Title of Invention

A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMICALLY ALLOCATING A DATA RATE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Abstract The present invention provides an apparatus and method for optimizing power in order to increase capacity. Rather than having any terminal device limited to a specific maximum data rate, instead the terminal device data rate is limited by the power being used, such that the data rate can vary according to the distance that the terminal device is from the intended receiver.
Full Text METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS HAVING VARYING DATA RATES
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for wireless communications having varying data rates, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for wireless communica¬tions having varying data rates using U-NTJ compliant devices.
Background of the Related Art
Conventional digital communications systems, such as systems that practice the IS-95 communication standard, transmit communication signals between a base station and handset receivers. In such systems, many different base stations are located in geographically diverse locations. Each base station therefore covers a portion of the overall area in which communi¬cations can occur. In order to increase overall capacity, the area covered by a single base station, typically known as a cell, will have reduced size, or different cells will overlap. In operation, conventional systems transmit communications signals from the base station to the terminal device using certain communication bands, collectively known as either the down-link or the forward link. Also such conventional systems transmit communications signals from the terminal device to the base station using other communication bands, collectively known as the up-Iink or reverse link. In such systems, recovery of communi¬cations on the reverse link is more difficult than recovery of communications on the forward link, since communications from many different terminal devices must be simultaneously detected from a single received signal at a base station.
To help assist with the simultaneous detection of signals from different teirniiial devices on the reverse link, such conventional digital communications systems use power control in order to reduce interference for terminal devices that are at different distances within a particular cell. IS-95 describes a particular power control scheme, which effectively maintains the power of multiple terminal devices at different distances at levels such that each terminal device can communicate without interference from other terminal devices predominating. Accordingly, with such a power control scheme, higher transmit power is used for longer range.
Another type of digital communication system is of the type described in the 802.11 Wireless LAN standard. With this standard, there are two ISM bands intended for communications, 902-928 MHz and 2.4-2.48 GHz, and each band has different maximum transmit power levels associated with it. As originally envisioned, digital communication

systems that implement this standard use a carrier-sensing multiple access scheme, such that there can be only one device transmitting at a time. The different maximum transmit power levels associated with each band are used to accommodate different ranging requirements.
While these systems have allowed digital communications to evolve, they have their drawbacks. One such drawback is that the data rate for each terminal device is maintained at some nominal rate, regardless and independent of the power being used.
Recently the FCC allocated three bands in the 5 GHz range, the U-NII bands 5.15-5.25GHz, 5.25-5.35GHz, and 5.725-5.825GHz, for general use in wireless communication. More effective use of bandwidth for devices operating in these bands would allow for more efficient communications. Specifically, rather than specifying a certain maximum data rate for all devices, it would be desirable to have variable data rates for different devices operating within these bands, such that all of the devices need not have a maximum data rate, but could use various amounts of the overall bandwidth, depending upon the power that each device was using. Thus, in contrast to conventional digital communications systems that do not allow for any tradeoffs to occur between capacity and distance, it would be desirable to have a system that allows for increases in capacity if each terminal device were operating closer to the intended receiver, and thereby using less power.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an objective of the present invention to provide a communication system operating in the 5.15-5.25GHz, 5.25-5.35GHz, and 5.725-5.825GHz bands that allows for tradeoffs to occur between capacity and distance.
It is another objective of the present invention to provide a communication system operating in the 5.15-5.25GHz, 5.25-5.35GHz, and 5.725-5.825GHz bands that allows for an increase in capacity when receivers are operating closer to transmitters, and thereby using less power.
In order to attain the above objectives of the present invention, among others, the present invention provides an apparatus and method for optimizing power in order to increase capacity. Rather than having any terminal device limited to a specific maximum data rate, instead the terminal device data rate is limited by the power being used, such that the data rate can vary according to the distance that the terminal device is from the intended receiver.

The above and other objectives, features, and advantages of the present invention are further described in the detailed description which follows, with reference to the drawings by way of non-limiting exemplary embodiments of the present invention, wherein like reference numerals represent similar parts of the present invention throughout several views and wherein:
Figs. 1 A-lD illustrate a communication system according to the invention;
Figs. 2A-2C illustrates graphs of the maximum data rate for different distances for each of the different U-NII bands;
Fig. 3 illustrates one embodiment of the communications system according to the invention;
Fig. 4 illustrates another embodiment of the communications system according to the invention;
Fig. 5 illustrates another embodiment of the communications system according to the invention;
Fig. 6 illustrates another embodiment of the communications system according to the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
U-NII devices communicate on three different frequency bands. Devices which com¬municate on the 5.l5-5.25GHz band can transmit a maximum of 50mW transmit power per device, plus a 6 dBi antenna gain. Devices which communicate on the 5.25-5.35GH2 band can transmit a maximum of 250 mw transmit power per device, plus a 6 dBi antenna gain. Devices which communicate on the 5.725-5.825 GHz band can transmit a maximum of lw transmit power per device, plus a 23 dBi antenna gain.
As mentioned previously, U-NTI devices were originally envisioned to operate on these different bands to accommodate various ranging requirements. This invention, however, teaches a much more advantageous use of the bandwidth available for such devices. In particular, as described hereinafter, the invention has particular advantages when used in wireless devices not intended for substantial movement, in contrast to "wireless devices that are intended to move at rates of automobile speeds.
Fig. 1A illustrates an overview of the invention. As illustrated, the system 10 includes a base station 12 that communicates with many different terminal devices 16. Using one of the
U-NII channels, each terminal device 16 receives down-link communications from the base

station 12. Using another of the U-NII channels, the terminal device 16 transmits up-link communications to the base station 12. In the preferred embodiment, the down-link commu¬nication channel will be at a higher frequency than the up-link communication channel, although it will be appreciated that systems can be designed where this need not be the case. Accordingly, for a terminal device 16 and a base station 12 that are within a distance D from each other, as shown in Fig. 1A, the two different bands can be used such that one of the up¬link and down-link (preferably the down-link as described above) will have much greater capacity, due to there being more available power on that band. For example, in the 5.25-5.35GHz band, five times the transmit power as in the 5.15-5.25GHz band is allowed. This extra allowance in transmit power can be used to increase the aggregate bandwidth five fold for down-link transmissions as compared to up-link transmissions, if the terminal device 16 is using the 5.15-5.25 GHz band for up-link transmissions and the 5.25-5.35GHz band for down-link transmissions.
The distance D is determined as that distance within which both the up-link and the down-link communications can take place and reliably transmit data. As will be appreciated, at some distance greater than D, in order to transmit the same amount of data, higher power would be necessary for at least one of the up-link or down-link. Since, however, the U-NTJ devices are limited by the amount of power that they can transmit, greater power cannot be used for the devices to comply with the U-NII regulations. This invention trades off data rate for lower transmit power, so that if a terminal device 16-3 is farther away from the base station, a lower rate communication link can be setup without violating the U-NII regulations.
It will be appreciated that the present invention has particular advantages in environments in which the base station 12 and terminal devices do not move at high speeds, but rather at "human speed", which is approximately 1 meter per second. Since the average packet length in modem wireless communication systems is fairly short, on the order of a few milliseconds, the distance traveled during one packet interval is on the order of a few millimeters, sufficiently smaller compared to the average distance between a base-station and a terminal device. This allows, therefore, initialization of communications of a given terminal device 16 with the base station 12 such that calculation of the power being used can be performed, with the knowledge that communications thereafter can continue to occur up to a maximum data rate associated with the distance between the base station and a terminal device and the maximum power of each channel being used.

The components used to make each base station 12 and terminal device 16 illustrated as transmitter 100 in Fig, IB and receiver 200 in Fig. IC. It will be apparent that each base station 12 and a terminal device 16 will typically include both of a transmitter 100 and a receiver 200. It will be understood that certain of the same components can be used in both the transmitter and receiver. For ease of understanding, however, they are separately labeled and discussed herein.
The transmitter 100 includes a digital processor 102 for digital data processing. A digital to analog converter 104 converts the digital data from the digital processor to an analog format. A frequency synthesizer 106 generates the appropriate carrier frequency. A mixer 108 for frequency up-conversion combines the carrier frequency from the frequency synthesizer 106 with the analog data output from the digital to analog converter 104 to obtain a radio frequency transmission signal. A power amplifier 110 performs signal amplification on the transmission signal. The transmission signal is then bandpass filtered with a bandpass filter 112 and finally transmitted using the antenna 114.
The receiver 200 includes a receive antenna 202 that receives the transmission signal, which is then bandpass filtered using bandpass filter 204. A low-noise-amplifier 206 then amplifies the relatively small received radio-frequency transmission signal. A frequency synthesizer 208 generates the appropriate carrier frequency for down-conversion. A mixer 210 receives the carrier frequency from the frequency synthesizer and the amplified radio-frequency transmission signal and performs down-conversion to obtain an analog signal representative of the originally transmitted signal. An analog to digital converter 212 converts the analog signal to a corresponding digital signal, and a digital processor 214 processes the received digital signal.
The components discussed above are conventional components and no further discussion of them is believed necessary. For example, multiple antennas can be used by the base station 12 or the terminal devices 16 in order to achieve spatial diversity, for the purpose of increased capacity and robustness.
Since, however, operations performed by the present invention in order to dynamically allocate data rate are not conventionally performed, a further description of these operations will be provided. Specifically, according to the present invention, the rate of data transmis¬sion between a specific base station 12 and a specific terminal device 16 are dynamically determined in the digital domain using the digital processor 102, through either code-division multiple access or other data modulation schemes. The actual data rate to each terminal

device 16 can be dynamically allocated, given the power budget and the range between the terminal device 16 and the base-station 12, as illustrated in Figs. 2A-2C. Figs. 2A-2C are established based upon the following assumptions: 0 dB antenna gain, -70 dBm receiver sensitivity, 10 dB Et/N0 before detection, 10 dB overall receiver noise figure, and 50 dB transmit power loss after 1 meter radius. It will be understood that the correlation between power budget and range provided in Figs. 2A-2C is idealized, and that there will be interference effects that require more precise adjustment. This will be described further hereinafter, but Figs. 2A-2C illustrate that different data rates are possible for the various power levels that exist within each of the U-NII bands, and thus help provide an under¬standing of the present invention.
This dynamic allocation is simply repeated for communications between the base station and each different terminal device 16. Typically, each base station can support up to tens of different terminal devices, with each terminal device not exceeding the maximum power level for transmissions in either direction.
For purposes of teaching the dynamic allocation of data rate according to the present invention, assume that the power-distance relationship follows a 4-th order roll-off, i.e., the average power requirement is proportional to the 4-th order of the distance between a base-station and a terminal device. A rule-of-thumb calculation based on that assumption indicates that 12 dB more power is required whenever the distance is doubled. Since the average power requirement should be proportional to the data rate in a well-designed system, whenever the distance is halved, the data rate can increase by a factor of 16, assuming the power budget remains the same.
Accordingly, in determining the appropriate data rate from a base station 12 to a specific terminal device 16, the signal processor 102 in the base station will initiate a transmission to the terminal device 16 at the maximum power level that is allowed and predetermined low data rate, as shown in step 300 illustrated in Fig. ID.
Thereafter, in step 302 the received power level at that low data rate is determined by the signal processor 214 by way of an automatic gain control circuit (AGC), which is needed to determine the appropriate dynamic range for the ADC to function correctly in a receiver. Based on the received power level, the signal processor 214 can determine the appropriate data rate to use for transmission. Signal detection is based on the received signal energy per bit, E0j which is the product of the received power and the interval per bit. If a desired level of E0has to be maintained to guarantee certain performance requirement, the received power

level and the data rate are in direct proportion to each other to maintain a constant Eo-Therefore in most well-designed systems, the new data rate can be determined from the received power level. Step 304 follows, in which the signal processor 214 informs the signal processor 102 of the appropriate data rate to use at a predetermined low data rate for the next round of communications. Thereafter, based upon the received information, the signal processor 102 will then transmit data at that data rate as shown by step 306. If at any time during the transmission the power level changes by more than a certain threshold, such as 1 dB (step 308), the signal processor 214 informs the signal processor 102 of a new data rate, as shown in step 310, and the signal processor 102 adjusts the data rate accordingly, as shown by step 312. Further, the processor 214, having sent the new data rate to the processor 102, will thereafter process subsequently received data corresponding to that new rate, as shown by step 314. This is the closed loop rate control.
Alternatively, rather than sending the new data rate, the signal processor 214 can use the new data rate to send data to the signal processor 102. Because the new data rate is based on the received power level at the processor 214, assuming that the channel is symmetrical, the signal energy per bit received by the signal processor 102 will be sufficient for reliable detection. The uncertainty on the data rate for the signal processor 102 can be resolved by either one of the following two methods. First, the information of the new data rate can be sent at a predetermined low data rate by signal processor 214 and then the signal processor 214 can switch to the new data rate for data transmission, assuming that the bits which carry the information of the new data rate can be timely detected by the signal processor 102. The second method uses a set of predetermined date rates agreed upon by both processors 102 and 214. The signal processor 214 can choose any data rate in this set, and the signal processor 102 can reliably detect the sent data at any rate chosen from this set, as long as the received energy per bit is greater than a certain threshold, which is guaranteed by the signal processor 214. The actual mechanism for detecting data without knowing the exact data rate is within the ability of those skilled in the art. This is the open loop rate control.
Another example of the communications that can be implemented using this embodiment is the usage of the 5.725-5.825GHz band for down-link transmissions and 5.15-5.25GH2 for up-link transmissions. Since there is more power available for the down-link transmissions, the aggregate down-link capacity can be increased accordingly. This example has the additive advantage in that the synthesizer design in both the terminal device and the base station is easier to implement, as the two bands are more widely separated.

Using the principles outlined above with respect to Figs. 1A-1D and 2A-2C, there are various different embodiments of the present invention that can also be implemented.
As illustrated in Fig. 3, in the system 30 according to one embodiment of the present invention, the 5.725-5.825 Ghz band is used for distribution between base station 32 and repeaters 34 (for both down-link and up-link or for down-link only). Repeaters, as are known, are used to serve as a local distributor of data. Accordingly, there will typically be a number of different repeaters 34 associated with a single base station 32. According to the present invention, having a repeater in different rooms or different buildings is an effective way of communicating data. Similarly, a number of different terminal devices 36 can then be associated with each repeater 34. For communications between terminal devices 36 and one of the repeaters 34, depending on which band is used for the up-link from a repeater to a base-station, the 5.25-5.35GHz band can used for down-link transmissions, and the 5.15-5.25GHz band is used for up-link transmissions.
In this embodiment, each repeater or the base-station is considered as a single transceiver. Furthermore, the specific components used to make each base station 32 and terminal device 36 are similar to those described above with reference to the base station 12 and terminal device 16, respectively, of Fig. 1, whereas the components used to make each repeater 34 are similar to that of a terminal device, only that the digital data processing unit can be minimized. One extreme example would be that there is no need for ADC, digital circuit, or DAC in a repeater, as the frequency conversion task, which is composed of received signal amplification, frequency conversion, and transmitted signal amplification, can be performed completely by analog components. Similarly as with the previous embodiment, multiple antennas can be used by each of the base station 32, repeaters 34, or terminal devices 36, in order to achieve spatial diversity, for the purpose of increased capacity and robustness.
In accordance with the principles described above, the actual bandwidth to each terminal device 36 can be varied according to the individual needs and the distance between the repeater 34 and the terminal device 36. In other words, the total resource available for each repeater 34 is 250mW of transmit power (plus potential 6dBi of antenna gain) for down-link transmissions. The actual data rate to each terminal device can be dynamically allocated, given the power budget and the range between the terminal device and the repeater. The data rate between the base station 32 and each repeater 34 can be substantially higher than the data rate between a terminal device and a repeater. The reason is that more power budget is allowed in the 5.725-5-825 GHz band, plus a substantial antenna gain, 23 dBi. With both

high power and high antenna gain, the system can deliver substantially longer range and higher aggregate data rate between a base station and a repeater.
In contrast to the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 1, the use of repeaters 34 in the embodiment of Fig. 3 allows better control of the transmission range, so that, for example, the data transmitted between a given repeater 34-A and its terminal devices 36Al-36An will not interfere with the data transmitted between another repeater 34-B and its tenninal devices 36Bl-36Bm.
As illustrated in Fig, 4, in the system 40 according to one embodiment of the present invention, the 5.725-5.825Ghz band is used for distribution between base station 42 and repeaters 44 (for both down-link and up-link, or for down-link only). Unlike the base station 32 and repeater 34 in the previous embodiment, the base station 42 and each of the repeaters 44 are preferably a cluster of transceivers, with each transceiver having one or multiple antennas. As in the Fig. 4 example, base station 42 is made of transceivers 43-1, 43-2 ...43-n and repeater 44A is made up of transceivers 45-1, 45-2...45-m, where n and m can be different, and m need not be the same for each different repeater 44. According to the FCC regulation Part 15, each transceiver 43, as part of the base-station 42, is allowed to transmit 1 watt of power for distribution of bundled data to each transceiver 45, thus multiplying the overall capacity by the number of transceiver pairs. The same configurations also allows not only the use of the 5.725-5.825Ghz band for distribution between the base station 42 and each of the repeaters 44, but also the use of this band for down-link communications from a transceiver 45 within one of the repeaters 44 to one of the tenninal devices 46, since if CDMA is used, multiple transmission links can be active at the same time in the same frequency band. This feature can be used, therefore, to enhance the capacity of the terminal device 46 or to increase the range of the terminal device 46. Also, as illustrated, in the embodiment, each repeater 44 communicates with the terminal devices 46 such that the 5.25-5.35GHz band is used for down-link transmissions, and 5.15-5.25GHz band is used for up-link transmissions.
Given the introduction of the use of transceivers 43 for the base station 42 in the embodiment of Fig. 4, it should also be noted mat the base station 12 in the embodiment of Fig. 1 could also be made up a plurality of transceivers, with the same benefits being derived therefrom.
As illustrated in Fig. 5, in another embodiment of the present invention, a system 50 provides a base station 52 and a plurality of terminal devices 56, and each band can be used

for both up-link and down-link through time division duplex (TDD) between the base station 52 and the terminal devices 56. In this embodiment, the base-station 52 can be constructed as a cluster of transceivers if the aggregate down-link capacity is equal to or larger than the up¬link capacity of each individual terminal device 56, as both the terminal devices 56 and base station transceivers have the same transmit power limit
As illustrated in Fig. 6, the invention is also intended for usage with multiple base stations 62 and multiple termmal devices 66. Each base station 62 can be considered as a single transceiver or a cluster of transceivers, as has been previously discussed. If each of the base stations 62 are sufficiently apart so that the transmitted signal power in one cluster is lower than the noise floor as received by the devices in other clusters, each base station 62 and its terminal devices 66 can be considered as a stand-alone system, as set forth and described in the above embodiments. If the base stations 62 are placed close enough such that signals intended for one base station and its associated terminal devices can be detected by another base station arid its associated terminal devices, the system can still be designed using the above-described principles for both down-link transmissions and up-link transmissions. The individual channel to each terminal device can be created using either conventional code-division multiple access techniques (different codes for different terminal devices) or spatial-division multiple access techniques (use of antenna diversity).
In a further embodiment of the present invention, the principles of the present invention can be implemented on Ad-hoc networks as well. By Ad-hoc network is meant a network in which there is no fixed base station. Each communication link is set up dynamically through a mutually understood protocol, such as the one used by Bluetooth. Once a link is set up, the master, or the head of a cluster, should be considered as a base station. Accordingly, once the base station is determined, one of the previously described embodiments can be implemented in such an Ad-hoc network. In other words, allowing the master node higher transmit power will accommodate a larger overall capacity for the master to transmit data to its slaves.
While the invention has been described herein with reference to particular embodiments thereof, a latitude of modification, various changes and substitutions are intended in the fore¬going disclosure. For example, the bandwidth management methods in this invention can be applied to any combination of frequency bands, including the two ISM bands previously mentioned. It will also be appreciated that in some instances some features of the invention will be employed without a corresponding use of other features without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.


WE CLAIM :
1. A method of dynamically allocating a data rate for wireless communication
between a first transceiver and a second transceiver comprising the steps of:
transmitting data at a first predetermined power level and a first data rate from a first
transceiver to a second transceiver;
receiving the data at the second transceiver;
sensing the received power level of the received data;
determining a modified first data rate greater than said first data rate at which to transmit data, said modified first data rate having a maximum data rate that is determined based upon the received power level of the received data;
transmitting the data at the modified first data rate and the first predetermined power level from the first transceiver to the second transceiver; and
receiving the data at the second transceiver.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1 comprising the steps of:
sensing the received power level of the received data; and redetermining the modified first data rate if the received power level of the received data is changed by a predetermined amount from the received power level of the received data.
3. The method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the predetermined amount is about 1 dB.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1 comprising the steps of:
transmitting second data at a second predetermined power level different from

the first predetennined power level and a second data rate trom the second transceiver to the first transceiver;
receiving the second data at the first transceiver;
sensing the received power level of the received second data;
determining a modified second data rate greater than said second data rate at which to transmit second data, said modified second data rate having a maximum data rate that is determined based upon the received power level of the received second data;
transmitting the second data at the modified second data rate and the second predetermined power level from the second transceiver to the first transceiver; and receiving the further second data at the first transceiver;
5. The method as claimed in claim 4 comprising the steps of:
sensing the received power level of the received further second data; and redetermining the modified second data rate if the received power level of the received second data is changed by a second predetermined amount from the received power level of the received second data.
6. The method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the second predetermined amount is about 1 dB.
7. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the steps of transmitting the data and the data transmits within the 5.725-5.825Ghz band and the steps of transmitting the second data and the second data transmits within one of the 5.25-5.35GHz and 5.15-5.25GHzbands.
8. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the steps of transmitting the data and the data transmits within the 5.725-5.825Ghz band and the steps of transmitting the

second data and the second data transmits within both of the 5.25-5.35GHz and 5.15-5.25GHz bands.
9. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the first predetermined power level is greater than the second predetermined power level.
10. A method of wirelessly communicating between a first base station transceiver and a plurality of terminal devices comprising at least first and second terminal device transceivers comprising the steps of:.
transmitting data at a first predetermined power level and a first data rate within the - 5.725-5.825Ghz band from a first base station transceiver to a repeater;. receiving the data at the repeater;
transmitting a first portion of the data from the repeater to the first terminal device transceiver;
transmitting a second portion of the data from the repeater to the second terminal device transceiver; sensing the received power level of the received data;
determining a modified first data rate greater than said first data rate at which to transmit further data, said modified first data rate having a maximum data rate that is determined based upon the received power level of the received data;
transmitting the data at the second data rate and the first predetermined power level from the first base station transceiver to the repeater;
receiving the data at the repeater;
transmitting a first portion of the data from the repeater to the first terminal device transceiver at a second data rate; and
transmitting a second portion of the data from the repeater to the second terminal device transceiver at a third data rate.

11. The method as claimed in claim 10 comprising the steps of:
sensing the received power level of the received data by the repeater; and redetermining the modified first data rate if the received power level of the received data is changed by a predetermined amount from the received power level of the received data.
12. The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein each of the repeaters contains a
plurality of repeater transceivers such that there exists one repeater transceiver for
each of the plurality of terminal device transceivers; and
wherein the steps of receiving the data and the data at the repeater cause each of the plurality of repeater transceivers to receive a portion of the data and the data corresponding to one of the terminal device transceivers.
33. The method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the steps of transmitting the data and the data transmit from first and second repeater transceivers to respective first and second terminal device transceivers using the 5.725-5.825Ghz band.
14. The method as claimed in claim 13, comprising the step of transmitting second data from each of the first and second terminal device transceivers at respective fourth and fifth data rates to the repeater at a second predetermined power level using one of the 5.25-5.35GH2 and 5.15-5.25GHz bands.
15. The method as claimed in claim 14, comprising the step of transmitting the second data from the first and second repeater transceivers at a sixth data rate to the base station transceiver at the first predetermined power level using the 5.725-5.825Ghzband.
16. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the steps of transmitting the data and

the data transmit from the repeater to the first and second terminal device transceivers at a second predetermined power level using one of the 5.25-5.35GHz and 5.15-5.25GHz bands.
17. The method as claimed in claim 16 comprising the steps of transmitting second data from each of the first ands second terminal device transceivers to the repeater at a third predetermined power level using the other one of the 5.25-5.35GHz and 5.15-5.25GHz bands.
18. The method as claimed in claim 17 comprising the steps of transmitting the second data from the repeater to the base station transceiver at the first predetermined power level using the 5. 725-5.825Ghz band.
19. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the first predetermined power level is greater than the second predetermined power level.
20. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein there is included a plurality of repeaters and a second plurality of terminal device transceivers, such that one repeater and corresponding terminal devices are in one room and another repeater and corresponding terminal devices are in another room.
21. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein there is included a plurality of repeaters and a second plurality of terminal device transceivers, such that one repeater and corresponding terminal devices are in one building and another repeater and corresponding terminal devices are in another building.

22. An apparatus for dynamically allocating a data rate for wireless communication by the method claimed in any one of the preceeding claims.

Documents:

in-pct-2002-0288-che abstract.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che assignment.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che claims duplicate.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che claims.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che correspondence others.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che correspondence po.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che description (complete) duplicate.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che description (complete).pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che drawings.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che form-1.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che form-19.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che form-26.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che form-3.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che form-4.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che form-5.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che others.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che pct.pdf

in-pct-2002-0288-che petition.pdf


Patent Number 202419
Indian Patent Application Number IN/PCT/2002/288/CHE
PG Journal Number 05/2007
Publication Date 02-Feb-2007
Grant Date 05-Oct-2006
Date of Filing 22-Feb-2002
Name of Patentee M/S. ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Applicant Address 529 Almanor Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Inventors:
# Inventor's Name Inventor's Address
1 MENG, Teresa, H 44 Encina Road, Palo Alto, CA 94301
PCT International Classification Number H04L 1/00
PCT International Application Number PCT/US2000/020610
PCT International Filing date 2000-07-28
PCT Conventions:
# PCT Application Number Date of Convention Priority Country
1 09/368,637 1999-08-04 U.S.A.