Title of Invention

PROCESS FOR PATTERNING TEXTILE MATERIALS AND FABRICS MADE THEREFROM

Abstract

A process for manufacturing patterned fabrics comprising the steps of: applying a water soluble chemical substance designed to inhibit wetting to selected regions of a fabric to define treated and untreated regions forming a pattern; exposing the fabric to an aqueous dye liquor until said untreated regions are saturated while said treated regions are less than fully saturated, to thereby form a patterned fabric.

Full Text

FORM 2 THE PATENTS ACT 1970 [39 OF 1970] COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [See Section 10 ; rule 13]] "PROCESS FOR PATTERNING TEXTILE MATERIALS AND FABRICS MADE THEREFROM" MILLIKEN & COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, of 920 Milliken Road, Spartanburg, SC 29303, United States of America, The following specification particularly describes the nature of the invention and the manner in which it is to be performed:- PROCESS FOR PATTERNING TEXTILE MATERIALS AND FABRICS MADE THEREFROM \ 5 FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention generally relates to a process for patterning textile materials. 10) More specifically, the invention relates to a process for producing patterned textile materials using a dye process conventionally used for dyeing solid fabrics, and fabrics made using the process. BACKGROUND 15 Textile manufacturers are continually striving to achieve products having unique and different appearances. While designers can create seemingly infinite quantities of looks for fabrics, the fabric manufacturers must take into account such things as machinery capabilities, costs of raw materials, labor input and processing 20 expenses, performance characteristics required of the fabric, and the like. Thus, the creativity of the designers is often limited by the ability of the manufacturers to efficiently produce the fabrics according to their designs. One traditional way of achieving patterned fabrics is by forming the fabric from 25) alternating regions of differently colored, previously dyed yarns. The fabrics made in this manner are called yam-dyed fabrics, and are used in the manufacture of such fabrics as woven striped broadcloth (e.g., of the variety commonly used in men"s dress shirts). While providing a desirable appearance in many respects, there are some disadvantages to yarn-dyed fabrics, the main being that the yarns must be ,30) dyed in advance to the"colors desired for use in the product. As will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, this adds significantly to the lead time required to produce the fabric (since colors must be determined and the yarns dyed to achieve those colors prior to the fabric formation process) and it can be expensive to produce small lots of particular color combinations. In addition, the fabric formation equipment (e.g. the loom or knitting machine) 5 must be specifically set up to achieve the particular pattern desired. This can result in significant machine downtime between color and pattern changes. Furthermore, yarn-dyed fabrics have a tendency to shrink differentially due to component yarns having been exposed to different temperatures and conditions during their respective dyeing and processing conditions. As a result, yarn-dyed fabrics often pucker along 10 the regions of transition between one yarn color and another following laundering. In summary, the yarn-dyed products require undesirably long lead times and manufacturing complexity, while achieving products that may have undesirable side-to-side variation. 15 Attempts have been made to achieve patterned fabrics by means other inan the use of differently colored yarns in the fabric formation process. For example, fabrics are often directly printed with variously colored patterns. In this method, the colors for the desired designs are applied directly to the undyed or previously dyed fabric. The disadvantages of this type of patterning are twofold. First, where colors 20 are being printed over a previously dyed fabric, the color palette is limited based upon the base shade. This is because some colors used in patterning will not be visible or will be changed because of the base shade showing through. An example would be a blue pattern printed on a yellow base shade. After printing, the pattern would likely appear to be green. Furthermore, a yellow pattern printed on the yellow 25 base may not be visible at all. Therefore, with very dark base shades, very few printed dyes would be visible. This limits the designer to using only certain colors with particular base shades or dictates the use of an undyed base fabric in order to use the full color palette. 30 The second disadvantage of this type of patterning is encountered when using pigments to print over a base shade. It is generally known that the above-described problem of color limitations can be overcome by printing pigments onto the surface of a dyed fabric as is commonly done in plastisol printing. In this way, even white and light colors can be patterned onto very dark backgrounds and the color selection is not limited. However, the resulting pattern has a somewhat stiff and/or rubbery feel and may have a raised appearance as compared to the feel and appearance of 5 the unpatterned area. In many apparel applications, this is not desirable. Furthermore, with repeated launderings and/or abrasion, the printed pattern may eventually become brittle, crack and peel off. Another method commonly used is called discharge printing. In discharge 10 printing, the fabric is dyed (typically piece dyed), then printed in a pattern with a paste containing a chemical that reduces the dye, to thereby form white patterns within the dyed background. A colorant may also be added to the discharge paste so that the discharged color is replaced with another color. The discharge chemistry can tend to be harsh and often weakens the portions of the fabric to which it is 15 applied, thereby reducing the overall strength of the fabric. Another disadvantage of this type processing is that only dyes that readily discharge to white when subjected to chemical reducing agents can be selected or there will be residual color left in the patterned area. This type of chemistry adds to the cost and reduces the flexibility of the process. 20 Another method used to produce patterned fabrics is called resist printing. In resist printing, a substance designed to resist dyeing of the fabric is applied to the fabric in a pattern. The fabric is then dyed using a discontinuous dye process. In prior resist printing processes, the resist agent was typically a water insoluble 25 medium. Examples of patterning processes which use water insoluble media are batik, which uses wax, and tie dyeing, which uses elastic bands or the like to inhibit the dyeing of the fabric in particular regions. As will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the use of these media requires an additional processing operation to remove the dye-inhibiting medium. Where the dye-inhibiting medium is 30 wax, the removal process c#n be difficult and can result in damage to the underlying fabric regions. In tie-dye processes, removal of the bands is likewise labor intensive. Furthermore, processes such as tie-dyeing are limited in the types of design configurations they can be used to produce, and the wax used in batik does not enable the portions of the fabric where it is applied to be simultaneously dyed a different color from the rest of the fabric. Another type of resist printing involves the chemical binding of the dye sites of the fibers in particular regions of the fabric. Typically, the resist chemistry will be printed on the fabric in a particular pattern prior to dyeing of the fabric. One example of this method is described in U. S. Patent No. 5,984,977 to Moore et al. which describes the use of a substance designed to chemically block the dye sites of a cellulosic material during a discontinuous dye process. Because the dye sites are bound by the resist chemistry, the fabric will not dye in the regions where the chemistry has been applied. While performing well in many applications, this process is somewhat limited in that the resist chemistry must be selected to chemically block the dye sites of the particular fibers in the fabric, which may present a problem when the fabric to be patterned is made from a blend of fibers. For one, if one fiber in the blend is blocked and the other fiber is not prevented from dyeing, then a total resist of the patterned area cannot be achieved unless the unblocked fiber is left undyed. This results in a heather effect on the base shade of the fabric, thereby limiting design flexibility. In addition, commercially available chemical resist processes are marketed for use in discontinuous dye processes, which have lower production speeds as compared with continuous and semi-continuous processes. Also, such resist chemistries are generally deleterious to fabric strength. Finally, heat transfer printing is also used to pattern fabrics. This method uses a paper printed with dyes that are subject to sublimation upon heating. The paper is placed in direct contact with the fabric and heat is applied to transfer the dyes from the paper to the fabric by sublimation. Largely used with disperse dyes on polyester, heat transfer printing is normally performed in a dry state, with the heat applied also serving to diffuse the dye into the fiber. This method is primarily limited to disperse dyes that readily sublime. A variation of this method where the heat transfer is done in a wet state allows other dye classes to be used that will readily transfer from the paper to the fabric in the vapor phase. Still, the dye selection is limited and a two-step process of printing the paper and then transferring the dye to the fabric is necessary. Furthermore, resist effects are not made by this process and designs are therefore limited by the base shade of the fabric prior to printing. 5 SUMMARY The process of the instant invention enables the production of patterned fabrics in an efficient manner, while avoiding extra processing operations required by 10 prior art methods. In addition, the process enables the production of fabrics having the surface appearance of yarn-dyed goods, while avoiding the complexity inherent in yarn-dye manufacturing methods and the fabric strength degradation provided by other dye methods. Furthermore, the process enables the manufacture of patterned fabrics using a continuous or semi-continuous dyeing operation, which achieve 15 greater manufacturing efficiencies than typical discontinuous processes. For purposes of this application, the term "continuous or semi-continuous dye operation" is intended to mean those dye operations where the fabric generally lingers within the dye bath for a relatively short period of time, generally as a result of the continuous motion of the fabric through the process. For example, continuous and 20 semi-continuous dye operations of the variety contemplated by the invention include thermosol dye processes, pad/steam processes, thermosol/pad/steam processes, pad/high temperature steam operations, jig dye processes, pad batch, and the like. Such processes are typically non-exhaust type processes. In contrast, discontinuous dye processes involve the dyeing of a "batch" of fabric, where the 25 fabric spends an extended uninterrupted period of time in the dye liquor to achieve even dyeing through exhaustion and equilibrium. The process involves applying to the fabric a chemical substance capable of temporarily mechanically inhibiting the wetting of underlying regions of the fabric, 30 and then continuously or semi-continuously dyeing the fabric. The chemical substance desirably comprises a print paste. In some embodiments of the invention, the chemical substance may comprise a fluorochemical. In some cases, the chemical substance may comprise both fluorochemical and a print paste. In any event, the chemical substance is selected so that it mechanically inhibits the wetting of underlying regions of the fabric to which it is applied, while not requiring removal from the fabric by way of a separate removal operation. To this end, the chemical 5 substance is desirably water soluble so that it is removed, if desired, by the subsequent chemical and/or mechanical action of the normal dyeing and finishing processes. The chemical substance can be selected to either totally inhibit wetting of the 10 underlying fabric regions or only partially inhibit the dye uptake such that the underlying fabric regions dye to a lesser extent than other areas of the fabric where the chemical substance was not provided. In a similar manner, the chemical substance can be selected to correspond with the particular dye process to be utilized so that the chemical substance is removed shortly before the end of the dye 15 process and portions of the fabric underlying the chemical substance are wet to a lesser extent than the base portions of the fabric, thereby having less of an opportunity to bond with the dye molecules in those regions. In this way, the portions of the fabric where the chemical substance was applied are dyed the same color as the uncovered fabric portions but at a lighter shade level. Therefore, a 20 fabric having a pattern formed from varied dye uptake amounts in predetermined regions can be efficiently manufactured. The chemical substance may also include a dye such that the portions of the fabric on which the chemical substance is printed are dyed a different color than 25 those portions of the fabric dyed by the subsequent continuous dye process. The invention is not limited to the application of a single chemical substance, rather plural different chemical substances could be printed in different patterns within the scope of the invention. For example, a first pattern of a chemical substance which does not include dye could be applied in a first pattern, while a second chemical substance 30 which does include dye could be applied in a second pattern, to thereby produce a three-color patterned fabric. Additionally, a three or more color effect could be achieved using two different chemical substances having different resist characteristics printed in two or more different patterns. The process of the invention enables the production of fabrics having a 5 unique yarn-dyed appearance without the disadvantages associated with yarn-dyed products. For example, in one aspect of the invention, the pattern printed on the fabric is selected to correspond to the yarns in the fabric construction, to thereby give the appearance of a yarn-dyed fabric. In addition, the patterning capability and pattern clarity of fabrics printed in this manner far exceeds that of yarn-dyed goods, 10 especially where intricate designs are desired. Furthermore, the fabrics retain substantially all of their initial strength, have good colorfastness, and have superior aesthetic and functional characteristics. E|DRAWINGS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE/DRAWINGS 15 Fig. 1 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of the process of the instant invention; Fig. 2 is a photograph (40X magnification) of a conventional yarn-dyed product; and 20 Fig. 3 is a photograph (40X magnification) of a fabric made according to the invention. 25 DETAILED DESCRIPTION In the following detailed description of the invention, specific preferred embodiments of the invention are described to enable a full and complete understanding of the invention. It will be recognized that it is not intended to limit the 30 invention to the particular preferred embodiment described, and although specific terms are employed in describing the invention, such terms are used in a descriptive sense for the purpose of illustration and not for the purpose of limitation. WO 0^055785 PCT/US01/i2m- With reference to the drawings, Fig. 1 illustrates a process for manufacturing patterned fabrics according to the instant invention. As noted, the steps performed in this aspect are printing resist chemistry on the fabric, drying the chemistry 5 (optional), applying the dye, pre-drying the dye (if desired), setting the dye, cooling the fabric (if previously heated), applying chemistry as desired, reacting the chemistry if necessary, washing the fabric to remove excess chemistry, and drying and taking up the fabric. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the specific steps used will vary according to the dye process used, type of fabric 10 being patterned, chemistry used, pattern sought, etc. The steps will be discussed more specifically below. The fabric to be patterned is obtained. The fabric can be of any variety, including a woven fabric, a knit fabric, nonwoven fabric, or the like. The fabric can 15 be formed of any conventional type of fibers that are capable of being continuously or semi-continuously dyed, including but not limited to synthetic fibers such as polyesters (including, but not limited to polyethylene terephthalate, polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT) and modified versions thereof), polyamides, polypropylene, aramids, polyolefins, regenerated fibers such as polylactide based fibers (PLA) and 20 rayon (e.g. viscose, cuprammonium), natural fibers such as cotton, linen, ramie, hemp, jute, or the like, or combinations thereof. The process of the invention has been found to perform particularly well in the production of 100% polyester, 100% cotton, and polyester/cotton blended fabrics. The fabric will be selected to provide the weight and performance characteristics desired for the end use product. 25 The fabric is desirably in prepared form, meaning that it has been washed to remove oils, impurities and the like which it has picked up during the manufacturing and/or transport processes. Preferably, the fabric is dried as part of the preparation process so that a consistent product is presented for chemical substance application 30 and dyeing. A chemical substance designed to temporarily inhibit the wetting of the underlying fabric areas is then applied to the fabric in a desired pattern. The chemical substance is desirably applied to the fabric by a printing process. For example, the printing process can be roller bed printing, rotary screen printing, 5 flexographic printing, gravure roll application, multiple nozzle injection patterning (such as that described in commonly-assigned U.S. Patent No. 4,923,743), or the like. However, other application methods are contemplated within the scope of the invention including, but not limited to flick brush, ultrasonic spray, foam application.print head pattern methods, and the like. The chemical substance can be 10 applied in any desired pattern. Alternatively, the application "pattern" can be that of randomized spots or the like (e.g. such as those achieved with a flick brush.) As will be readily appreciated, the regions where the chemistry is applied will determine the pattern of undyed or differentially dyed areas on the finished fabric, and the variety of application patterns is essentially limitless. As a result, the process can be used to 15 achieve a limitless variety of fabric appearances. The chemical substance is designed to physically inhibit the wetting of underlying regions of the fabric for a period of time. In one aspect of the invention, the chemical substance is designed to prevent wetting of the underlying regions of 20 the fabric for a period of time greater than the fabric is in contact with the aqueous dye liquor. In another aspect of the invention, the chemical substance can be selected to prevent saturation of the underlying regions while allowing some wetting, either by virtue of the length of time it inhibits wetting or the degree it inhibits wetting. The fabric may retain the property of being inhibited from wetting after processing 25 since the downstream processing does not require the removal of the chemistry. (In contrast, prior means of mechanically inhibiting the wetting of fabric areas such as wax require a separate processing step to remove the substance, since the fabric would not have the aesthetic and performance characteristics sufficient to render it useful until such time as that substance was removed.) To this end, the chemical 30 substance is desirably water soluble. Stated differently, the chemical substance is selected to inhibit wetting of the underlying portions of the fabric, and preferably to totally inhibit wetting. Where the chemical substance is designed to partially inhibit wetting of the fabric, it can be selected to allow underlying portions of the fabric to wet at a significantly slower rate 5 than the untreated regions, or it can be selected to inhibit wetting for a period of time somewhat shorter than the length of the dye process. In this way, portions of the fabric on which the chemical substance has been printed will be exposed to a lesser amount of the dye and/or exposed for a lesser length of time than the untreated fabric regions. As a result, the portions of the fabric that were treated with the 10 chemical substance will be dyed the same basic color (hue) as the surrounding fabric regions, but with a depth of shade ranging from slightly lighter to much lighter than the untreated regions. The chemical substance preferably includes a print paste comprising a 15 thickening agent and water. In some forms of the invention, the chemical substance includes a fluorochemical. In some forms of the invention, the chemical substance includes both a print paste and a fluorochemical. In any event, the chemical substance is selected so that it inhibits the wetting of underlying regions of the fabric to which it is applied, while not requiring removal from the fabric by way of a 20 separate removal operation, as will be discussed further herein. Examples of chemical substances that have been found to perform well in the instant invention are alginate-based print pastes, xanthan-based print pastes, synthetic-thickener-based print pastes, a wide variety of fluorochemicals, and 25 combinations thereof. The viscosity and rheology of the chemical substance will be selected to optimize wetting inhibition and to achieve the intended design appearance in the finished fabric. As will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the precise chemical substance formulation used will be selected to accommodate the application method used, screen or mesh size, add-on desired, 30 etc. Such parameters are all contemplated within the scope of the invention, with the precise formulations used for each fabric being readily discernable without undue experimentation. It has been found that in a rotary screen print process (such as that used herein in the examples), a chemical substance viscosity of about 8 poise to about 70 poise, and preferably about 10 poise to about 40 poise (depending on the thickening agent used) performs well. The chemical substance will be applied at a pressure designed to achieve even printing with adequate penetration for the specific 5 chemical substance and substrate used. For example, pressure ranges of about 3 psi to about 10 psi have been found to perform well for the chemical substances described above. In addition, the pressure at which the chemical substance is applied will be selected to optimize penetration of the substance into the particular fabric to the extent necessary to achieve the desired design and to achieve evenly 10 printed goods. Likewise, the rheology of the chemical substance desirably provides good flow and quick stop characteristics. In some forms of the invention, the chemical substance will also include a dye. In this way, the portions of the fabric on which the chemical substance is 15 applied will be printed a first color, while surrounding regions of the base fabric not having the chemical substance thereon will be dyed a different color during the dye process. As will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the chemical substances may be applied more than once using different patterns and different chemical substances. Therefore, the process can be used to form an 20 essentially infinite number of fabric patterns and appearances. For example, the chemical substance can be applied to the fabric such that it mimics the pattern of yarns in a fabric construction, such as through a pattern of stripes printed in the direction of warp or filling yarns on a woven fabric to simulate a yarn-dyed striped fabric. Furthermore, the chemical substance may include other types of chemicals 25 such as optical brighteners, different dye classes, copolymers, any type of chemistry that provides an additional benefit without interfering with the properties necessary for this invention to operate, and the like. In most instances, it will be desirable to dry the chemistry prior to the 30 subsequent dyeing step. This can be done by way of any method conventionally used to dry fabrics, such as by passing the fabric through an oven. This helps secure the chemical substance to the underlying fabric portions. The temperature and method used will be selected to optimize performance of the chemical substance and substrate used. The fabric is then dyed in a conventional continuous or semi-continuous 5 manner such as by a thermosol dye process. However, other types of dye operations such as pad/steam processes, thermosol/pad/steam processes, cold pad batch, jig dye processes, and the like can also be used within the scope of the instant invention with varying effects. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the dyeing process used will be selected depending on the type of fabric 10 being processed as well as the type of dye to be used. Similarly, the type and amount of chemical substance used will be selected to optimize the appearance of the dyed fabric. In other words, the type of dye process and chemical substance will be coordinated so that the mechanical inhibition of wetting provided by the chemical substance survives the specific dye process used to the extent necessary to achieve 15 the desired patterned effect from dyeing. Similarly, the dye method utilized will be selected to achieve the desired results for the particular fabric being produced. For example, in many cases it will be desirable to utilize high efficiency continuous and semi-continuous dye processes; in such cases the yarns forming the fabric will often be ring dyed. 20 When a thermosol/pad-steam process is used, the process generally goes as follows: The fabric having the chemical substance applied to it is routed through the dye pad, where the fabric is saturated with dye, with the exception of those regions where the chemical substance prevents the fabric from fully wetting. The fabric is 25 desirably pre-dried, and then heated to a temperature sufficient to sublime the dyestuff into the substrate such that the dyes sublime and penetrate into the fibers. The fabric is then desirably steamed, scoured and washed in a conventional manner to remove any excess chemistry and dye that may remain. The fabric is cooled, and any finish chemistries that are desired can be applied. For example, chemistries 30 designed to promote soil release and wicking, or reduce static and/or pilling, etc. can be provided according to the needs of the fabric. In addition, any desired face finishing operations can also be performed as needed. dried and packaged for distribution. The fabric is then desirably The dye utilized can also be selected to achieve the type of appearance 5 desired. For example, where the textile fabric is a polyester/cotton blended fabric and it is desired to have a solid-colored base fabric, a combination of disperse and vat dyes may be utilized to achieve dyeing of both the polyester and cotton constituents. In this instance, a thermosol/pad/steam process could be utilized with the additional steps of steaming, scouring and washing added to the process 10 described above after the thermosol oven. Alternatively, the dye bath may include dyes that are designed to dye only one of the fiber constituents, so as to achieve a heather type appearance of the base fabric. For example, a polyester/cotton blended fabric could be exposed to disperse dyes only, which will dye the polyester component while leaving the cotton component substantially undyed, to thereby 15 achieve a unique appearance of the base fabric. As noted above, the chemical substance is selected to at least temporarily inhibit wetting of portions of the fabric, so that a pattern can be produced on the fabric during a continuous or semi-continuous dye process. The nature of the 20 chemical substance results in it not requiring a subsequent removal process. In other words, the action of the dye process, drying, finishing and/or scouring operations serve to remove any of the chemistry that would interfere with the end performance of the fabric. For example, where the chemical substance includes or consists essentially of a print paste, the subsequent processing steps generally 25 serve to remove the print paste from the fabric. By the same token, where the chemical substance comprises or consists essentially of a fluorocarbon, it may be desirable for some of the fluorocarbon chemistry to remain on the fabric in order that long term water repellency in the printed areas is achieved. In any event, the chemical substance and dye process used can be coordinated so that the amount of 30 the chemical substance that remains on the fabric following processing is controlled at desired levels. As illustrated by a comparison of the yarn-dyed fabric in Fig. 2 and the fabric of the invention illustrated in Fig. 3, the fabrics produced according to the process of the invention have superior appearance, in many cases closely approximating the appearance of yarn-dyed fabrics, while avoiding the problems with that production 5 process. For example, the differential shrinkage problems commonly associated with yarn-dyed fabrics can be avoided because the base fabric can be produced in a uniform construction if so desired. The fabrics of the invention also have good performance characteristics such as good uniform physical strength, appearance, colorfastness, washfastness, design durability, and a consistent feel or hand across 10 patterned and unpatterned areas. EXAMPLES 15 Three samples of commercially-available yarn-dyed shirting fabrics were obtained and are described below as Samples A, B and C. Sample A was a bright blue and dark grey striped conventional poplin fabric having a weight of 4.3 oz/sq yd. The finished construction had 102 ends per inch 20 and 57 picks per inch. Both warp and filling yarns consisted of a 65% polyester and 35% cotton blend. It is believed by the inventors that the fabric had been treated with conventional soil release and permanent press chemistries, and lightly sanded. Sample B was a conventional poplin fabric having small blue stripes on a 25 white background. The fabric had a weight of 4.3 oz/ sq yd and a finished construction having 77 ends per inch and 59 picks per inch. Both warp and filling yarns consisted of a 65% polyester and 35% cotton blend. It is believed by the inventors that the fabric had been treated with conventional soil release and permanent press chemistries, and lightly sanded. 30 Sample C was a conventional poplin fabric having multi-colored stripes. The fabric had a weight of 4.3 oz/ sq yd and a finished construction of 104 ends per inch and 60 picks per inch. Both warp and filling yarns consisted of a 65% polyester and 35% cotton blend. It is believed by the inventors that the fabric had been treated with conventional soil release and permanent press chemistries, and lightly sanded. 5 Sample D was a 4.3 oz 65/35 polyester/cotton poplin fabric. The fabric was dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. (In other words, the fabric was dyed the same base shade as Sample 10 E below.) The fabric was then finished in a conventional manner, by padding on conventional type finish chemistry to provide moisture transport, soil release and permanent press characteristics, running it through a tenter in a conventional manner to cross-link the resin and set the fabric width. The fabric was then mechanically abraded in the manner described in commonly-assigned U.S. Patent 15 No. 5,752,300 to Dischler and treated with high pressure air (to form microfissures in the resin chemistry) in the manner described in commonly-assigned U.S. Patent No. 5,822,835 to Dischler. The fabric had a finished construction of 102 ends per inch and 47 picks per inch. 20 Sample E was woven in the same construction as Sample D, prepared, and then a twin stripe pattern from a 165 mesh screen of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc.), 11 g/kg of a synthetic back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate thickener, a 25 sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water. (As will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the sequestering agent, defoamer and antimicrobial were provided in minor quantities to facilitate the performance of the printing equipment.) The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix 30 had a viscosity of 38 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. The chemical substance was dried at 320°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described with respect to Sample D. The finished fabric had a weight of 4.36 oz /sq yd, with 101 ends per inch and 48 picks per inch. Sample F was woven in the same construction as Sample D, prepared, and then a wide stripe pattern of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc. of Carlstadt, New Jersey), 11 g/kg of a synthetic back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water). The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. The chemical substance was dried at 370°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above with respect to Sample D. The finished fabric had a weight of 4.41 oz/ sq yd and a construction of 101 ends and 48 picks per inch. Sample G was woven in the same manner as Sample D, prepared, and then a wide stripe pattern of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc. of Carlstadt, New Jersey), 11 g/kg synthetic back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included a 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water.) The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. The chemical substance was dried at 350°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above with respect to Sample D. The finished fabric had a weight of 4.36 oz/ sq yd, 5 with 101 ends and 48 picks per inch. Sample H was woven in the same manner as Sample D, prepared, and then a twin stripe pattern of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc.), 11 g/kg of a synthetic 10 back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water). The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. 15 The chemical substance was dried at 350°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above with respect to 20 Sample D. The finished fabric had a weight of 4.31 oz/ sq yd and a construction of 101 ends and 48 picks per inch. Sample I was woven in the manner of Sample D, prepared, and then a wide stripe pattern of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg 25 fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc.), 11 g/kg of a synthetic back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water). The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 30 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. The chemical substance was dried at 320°F. The fabric was dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above with respect to Sample D. The finished fabric had a weight of 4.35 oz/ sq yd and a construction of 102 ends and 48 5 picks per inch. Sample J was woven in the manner of Sample D, prepared, and then a twin stripe pattern of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc.), 11 g/kg synthetic back 10 thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water). The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. 15 The chemical substance was dried at 370°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above in Sample D. The 20 finished fabric had a weight of 4.34 oz/sq yd and a construction of 102 ends by 48 picks per inch. Sample K was woven in the manner of Sample D, then a twin stripe pattern of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical 25 (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc), 11 g/kg synthetic back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water). The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 poise, 30 and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. The chemical substance was dried at 385°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 19 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above in Sample D. The fabric had a finished weight of 4.4 oz/sq yd and a construction of 102 ends by 48 picks per inch. 5 Sample L was woven in the manner of Sample D, then a wide stripe pattern of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc.), 11g/kg synthetic back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate 10 thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water). The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. The chemical substance was dried at 385°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 15 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above in Sample D. The finished fabric had a weight of 4.42 oz/sq yd and a construction of 101 ends by 48 picks per inch. 20 Sample M was woven in the manner of Sample D, then a mesh pattern of the following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc.), 11 g/kg of a synthetic back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate 25 thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water). The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. The chemical substance was dried at 385°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 30 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above in Sample D. The finished fabric had a weight of 4.42 oz/sq yd and a construction of 101 ends by 48 picks per inch. Sample N was woven in the manner of Sample D, then a mesh pattern of the 5 following chemical substance was applied to the fabric: 60 g/kg fluorochemical (APG-85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc.), 11g/kg of a synthetic back thickener, 929 g/kg alginate stock print paste (which included 32.5 g/kg of a low viscosity alginate thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an antimicrobial, and water). The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse 10 blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The mix had a viscosity of 38 poise, and was applied using a 40mm metal blade at a pressure of about 11 psi. The chemical substance was dried at 385°F. The fabric was then dyed in a thermosol at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI 15 Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then finished in the manner described above in Sample D. The finished fabric had a weight of 4.33 oz/sq yd and a construction of 102 ends by 48 picks per inch. TEST METHODS: 20 For purposes of these tests, the term "industrial washes" is intended to describe the wash process described below. Industrial Wash Test: PROCEDURE: 25 1. Weigh samples to make a 15 ±1) pound load. Note: Use 100% cotton white dummies if necessary to achieve the proper load weight. 30 2. Industrial Laundry Process Specifications (Milnor Washer): Start the cycle with the signal switch in the down position. W/L refers to water level. LOW = 12 gallons and HIGH = 24 gallons. Take 4 (+.25) pounds out of the 15 (±1) pound load and place in the Sears Kenmore Home Dryer. (Insure all of the samples are placed in the dryer, if you have more than 4.25 pounds of samples, split them into two loads with an even number of samples in each. The balance of each load should be made up of dummy fabric.) Set the dryer on the Cotton Sturdy setting for 30 minutes. Insure the samples are completely dry prior to removing them from the dryer. Repeat the above wash and dry steps for the specified number of cycles. Orthosil = Orthobrite Tensile Strength: The tensile strength of each of the fabric samples was tested in each of the warp and fill directions according to ASTM D-5034-95. A number of the samples were also tested after 10, 25, 50 and 100 Industrial Washes. 5 Tear Strength: The tear strength of each of the fabric samples was tested in each of the warp and fill directions using an Elmendorf Tear Test according to ASTM D1424-96. A number of the samples were also tested after 10, 25, 50 and 100 industrial washes. 10 Seam Slippage: Seam slippage was tested in both the warp and fill directions according to the ASTM D-434-42 Test Method. Flex: Fabric flexion was tested in both the warp and fill directions according to ASTM D3885-99. 15 Appearance: Fabrics were washed according to the above-described wash methods, and rated according to AATCC Test Method 124-1992. Pilling: Fabric pilling was tested according to ASTM D-3512-99A. For the 20 yarn dyed products, it was tested as received and after 10, 25 and 50 industrial washes. For the fabrics of the invention, pilling was tested as received. Color Data: Raw color data was measured using a 10 degree spherical spectrophotometer, with a D65, specular excluded light source with a UV filter set at 25 0%. The untreated regions were as the standard and the treated regions were read as the sample. The DE, DL, Da and Db were calculated using the following formulae: 30 DL = L1 - L2, withL1 being the untreated and L2 being the treated. Da = A1 A2, with A1 being the untreated and A2 being the treated. Db = B1 B2, with B-1being the untreated and B2 being the treated. 10 15 % Strength = area under reflectance curve of treated area area under reflectance curve of untreated area DE is indicative of the overall color difference between the two areas, while DL is indicative of the difference in depth of shade. For example, a DL of zero would indicate there was no difference in the depth of shade between the two areas. Da is indicative of the difference in red/green hues, while Db is indicative of differences in yellow/blue hues. The Strength rating illustrates the % difference in the color for the two regions. For those samples where the resist chemistry did not include a dye, a low strength number would illustrate a high amount of resist. The results of each of the tests are recorded below in Tables A and B. TABLE A ^*T- Samples AA through AP were all done in the lab. A lab thermosol pad steam 5 was used. None of the fabrics were finished. Sample AA was a 4.3 oz 65/35 polyester/cotton poplin fabric. The fabric was printed on a lab scale strike table in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste containing 11.5g/kg of a synthetic back thickener, and a 988.5g/kg of a stock print paste containing an anginate thickener, a sequestering agent, a defoamer, an anti-microbial agent, and water. (As in the above samples, the sequestering agent, defoamer and anti-microbial agent were included in minor quantities to facilitate the 5 performance of the printing.) The paste had a viscosity of 25 poise. The chemical substance was dried on a laboratory infrared conveyor dryer of the variety marketed by Glenro Inc. of Paterson, New Jersey, set at 65% output with a conveyor speed of 1.96 m/min. and a temperature between 220 and 330°. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye 10 mixture: 5.10 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 11.97 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 5.65 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample AB was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed 15 in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA and which also included 6% of the fluorochemical APG 5264 from Advanced Polymer, Inc. Carlstadt, New Jersey. The chemical substance was dried on a laboratory infrared conveyor dryer as described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following 20 dye mixture: 5.10 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 11.97 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 5.65 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample AC was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed 25 in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA and which also included 6% of the fluorochemical APG 85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 5.10 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 11.97 30 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 5.65 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample AD was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA and which also included 10% of Solopol ZB30, a sugar co-polymer supplied by Stockhausen, Inc. of Greensboro, North Carolina. The chemical 5 substance was dried in the manner described above in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 5.10 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 11.97 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 5.65 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. 10 Sample AE was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described above in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 15 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. 20 Sample AF was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The paste also included 6% of the fluorochemical APG 5264 from Advanced Polymer, Inc. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described above in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 25 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. 30 Sample AG was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The paste also included 6% of the fluorochemical APG 85 from Advanced Polymer, Inc. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described above in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI 5 Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample AH was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in 10 Sample AA. The paste also included 10% of Solopol ZB30, a sugar co-polymer supplied by Stockhausen, Inc. of Greensboro, North Carolina. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 15 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample Al was the same base fabric as Sample AA, The fabric was printed in 20 a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The paste also included 10% of Solopol ZB30, a sugar co-polymer supplied by Stockhausen, Inc. of Greensboro, North Carolina and 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then 25 dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. 30 Sample AJ was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The print paste also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit I at 425°Ffor 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 0.700 g/l CI 5 Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample AK was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in 10 Sample AA. The print paste included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The paste also included 6% of the fluorochemical APG 5264 from Advanced Polymer Inc. The chemical substance was dried on a laboratory infrared conveyor dryer set at 65% output with a conveyor speed of 1.96 m/min. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 15 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in an infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample AL was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed 20 in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA and also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60/and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The paste also included 6% of the fluorochemical APG 85. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F 25 for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AA. Sample AM was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed 30 in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The print paste also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The paste also included 10% of Solopol ZB30, a sugar co-polymer supplied by Stockhausen, Inc. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425T for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 5 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AA. Sample AN was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed 10 in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 15 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried as described in Sample AA. Sample AO was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed 20 in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The paste also included 6% of the fluorochemical APG 5264. The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab 25 thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AA. 30 Sample AP was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with an alginate based print paste as described above in Sample AA. The paste also included 6% of the fluorochemical APG 85. The chemical substance also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The chemical substance was dried in the manner described in Sample AA. The fabric was then dyed in a lab 5 thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AA. 10 Sample AQ was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with a synthetic based print paste containing 17.4 kg water, 12.114 g/kg concentrated synthetic paste (sold under the tradename WTA by Abco Industries of Roebuck, South Carolina), and minor quantities of a sequestering 15 agent, a defoamer and an antimicrobial agent to facilitate printing performance. The paste was stiff and therefore was not tested for viscosity. The paste was dried using a laboratory infrared conveyor dryer of the variety marketed by Glenro Inc. of Paterson, New Jersey, set at 65% output with a conveyor speed of 1.96 m/min. and a temperature between 220 and 330°F. The fabric was then dyed in a lab 20 thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 5.10 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 11.97 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 5.65 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. 25 Sample AR was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with a synthetic based print paste of the variety described in Sample AQ. However, the print paste also included 6% Hipochem FCX fluorocarbon extender, distributed by High Point Chemical Co. of High Point, North Carolina. The fabric was dried in the manner described in Sample AQ. The fabric was then dyed in 30 a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample AS was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed 5 in a wide bar pattern with a synthetic based print paste of the variety described in Sample AQ. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AQ. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI 10 Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AQ. Sample AT was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with a synthetic based print paste of the variety described in 15 Sample AQ. The paste also included 6% Hipochem FCX fluorocarbon extender. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AQ. The fabric was then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat 20 Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AQ. Sample AU was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with a synthetic print paste of the variety described in Sample 25 AQ. The paste also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The fabric was dried in the manner described in Sample AQ, and then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then 30 dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. Sample AV was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with a synthetic print paste of the variety described in Sample AQ, with the paste also containing 6% Hipochem FCX fluorocarbon extender along with 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse 5 violet 57 dye. The fabric was dried in the manner described in Sample AQ, then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, and 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix. The fabric was then dried in the infrared drying unit at a temperature not exceeding 300°F. 10 Sample AW was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with a synthetic print paste of the variety described in Sample AQ. The paste also included 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 dye. The fabric was dried in the manner described in 15 Sample AQ, then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l C\ Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in Sample AQ. 20 Sample AX was the same base fabric as Sample AA. The fabric was printed in a wide bar pattern with a synthetic print paste of the variety described in Sample AQ. The paste also included 6% Hipochem FCX fluorocarbon extender and 1.35 g/kg disperse red mix, 0.41 g/kg disperse blue 60, and 8.2 g/kg disperse violet 57 25 dye. The fabric was dried in the manner described in Sample AQ, then dyed in a lab thermosol/pad/steam unit at 425°F for 50 seconds with the following dye mixture: 2.469 g/l CI Disperse Orange 30, 0.729 g/l CI Disperse Blue 165, 0.700 g/l CI Disperse Rubine Mix, 1.986 g/l CI Vat Yellow Mix, 1.811 g/l CI Vat Red 10, and 3.394 g/l CI Vat Black 22. The fabric was then dried in the manner described in 30 Sample AQ. 34 The color data was tested using the method described above. The relative dE, dl_, da, db and strength for each sample (for the portion having the chemical substance relative to the portion of the fabric not having the chemical substance) were calculated. The results are listed below in Table C. TABLE C dE dL da db Strength (%) AA 13.858 13.764 0.092 -1.609 39.2 AB 15.391 15.359 0.161 -0.977 35.52 AC 17.106 17.093 0.031 -0.654 31.76 AD 16.026 15.969 0.07 -1.345 33.95 AE 16.37 16.246 1.268 1.556 34.86 AF 17.129 16.983 1.824 1.293 33.01 AG 19.682 19.496 1.95 1.869 28.07 AH 18.319 18.182 1.359 1.775 30.67 Al 14.75 10.127 -6.124 -8.804 50.24 AJ 13.937 8.904 -5.865 -8.976 54.23 AK 16.551 8.624 -7.508 -11.966 55.85 AL 16.87 8.054 -7.872 -12.561 58.2 AM 15.814 8.653 -7.604 -10.834 57.03 AN 15.939 7.56 -7.742 -11.703 61.25 AO 18.173 6.821 -8.024 -14.811 64.18 AP 18.591 5.07 -8.062 -15.966 72.28 AQ 5.681 5.622 -0.091 -0.808 67.8 AR 7.701 7.643 0.041 0.91 60.55 AS 8.6 8.652 0.095 0.35 56.6 AT 10.421 10.353 0.17 1.175 51.13 AU 7.414 2.905 -3.902 -5.595 80.85 AV 7.463 2.752 -4.63 -5.16 82.6 AW 12.73 1.144 -6.616 -10.815 92.22 AX 12.698 0.0601 -6.914 -10.633 95.99 As noted from the examples, both the synthetic and the alginate print pastes enabled the production of patterned fabrics using a continuous dye process. However, the alginate was found to perform better than the particular synthetic print paste used based upon the specific conditions (viscosity, pressure, screen mesh, etc) used. However, it was found that each of the pastes tested provided good patterning while minimizing the strength loss of the fabric. It is noted that varying degrees of resistance of dyeing can be achieved using the process of the invention, through the selection of the type of resist chemistry, application method, substrate, and dyes used, and the like. Patterns using high to substantially complete resistance as well as those having lower levels of resistance (to achieve only subtle 5 color variations) are all contemplated within the scope of the invention. The fabrics produced according to the invention can be used in any end use where patterned textiles would have utility, including but not limited to apparel, home furnishings, napery, industrial products, or the like. As evidenced by the durability of 10 the products following industrial launderings, the fabrics will have particular utility in the manufacture of garments used in the rental laundry markets. In the specification there has been set forth a preferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and 15 descriptive sense only and not for purpose of limitation, the scope of the invention being defined in the claims. WE CLAIM: 1. A process for manufacturing patterned fabrics comprising the steps of: applying a water soluble chemical substance designed to physically inhibit wetting to selected regions of a fabric to define treated and untreated regions forming a pattern, wherein the treated regions to which the chemical substance is applied are characterized by reduced wetability relative to the untreated regions; and exposing substantially the entire fabric to an aqueous dye liquor until said untreated regions are saturated while said treated regions are less than fully saturated, to thereby form a patterned fabric. 2. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chemical substance comprises a substance selected from the group consisting of alginate print pastes, synthetic print pastes, fluorochemicals and combinations thereof. 3. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chemical substance comprises a print paste. 4. The process as claimed in claim 3, wherein said chemical substance consists essentially of a print paste. 5. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chemical substance comprises a fluorocarbon. 6. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chemical substance comprises a fluorocarbon and a print paste. 7. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chemical substance further comprises a dye. 8. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chemical substance comprises an optical brightener. 9. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said chemical substance comprises a dye and a print paste. 10. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of exposing substantially the entire fabric to an aqueous dye liquor is performed by a continuous or semi-continuous dye process. 11. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of exposing substantially the entire fabric to an aqueous dye liquor is performed by a process selected from the group consisting of thermosol dye processes, pad/steam processes, thermo sol/pad/steam processes, cold pad batch dyeing, jig dye processes, and combinations thereof. 12. The process as claimed in claim 11, wherein said step of continuously exposing substantially the entire fabric to an aqueous dye liquor is performed using a thermosol dye process. 13. The process as claimed in claim 11, wherein said step of continuously exposing substantially the entire fabric to an aqueous dye liquor is performed using a pad/steam process. 14. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said fabric comprises fibers selected from the group consisting of polyester, cotton, PLA, PTT, nylon, rayon, and blends thereof. 15. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said fabric comprises polyester, and the step of exposing substantially the entire fabric to an aqueous dye liquor is performed using a thermosol or pad/steam dye process. 16. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of exposing substantially the entire fabric to an aqueous dye liquor comprises dyeing the fabric with a dyestuff selected from the group consisting of disperse dyes, reactive dyes, direct dyes, vat dyes, acid dyes, and sulfur dyes. 17. The fabric made according to the process of Claim 1. 18. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of applying a chemical substrate is performed by a method selected from the group consisting of flexographic printing, gravure roll application, roller bed printing, roller screen printing, flick brush, ultrasonic spray, multiple nozzle injection patterning, and print head pattern methods. 19. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of applying the chemical substance defines a first pattern, and further comprising the step of applying a second chemical substance in a second pattern which is different from the first pattern, to. thereby form a multi-colored fabric. 20. The process as claimed in claim 19, wherein at least one of said first and second chemical substances comprises a dye. 21. The process as claimed in claim 1, wherein said fabric comprises at least two types of fibers, and said step of dyeing the fabric comprises dyeing less than all of said at least two types of fibers, to thereby form a heather fabric. 22. A process for manufacturing patterned fabrics from a dye process comprising the steps of: applying a chemical substance to selected regions of a fabric, said chemical substance being adapted to prevent total saturation of underlying fabric regions to which it is applied, wherein treated regions to which the chemical substance is applied are characterized by reduced wetability relative to untreated regions; and dyeing substantially the entire fabric, to thereby produce a patterned fabric wherein the treated regions are characterized by reduced dye uptake relative to the untreated regions. 23. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said step of dyeing is performed by a continuous or semi-continuous dye process. 24. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said step of dyeing is performed by a process selected from the group consisting of thermosol dye processes, pad/steam processes, thermosol/pad/steam processes, cold pad batch dyeing, jig dye processes, and combinations thereof. 25. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said step of dyeing comprises exposing the entire piece of fabric to at least one dye bath. 26. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said chemical substance comprises a substance selected from the group consisting of alginate print pastes, synthetic print pastes, fluorochemicals, and combinations thereof. 27. The process as claimed in claim 25, wherein said chemical substance consists essentially of a print paste. 28. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said chemical substance consists essentially of a fluorocarbon. 29. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said chemical substance further comprises a fluorocarbon and a print paste. 30. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said chemical substance further comprises a dye. 31. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said fabric comprises fibers selected from the group consisting of polyester, cotton, PLA, PU, nylon, rayon, and blends thereof. 32. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said step of applying a chemical substrate is performed by a method selected from the group consisting of flexographic printing, gravure roll application, roller bed printing, roller screen printing, foam application, flick brush, ultrasonic spray, multiple nozzle injection patterning, and print head pattern methods. 33. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said step of applying the chemical substance defines a first pattern, and further comprising the step of applying a second chemical substance in a second pattern which is different from the first pattern, to thereby form a multi-colored fabric. 34. The process as claimed in claim 33, wherein at least one of said first and second chemical substances comprises a dye. 35. The process as claimed in claim 22, wherein said fabric comprises at least two types of fibers, and said step of dyeing the fabric comprises dyeing less than alt of said at least two types of fibers, to thereby form a heather fabric. 36. A fabric made according to the process as claimed in claim 22. 37. A fabric as claimed in claim 22, wherein the fabric defines a pattern of yarns forming the fabric, and the pattern formed by the steps of applying a chemical substance and dyeing the fabric mimics the pattern of the yarns forming the fabric. 38. A process for manufacturing patterned fabrics comprising the steps of: applying a water soluble chemical substance designed to inhibit wetting to a fabric to define treated and untreated fabric regions wherein treated regions to which the chemical substance is applied are characterized by reduced wetability relative to untreated regions; and exposing substantially said entire fabric to an aqueous dye, such that said treated regions are wet by said aqueous dye to a lesser extent than said untreated regions, thereby forming a pattern of relatively dissimilar colors as a result of their relative differences in uptake of the aqueous dye. 39. The process as claimed m claim 38, wherein said chemical substance comprises a substance selected form the group consisting of alginate print pastes, synthetic print pastes, fluorochemicals, and combinations thereof. 40. The process as claimed in claim 38, wherein said step of exposing the fabric to a dye comprises dyeing the fabric by a continuous or semi-continuous dye process. 41. The process as claimed in claim 38, wherein said water soluble chemical substance includes a dye, to thereby dye the treated fabric regions a different color from the aqueous dye. 42. A fabric made by the process of Claim 38. 43. A patterned textile fabric having a predetermined pattern of color defined by regions of greater and lesser uptake of the same color of equally applied dye, wherein said regions of lesser dye uptake of the finished fabric have substantially the same physical strength as said regions of greater dye uptake, and wherein the regions of lesser dye uptake are characterized by reduced surface wetability relative to the regions of greater dye uptake, the reduced surface wetability being imparted by a water soluble chemical substance adapted to physically inhibit wetting. 44. The fabric as claimed in claim 43, wherein said fabric comprises fibers selected from the group consisting of polyester, cotton, PLA, PTT, nylon, rayon, and blends thereof. 45. The fabric as claimed in claim 43, wherein transitions between said regions of greater and lesser uptake of the dye are sharply defined. 46. The fabric according to claim 43, wherein yarns forming the fabric are ring dyed. -" 47. The fabric as claimed in claim 43, wherein the predetermined pattern of color simulate the construction of a fabric, to thereby provide the appearance of a yarn-dyed fabric. 48. The fabric as claimed in claim 43, wherein said fabric is a woven fabric and the predetermined pattern of color comprises stripes extending in at least one of the warp and filling directions of the woven fabric.

Documents:

662-mumnp-2003-assignment(27-6-2003).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-cancelled pages(18-7-2007).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-claims(granted)-(18-7-2007).doc

662-mumnp-2003-claims(granted)-(18-7-2007).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-correspondence(24-7-2007).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-correspondence(ipo)-(21-7-2006).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-drawing(18-7-2007).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form 13(18-7-2007).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form 18(7-12-2005).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form 1a(27-6-2003).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form 2(granted)-(18-7-2007).doc

662-mumnp-2003-form 2(granted)-(18-7-2007).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form 3(18-7-2007).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form 3(27-6-2003).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form 5(18-7-2007).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form-pct-ipea-409(27-6-2003).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-form-pct-isa-210(27-6-2003).pdf

662-mumnp-2003-power of authority(18-7-2007).pdf

abstract1.jpg