Title of Invention

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF SEMIFINISHED PRODUCTS

Abstract Method for the automated identification of semi-finished products, the said method comprising of automatic recognition of strand sections (2,20) after a cutting station (21) of a continuous casting plant, particularly for identification in a subsequent sorting point (36), when digitized pictures of optically recognisable surface features, e.g. the geometry of the strand section, surface roughness, texture, micro-structural properties and/or cut-specific surface features, are obtained on a cut surface (23), which is specified as the identification surface, of the strand section (2,20), by means of a first camera (6,30), and stored in a database (31), and that to identify and sort the strand sections and then digitized pictures of the optically recognisable surface features are produced at the sorting point with a second camera (14,38), these are fed to the database (10,31), the pictures from the first (6,30) and second cameras (14,38) are evaluated by the comparison method to identify the strand sections (2,20), and the casting process parameters of the identified strand sections are assigned to the said strand sections.
Full Text The invention relates to a method and device for automated identification of
semi-finished products. More particularly, it relates to a method and device for
carrying out the method for automated recognition of semi-finished products.
For quality assurance, in a steel and rolling mill individual part tracking of
semi-finished products, as part of process and plant monitoring, is
indispensable.
During strand casting, all quality-relevant parameters of the casting process
can be perfectly assigned to the individual strand section in the cutting station.
So that the assignment of these parameters is retained even after the cutting
station for every individual strand section, a marking which can be read by the
human eye and/or by mechanical optical capture must be put onto the strand
sections.
For this purpose, after the cutting station, a marking such as indented
numbers, a bar code, a dot code, etc. is put onto the strand sections. Instead of
being marked, the strand sections can also be made recognizable by a sheet
metal label with the appropriate data being hung, welded or nailed onto them.
In the prior art, the ability to track strand sections, particularly in the case of
mechanical reading of markings, is till subject to an error rate which is
unsatisfactory in practice. Mechanical reading of an applied marking is
understood to mean, on the one hand, geometrical recognition of the marking,
and on the other hand the

assignment of the semantic content of the geometrically-
recognised marking. If an error occurs in one of these
steps, the mechanical identification of the strand section
is unusable. Strand sections which cannot be identified
mechanically must be identified by the human eye if
possible, or remain unidentifiable and are rejected.
As well as a very wide variety of marking systems, a large
number of devices to read the applied markings is known.
All these systems are confronted, on the one hand, with the
harsh operating environment of the steel mill, and on the
other hand with the fact that in general the marking must
be applied to the incandescent strand section. It must be
possible to recognise markings mechanically and assign the
casting parameters to the individual strand section in both
the incandescent and the cooled state.
From JP-OS 2000-190257 A, a method of automatic recognition
of strand sections after a cutting station of a continuous
casting plant, particularly in a subsequent sorting point,
is known. In a first step, numbers and/or letters are
stamped into the strand section by a stamping machine. In a
second step, the numbers and/or letters are recorded
photographically by a camera in a first information
picture. In a third step, there is a test for whether the
semantic or read content of the stamped-in numbers and/or
letters is recognisable. In a fourth step, the first
information picture is stored together with the data which
is specific to the strand section. In a subsequent sorting
point, e.g. before the rolling process, a second
information picture of the numbers and/or letters stamp is
produced by a second camera, and the second information
picture is compared with the first information picture by

the comparison method and used for identification. This
method makes it possible to identify badly readable or
unreadable numbers and/or letters stamps, the semantic
content of which cannot be completely determined, by means
of the comparison method of the unreadable remaining
numbers and/or letters. The device to carry out this method
requires, as well as the stamping machine, two optical
stamp reading machines, and in addition a database and a
computer program for comparing the stamped-in numbers
and/or letters in the first and second information
pictures.
The invention is based on the object of creating a method
and a device for simple, error-free automated recognition
of identification data of semi-finished products,
particularly of strand sections after the separating cut,
in a continuous casting plant, and for use of this
identification data for sorting the strand sections for
subsequent manufacturing processes. The method and device
for recognition of identification data is also intended to
increase reliability of identification, to require little
space in the plant layout, to be economical, to be possible
to automate, and to make the use of expensive marking
equipment unnecessary.
According to the invention, this object is achieved by the
characterizing features of the method Claim 1.
For identification of strand sections, the method and
device according to the invention use optically
recognisable surface features on the cut surface of strand
sections. These features were applied to the cut surface by
the separating cut, irrespective of the cutting method. For

identification, in principle all optically recognisable
features can be used, e.g. the geometry of the strand
section, surface roughness, texture, microstructural
properties and/or cut-specific surface features. The device
for identifying strand sections is simplified, in
particular, in that the pictures in the cutting or
identification station are generated by a first camera, and
the pictures at the sorting point are generated by a second
camera, with essentially the same kind of facilities. Such
cameras are relatively small and can easily be protected
from heat radiation. The identification itself takes place
using the digital image data which is processed in the
database in the computer room by the comparison method,
similarly to the OCV (optical character verifying) method.
There is no assignment of semantic or read content in the
method according to the invention.
Depending on the cutting method, e.g. flame cutting,
shearing machine, laser, plasma, cutoff wheel, different
optically recognisable features are applied to the cut
surface, which is used as the identification surface.
According to an embodiment of the invention, it is
specially advantageous if the optically recognisable
features are created on the predetermined identification
surface by cutting shears or a flame cut.
For various reasons, it can be advantageous to put
optically recognisable surface features additionally onto
the identification surfaces, which are given identification
features by the separating cut. Such additional surface
features can show, for instance, the position of the billet
in relation to the camera, or make broad sorting by the
human eye possible, e.g. in a storage area. According to

another embodiment, it can be advantageous if before the
first pictures are obtained, additional optically
recognisable features such as colour patterns, rust
protection patterns, mechanically generated embossed
patterns without semantic or read content are applied, and
evaluated by the comparison method (like a fingerprint
comparison).
To eliminate any light effects of the environment, e.g. in
the case of day or night operation, but for instance also
to generate a shadow effect which aids identification, it
can be advantageous, while obtaining the pictures, to
illuminate the identification surface with artificial
light. The angle of incidence of the light on the
identification surface is set between 8° and 45°,
preferably between 12° and 35°.
Depending on the length of the time span between the first
picture in the cutting station and the second picture at
the sorting point, in general the temperature of the strand
section changes. This temperature change is associated with
a colour change of the identification surface, and this
colour change must be neutralised for the comparison
method. According to one embodiment, it is therefore
proposed that when the pictures are obtained, a light
spectrum should be filtered out by means of a filter
between the identification surface and the camera.
With this method, the small time requirement for obtaining
and storing a picture makes it possible, both in the
identification station and in the sorting station, to
obtain multiple pictures of the same identification surface
with different directions and/or angles of incidence of

light, store them in the database, and evaluate them during identification by
the comparison method, to increase the reliability of recognition. According to
one embodiment, light can be applied to the same identification surface from
four sides, with predetermined angles of incidence of light, by means of lamps,
the light being applied from a different side for each picture. Because the
shadows are thrown differently, the result is four different pictures of the same
identification surface. To exclude external light resources, according to a
further embodiment, arranging a light screen in the form of a small tunnel or
tube at the identification station and sorting station is recommended.
Because of different angles of incidence of light, the way the shadows of
unevennesses are thrown on the same identification surface changes. With this
method, typical features such as elevations or depressions on the identification
surface are available as optical identification features for the comparison
method, corresponding to the existing number of obtained pictures.
Below, the invention will be additionally explained on the basis of figures.
Brief description of the accompanying drawings
Fig. 1 shows a schematically represented device, partly in
perspective, for identifying strand sections, and
Fig.2 shows another schematic example of a device, partly in
perspective, for identifying strand sections.

In Fig. 1, a semi-finished product in the form of a strand
section 2 on an identification bed 3 is shown. In this
example, the strand section 2 has been separated from the
strand by means of diagonal shears (not shown). A cut
surface 4 shows traces of being sheared off by the knife of
the diagonal shears. These traces on the cut surface 4 are
used as optically recognisable features of the surface
character for identification of the strand section 2. In
this example, the whole cut surface is used as the
identification surface. However, in the case of large cut
surfaces, e.g. of slabs, only parts of the cut surface can
be used as the identification surface.
A first camera 6 is arranged behind a heat protection
shield 8 which can be moved like a slider and aligned onto
the identification surface. Instead of the heat protection
shield 8, the camera 6 can also be arranged on a moving
device. To illuminate the identification surface, one or
more lamps 9 are connected to the camera 6. The light
strength of the artificial light is set so that the light
effect of daylight is excluded.
The digitised picture from the first camera 6 is stored in
the database 10. All identification data, in particular all
quality-related identification data of the monitoring
system 12 of the continuous casting plant, is fed to the
database 10 and assigned to the cut strand section 2. The
strand section 2 which is identified by the digitised
picture is then fed to a sorting point for a subsequent
manufacturing process, or to temporary storage.
In the sorting point 13, a second digitised picture is
obtained using the second camera 14, and used in the

database 10 to identify the strand section 2. The
identification takes place in the database 10 by comparing
the digitised picture from the second camera 14 with the
digitised pictures from the first camera 6, which are
stored in the database 10.
To obtain high-definition pictures, auxiliary devices to
adjust the distance between camera and identification
surface are provided. Such an auxiliary device can consist
of a height-adjustable positioning device 49 for the strand
section 2, a distance measuring device connected to the
camera, or an automatic focusing system which is integrated
into a camera.
Between the picture being made by the first camera 6 and
the picture being made by the second camera 14, in general
the temperature of the strand section 2 changes. To exclude
such temperature effects, filters 16 are arranged between
the identification surface and the first and second cameras
6, 14, to filter out a light spectrum.
If the identification of the strand section 2 by the
comparison method in the database 10 is complete, the
identification data is fed to the monitoring system 18 of
the rolling mill. The digitised pictures of strand sections
which have been identified in the sorting point are marked
in the database or removed from the database.
In Fig. 2, a strand section 2 0 is shown in a flame cutting
station 21. A separating cut has been made by means of a
flame cutter 22. On a cut surface 23, which is used as the
identification surface, optically recognisable
identification features have been generated by the flame

cut. In the flame cutting station 21 or a subsequent
station 24, additional optically recognisable surface
features 25 are applied to the cut surface 23. Such
features 25 can consist of simple holes, special symbols,
alphanumeric symbols, bar codes or colour patterns, etc.
Such optically recognisable additional features have a
variety of purposes. For instance, they can represent
additional distinguishing features for strand sections, and
these features can be recognisable by the human eye and
make presorting possible, e.g. in a storage area.
Additionally, however, they can also represent only the
momentary position of a strand section or its
identification surface to a camera 30. For comparison of
the first and second pictures, it is advantageous if in the
case of round or square cross-sections, the position of the
strand section to the camera is uniquely defined by such a
surface feature before a picture comparison. A device to
apply such additional features is shown schematically at
26. In the subsequent identification station 28, a
digitised picture of the cut surface 23 is taken by a first
camera 30 and fed to a database 31. This database also
receives signals 32 of the device 26 and the relevant
parameters 33 of the casting process monitoring 34.
From the identification station 28, the strand section 20
can be fed to a storage area 35 or directly to a sorting
station 36 for further processing. To identify and sort the
strand sections 20, digitised pictures of the cut surface
23 are taken by a second camera 38. In this example, the
additional features 25 indicate that the strand section 20
has entered the sorting station 36 tilted by 180° compared
with the station 24 and identification station 28. The
digitised pictures from the camera 38 are therefore also

rotated by 180° when they are stored in the database for
comparison evaluation. When the identification of the
strand section 20 by the comparison method is complete, all
relevant parameters of the casting process are fed to a
process controller 45 of a rolling mill with the identified
strand section 20.
As well as the essentially shadow-free illumination by
means of lamps 9 as shown in Fig. 1, it is also possible to
control the light incidence on the identification surface
in such a way that unevennesses stand out more because of
cast shadows, and thus additional identification features
are created. The more flatly the artificial light falls on
the identification surface, the darker the cast shadows
become. In Fig. 2, illumination which falls diagonally on
the identification surface is represented by a light beam
40 and lamp 41. The choice of the position of the
illumination, e.g. from above or below, and the choice of
an angle of incidence 43 of light onto the cut surface 23
is defined in the database 31, together with the digitised
picture. For instance, if the strand section 20 enters the
sorting station 36 tilted by 180°, as shown in Fig. 2, the
light incidence is adjusted accordingly.
Taking the digitised pictures and storing them in the
database 31 requires only fractions of seconds. To increase
the reliability of identification, it is possible to store
digitised pictures of the cut surface 23 in the database in
succession, with different angles of incidence 43 of light.
With two or more digitised pictures of the same cut surface
23, but with different directions of light incidence, the
reliability of identification is increased without

significant loss of time and without causing increased
cost.
In Fig. 2, a screen 46 against external light sources, in
the form of a tunnel or tube body, is arranged in the
identification station 28 and sorting station 36. In this
screen 46, light sources 41 are housed in niches 47 on all
four sides of the tunnel. These niches can be closed by-
flaps 48 for protection against heat radiation. The four
light sources 41 make it possible to obtain four pictures
in succession, light being applied to the identification
surface from a different direction for each picture.
Because the shadows are thrown differently by each light
source, the result is four different pictures of the same
identification surface.
To obtain pictures in the screen 46, the strand section 20
can be moved into the screen 46 and fixed against a limit
stop 49, or the screen 4 6 moves, together with the camera,
towards the strand section. For precise distance setting
between the cut surface 2 3 and the camera 38, even in the
case of this embodiment a distance measuring device which
is known in the prior art, or an automatic focusing system,
can be used.
Pictures from the first camera which are stored in the
database and have resulted in identification of a strand
section are marked in the database or removed from the
database.
Instead of strand sections 2, 20 as described in the
embodiments, automated identification can also be used for
semi-finished products in other parts of a steel mill.

WE CLAIM
1. Method for the automated identification of semi-finished products, the
said method comprising of automatic recognition of strand sections
(2,20) after a cutting station (21) of a continuous casting plant,
particularly for identification in a subsequent sorting point (36),
characterized in that digitised pictures of optically recognisable surface
features, e.g. the geometry of the strand section, surface roughness,
texture, micro-structural properties and/or cut-specific surface features,
are obtained on a cut surface (23), which is specified as the identification
surface, of the strand section (2,20), by means of a first camera (6,30),
and stored in a database (31), and that to identify and sort the strand
sections, digitised pictures of the optically recognisable surface features
are produced at the sorting point with a second camera (14,38), these are
fed to the database (10,31), the pictures from the first (6,30) and second
cameras (14,38) are evaluated by the comparison method to identify the
strand sections (2,20), and the casting process parameters of the
identified strand sections are assigned to the said strand sections.
2. Method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the optically recognisable surface
features on the identification surface are created by a separating cut by
means of a shearing machine or a flame cut by means of a flame cutter
etc.
3. Method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein on the cut surface which is
specified as the identification surface, optically recognizable surface
features are applied in addition to the cut-specific and strand-specific
surface features.

4. Method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the additionally applied optically
recognizable surface features such as colour pattern, rust protection
pattern, mechanically generated embossed pattern without semantic or
read content are evaluated by the comparison method (like a fingerprint
comparison).
5. Method as claimed in claim 1 to 4, wherein the size of the identification
surface agrees with the strand cross-section, and the strand cross-
section is used as the control code for selecting the stored pictures from
the first camera for a picture comparison.
6. Method as claimed in claim 1 to 5, wherein to obtain the pictures, the
identification surface is illuminated with artificial light.
7. Method as claimed in claim 6, wherein an angle of incidence of the
artificial light on the identification surface is set between 8° and 45°,
preferably between 12° and 35°.
8. Method as claimed in claim 1 to 7, wherein the pictures are obtained, a
light spectrum is filtered out by means of a filter between the
identification surface and the camera.
9. Method as claimed in claim 1 to 8, wherein two or more digitized pictures
of the same identification surface in succession, with different light
incidence directions, are made with the first and second cameras, stored
in the database and evaluated for identification by the comparison
method.

10. Device to carry out the method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 9,
characterised in that in an identification station (28) after the
cutting station (21), a first digital camera, and at the sorting point
(36) a second digital camera (6, 30 and 14, 38 respectively) are
arranged, and are each aligned on cut surfaces (4,23) of strand
sections (2,20) and connected to a database (10,31), and that to
identify optically recognizable surface features, e.g. the geometry of
the strand section, surface roughness, texture, micro-structural
properties and/or cut-specific surface features on a cut surface
(4,23) which is specified as the identification surface, of the strand
sections (2,20), the database (10,31) has a picture comparison
device.
11. Device as claimed in claim 10, wherein between the cutting station
(21) and the identification station (28), a device (26) to apply
optically recognisable surface features without read content to the
identification surface is arranged.
12. Device as claimed in claim 10 or 11, wherein in the identification
station (28) and sorting station (36), lamps (9,41) are arranged, are
directed onto the identification surface (4,23), and illuminate the
identification surface (4,23) with a predetermined angle of
incidence of light.
13. Device as claimed in one of claims 10 to 12, wherein a screen (46)
for external light sources is arranged in the identification station
(28) and sorting station (36), that by means of lamps (41), light can
be applied to the identification surface (23) from multiple sides
with a predetermined angle of incidence (43), and that these lamps
(41) can be switched on individually or in groups to obtain pictures.
14. Device as claimed in claim 10 to 13, wherein a filter (16) is arranged
between the identification surface (4,23) and the digital camera
(6, 14, 30, 38) to filter out a light spectrum.

Documents:

00898-kolnp-2006 assignment.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-abstract.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-claims.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-correspondence others.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-description complete.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-drawings.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-form 2.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-form1.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-form3.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-form5.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-international publication.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-international search authority report.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-pct form.pdf

00898-kolnp-2006-priority documents.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-ABSTRACT.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-AMANDED PAGES OF SPECIFICATION.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-CLAIMS.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-correspondence.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-DRAWING.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-EXAMINATION REPORT REPLY RECIEVED.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-examination report.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-FORM 1.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-form 18.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-form 2.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-form 26.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-form 3-1.1.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-FORM 3.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-form 5-1.1.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-form 5.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-FORM-27.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-granted-abstract.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-granted-claims.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-granted-description (complete).pdf

898-kolnp-2006-granted-drawings.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-granted-form 1.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-granted-form 2.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-granted-specification.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-OTHERS.pdf

898-KOLNP-2006-PETITION UNDER RULE 137.pdf

898-kolnp-2006-reply to examination report.pdf

abstract-00898-kolnp-2006.jpg


Patent Number 247792
Indian Patent Application Number 898/KOLNP/2006
PG Journal Number 20/2011
Publication Date 20-May-2011
Grant Date 18-May-2011
Date of Filing 12-Apr-2006
Name of Patentee CONCAST AG
Applicant Address TODISTRASSE 9, CH-8027 ZURICH
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 LITTOOIJ, NICO LAUFENRALNSTRASSE 19B, CH-8340 HINWIL
2 MUELLER, PAUL RIGISTRASSE 3, CH-6404 GREPPEN
PCT International Classification Number B22D 11/12
PCT International Application Number PCT/EP2004/011073
PCT International Filing date 2004-10-05
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 03023365.4 2003-10-16 EUROPEAN UNION