcast/multicast servers is done by means of multicast. Therefore the external
multicast address received from the server is translated into the internal multicast address used
on the interface towards the users. It is also possible that the handling requires only

forwarding to the appropriate multicast group, because the same multicast address is used
between the server and the intermediate node and between the intermediate node and the
multicast groups. It is advantageous to have different possibilities to inform the
multicast/broadcast server about the streaming node, for example this can be event-based
messages sent from an operator to the multicast/broadcast server and to the streaming node on
which reaction the multicast/broadcast server sends a request message to the sender and
receives an acknowledgement message with all the relevant parameters. In a further
embodiment the operator administrates this information or the multicast/broadcast server may
regularly request the information from the streaming servers.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the intermediate node receives a session
description message like for example Session Description Protocol SDP inside of a Real Time
Steaming Protocol RTSP message from the server informing about the transmission
parameters required for the streaming session. The intermediate node can decide by receiving
the session description message which streaming node can be taken in order to fulfil the
requirements for the streaming session. This session description info is forwarded to the group
members by means of the multi-user push signalling message, like for example SDP inside of
a Session Initiation Protocol SIP or Session Adaptation Protocol SAP message.
Further it is proposed that the intermediate node by receipt of a session description message
informing about the transmission parameters required for the streaming session changes the
received parameters according to the needs of the subgroups and sends the changed
parameters to the group members by means of the multi-user push signalling message. The
advantage of this solution is that a dedicated adaptation according to the users requirements
can be performed.
For the realisation of the dedicated adaptation nodes higher up in the hierarchy are informed
that the streaming flow is only to be forwarded to a single node lower in the hierarchy. It
means in case of a dedicated adaptation for an SGSN-area as an example nodes like, the
GGSN, BM-SC and NIN must be informed that the streaming flow is only to be sent to that
specific SGSN. As mentioned before the decision of dedicated adaptations is taken in the
intermediate node. A new message is then to be distributed along the multicast delivery tree,

indicating the streaming flow and the destination, for example a certain SGSN. All nodes in-
between will set the distribution tree information accordingly for that specific stream.
Further it is proposed that the conversion between single-user on-demand and multi-user push
signalling implies that certain messages are not propagated. In a preferred embodiment it is
not required that all the users send an answer about the acceptance of the parameters, when
they registered to a group advertising certain parameters and thus already indicated that they
are willing and able to receive the content with these conditions.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the replication of the streaming flow is
based on an access network, in which users are located or/and is based on the geographic area
and/or on the Quality of Service requested by the group members. The advantage of this
solution is the definition of different subgroups within a multicast group so that the
subgrouping can better satisfy the users requirements, for example considering their current
access network characteristics and status.
It is proposes that in order the intermediate node is aware of the available QoS in the
corresponding area, the intermediate requests the actual characteristics of the area in order to
adapt the streaming flow accordingly. This implies for example that the intermediate node is
provided with the addresses of the corresponding subarea or access nodes, such as the SGSN
or the RNC. From these nodes the intermediate node can then request the actual
characteristics of the subarea.
Since the intermediate node administrates all the multicast traffic sent to the group members,
including the dedicated (sub-)group adaptations, it can provide more accurate charging, and in
a further preferred embodiment the intermediate node provides additional information to the
charging/billing server in order to be able to do an accurate charging and/or multi-user
streaming related charging. The information provided to the charging/billing server is the
number of group members, the reception quality, which is received in the feedback from the
group members, according to which an adaptation may be done, the streaming flow
characteristics, the number of group members per adapted/replicated streaming flow, etc.

Further it is proposed to have an intermediate node being adapted to provide multicast for
streaming transmission from a streaming server to users of a multicast group with a
multicast/broadcast server providing multicast transmission and with a streaming node
providing a streaming transmission and based on an on-demand single-user signalling
supporting the transmission of a streaming flow. Said intermediate node includes the
multicast/broadcast server and the streaming node with the following additionally
functionality. Bearer establishing means for establishing a bearer for a multicast transmission
according to the requirements for streaming transmission received from the server. Further
there is session establishing means for establishing a multi-user streaming session on the
bearer by translating the on-demand single-user signalling received from the streaming server
into multi-user push signalling. The adaptation means is responsible for adapting the received
streaming flow to the multicast transmission according to the needs of a multicast group. The
replication means is responsible for the replication of the streaming flow among the
subgroups.
Further a system being adapted to provide multicast for streaming transmission from a
streaming server to users of a multicast group with a multicast/broadcast server providing
multicast transmission and with a streaming node providing a streaming transmission and
with an on-demand single-user signalling supporting the transmission of a streaming flow,
wherein said system has an intermediate node according to claim 15 and the method
according to claim 1 is performed within the system.
In the following a detailed description of the invention is given.
Fig.l: Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service architecture.
Fig.2: Embodiment of the present invention with NIN located
between a server and a BM-SC.
Fig.3: Embodiment of the present invention with a BM-SC
located between a server and a NIN.
Fig.4: Embodiment of the present invention with a decision
unit.

Fig.5: signalling flow for multi-user streaming session
establishment.
Fig.6: signalling flow for multi-user streaming session with
multiple subgroups.
Fig.7: signalling flow for multi-user streaming session with
multiple NINs when NIN is located between a server and a
BM-SC.
Fig. 8: signalling flow for multi-user streaming session with
multiple NINs when a BM-SC is located between a server and the NINs.
The description of the possible technical realisation of the present invention is based on the
network architectures according to figure 1 and 2. Therefore in the following description the
broadcast/multicast server will be called BM-SC. The Network Integration Node NIN is an
example of a streaming node supporting streaming protocols like for example RTSP, RTP,
RTCP. However in the following an example is given with the architecture having the NIN,
this should not be seen as a restriction for the present invention.
In the following the different possibilities of the direction of the streaming flow within the
intermediate node, which can be called Multicast Streaming Proxy MSP regarding the order
of adaptation and replication are described in more details.
In one embodiment the BM-SC is integrated between the NIN and the GGSN as depicted in
figure 2. Figure 2 shows a server sending the streaming flow to the intermediate node. Within
the intermediate node the NIN is the first node that is contacted. Said NIN communicates on
the other hand with the BM-SC. The numbers on the arrows indicate the number of flows that
are to be sent on said link. Thus at first an adaptation of the received stream in the NIN is
performed, 10, and then the stream is sent to the BM-SC, 20, being responsible for the
replication, n, indicating the replication of the stream for n subgroups. The stream(s) is/are
sent to the GGSN and respectively to the SGSN. Additionally a communication with the so-
called C&B Prepaid node takes place regarding the forwarding of charging and billing related
data. The benefit of this solution is that the NIN does a general adaptation for the whole group
before the replication is performed in the BM-SC.

In another embodiment the BM-SC is integrated between the streaming server and the NIN, as
reflected in figure 3, in which the server sends a streaming flow to the BM-SC being
responsible for the replication. The replicated streams are forwarded to the NIN or NINs,
which perform(s) the adaptation. Respectively the n streams are distributed to subgroups
passing GGSN and SGSNs. The benefit of this solution is that the NIN provides a dedicated
adaptation for specific subgroups with the same characteristics, like for example all members
served by the same SGSN or residing in the same access network. Furthermore, the BM-SC
may select different NINs for the different replicated streams.
In the third embodiment of the present invention in order to increase the flexibility a decision
is taken, over which path the received streaming flow within the intermediate node is to be
directed. The path is determined by means of configuration, depending on the group or other
criteria. The issue here is that different paths are possible, even simultaneously and that
certain criteria are used to establish and maintain the most appropriate path. This solution is
reflected in figure 4. A logical unit, called Path Determination Logic (PDL), determines the
optimal path of the streams and the corresponding signalling messages. In the figure 4 the
logical PDL is co-located with the BM-SC. In general the PDL may be a standalone entity or
it may be co-located with any other network entity as long as the corresponding interfaces to
the other network entities exist.
The PDL selects and creates a path via the intermediate node. The selection criteria depend on
the benefit, which is to be achieved, it means it is required to adapt the streaming flow for the
whole group or the requirement is to adapt individual streams dedicated to different
subgroups. The benefits are discussed above. The selection can be applied on a per content or
content provider base. Input for the selection is given by the operator for example by means of
a corresponding management interface or by the content server or by the BM-SC, which has
the advantage that the selection is group driven.
In the following some examples of selection scenarios are discussed. In case a service is
offered where one quality level has to fit all wishes. For example due to a reduced tariff a
common stream adaptation in the NIN might be sufficient. In contrary in case a service
quality is to be achieved the content is to be first replicated in the BM-SC and then a
dedicated adaptation per SGSN, RNC or even per cell is to be performed.

When the intermediate node determines certain parameters for a subgroup then said
parameters are to be sent to the subgroup. They confirm the possibility for receiving a
streaming flow with these parameters, unless the signalling is changed to push signalling in
which case the network does not expect or require a confirmation from the group members. It
is also possible that a subgroup sends at session establishment a request for expected quality
and then the intermediate node has to select the appropriate adaptation. The reception quality
reporting per subarea is done via standard mechanisms, such as the Real-time Transport
Control Protocol, RTCP, which reports on a per subscriber level or any other mechanism, like
for example collective reporting by the RNC. The intermediate node or the streaming server is
the receiver of these reception quality reports. The stream to be adapted is determined from
the stream identifier in a Real-time Transport Control Protocol RTCP report. Alternatively a
subarea identifier can be included in the RTCP report, which is then used by the NIN or the
server to adapt the corresponding stream.
In the following the establishment of a streaming session is described in more details. In
particular the translation of the on-demand single-user signalling received from the streaming
server into multi-user push signalling is discussed. The RTSP protocol is an example of an
on-demand single-user signalling, because it is a client-server protocol, providing an
interaction between two entities. The Session Initiation Protocol SIP is used as an example for
a multi-user push signalling. SIP is a protocol, which provides functionality for performing
actions initiated by the network without that the user requests it explicitly. Thus it is push-
based protocol. Further the SIP provides the option for multicast addressing, it means a
number of user can be requested with one message. Although the SIP protocol was developed
for a point-to-point transmission, it supports multicast addressing. In the present invention it
is used for multicast signalling.
Therefore SIP fulfils the requirements of a multi-user push signalling protocol. Further
example for the a multi-user push signalling protocol is the combination of SIP and Session
Description Protocol SDP, SIP/SDP , wherein the messages are SIP, but the stream
description contained in the SIP messages is based on the SDP. Further the SIP/SDP
messages can be replaced by corresponding Session Announcement Protocol SAP/SDP
messages.

These protocols are merely examples for the multi-user push signalling and therefore they do
not restrict the scope of the invention.
Multi-user streaming session establishment is described in respect to figure 5, which depicts
the signalling flow between the Server, the NIN, the BM-SC and the members of a multicast
group {UE}. At first the Server and the BM-SC are notified about a certain multicast service.
The service notification can be realised by means of distribution of event-based messages
from an operator, web-server or any other source to the BM-SC and the Server. With this
solution the BM-SC is informed about servers offering multicast services. However there are
different possibilities. Usually the info is available on web pages, distributed for example via
e-mail or SAP messages. This information may be distributed by means of multicast or by
means of papers to the operators administrating such information.
According to figure 5 in the first step the BM-SC requests a content description, by means of
the RTSP: Describe message in order to see whether and how to handle the stream. Implicitly
with this message the server is informed about the BM-SC as a streaming client for that
particular session. It is necessary that the BM-SC knows the location of the Server, indicating
only examples for receiving this information either the BM-SC has the addresses of the
servers from the operator or this information is indicated by the user in corresponding Real-
Time Transport Session Protocol RTSP message flows. The RTSP is a protocol responsible
for establishment and for control of a session for point-to-point real-time applications,
although it supports multicast addressing. The RTSP.DESCRIBE from the BM-SC to the
streaming server can optionally includes the number of clients that this RTSP applies to in
order to enable for example the proper charging of the mobile operator by the streaming
service provider. The Server answers to the BM-SC with RTSP.200 OK (SDP-info), which is
an acknowledgment specified in RTSP. This acknowledgment carries as parameters the
Session Description Protocol information, SDP-info, like for example the required buffer size,
the required transport bandwidth. According to this information the BM-SC establishes a
multicast bearer for the certain multicast group when the streaming is about to start. In order
to inform the users about incoming streaming session with the corresponding parameters a
SIP: Invite message is sent. The users send the message SIP: 200 OK acknowledging the
readiness for the streaming session. After that step a RTSP connection between the BM-SC

and the Server by means of RTSP.SETUP and RTSP:200OK is established. It is also possible
that the RTSP-Setup and RTSP:200 OK are exchanged before the transmission of the SIP
message to the users. The RTSP.SETUP message can include parameters being changed
according to performed negotiation and the Server answers with RTSP.200OK, whether he is
able to accept a connection with the changed parameters. The changed parameters can be sent
to the group members by means of a SIP:ACK message acknowledging to the group members
the accepted changes and closing the streaming session establishment procedure. As next the
transmission of the streaming flow is performed by means of a RTSP Play message, receipt of
which is acknowledged by means of a RTSP.200OK message.
It means the intermediate node acts like a single or multiple group members towards the
streaming server, simulating one group member per GGSN, SGSN, RNC, or even cell. It is
also possible to simulate a group member per QoS subgroup. Towards the users it acts like a
SIP server or remote client, inviting these users for a streaming session by translating the
single user flows into multi-user flows. In the direction from the server to the users the
intermediate node may interpret and modify the corresponding RTSP messages before
propagating these as SIP messages. Modifications of messages can include the filtering of the
SDP information according to the sub-network characteristics where the RTSP message and
afterwards the RTP frames will be replicated. It means the BM-SC reduces QoS in SDP in
case the access network is not able to handle the QoS or the operator does not allow such a
QoS for that specific service. This is done by the generation of the RTSP.SETUP message.
Further modification of the messages received from the Server can be that the BM-SC does
not propagate the message, like for example the last RTSP:200 OK in the sequence in figure 5
must not be propagated. Further the BM-SC is responsible for changing the unicast address to
a multicast address in the corresponding messages in case this is required.
In the direction from the users to the server the intermediate node may modify the
corresponding RTSP message content before sending it to the server. Modifications of
messages can be for example the replication of the number of RTSP SETUP message and
sending a SETUP message per multicast subgroup. In case a translation of addresses is
required the BM-SC changes the multicast address to a unicast address

In order to reduce the signalling for multi-user streaming sessions, and especially the number
of messages sent on the radio interface, the signalling sequence can be optimized for multi-
user streaming sessions in wireless networks. This optimization is depicted in figure 6.
In figure 6 the communication between a Server via the intermediate node to users being in
two different access networks, {UE-1} and {UE-2}, is shown. The establishment of a bearer
between the BM-SC and the group members according to the Server SDP-info is handled in a
similar way as described in respect to figure 5. The difference is the filtering and the
replication performed in the intermediate node before the first SIP :INVITE message is sent.
As described before the BM-SC replicates the content and takes care of the necessary filtering
of the SDP information and later the streamed content. The users indicate their interest in the
service/content before or during registering to the multicast group and since the content is
anyhow broadcasted on the air-interface, the actual service can be regarded as a push service
in the sense that the users are just informed that the content will come by means of the SIP:
INVITE message and then they wait for the arrival of the streaming flow. This message is
either sent via unicast or broadcast/multicast to the users per area. It means users being in
different access networks are distinguished, because according to the access network different
Quality of Service requirements may have to be fulfilled.
This optimization reduces the signalling time delays and the number of messages to be sent on
the radio interface. The users can be optionally informed about this optimization for multi-
user streaming by means of an indication in the SIP INVITE message, which states that the
next thing to be received is the actual streaming content. Optionally time or time period can
be indicated to prepare the user for the reception of the streaming content.
Above the general idea was described without considering the order of performing the
adaptation and replication of the streaming flow.
In the following the signalling exchange is described considering the order of the adaptation
and replication of the streaming flow. This is to be distinguished by implementing the order of
placing the BM-SC and the NIN within an intermediate node or in case the intermediate node
has a decision unit for deciding about the way a streaming flow has to pass the corresponding
entities within the intermediate node.

As mentioned above the BM-SC has information about the addresses of the servers. Further
the BM-SC has also the addresses of the NINs, wherein the BM-SC either administrates the
addresses or it has any other server discovery mechanism in order to be able to contact the
NINs and link these into the path. In case of a network with multiple NINs having different
capabilities, the BM-SC is aware of the capabilities either because they are administrated in
the network or because NINs register to the BM-SC with their capabilities. These capabilities
are used to select the appropriate NIN. This implies that different NINs can be selected by the
BM-SC, for the adaptation of the streaming flow depending on the required capabilities. In
the following some examples are given for capabilities to be considered. For example the
available resources can be considered. Further the BM-SC distinguishes according to the
adaptation speed, wherein the speed can depend on the used processors and/or on the
reception quality reporting speed and/or the applied method. Further example is the supported
wireless specific adaptation. This can be done on high level distinguishing between the
different networks like for example GSM, WCDMA, WLAN, or more detailed by
distinguishing the different specific parameters like the bandwidth, from 300 to 64 kbps, or
the delay from 2 ms to 5 ms and corresponding buffering. Another example for distinguishing
the NINs is the charging support, for example due to specific prepaid solutions based on
different solutions like CAMEL, RADIUS, or DIAMETER. The available buffer size per
stream indicating an overflow risk can be considered as a criterion for distinguishing the
NINs. Further examples can be the supported wireless specific compression and security
algorithms or the supported error protection mechanisms.
At first in respect to figure 7 the solution is described in which the streaming flow is
forwarded at first through the NIN in order to adapt it accordingly and then through BM-SC
for replication. The figure 7 includes two different NINs, NIN1 and NIN2 and two different
subareas with multiple users {UE-1} and {UE-2}.
As described in respect to figure 5 and 6 the BM-SC sends an RTSP: Describe to the server
and receives the SDP-info. With that info it determines the NIN(s) to be allocated, taking into
account the access networks or the subareas, where the users have registered, the capabilities
of the different NINs and the selection criteria in the BM-SC. The BM-SC then allocates the
corresponding resources in the NIN(s), like for example streaming adaptation resources may

be reserved. This is beneficial in order to avoid that the resources are not available wnen tne
streaming session is starting. However, an operator may also decide not to reserve the
resource but to take a small risk that the resources are not available later on. In the figure 7
only one NIN, NIN-2, is used for all streams. The BM-SC informs the server about the NINs,
basically the NIN addresses are exchanged. This information may also be sent later in the
SETUP or PLAY message. After that the SIP:invite messages are sent respectively for the
different areas. The RTSP: SETUP and RTSP:PLAY messages are handled as described in
respect to figure 5 and 6. These may also be sent indirectly via the NIN in order for the NIN
to be aware of the start of the stream. This may particularly be interesting for the RTSP .PLAY
message.
The server sends two streams to NIN-2. Both are adapted according to the rules determined
earlier and the streams are forwarded to the users in subarea-1 and subarea-2 respectively.
Alternatively two or more different NINs could have been selected.
In respect to figure 8 the situation is described, in which at first the streams are replicated
before their adaptation is performed. The difference to figure 7 is that in figure 7 the
replication is done in the server possibly ordered by the BM-SC, whereas in figure 8 the
replication is done in the BM-SC.
As in the previous signalling sequences the BM-SC sends an RTSP:Describe to the server and
receives the SDP-info. With that info it determines the NIN(s) to be allocated, taking into
account the access networks or subareas where the users have registered, the capabilities of
the different NINs and the selection criteria in the BM-SC. The BM-SC then allocates the
corresponding resources in the NIN(s) and the corresponding SIP:INVITE messages for the
respective subareas are sent. In the figure 8 two NINs are used for all streams. The
RTSP.SETUP and RTSP:PLAY messages are handled as before.
The server sends a single stream to the BM-SC, which replicates this into two streams and
forwards one stream to NIN-1 and the other to NIN-2. Both are adapted according to the rules
determined earlier and the streams are forwarded to the users in subarea-1 and subarea-2
respectively. In case hierarchical coding is used, the streams to NIN-1 and NIN-2 may be
different in the sense that a different number of layers are sent to each NIN, wherein the base

layer is sent to both NINs and depending on the requirements a different number of the
enhancement layers are sent to the different NINs.
With the present invention it is possible to perform a dedicated adaptation for areas covered
by a GGSN, SGSN, RNC or NodeB, which means areas that are smaller than the coverage
offered by a NIN or BM-SC. Furthermore, it is possible to do a dedicated adaptation per QoS
subgroup, which may imply that more subgroups per geographical area, including a cell may
exist. In order to realize it the nodes higher up in the hierarchy must be informed that the
stream is only to be forwarded to a single node lower in the hierarchy. It means in case of a
dedicated adaptation for an SGSN-area, the GGSN, BM-SC and NIN must be informed that
the stream is only to be sent to that specific SGSN. As mentioned before the decision of
dedicated adaptations is taken in the intermediate node. A new message is then to be
distributed along the multicast delivery tree, indicating the stream and the destination for
example a certain SGSN. All nodes in-between will set the distribution tree info accordingly
for that specific stream.
It was mentioned for the NIN or the BM-SC to be aware of the available QoS in the
corresponding subarea. This implies that the replication information must be accompanied by
the addresses of the corresponding subarea or access nodes, such as the SGSN or the RNC.
From these nodes the NIN or the BM-SC can then request the actual characteristics of the
subarea in order to instruct the NIN adaptation logic accordingly.
In the following the replication of the multi-user streaming in the intermediate node or in the
server upon request from the BM-SC is described in more details. The replication can be
based on the different criteria. For example a replication is done to all members in a specific
access network with specific access characteristics, like bandwidth it means one streaming
flow goes to GSM users, one goes to UMTS users and one stream to users with WLAN
access. The information about the access characteristic of the users is assumed to be available
in the BM-SC or has to be included in the corresponding multicast group registration
procedures. Another example is that the replication is performed to all members in a specific
geographical area, served by a GGSN, SGSN, RNC or even each individual user. This kind of
location information is also known to the BM-SC. This node has to know the NINs per

4 f
port/link in case the replication is done to all users served by a specific NIN with a certain
type or a certain version.
Basically, the BM-SC can replicate the same content in multiple streams with different
characteristics. These streams can then get a dedicated and optimal treatment and adaptation
in the NIN.
As described above once the session is established the payload can be streamed to the multi-
user group. The initial replication is done by the server, which sends multiple different
streams. The BM-SC acts as one or several group members towards the server and as a server
towards the group members. Furthermore, it takes care of the necessary addressing
adaptations.
In the following the charging and billing solution for the present invention is described. As
already mentioned with the present invention an efficient solution is achieved for performing
charging and billing for a multicast group receiving streaming flows.
The intermediate node coordinates the whole multi-user session and has all relevant
information. Said node knows for example the users, the reception quality, the stream
characteristics, the number of users per stream adaptation. All this information can be
provided to the charging and billing servers in order to have a very accurate and fair charging
policy applied. Since more accurate reception quality information is received by the NIN
since it treats smaller subgroups, this information can be used to do a more accurate charging
and billing for the multi-user service.
The described embodiments, in particular for UMTS should not be seen as a restriction for the
present invention. Since this invention also applies to GPRS and can actually also be used in
other wireless systems like for example WLAN together with a UMTS core network.

WE CLAIM :
1. Method for providing multicast for streaming transmission from a streaming server to
users of a multicast group with a multicast/broadcast server (BM-SC) providing
multicast transmission and with a streaming node (NIN) providing a streaming
transmission based on an on-demand single-user signalling supporting the
transmission of a streaming flow
characterized in that
an intermediate node is provided including the multicast/broadcast server (BM-SC)
and the streaming node (NIN) with the following
- the intermediate node establishes a bearer for a multicast transmission as
claimed in the requirements for streaming transmission,
- the intermediate node establishes a multi-user streaming session on the bearer
by translating the on-demand single-user signalling received from the streaming
server into multi-user push signalling,
- the intermediate node adapts the received streaming flow to the multicast
transmission as claimed in the needs of a multicast group or subgroup of a
multicast group,
- the intermediate node replicates the received streaming transmission according
*
the number of the multicast subgroups.
2. Method as claimed in claim 1 characterised in that the streaming node (NIN)
communicating with the server adapts the streaming transmission and forwards the
adapted streaming transmission to the multicast/broadcast server (BM-SC), which
replicates the received streaming transmission among subgroups of a multicast
group.
3. Method as claimed in claim 1 characterised in that the multicast/broadcast server
(BM-SC) communicating with the server replicates the received streaming
transmission among the subgroups of a multicast group and forwards each
replicated streaming transmission to the streaming node (NIN), which adapts each
streaming transmission.

4. Method as claimed in claim 1, 2 or 3 characterised in that a decision unit is provided
for deciding how the received streaming flow is to be directed in the intermediate
node.
5. Method as claimed in claim 3 or 4 characterised in that the streaming nodes (NIN)
have different capabilities and the multicast/broadcast server (BM-SC) knows the
different capabilities and addresses of the streaming nodes (NIN) in order to select
an appropriate streaming node for performing an appropriate adaptation of the
streaming flow.
6. Method as claimed in claim 5 characterised in that in case a hierarchical coding is
used the streaming flows are differentiated in the sense that a different number of
layers is sent to different streaming nodes (NIN).
7. Method as claimed in one of the claims 1 to 6 characterised in that the intermediate
node administrates an address identifying the streaming flow arriving from the
server.
8. Method as claimed in one of the claims 1 to 7 characterised in that the intermediate
node receives a session description message informing about the transmission
parameters required for the streaming session and forwards the received parameters
to the group members by means of the multi-user push signalling message.
9. Method as claimed in one of the claims 1 to 7 characterised in that the intermediate
node receives a session description message informing about the transmission
parameters required for the streaming session and said intermediate node changes
the received parameters as claimed in the needs of the subgroups that receive a
dedicated replicated stream and sends the changed parameter to the group
members by means of the multi-user push signalling message.
10. Method as claimed in claim 9 characterised in that nodes

higher up in the hierarchy are informed that the streaming flow is only to be
forwarded to a single node lower in the hierarchy by means of a new message being
distributed along the multicast delivery tree.
11. Method as claimed in one of the claims 1 to 10 characterised in that the conversion
between single-user on-demand and multi-user push signalling implies that certain
messages are not propagated.
12. Method as claimed in one of the claims 1 to 11 characterised in that the replication of
the streaming flow is based on an access network, in which users are located or/and
on the geographic area and/or on the Quality of Service a subgroup wishes for
streaming sessions.
13. Method as claimed in claim 12 characterised in that the intermediate node requests
the actual characteristics of the area in order to adapt the streaming flow accordingly.
14. Method as claimed in one of the claims 1 to 13 characterised in that the intermediate
node provides additional information to the charging/billing server in order to
guarantee an accurate charging and/or multi-user streaming related charging.
15. Intermediate node being adapted to provide multicast for streaming transmission
from a streaming server to group members of a multicast group with a
multicast/broadcast server (BM-SC) providing multicast transmission and with a
streaming node (NIN) providing a streaming transmission based on an on-demand
single-user signalling supporting the transmission of a streaming flow
characterized
said intermediate node includes the multicast/broadcast server (BM-SC) and the
streaming node with the following
- bearer establishing means in multicast/broadcast server (BM-SC) for establishing
a bearer for a multicast transmission according to the requirements for streaming
transmission received from the server,

- session establishing means in multicast/broadcast server (BM-SC) for
establishing a multi-user streaming session on the bearer by translating the on-
demand single-user signalling received from the streaming server into multi-user
push signalling,
- adaptation means in the streaming node (NIN) for adapting the received
streaming flow to the multicast transmission according to the needs of a multicast
group,
- replication means for replication of the received streaming transmission
according the number of the multicast subgroups.
16. System being adapted to provide multicast for streaming transmission from a
streaming server to group members of a multicast group with a multicast/broadcast
server (BM-SC) providing multicast transmission and with a streaming node (NIN)
providing a streaming transmission based on an on-demand single-user signalling
supporting the transmission of a streaming flow
characterized in that
said system has an intermediate node as claimed in claim 15 and the method as
claimed in claim 1 is performed within the system.


The invention provides a solution for performing multicast for streaming transmission in a
telecommunication system. An intermediate node is proposed which is able to connect
the functionality of a broadcast/multicast server and of a streaming node. Further the
intermediate node is responsible for the establishment of a bearer for multicast
transmission. The establishment of a session is done by means of a translation the on-
demand single-use signalling into multi-user push signalling. Furthermore an adaptation
of the streaming flow for a whole multicast group or for individual subgroups of a
multicast group is performed.

Documents:

01362-kolnp-2006 abstract.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 assignment.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 claims.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 description(complete).pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 drawings.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 form-1.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 form-2.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 form-3.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 form-5.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 international publication.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 international search authority report.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006 pct form.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006-correspondence others.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006-correspondence-1.1.pdf

01362-kolnp-2006-form-18.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-(31-10-2011)-AMENDED CLAIMS.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-(31-10-2011)-ASSIGNMENT.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-(31-10-2011)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-(31-10-2011)-FORM 1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-(31-10-2011)-PETITION UNDER RULE 137.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-ABSTRACT 1.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-ASSIGNMENT.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-CLAIMS.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-CORRESPONDENCE 1.2.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-CORRESPONDENCE 1.3.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-CORRESPONDENCE 1.4.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-CORRESPONDENCE 1.5.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-CORRESPONDENCE-1.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-CORRESPONDENCE.1.2.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE) 1.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-DRAWINGS 1.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECIEVED.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-EXAMINATION REPORT.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-FORM 1.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-FORM 18.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-FORM 2.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-FORM 3.1.2.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-FORM 3.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-FORM 3.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-FORM 5.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GPA.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GPA1.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GRANTED-ABSTRACT.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GRANTED-CLAIMS.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GRANTED-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE) 1.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GRANTED-DRAWINGS.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GRANTED-FORM 1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GRANTED-FORM 2.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-GRANTED-SPECIFICATION.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-OTHERS 1.1.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-OTHERS DOCUMENTS.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-OTHERS.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-PRIORITY DOCUMENT.pdf

1362-KOLNP-2006-REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT 1.1.pdf

abstract-01362-kolnp-2006.jpg


Patent Number 253379
Indian Patent Application Number 1362/KOLNP/2006
PG Journal Number 29/2012
Publication Date 20-Jul-2012
Grant Date 17-Jul-2012
Date of Filing 22-May-2006
Name of Patentee TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
Applicant Address S-164 83 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 KELLER, RALF TALBLICK 22, 52146 W√úRSELEN, GERMANY
2 HUNDSCHEIDT, FRANK IN DE BOOMGAARD 26, NL-6464 GC KERKRADE, NETHERLAND
3 LOHMAR, THORSTEN KIRCHRATHER STRASSE 33, 52074 AACHEN, GERMANY
PCT International Classification Number H04L 12/18
PCT International Application Number PCT/EP2003/011720
PCT International Filing date 2003-10-23
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 NA