Title of Invention

OXYGEN-ABSORBING COMPOSITON

Abstract

An oxygen - absorbing composition for combination combining with a resin as a component thereof to effect oxygen - absorption thereby comprising in relatively sufficient proportions by weight iron in an amount of between 50% and 98% an acidifier selected from the group consisting of sodium and potassium bisulfates and present by weight in an amount of between 1% and 30% and an electrolyte that functions as an oxygen - absorber in the presence of the iron and is present by weight in an amount of at least 0.1%

Full Text

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to an oxygen-absorbing composition for combining with a resin to impart an oxygen-absorbing quality thereto so that it-can be used as plastic packaging material for the purpose of absorbing oxygen within a container which includes such packaging material. By way of background, various resins, especially polyethylene and the polyester poly-ethylene-terephthalate, are used as containers for various foodstuffs' and materials which may be deleteriously affected by oxygen. It is desirable to have an oxygen-absorber as a component of the packaging material so that any oxygen within the container can be absorbed thereby. Furthermore, it is desirable that the oxygen-absorber should be ' one which acts reasonably rapidly in the packaging material so that it. will absorb the oxygen before the oxygen can materially affect the quality of the goods, such as food, within .the container. It is with such an oxygen absorbing composition for use as a component of a resin packaging material that the present invention is concerned. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is one object of the present invention to provide an improved oxygen-absorb ing composition for use as a component of a resin packaging material which will absorb oxygen reasonably rapidly. Another object of the present invention is to provide an improved oxygen-absorb ing composition for use as a component of resin packaging material which, is relatively simple and which will combine well with a plastic. A further object of the present invention is to provide an improved oxygen-absorb ing composition for use as a component of resin packaging material which will not detract from the physical characteristics of a container or package. Other objects and attendant advantages of the present invention will readily be perceived hereafter. The present invention relates to an oxygen— absorbing composition for combination with a resin to effect oxygen-absorption thereby comprising in relatively sufficient proportions iron, an acidifier and an electrolyte. The present invention als6 relates to an oxygen-absorbing composition for combination with a resin to effect oxygen-absorption thereby consisting essentially in relatively sufficient proportions iron, an acidifier and an electrolyte. The various aspects of the present invention will be more fully understood when the following portions of the specification are read. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION As noted above, the oxygen-absorbing composition of the present invention is for use as a component of resin packaging materials, including rigid plastic containers and flexible packaging materials, including sheet and film plastics. The oxygen-absorbing composition of the present invention comprises in relatively sufficient proportions iron, an acidifier, which is preferably sodium bisulfate, and an electrolyte, which is preferably sodium chloride. As is well understood in the art, the iron in the presence of an electrolyte functions as an oxygen— absorber. The acidifier in the composition provides an acidic environment which hastens the oxygen-absorption. However, it is not known that an oxygen-absorbing composition including iron, acidifier and the electrolyte was previously used as a component of a resin to cause the resin to have desirable oxygen-absorbing qualities. The types of iron which can be used are hydrogen reduced iron, especially sponge grade, annealed 3 electrolytically reduced iron and carbonyl iron. The hydrogen reduced sponge grade iron is preferred because it has been found that it functions significantly better than other irons. It is believed that this better functioning is due to the fact that the sponge grade hydrogen reduced iron has a rough surface which is larger than the surface of annealed electrolytically reduced iron which is spherical. However, other types of iron including but not limited to non-annealed electrolytically reduced iron can also be used in addition to the various irons noted above. In a preferred composition comprising iron, sodium bismif ate and sodium chloride, the iron may be present by weight in an amount of between about 50% and 98%, and more preferably between about 75% and 95%, and most preferably between about 80% and 90%. The majority of the iron may have a size of between about 150 microns and 1 micron, and more preferably between about 100 microns and 5 microns, and most preferably between about 50 microns and 5 microns. The sodium bisulf ate may be present by weight in an amount of between about 1% and 30%, and more preferably between about 4% and 20%, and most preferably between about 5% and 18%. The majority of the sodium bisulfate may have a size of between about 150 microns and 1 micron, and more preferably between about 100 microns and 5 microns, and most preferably between about 50 microns and 5 microns. However, if desired, the sodium bisulf ate or any other acidifier may be applied as a solution to the iron and the solvent can then be removed, leaving a deposit of the acidifier on the iron. While sodium bisulfate is the preferred acidifier in the composition, potassium bisulfate was also tested and found to function satisfactorily. Also, other acids and acid salts will function satisfactorily as the acidifier. These may include, without limitation, 4 fumaric acid, sodium diacetate citric acid and sodium salt of acetic acid. These other acidifiers may be of the same size ranges and be used in the relative proportions with respect to the sodium bisulf ate, depending on their relative molecular weights and acidity. The sodium chloride, which is the preferred electrolyte, may be present by weight in an amount of at least about .1% provided that it is mixed well enough with the other components to produce the desired electrolytic action, and more preferably between about .5% and 4%, and most preferably between about 1% and 3%. As a practical matter, only a minimum amount of salt is necessary to produce the desired electrolytic action, and any excess salt merely takes the place of iron which actually produces the oxygen-absorption. The majority of the sodium chloride may have a particle size of between about 150 microns and 1 micron, and more preferably between about 100 microns and 5 microns, and most preferably between about 50 microns and 5 microns. However, if desired, the sodium chloride or any other electrolyte may be applied as a solution to the iron and the solvent can then be removed, leaving a deposit of the electrolyte on the iron. Also, the electrolyte and the acidifier may be carried by the same solvent and applied to the iron simultaneously. While sodium chloride is the preferred electrolyte1 other electrolytes, including but not limited to potassium chloride, sodium iodide and calcium chloride may be of the same size ranges and be used in the same proportions as noted above for the sodium chloride.· Actual tests of compositions which were found to function satisfactorily when combined with polyethylene and with poly-ethylene-terephthalate comprised by weight (1) 80% iron, 16% sodium bisulfate 5 and 4% sodium chloride, and (2) 90% iron, 8% sodium bisulf ate and 2% sodium chloride. The preferred composition consisted by weight of 90% hydrogen reduced sponge grade iron, 8% sodium bisulf ate and 2% sodium chloride. The iron was of a particle size which passed through a 325 mesh screen having the designation "USA Standard Sieve ASTM Specification E—ll." The particle size analysis of the roregoing iron was: 11.8% was less than 10 microns, 27.03% was above 3~ microns and the average was 28.25 microns. However, the distribution of particle sizes will vary from batch to batch. Annealed electrolytically reduced iron was also found to be satisfactory in the above composition. The sodium bisulf ate was ground to a size which passed through a 325 mesh screen. The sodium bisulfate had an average size of eight microns with a top size of 20 microns. The sodium chloride was a commercially obtainable 325 mesh size, and the particle size distribution was 1% was greater than 200 mesh (74 microns) , 95% was less than 325 mesh (43 microns) EXAMPLE I Pelletized Dowlex 2517 linear low density poly— ethylene was melted in an oven. Once melted, 2.5% by weight of the following oxygen-absorbing blend was thoroughly mixed in. The oxygen—absorbing blend consisted by weight of 90% sponge grade hydrogen reduced iron which passed through a 325 mesh screen and had a size distribution wherein 11.8% was less than 10 microns, 27.03% was above 36 microns and the average was 28.25 microns. The oxygen—absorbing blend also contained 8% by weight of sodium bisulfate and. 2% by weight of sodium chloride, both of which had the size ranges set forth in the preceding paragraph. Prior to mixing the oxygen-absorbing composition with the melted polyethylene it was blended in a Hobart mixer. The oxygen—absorbing blend was not milled after blending. Twenty—five grams of the thoroughly mixed composition of melted 6 polyethylene and oxygen—absorber was placed on an Industry Tech hot plate set at 2750F. Using a .5 inch coating rod, a film was made by pulling the coating rod along the hot plate to form a film from the molten polyethylene containing the oxygen-absorber. A release liner had been placed on the hot plate before the molten resin and oxygen—absorber composition was placed on the hot plate so that the finished film would not stick to the hot plate. The film was tested for oxygen—absorption in the following manner. Fifteen grains of the above oxygen-absorbing film were placed in an eight—inch by eight-inch barrier pouch made of biaxially oriented nylon. A three-inch by three—inch piece of wet blotter paper was also placed in the pouch as a moisture source to provide moisture for the oxygen-absorbing reaction. The pouch was then vacuum sealed. The pouch was then filled with 500 cc of gas containing .4% oxygen and 99.6% nitrogen through a septum on the pouch. Since it was not possible to vacuum all of the original air out of the pouch, the oxygen content in the pouch was 1.5% as measured by a Mocon Pac Check Model 450 Head Space Analyzer. Initial oxygen readings were taken and then readings were taken every few days to measure the rate of oxygen—absorption. The oxygen—absorption is set forth in Table I. EXAMPLE II This example was performed in the same manner as described above in EXAMPLE I except that the oxygen-absorbing blend was milled in accordance with the following procedure. The same composition as described in EXAMPLE I was not blended in a Hobart mixer, but was blended in a Forberg mixer and the iron, sodium bisulf ate and sodium chloride were then milled together in a jet mill to further decrease the particle size to an average of 25 microns with a range of 3 to 80 microns. The oxygen-absorption is set forth in Table I. 7 EXAMPLE III This example was performed in the same manner as described above in EXAMPLE I except that the oxygen-absorbing blend consisted by weight of 80% sponge grade hydrogen reduced iron, 16% sodium bisulfate, and 4% sodium chloride. The oxygen-absorption is set forth in Table I. EXAMPLE IV This example was performed in the same manner as described above in EXAMPLE II except that the oxygen-absorbing blend was the same as set forth in EXAMPLE lIT. The oxygen-absorption is set forth in TABLE I. The oxygen-absorbing characteristics of EXAMPLES I, II, III and IV are set forth in the following TABLE I along with a column labeled "Iron+ NaCi" which consisted of iron and sodium chloride which were unmilled and blended in a Hobart mixer. The iron and sodium chloride were then combined with molten polyethylene and then a film was made and tested for oxygen-absorbing capability in accordance with the procedure of EXAMPLE I. The sodium chloride had a 325 mesh size as described above, and the iron had an average 28 micron size. TABLE I - OXYGEN-ABSORPTION IN CC (OXYGEN—ABSORBING BLENDS IN POLYETHYLENE) Iron + EXAMPLE I II III IV 2% NaCl INITIAL 02 CONTENT(cc) 6.90 7.75 8.35 8.55 7.35 1 Day 1.3 2.5 2.2 2.85 .95 4 Days 3.27 5.83 5.41 5.59 2.35 8 Days 472 703 6.67 7.78 3.21 12 Days 5.07 7.14 6.74 8.29 3.41 5.31 15 Days 7.14 6.85 8.32 3.63 8 From comparing the examples with sodium bisulfate with the column of Iron ± NaCl in Table I, it can be seen that the acidifier greatly enhances the oxygen-absorption. From TABLE I it can also be seen that the oxygen-absorption of EXAMPLES II and IV, where the oxygen-absorbing composition was milled, is much greater than in EXAMPLES I and III, respectively, where the oxygen-absorbing composition was not milled. EXAMPLE V This example was performed in the same manner as EXAMPLE I except that the resin is a polyester, namely, poly-ethylene-terephthalate, commercially known as VORIDLAN CB-12. The oxygen-absorbing characteristics are set forth in TABLE II. EXAMPLE VI This example was performed in the same manner as EXAMPLE II except that the resin is a polyester as set forth in EXAMPLE V. The oxygen-absorbing characteristics are set forth in TABLE II. EXAMPLE VII This example was performed in the same manner as EXAMPLE III except that the resin is a polyester as set forth in EXAMPLE V. The oxygen—absorbing characteristics are set forth in TABLE II. EXAMPLE VIII This example was performed in the same manner as EXAMPLE IV except that the resin is a polyester as set forth in EXAMPLE V. The oxygen—absorbing characteristics of EXAMPLES V, VI, VII and VIII are set forth in TABLE II along with a column labeled "Iron-4- NaCi" which consisted of iron and sodium chloride which were unmilled and blended in a Hobart mixer. The iron and sodium chloride were then combined with molten polyethylene and then a film was made and tested for oxygen-absorbing capability in accordance with the procedure of EXAMPLE I. The sodium chloride had a 325 mesh size as described above, and the iron had an average 28 micron size. 9 TABLE II — OXYGEN-ABSORPTION IN CC (OXYGEN-ABSORBING BLENDS IN POLY-ETHYLBNE-TEREPHTHALATB) Iron + EXAMPLE V VI VII VIII 2% NaCl INITIAL 02 CONTENT(cc) 8.05 8.25 8.30 8.15 8.65 1 Day .08 .23 .12 .23 0 4 Days .25 .42 .17 .45 .03 8 Days .37 .55 .20 .77 .03 11 Days .38 .67 .25 .93 .05 15 Days .38 .78 .28 1.08 .15 19 Days .42 .87 .30 1.25 .15 From comparing the examples with sodium bisulfate with the column of Iron + NaCl in Table II, it can be seen that the acidifier greatly enhances the oxygen-absorption. From TABLE II it can also be seen that the oxygen-absorption of EXAMPLES VI and VIII, where the oxygen-absorbing composition was milled, is much greater than in EXAMPLES V and VII, respectively, where the oxygen-absorbing composition was not milled. In the above TABLES I and II and in the following TABLES III and IV, the day designations denote the amount of oxygen absorbed after each day. EXAMPLE IX This example was preformed in the same manner as EXAMPLE II and all parameters were the same except that the original oxygen content in the pouch was different. EXAMPLE X This example had the same formulation as EXAMPLES II and IX except that each of the ingredients of the oxygen-absorbing composition were milled separately and then blended in a Hobart mixer. As noted above, in EXAMPLES II and IX, in the oxygen—absorbing composition, the ingredients were milled together. After the separate milling the size range of the iron was an average of 22 10 microns. The size range of the sodium bisulfate was an average of 8 microns. The size range of the sodium chloride was an average of 8 microns. The oxygen-absorbing characteristics of EXAMPLES IX and. X are set forth in the following TABLE III along with a column labeled "Iron-,. NaCl" which consisted of iron and sodium chloride which were unmilled and blended in a Hobart mixer. The iron and sodium chloride were then combined with molten polyethylene and then a film was made and tested for oxygen-absorbing capability in accordance with the procedure of EXAMPLE I. The sodium chloride had a 325 mesh size as described above, and the iron had an average 28 micron size. TABLE III - OXYGEN-ABSORPTION IN CC (OXYGEN—ABSORBING BLENDS IN POLYETHYLENE) EXAMPLE IX X Iron + 2% NaCl INITIAL 02 CONTENT(cc) 0.35 8.48 8.63 1 Day 2.13 1.57 .37 4 Days 6.02 5.34 .88 8 Days 8.35 8.01 2.08 From a comparison of EXAMPLE II from TABLE I, where the ingredients of the oxygen-absorbing composition were milled together, with EXAMPLE X of TABLE III, where the ingredients of the oxygen—absorbing composition were milled separately, it can be seen that in the earlier days, the oxygen-absorption was more rapid in EXAMPLE II than in EXAMPLE X. The foregoing can also be seen from a comparison of EXAMPLES IX and X. From comparing the examples with sodium bisulfate with the column of Iron ± NaCl in Table III, it can be seen that the acidifier greatly enhances the oxygen-absorption. While certain of the above tests used 2% by weight of sodium chloride to insure that there was 11 sufficient electrolyte present for optimum results, experience with other oxygen-absorbers has shown that a very small percentage of the electrolyte sodium chloride is actually necessary to achieve a satisfactory electrolyte function, and therefore it is believed that ambients as low as .2% by weight and even lower percentages can actually be used. While certain of the above tests used amounts as low as 8% by weight of sodium bisulfate, lesser amounts can be used, but the rapidity of oxygen-absorption would probably be diminished. In actual use, a selected oxygen—absorbing resin composition of the type such- as described in EXAMPLES 1—VIII is pelletized and added to the same respective basic resin during the formulation of the ultimate products, such as bottles, sheets, films, trays and containers of various sorts. Therefore the percentage of the oxygen—absorber in the ultimate product will be a much lower percentage than shown in the above examples. However, it will be appreciated that in certain instances the above specifically described resin compositions of EXAMPLES 1—VIII may be used at full strength to produce the final product. While the resins which were tested in the above compositionis were linear low density polyethylene and poly—ethylene—terephthalate, the oxygen-absorbing composition will also work with medium density and high density polyethylene and in varying degrees with other resins including but not limited to polypropylene, nylon, polyvinyl alcohol, urethane, acrylic, polyvinyl chloride and polystyrene, and various blends and copolymers thereof, depending on their specific permeabilities. Where the ranges of iron, sodium bisulf ate and salt are listed above, it will be appreciated that these ranges are applicable to both the unmilled and milled embodiments. 12 While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed, it will be appreciated that it is not limited thereto but may be otherwise within the scope of the following claims. We Claim: 1. An oxygen - absorbing composition for combination combining with a resin as a component thereof to effect oxygen - absorption thereby comprising in relatively sufficient proportions by weight iron in an amount of between 50% and 98% an acidifier selected from the group consisting of sodium and potassium bisulfates and present by weight in an amount of between 1% and 30% and an electrolyte that functions as an oxygen - absorber in the presence of the iron and is present by weight in an amount of at least 0.1% 2. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron. 3. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns. 4. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between (1) 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns. 5. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein said iron is present by weight in an amount of between 75% - 95%, and wherein said acidifier is present by weight in an amount of between 4% - 20%, and wherein said electrolyte is present by weight in an amount of between .5% -4%. 6. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 5 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron. 7. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 5 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns. 8. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 5 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between (2) 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns. 9. An oxygen-absorbing composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein said iron is present by weight in an amount of between 80% - 90%, and wherein said acidifier is present by weight in an amount of between 5%- 18%, and wherein said electrolyte is present by weight in an amount of between l%-3%. 10. An oxygen- absorbing composition as claimed in claim 9 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron. 11. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 9 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns. 12. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 9 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns. 13. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein said iron is selected from the group consisting of annealed electrolytically reduced iron, hydrogen reduced iron, and carbonyl iron. 14. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 13 wherein said iron is present by weight in an amount of between 50% and 98%, and wherein said acidifier is present by weight in an amount of between 1 % and 30%, and wherein said electrolyte is present by weight in an amount of at least. 1%. 15. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 14 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron. 16. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 14 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns. 17. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 14 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between (4) 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns. 18. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 15 wherein said iron is present by weight in an amount of between 75% - 95%, and wherein said acidifier is present by weight in an amount of between 4% - 20%, and wherein said electrolyte is present by weight in an amount of between 0.5% - 4%. 19. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 18 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron. 20. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 18 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns. 21. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 20 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns. 22. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 13 wherein said iron is present by weight in an amount of between 80% - 90%, and wherein said acidifier is present by weight in an amount of between 5% - 18%, and wherein said electrolyte is present by weight in an amount of between l%-3%. 23. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 22 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 150 microns and 1 micron. 24. An oxygen - absorbing composition as claimed in claim 22 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 100 microns and 5 microns. 25. An oxygen-absorbing composition as claimed in claim 22 wherein the majority of said iron is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said acidifier is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns, and wherein the majority of said electrolyte is of a size range of between 50 microns and 5 microns. 26. The combination as claimed in claim 1 wherein said iron is milled. 27. The combination as claimed in claim 1 wherein the majority of said milled iron is of a size range of between 3 microns and 80 microns. 28. The combination as claimed in claim 1 wherein said iron and said acidifier are milled. 29. The combination as claimed in claim 28 wherein said majority of said iron and the majority of said acidifier are of a size range of between 3 microns and 80 microns. 30. The combination as claimed in claim 1 wherein the said iron and said acidifier and said electrolyte are milled. 31. The combination as claimed in claim 1 wherein the majority of said iron and the majority of said acidifier and the majority of said electrolyte are or a size range of between 3 microns and 80 microns. 32. An oxygen - absorbing composition for combining with a. resin as claimed in claim 1 wherein said iron is sponge grade hydrogen reduced iron.

Documents:

2054-DELNP-2005-Abstract-09-05-2008.pdf

2054-DELNP-2005-Claims-09-05-2008.pdf

2054-delnp-2005-claims.tif

2054-delnp-2005-correspondence-other.tif

2054-DELNP-2005-Correspondence-Others-09-05-2008.pdf

2054-delnp-2005-Description (Complete)09-05-2008.pdf

2054-delnp-2005-description-complete.tif

2054-DELNP-2005-Form-1-09-05-2008.pdf

2054-DELNP-2005-Form-2-09-05-2008.pdf

2054-DELNP-2005-Form-3-09-05-2008.pdf

2054-delnp-2005-form1.tif

2054-delnp-2005-form18.tif

2054-delnp-2005-form2.tif

2054-delnp-2005-form3.tif

2054-delnp-2005-form5.tif