Title of Invention

"A METHOD OF REMOVING PHOTORESIST FROM THE SURFACE OF A SUBSTRATE"

Abstract The invention is a method of removing materials such as carbon and metallic elements from a substrate surface via heating in an atmosphere of molecular chlorine and steam. In a preferred embodiment, carbon residue is removed from the surface of a Si or GaAs substrate material.
Full Text FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method of removing photoresist from tin- surface of a substrate. More- particularly, the invention relates to a method by which this may be accomplished, whereby a steam-chlorine gas thermal cleaning process is used.
BACKGROUND
The current method of semiconductor device fabrication involves the use- of ,i light sensitive polymer known as photoresist. A layer of the photoresist material is spun onto a semiconductor substrate surface at a thickness of about 1 micron (10,000A) and a patterned exposure perlormed through a previously prepared photomask. The wafer is then developed as in normal photography. After developing, the unexposed areas of photoresist are washed from the surface leaving selected areas of the \vafer exposed or covered, depending on the intent of the fabricator. Tin- wafer is now ready for a process step, such as the bombardment of the surface with boron ions to introduce a doping atom into the silicon wafer to change electrical properties. After this process step is completed, the developed areas of photoresist must be removed to allow the sequence to be repeated with a different pattern.
The current semiconductor industry standard stripping and cleaning method involves the use of at least three liquid chemical solutions known as SPM", SC'-l ' and "SC-2", in use- since 1970. "SPM" stands for
"sulfuric acid peroxide mix," and "SC" stands for "standard clean". SPM is a solution of concentrated sulfuric acid and 30% hydrogen peroxide, and is used to remove heavy organics, such as photoresist. SC-1 is a solution of 29 wt/wt % ammonium hydroxide, 30% hydrogen peroxide and deionized water. It is used at
approximately 70°C to 80°C to oxidize surface organic films and remove some metal ions. SC-2 is a final rinse solution of 37 wt/wt % hydrochloric acid and 30 % hydrogen peroxide and deionized water. It is used at
approximately 75°C to 80°C. These solutions were first developed at the RCA corporation during the 1960's and are sometimes known as "RCA cleans". This approach may
be accomplished at temperatures less than 100°C, which is an important consideration as uncontrolled dopant diffusion in the wafer itself will occur if
temperatures of approximately 150°C to 200°C are reached for any extended period of time.
The liquid process is deficient in that safety, environmental considerations of disposal and water availability are major drawbacks. In addition, a more important limitation comes from the inherent surface tension of these materials. The liquids have difficulty in entering features smaller than approximately 0.3 micrometers. Finally, the liquid process is relatively time consuming because there is a drying step required to remove the liquid cleaning agents. This results in low throughput. As device and feature size continue to decrease in size, new methods of stripping and cleaning must be found.
The most straightforward approach to dealing with the problems associated with liquid cleaning is to develop gas phase methods. Gases are easier to dispose
of by scrubbing, have less volume, do not require a drying step and do not have the same surface tension drawbacks. This approach is known as "dry cleaning".
Initially, gas phase methods similar to those used to remove contaminants such as dust were applied. These techniques use applied thermal or UV energy for contaminant excitation in an air, oxygen or inert gas atmosphere. (See U.S. Patents 5,024,968; 5,099,557 to Engelsberg). Unfortunately, these systems lack sufficient energy to remove photoresist or very heavy contamination.
This problem was partially solved by the use of various excimer laser photoresist stripping processes such as those disclosed in U.S. Patent 5,114,834 to Nachshon, and in W09507152 to Elliott et al. Nachshon teaches the application of a laser at an angle perpendicular to the semiconductor surface to remove photoresist via ablation. A reactive gas, such as oxygen or ozone may be provided to react with the ablated material. Elliott teaches the application of a
laser at an angle which is preferably 15° to the semiconductor surface to remove feature edges of photoresist via ablation. It is recommended that two applications should be used, wherein the disc is
rotated 90° between the first and second. As with Nachshon, a reactive gas such as oxygen or ozone may be provided to react with the ablated material.
These processes are deficient however, in that they leave a residue of carbon on the wafer surface
which is on the order of 100A to 200A in depth (for a 1 micron photoresist layer). Srinivasan et al (J. Appl. Phys. 61(1) January, 1987) teach that the source of the carbon does not appear to be from redeposition
of partially combusted ablated carbon, but from a type of ashing process produced from the instantaneous high (>1000 K) temperatures and pressures (>100 atm) of the laser itself. This residue "must be reduced to a
thickness of less than about 4A before the next fabrication step can be performed. Attempts to remove the carbon residue with a UV light and ozone treatment have not been successful in part because the UV laser light is absorbed by the ozone. In addition, metallic contaminant residues, such as Al or Fe may also result from the semiconductor fabrication processes. Activated chlorine gas has been used to remove these residues, but this results in damage to the wafer.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the invention to develpp a process that removes undesired carbon materials from a.substrate surface without altering said substrate the surface of the semiconductor substrate. This process should be low temperature
(less*tTian or equal to 200°C) and also be strictly gas phase.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a process whereby such carbon residues may be removed to an extent such that the next fabrication step in semiconductor device manufacture is possible.
Accordingly, there is provided a method of removing photoresist from the surface of a substrate, said method comprising the steps of:
a) applying a laser beam to said surface such that photoresist is ablated
from said surface and a carbon residue remains; then
b) removing said carbon from said surface via heating said wafer at a
temperature of less than 200°C, in the absence of UV light in an
atmosphere of steam and molecular chlorine gas in a molar ratio in the
range of 1:1 to 15:1.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Our invention is a method which removes carbon materials from a substrate surface. This method comprises heating said substrate in an atmosphere of steam and molecular chlorine gas.
In preferred embodiments, the heating is at a
temperature of less than 200°C, and the steam and molecular chlorine gas are in a ratio of approximately 12:1 in said atmosphere.
In another preferred embodiment, the carbon removal treatment is combined with a photoresist laser ablation step in order to provide a method for the removal of photoresist from substrate materials.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of preferred embodiments and the accompanying drawing, in which:
Figure I shows an apparatus which is used to remove carbon residue which remains after the application of the laser in the stripping process.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The invention is a treatment of a Si or GaAs____ wafer which has been stripped of photoresist via laser ablation. As stated above, present laser stripping processes are ineffective in that they leave a carbon
layer having a thickness of more than about lOOA on the surface of the substrate. The thickness of this layer must be reduced to an extent such that further device fabrication is possible. Thus any carbon remaining must be at a level such that it cannot be detected by SIMS analysis (e.g. the carbon must be at or below the "background" level of approximately 4A) . The process we have developed accomplishes this result, and involves heating the wafer in an atmosphere of steam and molecular chlorine gas.
Our process uses the following chemical reaction(Formula Removed)
This gas phase reaction is remarkable and critical to the process because of its ability to remove a
layer of carbon at a rate of about 1-2A per minute at
temperatures below 200°C. If the reaction is run at higher temperatures, the substrate materials are etched by the chlorine.
The reaction is carried out on wafers that have been stripped of their photoresist by laser ablation. The process may be used to remove a carbon residue of any thickness up to about a micron, the only limitation being the time. The process may be carried out in one of two ways.
In the first method, the reaction is carried out in the laser stripping apparatus. In this case, a mixture of humidified argon is blended with molecular chlorine and delivered to the gas reaction box. Many difficulties were encountered which involved corrosion within in the apparatus, as the reaction chamber cannot be heated and gaseous HC1 was formed from a photochemically induced side reaction between the steam and chlorine.
In the second method, the reaction is carried out in a specially modified thermal furnace, the details of which are shown in Figure 1. As shown in the figure, quartz tube 1 is placed in Lindberg furnace 2 which is ultimately connected to a water source 3 and a chlorine gas source 4. The furnace is shielded to_external light sources as stray UV light may result in the

formation of gaseous HCl. The general process will now be described.
A controlled amount of deionized water flows from the reservoir 3 through valve 5 to three-way needle valve 6. At this point it is mixed with an inert carrier gas (nitrogen) provided from source 7, and flow controlled via valve 8. The water is vaporized in stainless steel coil 9 and carried via the carrier gas via three-way valve 10 for blending with an amount of chlorine gas from source 4 which has been measured via valve 11. The blending occurs in line 12 which should
be Teflon® so as to prevent corrosion. The use of the three-way valve 11 is beneficial for three reasons. First, it allows for the confirmation of steam generation; second, it controls the application of steam to the wafer treating process; and third, it allows for uninterrupted steam generation when changing sample wafers.
Prior to mixing with the steam, the chlorine gas is heated to prevent condensation. This is controlled via temperature monitor 13 and VARIAC current controller 14.
The combined water-vapor/molecular chlorine gas stream 15 is introduced into the quartz tube 1 to treat the wafer 16. Post treatment condensate 17 is drained away from the wafer to avoid contamination. The primary advantage of this apparatus is that it is far cheaper and easier to maintain than the laser stripping unit described in the first method.
The steam-chlorine reaction should be run at a
temperature which is greater than 100°C and less than 200°C. At temperatures of 100°C and below the steam
will condense to a liquid phase which will damage the wafer. As noted earlier, at temperatures greater than
200°C, there may be diffusion of ion dopants (such as B or As) into the substrate.
A molar ratio of 12:1 of steam to molecular chlorine at a flow rate of 1 standard liter per minute is most preferred as this was found to give optimal results. Other ratios between 1:1 and 15:1 may be used, but all result in lower reaction rates which simultaneously extend process time and potentially increases the amount of substrate etching that occurs. As such these are less desirable. The 12:1 ratio is optimal as we found that a large excess of water was required for the reaction to proceed at a reasonable
rate such that l-2A/min. of carbon are removed. Further, at ratios in excess of 12:1, the chlorine was diluted to such an extent that processing time was unacceptable.
Also, while the most preferred flow rate is about one standard liter per minute, slower flow rates may be used. These are less desirable because they increase removal time. Faster flow rates of up to 20 standard liters per minute do increase the removal rate to some degree, but are more difficult to sustain.
Our most preferred conditions are:
Temperature: 110-200°C, preferably 150°C
Blend: 1:1 to 15:1, preferably 12:1 (molar)
steam:chlorine
Flow: 100-30,OOOcc/min, preferably 1200 cc/min steam
50-1500 cc/min, preferably 100 cc/min chlorine
Tne carrier gas is used to facilitate the movement of steam through the furnace, and may be any gas which is inert to the steam/chlorine reaction, such as N2, Ar or air.
It should be noted that other possible applications of this reaction include the intentional etching or surface preparation of wafers that have graphite or diamond layers as well as substrates
consisting entire of these materials in these
50-1000 cc/min, preferably 50 cc/min carrier (N2)
Rate of removal of C: about l-2A/min.
The carrier gas is used to facilitate the movement of steam through the furnace, and may be any gas which is inert to the steam/chlorine reaction, such as N2, Ar or air.
It should be noted that other possible applications of this reaction include the intentional etching or surface preparation of wafers that have graphite or diamond layers as well as substrates consisting entirely of those materials. In these applications the temperature of the reaction is not limited to the optimum range discussed above. The reaction is used to remove carbon from the substrate materials so as to etch the substrate. In addition, the process may be used in the removal from a substrate of trace contaminant elements such as Al or Fe, resulting from semiconductor device processing.
Specific features of the invention are shown in one or more of the drawings for convenience only, as each feature may be combined with other features in accordance with the invention. Alternative embodiments will be recognized by those skilled in the art and are intended to be included within the scope of the claims.




We Claim:-
1. A method of removing photoresist from the surface of a substrate, said method comprising the steps of:
a) applying a laser beam to said surface such that photoresist is ablated from
said surface and a carbon residue remains; then
b) removing said carbon from said surface via heating said wafer at a
temperature of less than 200°C, in the absence of UV light in an atmosphere of
steam and molecular chlorine gas in a molar ratio in the range of 1:1 to 15:1.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the substrate is selected from
the group consisting of Si and GaAs.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said substrate is heated to a
temperature of preferably more than 100°C.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said substrate is heated to a
temperature of most preferably more than 150°C.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said steam and molecular
chlorine gas are in a ratio of 12:1 in said atmosphere.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said heating takes place in a
furnace.
7. A method of removing photoresist from the surface of a substrate
substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as illustrated in
the accompanying drawings.

Documents:

816-del-1997-abstract.pdf

816-del-1997-claims.pdf

816-del-1997-correspondence-others.pdf

816-del-1997-correspondence-po.pdf

816-del-1997-description (complete).pdf

816-del-1997-drawings.pdf

816-del-1997-form-1.pdf

816-del-1997-form-13.pdf

816-del-1997-form-19.pdf

816-del-1997-form-2.pdf

816-del-1997-form-3.pdf

816-del-1997-form-4.pdf

816-del-1997-gpa.pdf

816-del-1997-petition-137.pdf

816-del-1997-petition-138.pdf


Patent Number 214792
Indian Patent Application Number 816/DEL/1997
PG Journal Number 09/2008
Publication Date 29-Feb-2008
Grant Date 15-Feb-2008
Date of Filing 27-Mar-1997
Name of Patentee PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Applicant Address 39 OLD RIDGEBURY ROAD, DANBURY, STATE OF CONNECTICUT 06810-5113, USA
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 ARTHUR EDWARD HOLMER 719 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, LEWISTON, NEW YORK 14092
2 MICHAEL MARK LITWIN 346 GEORGE URBAN BOULEVARD, CHEEKTOWAGA, NY 14225
3 KEVIN BRUCE ALBAUGH 2815 CREEKBEND DR., MCKINNEY, TEXAS 75070, U.S.A.
PCT International Classification Number C01B 43/02
PCT International Application Number N/A
PCT International Filing date
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 NA